Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1411.1631 · European Journal of Physics

A grasp of identity

Pere Seglar, Enric Pérez Canals

Published Mar 19, 2015• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract We revisit the treatment of identical particles in quantum mechanics. Two kinds of solutions of the Schrödinger equation are found and analysed. First, are the known symmetrized and antisymmetrized eigenfunctions. We examine how the very concept of particle is blurred within this approach. Second, we propose another kind of solution with no symmetries that we identify with Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics. In it, particles do preserve their individuality, as they are provided with individual energy and momenta. However, these properties cannot be univocally ascribed; moreover, particles do not possess distinctive positions. Finally, we explore how these results affect the calculation of canonical partition function, and we show that extensivity arises as a consequence of identity.

DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/36/3/035016

Related papers

Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Revisited

Robert C. Hilborn, Candice L. Yuca

The treatment of identical particles in quantum mechanics rests on two (related) principles: the spin‐statistics connection and the Symmetrization Postulate. In light of recent theories (such as q‐deformed commutators) that allow for ‘small’ violations of the spin‐statistics connection and the Symmetrization Postulate, we revisit the issue of how quantum mechanics deals with identical particles and how it supports or fails to support various philosophical stances concerning individuality. As a consequence of the expanded possibilities for quantum statistics, we argue that permutation symmetry is best formulated as a formal property of the state function describing the system of particles rather than as a property of the individual particles.1 Introduction2 Philosophical background2.1 Important terminology2.1.1 Identity2.1.2 Indistinguishability2.1.3 Indiscernibility2.2 When are particles indistinguishable?2.3 The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and quantum mechanics2.4 The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and logic2.5 Particle history2.6 Transcendental individuality3 Some quantum formalism3.1 The Principle of Permutation Invariance and the Symmetrization Postulate3.2 The configuration‐space approach3.3 Commutators and anticommutators, and identical particle statistics3.4 Q‐mutators4 Identical particle statistics: a holistic point of view5 Conclusions

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Sep 1, 2002•20 citations

Identical Particles

Ahmad Amer

This chapter addresses the quantum mechanics of identical particles, emphasizing the role of wavefunction symmetry in determining statistical behavior. Symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions are defined, and the implications of particle indistinguishability are examined, particularly regarding how it influences measurable outcomes and the concept of energy exchange degeneracy. The distinguishability of identical particles is discussed and shown to affect specific calculations. For systems where particle interactions can be neglected in the zero-order approximation, the total energy eigenfunction is expressed as a product of single-particle eigenfunctions. The Pauli exclusion principle is derived as a consequence of antisymmetrization. The relationship between symmetry type (bosonic or fermionic) and quantum statistics is elaborated. As an illustration, the ground state and the first excited $s$-state of the helium atom are analyzed under a simplified approximation. Metadata/Keywords: identical particles, symmetric wavefunction, antisymmetric wavefunction, Pauli exclusion principle, quantum statistics, energy exchange degeneracy, indistinguishability, helium atom, symmetry and statistics

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2025•0 citations

From identity to indistinguishability

Enric Pérez Canals

It is widely accepted that the papers by Bose in 1924 and by Einstein in 1924-1925 definitely opened the path to the quantum concept of ‘indistinguishability’. Since then, distinction in physics between ‘identity’ and ‘indistinguishability’ of particles has come to be required. However, even before the rise of quantum physics, Maxwell, Boltzmann and Gibbs, among others, had to tackle the difficulties and paradoxes that appear when counting identical particles. Later, after Sackur’s and Tetrode’s first quantum derivation of the canonical partition function of an ideal gas, much confusion arose around its dependence on the number of molecules in the system. Many other physicists, such as Planck, Lorentz or Schrodinger took part in those debates. In 1921, Ehrenfest and Trkal devoted a whole paper to this subject. Clearly, in the days before Bose’s seminal work, embroiling and misunderstanding were commonplace. In considering the emergence of the distinction between ‘identical’ and ‘indistinguishable’ particles, we will go through the so-called statistical route to quantum mechanics. The first developments in statistical mechanics became immediately confused and entangled with the irruption of quantum physics. In the first quarter of the twentieth century the mutual influence between both disciplines was profuse. We will pay special attention to the story of the so-called ‘Gibbs Paradox.’ We will argue that what is now often known by this name in some textbooks of statistical mechanics did not exist as such in those foundational days.

