Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1502.04135 · Nature

Undecidability of the spectral gap

Toby S. Cubitt, David Pérez-Garcı́a, Michael M. Wolf

Published Dec 1, 2015• 262 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1038/nature16059

Related papers

Undecidability of the Spectral Gap: An Epistemological Look

Emiliano Ippoliti, S. Caprara

Journal for General Philosophy of Science•Mar 1, 2021•3 citations

Instability of the undecidable behavior of the spectral gap in 1D

Laura Castilla-Castellano, Angelo Lucia

The problem of determining the existence of a spectral gap in a lattice quantum spin system was previously shown to be undecidable for one [J. Bausch et al., "Undecidability of the spectral gap in one dimension", Physical Review X 10 (2020)] or more dimensions [T. S. Cubitt et al., "Undecidability of the spectral gap", Nature 528 (2015) and Forum of Mathematics Pi, 10 (2022)]. In this work, we focus on the 1-dimensional result, showing that the constructed family with undecidable behavior is extremely sensitive to perturbations. In particular, for any $\varepsilon > 0$, there exists a 1-local, rank 1, perturbation with norm $O(\varepsilon)$, such that the spectral gap problem for the family in [J. Bausch et al., "Undecidability of the spectral gap in one dimension", Physical Review X 10 (2020)] now becomes decidable.

quant-pharXiv:2607.08686•Jul 10, 2026•0 citations

The Undecidability of the Spectral Gap: An Expository Account of a Fundamental Limitation in Quantum Many-Body Physics

Doug Doucette

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations

Undecidability of the Spectral Gap

J.B. Houben

We treat the results of the 2015 paper by Cubitt et al. entitled “Undecidability of the Spectral Gap”, and the constructions required to arrive at these results. This paper showed that a specific quantum mechanical problem (the “spectral gap problem”) is algorithmically undecidable, using techniques from computer science. We also treat the theory from quantum mechanics and computer science that is required to understand these results and constructions.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Spectral Decomposition

Daniel M. Greenberger, Klaus Hentschel, Friedel Weinert

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Spectral Gap and Exponential Decay of Correlations

Matthew B. Hastings, Tohru Koma

arXiv:math-ph/0507008•Communications in Mathematical Physics•Apr 21, 2006•580 citations
The problem of determining the existence of a spectral gap in a lattice quantum spin system was previously shown to be undecidable for one [J. Bausch et al., "Undecidability of the spectral gap in one dimension", Physical Review X 10 (2020)] or more dimensions [T. S. Cubitt et al., "Undecidability of the spectral gap", Nature 528 (2015) and Forum of Mathematics Pi, 10 (2022)]. In this work, we focus on the 1-dimensional result, showing that the constructed family with undecidable behavior is extremely sensitive to perturbations. In particular, for any ε>0\varepsilon > 0ε>0, there exists a 1-local, rank 1, perturbation with norm O(ε)O(\varepsilon)O(ε), such that the spectral gap problem for the family in [J. Bausch et al., "Undecidability of the spectral gap in one dimension", Physical Review X 10 (2020)] now becomes decidable.