Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1410.5773

Introduction to foundations of probability and randomness (for students in physics), Lectures given at the Institute of Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Austrian Academy of Science, Lecture-1: Kolmogorov and von Mises

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Published Oct 19, 2014• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The education system for students in physics suffers (worldwide) from the absence of a deep course in probability and randomness. This is the real problem for students interested in quantum information theory, quantum optics, and quantum foundations. Here the primitive treatment of probability and randomness may lead to deep misunderstandings of theory and wrong interpretations of experimental results. Since during my visits (in 2013 and 2014) to IQOQI a number of students (experimenters!) asked me permanently about foundational problems of probability and randomness, especially inter-relation between classical and quantum structures, this year I gave two lectures on these problems. Surprisingly the interest of experiment-oriented students to mathematical peculiarities was very high. This (as well as permanent reminding of prof. Zeilinger) motivated me to write a text based on these lectures which were originally presented in the traditional black-board form. I hope that this might be useful for students from IQOQI as well as other young physicists.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1410.5773

Related papers

Lectures on the Mathematics of Quantum Mechanics I

Gianfausto Dell’Antonio

The first volume (General Theory) differs from most textbooks as it emphasizes the mathematical structure and mathematical rigor, while being adapted to the teaching the first semester of an advanced course in Quantum Mechanics (the content of the book are the lectures of courses actually delivered.). It differs also from the very few texts in Quantum Mechanics that give emphasis to the mathematical aspects because this book, being written as Lecture Notes, has the structure of lectures delivered in a course, namely introduction of the problem, outline of the relevant points, mathematical tools needed, theorems, proofs. This makes this book particularly useful for self-study and for instructors in the preparation of a second course in Quantum Mechanics (after a first basic course). With some minor additions it can be used also as a basis of a first course in Quantum Mechanics for students in mathematics curricula. The second part (Selected Topics) are lecture notes of a more advanced course aimed at giving the basic notions necessary to do research in several areas of mathematical physics connected with quantum mechanics, from solid state to singular interactions, many body theory, semi-classical analysis, quantum statistical mechanics. The structure of this book is suitable for a second-semester course, in which the lectures are meant to provide, in addition to theorems and proofs, an overview of a more specific subject and hints to the direction of research. In this respect and for the width of subjects this second volume differs from other monographs on Quantum Mechanics. The second volume can be useful for students who want to have a basic preparation for doing research and for instructors who may want to use it as a basis for the presentation of selected topics.

Atlantis studies in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2015•10 citations

Introduction

Jonathan A. Jones, Dieter Jaksch

Why yet another book on quantum information theory? Like many lecturers we began writing this text because none of the alternatives seemed quite right. This book is aimed squarely at undergraduate physics students who want a brief but reasonably thorough introduction to the exciting ideas of quantum information, including its applications in computation and communication. It is based on a short course we have taught to fourth-year students at Oxford University since 2004; for the most part it only assumes knowledge of elementary quantum mechanics and linear algebra, and so could even be taught to third-year undergraduates. A brief revision guide to quantum mechanics is provided as an appendix, which should cover any minor points that have been missed. As the title implies the book is structured in three parts, starting with the basics of quantum information and then applying this to quantum computation and quantum communication. Part I is self-contained, but contains only the barest hints of the exciting applications which attract many people to this field and so might prove unsatisfying on its own. Parts II and III draw heavily on Part I, but are largely independent of each other, and it would be perfectly possible to study only one of these two without the other. As this text is aimed at physics undergraduates, we believe that it is vital to cover experimental techniques, rather than merely presenting quantum information as a series of abstract quantum operations. We have, however, concentrated on the basic ideas underlying each approach, rather than worrying about particular experimental details.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jul 19, 2012•0 citations