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Identical particles

Gennaro Auletta, Mauro Fortunato, Giorgio Parisi A

In classical physics, the question whether there are subsets of identical particles is not particularly interesting. After all, whether the particles are identical or not, we can always track each of them at any time. As we shall see, in quantum mechanics identical particles are indistinguishable because we cannot track trajectories, and this fact induces some important symmetry properties on the total wave function describing the system of particles under consideration. Generally speaking, a symmetry is an effect of an invariance, that is, the system does not change if one effects certain transformations (see Ch. 8). In this case, the system is not modified under exchange of two identical particles. Moreover, such a symmetry yields a most interesting connection between spin and statistics. After a short introduction to the significance of statistics in quantum mechanics (in Sec. 7.1), we define the permutation operator and discuss the symmetry properties of the wave function of N identical particles (Sec. 7.2). In Sec. 7.3 we show that quantum particles, differently from classical particles (that obey the Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics), may be subject to two different statistics, namely the Fermi–Dirac statistics for fermions and the Bose–Einstein statistics for bosons. In Sec. 7.4 we treat the so-called exchange interaction and, finally, in Sec. 7.5 we consider some applications of the two statistics. Statistics and quantum mechanics Identical particles are those particles whose Hamiltonian is symmetric under exchange of one particle with the other.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 16, 2009•0 citations

Identical Particles

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

In quantum mechanics the situation is different because the uncertainty principle does not allow us to know the initial positions and momenta of the particles with desired accuracy. The individual particle is described by a wave packet. Since the wave packet is localized and spreading with time, it is impossible to distinguish two identical particles as their wave functions always overlap at any point in space. Quantum theory describes any object at energies below its excitation threshold with four degrees of freedom. The wave functions of all the states of a given system of identical particles must have the same symmetry; otherwise, the wave function of a state formally a superposition of states of different symmetry would be neither symmetrical nor antisymmetrical. Hence, for a system of identical particles, at high energies and low concentration, probable number of particles per quantum state will be very small. Wave functions of the particles are well separated.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 29, 2022•0 citations

Identical Quantum Particles as Distinguishable Objects

Dennis Dieks, Andrea Lubberdink

Abstract According to classical physics particles are basic building blocks of the world. These classical particles are distinguishable objects, individuated by unique combinations of physical properties. By contrast, in quantum mechanics the received view is that particles of the same kind (“identical particles”) are physically indistinguishable from each other and lack identity. This doctrine rests on the quantum mechanical (anti)symmetrization postulates together with the “factorist” assumption that each single particle is represented in exactly one factor space of the tensor product Hilbert space of a many-particle system. Even though standard in theoretical physics and the philosophy of physics, the assumption of factorism and the ensuing indistinguishability of particles are problematic. Particle indistinguishability is irreconcilable with the everyday meaning of “particle”, and also with how this term is used in the practice of physics. Moreover, it is a consequence of the standard view that identical quantum particles remain indistinguishable even in the classical limit, which makes a smooth transition to the classical particle concept impossible. Lubberdink (1998; 2009) and Dieks and Lubberdink (2011) have proposed an alternative conception of quantum particles that does not rely on factorism and avoids these difficulties. We further explain and discuss this alternative framework here. One of its key consequences is that particles in quantum theory are not fundamental but emergent; another that once they have emerged, quantum particles are always physically distinguishable and thus possess a physically grounded identity.

