Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1410.0916 · Physical Review A

Quantum theory of angle and relative-phase measurement

Scott Roger Shepard

Published Dec 12, 2014• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The complementarity between time and energy, as well as between an angle and a component of angular momentum, is described at three different layers of understanding. The phenomena of super-resolution are readily apparent in the quantum phase representation which also reveals that entanglement is not required. We modify Schwinger's harmonic oscillator model of angular momentum to include the case of photons. Therein, the quantum angle measurement is shown to be equivalent to the measurement of the relative phase between the two oscillators. Two reasonable ways of dealing with degeneracy are shown to correspond to a conditional measurement which takes a snapshot in absolute time (corresponding to adding probability amplitudes) and a marginal measurement which takes an average in absolute time (corresponding to adding probabilities). The sense in which distinguishability is a ``matter of how long we look'' is discussed and the meaning of the general theory is illustrated by taking the two oscillators to be circularly polarized photons. It is shown that an odd number of $x$-polarized photons will never have an angle in correspondence with the $y$ axis, but an even number of $x$-polarized photons always can! The behavior of an $x$-polarized coherent state is examined and the snapshot angular distributions are seen to evolve into two counter-rotating peaks resulting in considerable correspondence with the $y$ axis at the time for which a classical linear polarization vector would shrink to zero length. We also demonstrate how the probability distribution of absolute time (herein a measurable quantity, rather than just a parameter) has an influence on how these snapshot angular distributions evolve into a quantum version of the polarization ellipse.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.90.062117

Related papers

Towards an experimental demonstration of some novel qubit behavior

Scott Roger Shepard

We show that the quantum angle measurement for x-polarized photon number states results in an angle which will never correspond to the y-axis for an odd number of photons; yet for an even number of photons it always can. The analogy of this surprising effect for other particles or ions (qubits in their spin up state) is presented and we show why such an effect cannot be observed in a standard SU(2) interferometer. The quantum phase representation of such an interferometer provides clues as to how its apparatus might be modified in order to demonstrate these phenomena. The same representation is then used to provide insight on the range and sensitivity that one can expect from quantum phase statistical inference algorithms which can surpass the Heisenberg limit.

arXiv:1511.09447•Nov 30, 2015•0 citations

Phase-space measurements and decoherence for angular momentum systems

Dorje C. Brody, Eva-Maria Graefe, Rishindra Melanathuru

The monitoring of the three independent components of the angular momentum (or spin) of a quantum system by its environment that does not isolate any preferred orientation is modelled in two different ways. One describes the dynamics by the Lindblad equation generated by three independent angular momentum operators. The other uses iterated measurements of the ``phase-space'' point on the sphere in terms of the positive operator-valued measure generated by SU(2) coherent states. In contrast to the equivalent scenario on a flat phase space, these two models give rise to subtle differences. Specifically, it is shown that the two super-operators corresponding to the two decoherence models for angular momentum systems are commutative, but their eigenvalues are different. Hence although both models give rise to phase-space decoherence, their dynamical behaviours are not equivalent. In either model, we find that the characterisation of classicality as represented by the decay rates of the elements of the density matrix (i.e. decoherence) and that as represented by the positivity of the quasiprobability distribution are not equivalent for angular momentum systems.

quant-pharXiv:2605.02696•May 5, 2026•0 citations

Quantum formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum

Jörg B. Götte, Stephen Mark Barnett

The quantum mechanical description of the azimuthal rotation angle and the orbital angular momentum around the polar axis differs greatly from the description of position and momentum. This has led to a controversy over the existence of a self-adjoint angle operator in the literature. It is possible to circumvent the problems of defining a self-adjoint operator for a periodic variable by using trigonometric functions of operators as a basis for the quantum mechanical description. This approach, however, does not allow us to study the properties of the angle operator itself. By using a state space of an arbitrarily large yet finite number of dimensions, it is possible to introduce angle and orbital angular momentum as a conjugate pair of variables both represented by Hermitian matrices. After physical and measurable quantities have been calculated in this state space the number of dimensions is allowed to tend to infinity in a limiting procedure. The first part of this chapter reviews the difficulties associated with the quantum mechanical formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum and presents a way to overcome these problems using a finite-dimensional state space. In the second part this formulation is generalised to include the phenomenon of non-integer orbital angular momentum. This part is based on a chapter of the PhD thesis of Götte [1], where further details may be found. Introduction The correct description of a periodic variable such as a rotation angle or the optical phase has been a long standing problem in quantum mechanics. At the root of the problem is the question of whether the variable itself is restricted in a 2 π radian range or whether it evolves continuously without bound.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 8, 2012•2 citations