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Information Science

Alexander Semenovich Holevo

Abstract Quantum information science is a new and rapidly developing discipline that studies the general laws governing the transmission, storage, and processing of information in systems that obey the laws of quantum mechanics. It makes extensive use of matrix theory and operator theory on Hilbert spaces to investigate the capabilities of such systems and to develop principles for their rational design. An important consequence of the development of quantum information science is a substantial clarification of the logical structure and foundations of quantum mechanics and of its relation to reality. These lectures are devoted to the foundations of the mathematical theory of quantum systems: states, observables, communication channels, their entropic and information characteristics, and quantum information-processing protocols. The lectures provide a detailed introduction to the statistical structure of quantum theory and the necessary background from classical information theory; hence, knowledge of the basic mathematical subjects—analysis, linear algebra, and probability theory—is sufficient for understanding the material. In the first part of the course, we use the “standard” statistical model of a quantum system, but consider it in comparison with the classical statistical description. A consistent development of this approach leads to a generalized statistical model of quantum mechanics, in which observables (in general, “unsharp”) are described by probability operator-valued measures, while evolutions (in general, irreversible) are described by completely positive maps. Introductory material on these concepts, which underlie mathematical models of quantum information systems in the presence of noise and errors and have numerous applications in quantum information science, is presented in the second part of the course.

Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations

Lectures on Quantum Mechanics for Mathematics Students

L. D. Faddeev, O. Yakubovskiĭ

This book is based on notes from the course developed and taught for more than 30 years at the Department of Mathematics of Leningrad University. The goal of the course was to present the basics of quantum mechanics and its mathematical content to students in mathematics. This book differs from the majority of other textbooks on the subject in that much more attention is paid to general principles of quantum mechanics. In particular, the authors describe in detail the relation between classical and quantum mechanics. When selecting particular topics, the authors emphasize those that are related to interesting mathematical theories. In particular, the book contains a discussion of problems related to group representation theory and to scattering theory. This book is rather elementary and concise, and it does not require prerequisites beyond the standard undergraduate mathematical curriculum. It is aimed at giving a mathematically oriented student the opportunity to grasp the main points of quantum theory in a mathematical framework.

