arXiv:1502.06709

The End of the Many-Worlds? (or Could we save Everett's interpretation)

Aurélien Drezet

Published Feb 24, 2015• 0 citations

Abstract

This is a manuscript to be published as a book chapter. The text summarizes some of my critics concerning Everett's theory as seen from the perspective of a Bohmian. This is the second draft and comments are still welcome.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1502.06709

Related papers

First Interlude

David Wallace

This interlude considers, in dialog form, various objections and responses to the Everett interpretation, and in particular to the view developed in chapters 1–3 of of this book. (Problems of probability are not considered.)

Oxford University Press eBooksMay 24, 20120 citations

The Case for the Everett Multiverse

David Wallace

I give a non-technical presentation of the argument that quantum mechanics, in the form in which it is currently used, needs to be understood in many-worlds (Everettian) terms; the alternatives that have been discussed are at present not able to reproduce the full empirical content of the theory. This is a draft of a chapter for the forthcoming \emph{Blackwell Companion to Philosophy and the Multiverse (Klaas Kraay and Daniel Rubio, eds.) }

quant-pharXiv:2608.07706Aug 11, 20260 citations

The Everett Interpretation

David Wallace

The Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics - better known as the Many-Worlds Theory - has had a rather uneven reception. Mainstream philosophers have scarcely heard of it, save as science fiction. In philosophy of physics it is well known but has historically been fairly widely rejected. Among physicists (at least, among those concerned with the interpretation of quantum mechanics in the first place), it is taken very seriously indeed, arguably tied for first place in popularity with more traditional operationalist views of quantum mechanics. In this article, I provide a fairly short (15,000 words) and self-contained introduction to the Everett interpretation as it is currently understood. I use little technical machinery, although I do assume the reader has encountered the measurement problem already (at about the level of the well-known discussions by Penrose or Albert).

Oxford University Press eBooksFeb 5, 201322 citations

An Attempt to Understand the Many-worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory

Euan J. Squires

The general class of what are called “Many–worlds” interpretations of quantum theory are entirely appropriate for this book, since they all originate from the paper of Everett (1957) which was based on the crucial assumption that the state vector of any system, ∣ψ>, changes with time only in accordance with the time-dependent Schrödinger equation: 1 i ℏ ∂ ∂ t | Ψ 〉 = H | Ψ 〉

CRC Press eBooksOct 19, 20171 citation

The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Lev Vaidman A

A novel interpretation of quantum mechanics, first proposed in brief form by Hugh Everett in 1957, forms the nucleus around which this book has developed. In his interpretation, Dr. Everett denies the existence of a separate classical realm and asserts the propriety of considering a state vector for the whole universe. Because this state vector never collapses, reality as a whole is rigorously deterministic. This reality, which is described jointly by the dynamical variables and the state vector, is not the reality customarily perceived; rather, it is a reality composed of many worlds. By virtue of the temporal development of the dynamical variables, the state vector decomposes naturally into orthogonal vectors, reflecting a continual splitting of the universe into a multitude of mutually unobservable but equally real worlds, in each of which every good measurement has yielded a definite result, and in most of which the familiar statistical quantum laws hold. The volume contains Dr. Everett's short paper from 1957, "'Relative State' Formulation of Quantum Mechanics," and a far longer exposition of his interpretation, entitled "The Theory of the Universal Wave Function," never before published. In addition, other papers by Wheeler, DeWitt, Graham, and Cooper and Van Vechten provide further discussion of the same theme. Together, they constitute virtually the entire world output of scholarly commentary on the Everett interpretation. Originally published in 1973. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.

Princeton University Press eBooksApr 24, 20151,016 citations

Multiplicity in Everett׳s interpretation of quantum mechanics

‎Louis Marchildon

arXiv:1504.04835Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern PhysicsOct 26, 20158 citations