A classical, elementary approach to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics

David Rodríguez

Elementary particles are found in two different situations: (i) bound to metastable states of matter, for which angular momentum is quantized, and (ii) free, for which, due to their high energy-momentum and leaving aside inner a.m. or spin, the $h$-quantization step is completely harmless. Perhaps Quantum Mechanics can be seen just as the simplest mathematical formalism where angular momentum (the magnitude of each of its three orthogonal projections) is by construction quantized: all possible values are taken from a discrete set. Indeed: (i) This idea finds support in very reasonable, completely classical physical arguments, if we place ourselves in the framework of Stochastic Electrodynamics (SED): there, all sustained periodic movement of a charge must satisfy a power balance that restricts the value of the average angular momentum, on each of its projections. (ii) It gives a natural explanation of the concept of "photon", as a constraint on the observable spectrum of energy-momentum exchanges between metastable physical states, in particular also for its discreteness. QM would be, in this picture, a semi-static theory, transparent to all the (micro)-dynamics taking place between apparently "discrete" events (transitions in the state of the system). For instance, (the magnitude of the projections of) quantum angular momentum would only reflect average values over a (classical) cyclic trajectory, a fact that we regard as almost obvious given the particularity of the corresponding addition rules in QM.

arXiv:1112.3369•Dec 13, 2011•0 citations

The phase angle of the photon's angular momentum locally determines the spin measurements and entanglement.

Rolando Nanu

Explanation of spin and coincidence measurements between entangled photons using an additional variable λ that makes the measurements local and deterministic and predicts the same outcome as in quantum mechanics. Proof of the invalidity of Bell's theorem for all local theories. Proposal of new measures.

•May 4, 2025•0 citations

Path distributions for describing eigenstates of orbital angular momentum

Randall M. Feenstra

The manner in which probability amplitudes of paths sum up to form wave functions of orbital angular momentum eigenstates is described. Using a generalization of stationary-phase analysis, distributions are derived that provide a measure of how paths contribute towards any given eigenstate. In the limit of long travel-time, these distributions turn out to be real-valued, non-negative functions of a momentum variable that describes classical travel between the endpoints of a path (with the paths explicitly including nonclassical ones, described in terms of elastica). The distributions are functions of both this characteristic momentum as well as a polar angle that provides a tilt, relative to the z-axis of the chosen coordinate system, of the geodesic that connects the endpoints. The resulting description provides a replacement for the well-known "vector model" for describing orbital angular momentum, and importantly, it includes treatment of the case when the quantum number $\ell$ is zero (i.e., s-states).