Student mathematical library•Mar 9, 2009•54 citations

Reminiscing about thesis work with E T Jaynes at Stanford in the 1950s

F.W. Cummings

Abstract A short personal and historical account of the field of radiation interacting with (two-level) atoms is given. Subsequent to 1963, developments and extensions have been extensive and fruitful. One of the most fortunate changes in my life came in late 1957. I was looking for a thesis advisor, after two years of graduate course-work at Stanford. I chanced to see a notice of an upcoming lecture by a professor named Edwin T Jaynes. I could not understand from the announcement what he intended to talk about, but I was searching; I went to find out. That decision was a very lucky one. Ed was talking about a subject that inspired him then, and had been for many years, namely his concept of 'Max-Ent'. 'Maximum-Entropy' is a subject now close to my heart also. Ed's very-clear, well-thought-out papers, spread over many subsequent years, are transforming the field of probability (albeit too gradually) to the 'subjective' outlook of Bayes. (A recent book 'Maximum Entropy and Ecology' [1] will probably convert many nay-sayers to 'Max-Ent'.) I went into Ed's office (late 1957) and asked if I could work with him on a thesis. Did he have a problem for me? Yes, he did. Somewhat to my surprise, he asked me to look into the 'maser problem', involving a comparison of the semi-classical theory of radiation to a proper quantum treatment. To make a two-year story short, Ed's guidance was expert. (I imagine that if another of Ed's students (e.g. Joe Eberly) had come into his office fifteen minutes before me, the 'Jaynes–Cummings' (J–C) model would now perhaps be called otherwise, e.g., the 'J–E' model). In the two-year time frame (∼1958–60), Ed had a number of other PhD dissertation students whom I knew; these included Joe Eberly, Doug Scalapino, Baldwin Robertson, Larry Davis and Mike Duggan. My thesis work under Ed reminds me of a story about Michelangelo and his famous 'Pieta'. Michelangelo was an old man about then, so he hired a young craftsman to do much of the physical work: 'chip here, carve there, cut off here, eliminate this, etc'. When the beautiful Pieta was finished, the young man was heard to say, 'I didn't realize before this that I was so talented'. Experiments by Clauser in 1972 on Bell's inequalities (e.g. [2]) showed them to be correct, and indicated that semi-classical alternatives to quantum electrodynamics were not viable. Working with Stuart Freedman, these were the first experimental tests of the predictions of Bell's theorem, the first observation of quantum entanglement, as well as the first experimental observation of a violation of a Bell inequality. The perturbation formulation of quantum radiation theory has long been rife with vexing infinities. Ed always insisted that only experiment can end an argument, so he and his students had been sensibly exploring semi-classical theory. This was not only because of the serious failings of standard QED, but more importantly because of the fact that (an improved) semi-classical theory was able to predict both spontaneous emission, with the correct Einstein coefficients, and the Lamb shift. These two effects have long been thought only possible in the quantum radiation domain (cf [3]). Ed readily accepted losing his bet with Franken about what experiment had to say about the Lamb shift. What is clear is that this bet of $50 with Peter Franken stimulated so much subsequent research that this bet played an important role in generally furthering the field of quantum optics. How did 'J–C' come to be published as it did in the IEEE [4]? Ed was not well known for the extravagant use of words, rather for paucity, clarity and economy. After about two years of working with Ed, he said to me one day, 'You have enough, write it up'. He also said 'We should publish'. (This was around early 1960). About this same time, I was contacted by someone from a new research lab just starting in Newport Beach, California (called 'Aeroneutronic', a division of Ford), asking if I would come to work there. I thought it sounded about right as an approximately two–three year position: repay some debts and look around at other possibilities (especially academe?). I left around June 1960 to take up this position in the research lab in Newport Beach. At about