Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1411.3589 · Journal of Geometry and Physics

Projective limits of state spaces I. Classical formalism

Suzanne Lanéry, Thomas Thiemann

Published Oct 24, 2016• 18 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.geomphys.2016.10.010

Related papers

Projective limits of state spaces II. Quantum formalism

Suzanne Lanéry, Thomas Thiemann

arXiv:1411.3590•Journal of Geometry and Physics•Jan 18, 2017•18 citations

Projective limits of state spaces III. Toy-models

Suzanne Lanéry, Thomas Thiemann

arXiv:1411.3591•Journal of Geometry and Physics•Sep 9, 2017•12 citations

BU33 Hilbert Space under B_U Object-Layer Operator Formalism under Boundary-Admissibility

Dedong Zhan

Abstract Hilbert Space under B_U: Object-Layer Operator Formalism under Boundary-Admissibility repositions Hilbert space within the B_U framework as an object-layer operator stage governed by boundary admissibility. The paper argues that Hilbert space supplies a highly effective formal arena for state representation, inner-product binding, orthogonal decomposition, closed-subspace projection, Cauchy-limit closure, and stable operator readout. Its mathematical completeness gives projection-layer background terms a closed domain in which approximation chains, high-frequency fluctuations, and microscopic residuals can be organized, stabilized, and cleared. However, Hilbert space does not grant standing by itself. Its vectors, subspaces, projections, spectra, and operators obtain physical significance only when admitted under single-universe boundary consistency, the fixed boundary B_0, and settlement projection \Pi_{B_0}. The core shift is from space-determinism to admission-determinism: dimensional freedom belongs to object-layer construction, while physical admissibility belongs to boundary-level adjudication. The note further clarifies that multidimensionality carries resolution gradients, projection partitions admissible domains, orthogonality performs stratified clearing, and completeness guarantees limit closure. In this sense, Hilbert space organizes projection; B_U grants admissibility; \Pi_{B_0} performs settlement; and single-valued standing locks the final readout.

•Apr 26, 2026•1 citation

State space as projective space. The case of massless particles

Luis J. Boya

Foundations of Physics•Nov 1, 1989•10 citations

Extended Pegg-Barnett Phase Operator

K. Kakazu

Vorontsov and Rembovsky pointed out recently a problem that unphysical states appear after an approximate quantum measurement of the Pegg-Barnett phase [Phys. Lett. A 254 (1999), 7; 262 (1999), 486]. To give a solution to this problem, we introduce a quantum phase in the extended number-state space and show that there is no Vorontsov-Rembovsky problem in the extended space. In the infinite-dimensional limit, the present extended formalism gives the same results in almost all cases as the Pegg-Barnett formalism. Also, it is shown that unphysical states can be suppressed by using the projection operator to the physical number space.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 2001•1 citation

Projective limits of state spaces IV. Fractal label sets

Suzanne Lanéry, Thomas Thiemann

arXiv:1510.01926•Journal of Geometry and Physics•Sep 8, 2017•6 citations
Abstract Hilbert Space under B_U: Object-Layer Operator Formalism under Boundary-Admissibility repositions Hilbert space within the B_U framework as an object-layer operator stage governed by boundary admissibility. The paper argues that Hilbert space supplies a highly effective formal arena for state representation, inner-product binding, orthogonal decomposition, closed-subspace projection, Cauchy-limit closure, and stable operator readout. Its mathematical completeness gives projection-layer background terms a closed domain in which approximation chains, high-frequency fluctuations, and microscopic residuals can be organized, stabilized, and cleared. However, Hilbert space does not grant standing by itself. Its vectors, subspaces, projections, spectra, and operators obtain physical significance only when admitted under single-universe boundary consistency, the fixed boundary B_0, and settlement projection \Pi_{B_0}. The core shift is from space-determinism to admission-determinism: dimensional freedom belongs to object-layer construction, while physical admissibility belongs to boundary-level adjudication. The note further clarifies that multidimensionality carries resolution gradients, projection partitions admissible domains, orthogonality performs stratified clearing, and completeness guarantees limit closure. In this sense, Hilbert space organizes projection; B_U grants admissibility; \Pi_{B_0} performs settlement; and single-valued standing locks the final readout.
Vorontsov and Rembovsky pointed out recently a problem that unphysical states appear after an approximate quantum measurement of the Pegg-Barnett phase [Phys. Lett. A 254 (1999), 7; 262 (1999), 486]. To give a solution to this problem, we introduce a quantum phase in the extended number-state space and show that there is no Vorontsov-Rembovsky problem in the extended space. In the infinite-dimensional limit, the present extended formalism gives the same results in almost all cases as the Pegg-Barnett formalism. Also, it is shown that unphysical states can be suppressed by using the projection operator to the physical number space.