© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:1410.5180 · Quantum Information and Computation

Minimum guesswork discrimination between quantum states

Weien Chen, Yongzhi Cao, Hanpin Wang, Yuan Feng

Published Jul 1, 2015• 8 citations

Abstract

Error probability is a popular and well-studied optimization criterion in discriminating non-orthogonal quantum states. It captures the threat from an adversary who can only query the actual state once. However, when the adversary is able to use a brute-force strategy to query the state, discrimination measurement with minimum error probability does not necessarily minimize the number of queries to get the actual state. In light of this, we take Massey's guesswork as the underlying optimization criterion and study the problem of minimum guesswork discrimination. We show that this problem can be reduced to a semidefinite programming problem. Necessary and sufficient conditions when a measurement achieves minimum guesswork are presented. We also reveal the relation between minimum guesswork and minimum error probability. We show that the two criteria generally disagree with each other, except for the special case with two states. Both upper and lower information-theoretic bounds on minimum guesswork are given. For geometrically uniform quantum states, we provide sufficient conditions when a measurement achieves minimum guesswork. Moreover, we give the necessary and sufficient condition under which making no measurement at all would be the optimal strategy.

DOI: 10.26421/qic15.9-10-2

Related papers

On the Measurement Attaining the Quantum Guesswork

Michele Dall’Arno

The guesswork quantifies the minimum cost incurred in guessing the state of an ensemble, when only one state can be queried at a time. In the classical case, it is well known that the optimal strategy trivially consists of querying the states in their non-increasing order of posterior probability. In the quantum case, on the other hand, the most general strategy to obtain the optimal ordering in which to perform the queries consist of a quantum measurement. Here, we solve such an optimization problem by deriving the quantum measurement attaining the guesswork for a broad class of ensembles and cost functions.

arXiv:2302.06783•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Dec 15, 2023•1 citation

Quantum-state comparison and discrimination

A. Hayashi, T. Hashimoto, M. Horibe

We investigate the performance of discrimination strategy in the comparison task of known quantum states. In the discrimination strategy, one infers whether or not two quantum systems are in the same state on the basis of the outcomes of separate discrimination measurements on each system. In some cases with more than two possible states, the optimal strategy in minimum-error comparison is that one should infer the two systems are in different states without any measurement, implying that the discrimination strategy performs worse than the trivial ``no-measurement'' strategy. We present a sufficient condition for this phenomenon to happen. For two pure states with equal prior probabilities, we determine the optimal comparison success probability with an error margin, which interpolates the minimum-error and unambiguous comparison. We find that the discrimination strategy is not optimal except for the minimum-error case.

arXiv:1803.09030•Physical Review A•May 21, 2018•3 citations

Guesswork with Quantum Side Information: Optimal Strategies and Aspects of Security

Eric P. Hanson, Vishal Katariya, Nilanjana Datta +1 more

What is the minimum number of guesses needed on average to correctly guess a realization of a random variable? The answer to this question led to the introduction of the notion of a quantity called guesswork by Massey in 1994, which can be viewed as an alternate security criterion to entropy. In this paper, we consider guesswork in the presence of quantum side information, and show that a general sequential guessing strategy is equivalent to performing a single quantum measurement and choosing a guessing strategy based on the outcome. We use this result to deduce entropic one-shot and asymptotic bounds on the guesswork in the presence of quantum side information, and to formulate a semi-definite program (SDP) to calculate the quantity. We evaluate the guesswork for a simple example involving the BB84 states, and we prove a continuity result that certifies the security of slightly imperfect key states when the guesswork is used as the security criterion.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jun 1, 2020•0 citations

Minimum-Bayes-cost discrimination for symmetric quantum states

Kenji Nakahira, Tsuyoshi Sasaki Usuda

We derive the measurement strategy that optimizes the Bayes criterion, not necessarily the strategy minimizing the error probability, for distinguishing between collections of quantum states. We present a sufficient condition concerning the rank of each detection operator of an optimal measurement for the Bayes criterion. We also derive an analytical expression for an optimal measurement for the Bayes criterion for an Abelian geometrically uniform state set or for a cyclic state set under a certain constraint.

Physical Review A•Dec 6, 2012•5 citations

Data Processing Inequality for The Quantum Guesswork

Ilyass Mejdoub, Julien Béguinot, Olivier Rioul

Non-orthogonal quantum states pose a fundamental challenge in quantum information processing, as they cannot be distinguished with absolute certainty. Conventionally, the focus has been on minimizing error probability in quantum state discrimination tasks. However, another criterion known as quantum guesswork has emerged as a crucial measure in assessing the distinguishability of non-orthogonal quantum states, when we are allowed to query a sequence of states. In this paper, we generalize well known properties in the classical setting that are relevant for the guessing problem. Specifically, we establish the pre and post Data Processing Inequalities. We also derive a more refined lower bound on quantum guesswork.