this same time (∼late 1959), Ed was moving to his new 'chair' at Washington University in St Louis. I proceeded as quickly as I could to put together a thesis after arriving in Newport Beach; I wrote about what I had done, as best as I could in my naiveté about such undertakings. I wrote of the work I had done under Ed's kind and patient guidance for the two years in Palo Alto. I soon remembered that Ed had done a recent Stanford Microwave Lab report on our project; his writing was so much better than mine that I thought it witless to put out something as 'uneven' as I had written by then. At just this time that I was cobbling together a thesis, a consultant at Aeroneutronic, Jay Singer of UC Berkeley EE department, approached me in the hall, (no tele-commuting then!) asking if I might have something to contribute to a special issue of a journal of the IEEE he was editing, on the subject of 'Quantum Electronics'. (Comment: One of the earliest predecessors to the MRI, Jay Singer was then measuring the blood flow in rat tails and human arms; he holds two key MRI patents). I said I thought I did have something. The journal sounded appropriate, so I soon handed my 'thesis' to Jay, put Ed's name first (of course, since it consisted so largely of his words from the Microwave Lab report, but also since Ed was my 'guru'), ...and that was that...done [4]. From my perspective, it seemed to subsequently sink to the bottom of the sea, not to be seen by me again for many years until the elegant Walther–Rempe–Klein (WRK) experiments of 1987 on long-time coherent radiative behavior appeared [5]. They confirmed the long-time quantum-theoretical results of Eberly, Narozhny and Sanchez-Mondragon [6]. Bob Buley and I, while at Aeroneutronic, had published in the field of lasers [7], based on the J–C model. We found very strange, puzzling 'chaotic' output of a 'Q-switched' laser. When computer time-steps were changed, the chaos didn't disappear. It was about then (∼June 1963) that both Bob and I headed elsewhere: I to the early-forming UC Riverside Physics Department as Assistant Professor, and Bob to a company in Santa Barbara. Our work on the mysterious 'chaotic' laser effect then ended (the term 'chaos' was not yet in the physics lexicon); Bob was the computer expert, our non-linear laser problem demanded rigorous numerical computations, and I was not savvy with the (then) 'refrigerator-sized' computers at UCR. P W Milonni has greatly extended this work (cf [8]). Mike Tavis, my graduate student at UCR around 1965, extended the J–C model to N atoms [9]. (We have more recently collaborated in a further study of this and other extensions of J–C.) The silence and zero feedback from the 'J–C', Buley and 'T–C' papers for so many years following 1965 was a bit deafening, so I thought it would be best that I go mostly onto other topics. One day in about 1989, I got a tap on the shoulder from a colleague at UCR: 'I saw your name in the title of a paper'. ('Huh?'). An astonishing number of exciting and important new topics have emerged since the 1987 WRK experiment, providing an ever-branching tree of both new theory and experiment. It is tempting to entitle this piece as 'Get your name in print: Diagonalize a 2 × 2'. References [1] Harte J 2011 Maximum Entropy and Ecology: A Theory of Abundance, Distribution, and Energetics (Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution) (Oxford: Oxford University Press) [2] Freedman S J and Clauser J F 1972 Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 938 [3] Stroud C R Jr and Jaynes E T 1970 Long-term solutions in semiclassical radiation theory Phys. Rev. A 1 106 [4] Jaynes E T and Cummings F W 1963 Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser Proc. IEEE 51 89 [5] Rempe G, Walther H and Klein N 1987 Observation of quantum collapse and revival in a one-atom maser Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 353 [6] Eberly J H, Narozhny N B and Sanchez-Mondragon J J 1980 Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 1323 [7] Buley E R and Cummings F W 1964 Dynamics of a system of N atoms interacting with a radiation field Phys. Rev. 134 A1454 [8] Milonni P W, Shin M-L and Ackerhalt J R 1987 Chaos in Laser–Matter Interactions (Singapore: World Scientific) [9] Tavis M and Cummings F W 1968 Exact solution for an N -molecule—radiation-field Hamiltonian Phys. Rev. 170 379