Journal for General Philosophy of Science•Jun 24, 2020•47 citations
Abstract We revisit the treatment of identical particles in quantum mechanics. Two kinds of solutions of the Schrödinger equation are found and analysed. First, are the known symmetrized and antisymmetrized eigenfunctions. We examine how the very concept of particle is blurred within this approach. Second, we propose another kind of solution with no symmetries that we identify with Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics. In it, particles do preserve their individuality, as they are provided with individual energy and momenta. However, these properties cannot be univocally ascribed; moreover, particles do not possess distinctive positions. Finally, we explore how these results affect the calculation of canonical partition function, and we show that extensivity arises as a consequence of identity.
The treatment of identical particles in quantum mechanics rests on two (related) principles: the spin‐statistics connection and the Symmetrization Postulate. In light of recent theories (such as q‐deformed commutators) that allow for ‘small’ violations of the spin‐statistics connection and the Symmetrization Postulate, we revisit the issue of how quantum mechanics deals with identical particles and how it supports or fails to support various philosophical stances concerning individuality. As a consequence of the expanded possibilities for quantum statistics, we argue that permutation symmetry is best formulated as a formal property of the state function describing the system of particles rather than as a property of the individual particles.1 Introduction2 Philosophical background2.1 Important terminology2.1.1 Identity2.1.2 Indistinguishability2.1.3 Indiscernibility2.2 When are particles indistinguishable?2.3 The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and quantum mechanics2.4 The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and logic2.5 Particle history2.6 Transcendental individuality3 Some quantum formalism3.1 The Principle of Permutation Invariance and the Symmetrization Postulate3.2 The configuration‐space approach3.3 Commutators and anticommutators, and identical particle statistics3.4 Q‐mutators4 Identical particle statistics: a holistic point of view5 Conclusions
This chapter addresses the quantum mechanics of identical particles, emphasizing the role of wavefunction symmetry in determining statistical behavior. Symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions are defined, and the implications of particle indistinguishability are examined, particularly regarding how it influences measurable outcomes and the concept of energy exchange degeneracy. The distinguishability of identical particles is discussed and shown to affect specific calculations. For systems where particle interactions can be neglected in the zero-order approximation, the total energy eigenfunction is expressed as a product of single-particle eigenfunctions. The Pauli exclusion principle is derived as a consequence of antisymmetrization. The relationship between symmetry type (bosonic or fermionic) and quantum statistics is elaborated. As an illustration, the ground state and the first excited sss-state of the helium atom are analyzed under a simplified approximation. Metadata/Keywords: identical particles, symmetric wavefunction, antisymmetric wavefunction, Pauli exclusion principle, quantum statistics, energy exchange degeneracy, indistinguishability, helium atom, symmetry and statistics
It is widely accepted that the papers by Bose in 1924 and by Einstein in 1924-1925 definitely opened the path to the quantum concept of ‘indistinguishability’. Since then, distinction in physics between ‘identity’ and ‘indistinguishability’ of particles has come to be required. However, even before the rise of quantum physics, Maxwell, Boltzmann and Gibbs, among others, had to tackle the difficulties and paradoxes that appear when counting identical particles. Later, after Sackur’s and Tetrode’s first quantum derivation of the canonical partition function of an ideal gas, much confusion arose around its dependence on the number of molecules in the system. Many other physicists, such as Planck, Lorentz or Schrodinger took part in those debates. In 1921, Ehrenfest and Trkal devoted a whole paper to this subject. Clearly, in the days before Bose’s seminal work, embroiling and misunderstanding were commonplace. In considering the emergence of the distinction between ‘identical’ and ‘indistinguishable’ particles, we will go through the so-called statistical route to quantum mechanics. The first developments in statistical mechanics became immediately confused and entangled with the irruption of quantum physics. In the first quarter of the twentieth century the mutual influence between both disciplines was profuse. We will pay special attention to the story of the so-called ‘Gibbs Paradox.’ We will argue that what is now often known by this name in some textbooks of statistical mechanics did not exist as such in those foundational days.
In classical physics, the question whether there are subsets of identical particles is not particularly interesting. After all, whether the particles are identical or not, we can always track each of them at any time. As we shall see, in quantum mechanics identical particles are indistinguishable because we cannot track trajectories, and this fact induces some important symmetry properties on the total wave function describing the system of particles under consideration. Generally speaking, a symmetry is an effect of an invariance, that is, the system does not change if one effects certain transformations (see Ch. 8). In this case, the system is not modified under exchange of two identical particles. Moreover, such a symmetry yields a most interesting connection between spin and statistics. After a short introduction to the significance of statistics in quantum mechanics (in Sec. 7.1), we define the permutation operator and discuss the symmetry properties of the wave function of N identical particles (Sec. 7.2). In Sec. 7.3 we show that quantum particles, differently from classical particles (that obey the Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics), may be subject to two different statistics, namely the Fermi–Dirac statistics for fermions and the Bose–Einstein statistics for bosons. In Sec. 7.4 we treat the so-called exchange interaction and, finally, in Sec. 7.5 we consider some applications of the two statistics. Statistics and quantum mechanics Identical particles are those particles whose Hamiltonian is symmetric under exchange of one particle with the other.
In quantum mechanics the situation is different because the uncertainty principle does not allow us to know the initial positions and momenta of the particles with desired accuracy. The individual particle is described by a wave packet. Since the wave packet is localized and spreading with time, it is impossible to distinguish two identical particles as their wave functions always overlap at any point in space. Quantum theory describes any object at energies below its excitation threshold with four degrees of freedom. The wave functions of all the states of a given system of identical particles must have the same symmetry; otherwise, the wave function of a state formally a superposition of states of different symmetry would be neither symmetrical nor antisymmetrical. Hence, for a system of identical particles, at high energies and low concentration, probable number of particles per quantum state will be very small. Wave functions of the particles are well separated.
Abstract According to classical physics particles are basic building blocks of the world. These classical particles are distinguishable objects, individuated by unique combinations of physical properties. By contrast, in quantum mechanics the received view is that particles of the same kind (“identical particles”) are physically indistinguishable from each other and lack identity. This doctrine rests on the quantum mechanical (anti)symmetrization postulates together with the “factorist” assumption that each single particle is represented in exactly one factor space of the tensor product Hilbert space of a many-particle system. Even though standard in theoretical physics and the philosophy of physics, the assumption of factorism and the ensuing indistinguishability of particles are problematic. Particle indistinguishability is irreconcilable with the everyday meaning of “particle”, and also with how this term is used in the practice of physics. Moreover, it is a consequence of the standard view that identical quantum particles remain indistinguishable even in the classical limit, which makes a smooth transition to the classical particle concept impossible. Lubberdink (1998; 2009) and Dieks and Lubberdink (2011) have proposed an alternative conception of quantum particles that does not rely on factorism and avoids these difficulties. We further explain and discuss this alternative framework here. One of its key consequences is that particles in quantum theory are not fundamental but emergent; another that once they have emerged, quantum particles are always physically distinguishable and thus possess a physically grounded identity.