arXiv:2407.16012•Jul 22, 2024•0 citations

Minimum-error state discrimination and Fano's inequality

Georgios M. Nikolopoulos

The discrimination between non-orthogonal quantum states plays a pivotal role in quantum information processing and quantum technology. Strategies that minimize the error probability are of particular importance, but they are only known for special classes of problems. Certain forms of Fano's inequality yield a bound on the error probability, but it is not known how close this bound is to the minimum-error probability achieved by means of optimal measurements. In this work we discuss how the minimum-error probability compares to the error bound obtained through the Fano's inequality for several scenarios, some of which are amenable to analytic treatments.

arXiv:2505.10042•May 15, 2025•0 citations

Error probability is a popular and well-studied optimization criterion in discriminating non-orthogonal quantum states. It captures the threat from an adversary who can only query the actual state once. However, when the adversary is able to use a brute-force strategy to query the state, discrimination measurement with minimum error probability does not necessarily minimize the number of queries to get the actual state. In light of this, we take Massey's guesswork as the underlying optimization criterion and study the problem of minimum guesswork discrimination. We show that this problem can be reduced to a semidefinite programming problem. Necessary and sufficient conditions when a measurement achieves minimum guesswork are presented. We also reveal the relation between minimum guesswork and minimum error probability. We show that the two criteria generally disagree with each other, except for the special case with two states. Both upper and lower information-theoretic bounds on minimum guesswork are given. For geometrically uniform quantum states, we provide sufficient conditions when a measurement achieves minimum guesswork. Moreover, we give the necessary and sufficient condition under which making no measurement at all would be the optimal strategy.

The guesswork quantifies the minimum cost incurred in guessing the state of an ensemble, when only one state can be queried at a time. In the classical case, it is well known that the optimal strategy trivially consists of querying the states in their non-increasing order of posterior probability. In the quantum case, on the other hand, the most general strategy to obtain the optimal ordering in which to perform the queries consist of a quantum measurement. Here, we solve such an optimization problem by deriving the quantum measurement attaining the guesswork for a broad class of ensembles and cost functions.

We investigate the performance of discrimination strategy in the comparison task of known quantum states. In the discrimination strategy, one infers whether or not two quantum systems are in the same state on the basis of the outcomes of separate discrimination measurements on each system. In some cases with more than two possible states, the optimal strategy in minimum-error comparison is that one should infer the two systems are in different states without any measurement, implying that the discrimination strategy performs worse than the trivial ``no-measurement'' strategy. We present a sufficient condition for this phenomenon to happen. For two pure states with equal prior probabilities, we determine the optimal comparison success probability with an error margin, which interpolates the minimum-error and unambiguous comparison. We find that the discrimination strategy is not optimal except for the minimum-error case.

What is the minimum number of guesses needed on average to correctly guess a realization of a random variable? The answer to this question led to the introduction of the notion of a quantity called guesswork by Massey in 1994, which can be viewed as an alternate security criterion to entropy. In this paper, we consider guesswork in the presence of quantum side information, and show that a general sequential guessing strategy is equivalent to performing a single quantum measurement and choosing a guessing strategy based on the outcome. We use this result to deduce entropic one-shot and asymptotic bounds on the guesswork in the presence of quantum side information, and to formulate a semi-definite program (SDP) to calculate the quantity. We evaluate the guesswork for a simple example involving the BB84 states, and we prove a continuity result that certifies the security of slightly imperfect key states when the guesswork is used as the security criterion.

We derive the measurement strategy that optimizes the Bayes criterion, not necessarily the strategy minimizing the error probability, for distinguishing between collections of quantum states. We present a sufficient condition concerning the rank of each detection operator of an optimal measurement for the Bayes criterion. We also derive an analytical expression for an optimal measurement for the Bayes criterion for an Abelian geometrically uniform state set or for a cyclic state set under a certain constraint.

Non-orthogonal quantum states pose a fundamental challenge in quantum information processing, as they cannot be distinguished with absolute certainty. Conventionally, the focus has been on minimizing error probability in quantum state discrimination tasks. However, another criterion known as quantum guesswork has emerged as a crucial measure in assessing the distinguishability of non-orthogonal quantum states, when we are allowed to query a sequence of states. In this paper, we generalize well known properties in the classical setting that are relevant for the guessing problem. Specifically, we establish the pre and post Data Processing Inequalities. We also derive a more refined lower bound on quantum guesswork.

The discrimination between non-orthogonal quantum states plays a pivotal role in quantum information processing and quantum technology. Strategies that minimize the error probability are of particular importance, but they are only known for special classes of problems. Certain forms of Fano's inequality yield a bound on the error probability, but it is not known how close this bound is to the minimum-error probability achieved by means of optimal measurements. In this work we discuss how the minimum-error probability compares to the error bound obtained through the Fano's inequality for several scenarios, some of which are amenable to analytic treatments.