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Nov 1, 2013•49 citations

Probability And Randomness: Quantum Versus Classical

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

"Creating a rigorous mathematical theory of randomness is far from being complete, even in the classical case. Interrelation of Classical and Quantum Randomness rectifies this and introduces mathematical formalisms of classical and quantum probability and randomness with brief discussion of their interrelation and interpretational and foundational issues. The book presents the essentials of classical approaches to randomness, enlightens their successes and problems, and then proceeds to essentials of quantum randomness. Its wide-ranging and comprehensive scope makes it suitable for researchers in mathematical physics, probability and statistics at any level"--

•Mar 3, 2016•34 citations
The education system for students in physics suffers (worldwide) from the absence of a deep course in probability and randomness. This is the real problem for students interested in quantum information theory, quantum optics, and quantum foundations. Here the primitive treatment of probability and randomness may lead to deep misunderstandings of theory and wrong interpretations of experimental results. Since during my visits (in 2013 and 2014) to IQOQI a number of students (experimenters!) asked me permanently about foundational problems of probability and randomness, especially inter-relation between classical and quantum structures, this year I gave two lectures on these problems. Surprisingly the interest of experiment-oriented students to mathematical peculiarities was very high. This (as well as permanent reminding of prof. Zeilinger) motivated me to write a text based on these lectures which were originally presented in the traditional black-board form. I hope that this might be useful for students from IQOQI as well as other young physicists.
The first volume (General Theory) differs from most textbooks as it emphasizes the mathematical structure and mathematical rigor, while being adapted to the teaching the first semester of an advanced course in Quantum Mechanics (the content of the book are the lectures of courses actually delivered.). It differs also from the very few texts in Quantum Mechanics that give emphasis to the mathematical aspects because this book, being written as Lecture Notes, has the structure of lectures delivered in a course, namely introduction of the problem, outline of the relevant points, mathematical tools needed, theorems, proofs. This makes this book particularly useful for self-study and for instructors in the preparation of a second course in Quantum Mechanics (after a first basic course). With some minor additions it can be used also as a basis of a first course in Quantum Mechanics for students in mathematics curricula. The second part (Selected Topics) are lecture notes of a more advanced course aimed at giving the basic notions necessary to do research in several areas of mathematical physics connected with quantum mechanics, from solid state to singular interactions, many body theory, semi-classical analysis, quantum statistical mechanics. The structure of this book is suitable for a second-semester course, in which the lectures are meant to provide, in addition to theorems and proofs, an overview of a more specific subject and hints to the direction of research. In this respect and for the width of subjects this second volume differs from other monographs on Quantum Mechanics. The second volume can be useful for students who want to have a basic preparation for doing research and for instructors who may want to use it as a basis for the presentation of selected topics.
Why yet another book on quantum information theory? Like many lecturers we began writing this text because none of the alternatives seemed quite right. This book is aimed squarely at undergraduate physics students who want a brief but reasonably thorough introduction to the exciting ideas of quantum information, including its applications in computation and communication. It is based on a short course we have taught to fourth-year students at Oxford University since 2004; for the most part it only assumes knowledge of elementary quantum mechanics and linear algebra, and so could even be taught to third-year undergraduates. A brief revision guide to quantum mechanics is provided as an appendix, which should cover any minor points that have been missed. As the title implies the book is structured in three parts, starting with the basics of quantum information and then applying this to quantum computation and quantum communication. Part I is self-contained, but contains only the barest hints of the exciting applications which attract many people to this field and so might prove unsatisfying on its own. Parts II and III draw heavily on Part I, but are largely independent of each other, and it would be perfectly possible to study only one of these two without the other. As this text is aimed at physics undergraduates, we believe that it is vital to cover experimental techniques, rather than merely presenting quantum information as a series of abstract quantum operations. We have, however, concentrated on the basic ideas underlying each approach, rather than worrying about particular experimental details.
