Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1503.02426 · Physics Letters A

Accidental crossings of eigenvalues in the one-dimensional complex PT-symmetric Scarf-II potential

Zafar Ahmed, D. C. Ghosh, Joseph Amal Nathan, Gaurang Parkar

Published Jun 13, 2015• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2015.06.024

Related papers

Real discrete spectrum in the complex non-PT-symmetric Scarf II potential

Zafar Ahmed, Joseph Amal Nathan

arXiv:1411.3231•Physics Letters A•Jan 14, 2015•9 citations

An update on coherent scattering from complex non-PT-symmetric Scarf II potential with new analytic forms

Sachin Kumar, Zafar Ahmed

arXiv:1912.12876•Pramana•Apr 16, 2021•1 citation

PT symmetry breaking and explicit expressions for the pseudo-norm in the Scarf II potential

GÉZA LÉVAI, F. Cannata, Alberto Ventura

arXiv:quant-ph/0206032•Physics Letters A•Jul 1, 2002•54 citations

Eigenvalue problems for the complex PT-symmetric potential

Zafar Ahmed

arXiv:quant-ph/0609219•Physics Letters A•Nov 29, 2006•6 citations

Eigenvalue spectra of a PT-symmetric coupled quartic potential in two dimensions

Fakir Chand, Savita, Shubham Mishra

Pramana•Oct 1, 2010•1 citation

New features of scattering from a one-dimensional non-Hermitian (complex) potential

Zafar Ahmed

For complex one-dimensional potentials, we propose the asymmetry of both reflectivity and transmitivity under time reversal: R ( − k ) ≠ R ( k ) and T ( − k ) ≠ T ( k ), unless the potentials are real or PT-symmetric. For complex PT-symmetric scattering potentials, we propose that R left ( − k ) = R right ( k ) and T ( − k ) = T ( k ). So far, the spectral singularities (SS) of a one-dimensional non-Hermitian scattering potential are witnessed/conjectured to be at most 1. We present a new non-Hermitian parametrization of the Scarf II potential to reveal its four new features. Firstly, it displays the just acclaimed (in)variances. Secondly, it can support two spectral singularities at two pre-assigned real energies ( E * = α 2 , β 2 ) either in T ( k ) or in T ( − k ), when αβ > 0. Thirdly, when αβ < 0 it possesses one SS in T ( k ) and the other in T ( − k ). Fourthly, when the potential becomes PT-symmetric [(α + β) = 0], we obtain T ( k ) = T ( − k ), it possesses a unique SS at E = α 2 in both T ( − k ) and T ( k ). Lastly, for completeness, when α = iγ and β = iδ there are no SS, instead we get two real energies −γ 2 and −δ 2 of the complex PT-symmetric Scarf II belonging to the two well-known branches of discrete bound-state eigenvalues. We find them as E + M = −(γ − M ) 2 and E − N = −(δ − N ) 2 ; M ( N ) = 0, 1, 2, ... with 0 ⩽ M ( N ) < γ(δ).

arXiv:1110.4485•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Dec 19, 2011•49 citations
For complex one-dimensional potentials, we propose the asymmetry of both reflectivity and transmitivity under time reversal: R ( − k ) ≠ R ( k ) and T ( − k ) ≠ T ( k ), unless the potentials are real or PT-symmetric. For complex PT-symmetric scattering potentials, we propose that R left ( − k ) = R right ( k ) and T ( − k ) = T ( k ). So far, the spectral singularities (SS) of a one-dimensional non-Hermitian scattering potential are witnessed/conjectured to be at most 1. We present a new non-Hermitian parametrization of the Scarf II potential to reveal its four new features. Firstly, it displays the just acclaimed (in)variances. Secondly, it can support two spectral singularities at two pre-assigned real energies ( E * = α 2 , β 2 ) either in T ( k ) or in T ( − k ), when αβ > 0. Thirdly, when αβ < 0 it possesses one SS in T ( k ) and the other in T ( − k ). Fourthly, when the potential becomes PT-symmetric [(α + β) = 0], we obtain T ( k ) = T ( − k ), it possesses a unique SS at E = α 2 in both T ( − k ) and T ( k ). Lastly, for completeness, when α = iγ and β = iδ there are no SS, instead we get two real energies −γ 2 and −δ 2 of the complex PT-symmetric Scarf II belonging to the two well-known branches of discrete bound-state eigenvalues. We find them as E + M = −(γ − M ) 2 and E − N = −(δ − N ) 2 ; M ( N ) = 0, 1, 2, ... with 0 ⩽ M ( N ) < γ(δ).