Abstract Quantum information science is a new and rapidly developing discipline that studies the general laws governing the transmission, storage, and processing of information in systems that obey the laws of quantum mechanics. It makes extensive use of matrix theory and operator theory on Hilbert spaces to investigate the capabilities of such systems and to develop principles for their rational design. An important consequence of the development of quantum information science is a substantial clarification of the logical structure and foundations of quantum mechanics and of its relation to reality. These lectures are devoted to the foundations of the mathematical theory of quantum systems: states, observables, communication channels, their entropic and information characteristics, and quantum information-processing protocols. The lectures provide a detailed introduction to the statistical structure of quantum theory and the necessary background from classical information theory; hence, knowledge of the basic mathematical subjects—analysis, linear algebra, and probability theory—is sufficient for understanding the material. In the first part of the course, we use the “standard” statistical model of a quantum system, but consider it in comparison with the classical statistical description. A consistent development of this approach leads to a generalized statistical model of quantum mechanics, in which observables (in general, “unsharp”) are described by probability operator-valued measures, while evolutions (in general, irreversible) are described by completely positive maps. Introductory material on these concepts, which underlie mathematical models of quantum information systems in the presence of noise and errors and have numerous applications in quantum information science, is presented in the second part of the course.
This book is based on notes from the course developed and taught for more than 30 years at the Department of Mathematics of Leningrad University. The goal of the course was to present the basics of quantum mechanics and its mathematical content to students in mathematics. This book differs from the majority of other textbooks on the subject in that much more attention is paid to general principles of quantum mechanics. In particular, the authors describe in detail the relation between classical and quantum mechanics. When selecting particular topics, the authors emphasize those that are related to interesting mathematical theories. In particular, the book contains a discussion of problems related to group representation theory and to scattering theory. This book is rather elementary and concise, and it does not require prerequisites beyond the standard undergraduate mathematical curriculum. It is aimed at giving a mathematically oriented student the opportunity to grasp the main points of quantum theory in a mathematical framework.
Abstract A short personal and historical account of the field of radiation interacting with (two-level) atoms is given. Subsequent to 1963, developments and extensions have been extensive and fruitful. One of the most fortunate changes in my life came in late 1957. I was looking for a thesis advisor, after two years of graduate course-work at Stanford. I chanced to see a notice of an upcoming lecture by a professor named Edwin T Jaynes. I could not understand from the announcement what he intended to talk about, but I was searching; I went to find out. That decision was a very lucky one. Ed was talking about a subject that inspired him then, and had been for many years, namely his concept of 'Max-Ent'. 'Maximum-Entropy' is a subject now close to my heart also. Ed's very-clear, well-thought-out papers, spread over many subsequent years, are transforming the field of probability (albeit too gradually) to the 'subjective' outlook of Bayes. (A recent book 'Maximum Entropy and Ecology' [1] will probably convert many nay-sayers to 'Max-Ent'.) I went into Ed's office (late 1957) and asked if I could work with him on a thesis. Did he have a problem for me? Yes, he did. Somewhat to my surprise, he asked me to look into the 'maser problem', involving a comparison of the semi-classical theory of radiation to a proper quantum treatment. To make a two-year story short, Ed's guidance was expert. (I imagine that if another of Ed's students (e.g. Joe Eberly) had come into his office fifteen minutes before me, the 'Jaynes–Cummings' (J–C) model would now perhaps be called otherwise, e.g., the 'J–E' model). In the two-year time frame (∼1958–60), Ed had a number of other PhD dissertation students whom I knew; these included Joe Eberly, Doug Scalapino, Baldwin Robertson, Larry Davis and Mike Duggan. My thesis work under Ed reminds me of a story about Michelangelo and his famous 'Pieta'. Michelangelo was an old man about then, so he hired a young craftsman to do much of the physical work: 'chip here, carve there, cut off here, eliminate this, etc'. When the beautiful Pieta was finished, the young man was heard to say, 'I didn't realize before this that I was so talented'. Experiments by Clauser in 1972 on Bell's inequalities (e.g. [2]) showed them to be correct, and indicated that semi-classical alternatives to quantum electrodynamics were not viable. Working with Stuart Freedman, these were the first experimental tests of the predictions of Bell's theorem, the first observation of quantum entanglement, as well as the first experimental observation of a violation of a Bell inequality. The perturbation formulation of quantum radiation theory has long been rife with vexing infinities. Ed always insisted that only experiment can end an argument, so he and his students had been sensibly exploring semi-classical theory. This was not only because of the serious failings of standard QED, but more importantly because of the fact that (an improved) semi-classical theory was able to predict both spontaneous emission, with the correct Einstein coefficients, and the Lamb shift. These two effects have long been thought only possible in the quantum radiation domain (cf [3]). Ed readily accepted losing his bet with Franken about what experiment had to say about the Lamb shift. What is clear is that this bet of $50 with Peter Franken stimulated so much subsequent research that this bet played an important role in generally furthering the field of quantum optics. How did 'J–C' come to be published as it did in the IEEE [4]? Ed was not well known for the extravagant use of words, rather for paucity, clarity and economy. After about two years of working with Ed, he said to me one day, 'You have enough, write it up'. He also said 'We should publish'. (This was around early 1960). About this same time, I was contacted by someone from a new research lab just starting in Newport Beach, California (called 'Aeroneutronic', a division of Ford), asking if I would come to work there. I thought it sounded about right as an approximately two–three year position: repay some debts and look around at other possibilities (especially academe?). I left around June 1960 to take up this position in the research lab in Newport Beach. At about this same time (∼late 1959), Ed was moving to his new 'chair' at Washington University in St Louis. I proceeded as quickly as I could to put together a thesis after arriving in Newport Beach; I wrote about what I had done, as best as I could in my naiveté about such undertakings. I wrote of the work I had done under Ed's kind and patient guidance for the two years in Palo Alto. I soon remembered that Ed had done a recent Stanford Microwave Lab report on our project; his writing was so much better than mine that I thought it witless to put out something as 'uneven' as I had written by then. At just this time that I was cobbling together a thesis, a consultant at Aeroneutronic, Jay Singer of UC Berkeley EE department, approached me in the hall, (no tele-commuting then!) asking if I might have something to contribute to a special issue of a journal of the IEEE he was editing, on the subject of 'Quantum Electronics'. (Comment: One of the earliest predecessors to the MRI, Jay Singer was then measuring the blood flow in rat tails and human arms; he holds two key MRI patents). I said I thought I did have something. The journal sounded appropriate, so I soon handed my 'thesis' to Jay, put Ed's name first (of course, since it consisted so largely of his words from the Microwave Lab report, but also since Ed was my 'guru'), ...and that was that...done [4]. From my perspective, it seemed to subsequently sink to the bottom of the sea, not to be seen by me again for many years until the elegant Walther–Rempe–Klein (WRK) experiments of 1987 on long-time coherent radiative behavior appeared [5]. They confirmed the long-time quantum-theoretical results of Eberly, Narozhny and Sanchez-Mondragon [6]. Bob Buley and I, while at Aeroneutronic, had published in the field of lasers [7], based on the J–C model. We found very strange, puzzling 'chaotic' output of a 'Q-switched' laser. When computer time-steps were changed, the chaos didn't disappear. It was about then (∼June 1963) that both Bob and I headed elsewhere: I to the early-forming UC Riverside Physics Department as Assistant Professor, and Bob to a company in Santa Barbara. Our work on the mysterious 'chaotic' laser effect then ended (the term 'chaos' was not yet in the physics lexicon); Bob was the computer expert, our non-linear laser problem demanded rigorous numerical computations, and I was not savvy with the (then) 'refrigerator-sized' computers at UCR. P W Milonni has greatly extended this work (cf [8]). Mike Tavis, my graduate student at UCR around 1965, extended the J–C model to N atoms [9]. (We have more recently collaborated in a further study of this and other extensions of J–C.) The silence and zero feedback from the 'J–C', Buley and 'T–C' papers for so many years following 1965 was a bit deafening, so I thought it would be best that I go mostly onto other topics. One day in about 1989, I got a tap on the shoulder from a colleague at UCR: 'I saw your name in the title of a paper'. ('Huh?'). An astonishing number of exciting and important new topics have emerged since the 1987 WRK experiment, providing an ever-branching tree of both new theory and experiment. It is tempting to entitle this piece as 'Get your name in print: Diagonalize a 2 × 2'. References [1] Harte J 2011 Maximum Entropy and Ecology: A Theory of Abundance, Distribution, and Energetics (Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution) (Oxford: Oxford University Press) [2] Freedman S J and Clauser J F 1972 Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 938 [3] Stroud C R Jr and Jaynes E T 1970 Long-term solutions in semiclassical radiation theory Phys. Rev. A 1 106 [4] Jaynes E T and Cummings F W 1963 Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser Proc. IEEE 51 89 [5] Rempe G, Walther H and Klein N 1987 Observation of quantum collapse and revival in a one-atom maser Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 353 [6] Eberly J H, Narozhny N B and Sanchez-Mondragon J J 1980 Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 1323 [7] Buley E R and Cummings F W 1964 Dynamics of a system of N atoms interacting with a radiation field Phys. Rev. 134 A1454 [8] Milonni P W, Shin M-L and Ackerhalt J R 1987 Chaos in Laser–Matter Interactions (Singapore: World Scientific) [9] Tavis M and Cummings F W 1968 Exact solution for an N -molecule—radiation-field Hamiltonian Phys. Rev. 170 379
"Creating a rigorous mathematical theory of randomness is far from being complete, even in the classical case. Interrelation of Classical and Quantum Randomness rectifies this and introduces mathematical formalisms of classical and quantum probability and randomness with brief discussion of their interrelation and interpretational and foundational issues. The book presents the essentials of classical approaches to randomness, enlightens their successes and problems, and then proceeds to essentials of quantum randomness. Its wide-ranging and comprehensive scope makes it suitable for researchers in mathematical physics, probability and statistics at any level"--