arXiv:2308.02884•Aug 5, 2023•0 citations
The complementarity between time and energy, as well as between an angle and a component of angular momentum, is described at three different layers of understanding. The phenomena of super-resolution are readily apparent in the quantum phase representation which also reveals that entanglement is not required. We modify Schwinger's harmonic oscillator model of angular momentum to include the case of photons. Therein, the quantum angle measurement is shown to be equivalent to the measurement of the relative phase between the two oscillators. Two reasonable ways of dealing with degeneracy are shown to correspond to a conditional measurement which takes a snapshot in absolute time (corresponding to adding probability amplitudes) and a marginal measurement which takes an average in absolute time (corresponding to adding probabilities). The sense in which distinguishability is a ``matter of how long we look'' is discussed and the meaning of the general theory is illustrated by taking the two oscillators to be circularly polarized photons. It is shown that an odd number of xxx-polarized photons will never have an angle in correspondence with the yyy axis, but an even number of xxx-polarized photons always can! The behavior of an xxx-polarized coherent state is examined and the snapshot angular distributions are seen to evolve into two counter-rotating peaks resulting in considerable correspondence with the yyy axis at the time for which a classical linear polarization vector would shrink to zero length. We also demonstrate how the probability distribution of absolute time (herein a measurable quantity, rather than just a parameter) has an influence on how these snapshot angular distributions evolve into a quantum version of the polarization ellipse.
We show that the quantum angle measurement for x-polarized photon number states results in an angle which will never correspond to the y-axis for an odd number of photons; yet for an even number of photons it always can. The analogy of this surprising effect for other particles or ions (qubits in their spin up state) is presented and we show why such an effect cannot be observed in a standard SU(2) interferometer. The quantum phase representation of such an interferometer provides clues as to how its apparatus might be modified in order to demonstrate these phenomena. The same representation is then used to provide insight on the range and sensitivity that one can expect from quantum phase statistical inference algorithms which can surpass the Heisenberg limit.
The monitoring of the three independent components of the angular momentum (or spin) of a quantum system by its environment that does not isolate any preferred orientation is modelled in two different ways. One describes the dynamics by the Lindblad equation generated by three independent angular momentum operators. The other uses iterated measurements of the ``phase-space'' point on the sphere in terms of the positive operator-valued measure generated by SU(2) coherent states. In contrast to the equivalent scenario on a flat phase space, these two models give rise to subtle differences. Specifically, it is shown that the two super-operators corresponding to the two decoherence models for angular momentum systems are commutative, but their eigenvalues are different. Hence although both models give rise to phase-space decoherence, their dynamical behaviours are not equivalent. In either model, we find that the characterisation of classicality as represented by the decay rates of the elements of the density matrix (i.e. decoherence) and that as represented by the positivity of the quasiprobability distribution are not equivalent for angular momentum systems.
The quantum mechanical description of the azimuthal rotation angle and the orbital angular momentum around the polar axis differs greatly from the description of position and momentum. This has led to a controversy over the existence of a self-adjoint angle operator in the literature. It is possible to circumvent the problems of defining a self-adjoint operator for a periodic variable by using trigonometric functions of operators as a basis for the quantum mechanical description. This approach, however, does not allow us to study the properties of the angle operator itself. By using a state space of an arbitrarily large yet finite number of dimensions, it is possible to introduce angle and orbital angular momentum as a conjugate pair of variables both represented by Hermitian matrices. After physical and measurable quantities have been calculated in this state space the number of dimensions is allowed to tend to infinity in a limiting procedure. The first part of this chapter reviews the difficulties associated with the quantum mechanical formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum and presents a way to overcome these problems using a finite-dimensional state space. In the second part this formulation is generalised to include the phenomenon of non-integer orbital angular momentum. This part is based on a chapter of the PhD thesis of Götte [1], where further details may be found. Introduction The correct description of a periodic variable such as a rotation angle or the optical phase has been a long standing problem in quantum mechanics. At the root of the problem is the question of whether the variable itself is restricted in a 2 π radian range or whether it evolves continuously without bound.
Elementary particles are found in two different situations: (i) bound to metastable states of matter, for which angular momentum is quantized, and (ii) free, for which, due to their high energy-momentum and leaving aside inner a.m. or spin, the hhh-quantization step is completely harmless. Perhaps Quantum Mechanics can be seen just as the simplest mathematical formalism where angular momentum (the magnitude of each of its three orthogonal projections) is by construction quantized: all possible values are taken from a discrete set. Indeed: (i) This idea finds support in very reasonable, completely classical physical arguments, if we place ourselves in the framework of Stochastic Electrodynamics (SED): there, all sustained periodic movement of a charge must satisfy a power balance that restricts the value of the average angular momentum, on each of its projections. (ii) It gives a natural explanation of the concept of "photon", as a constraint on the observable spectrum of energy-momentum exchanges between metastable physical states, in particular also for its discreteness. QM would be, in this picture, a semi-static theory, transparent to all the (micro)-dynamics taking place between apparently "discrete" events (transitions in the state of the system). For instance, (the magnitude of the projections of) quantum angular momentum would only reflect average values over a (classical) cyclic trajectory, a fact that we regard as almost obvious given the particularity of the corresponding addition rules in QM.
The manner in which probability amplitudes of paths sum up to form wave functions of orbital angular momentum eigenstates is described. Using a generalization of stationary-phase analysis, distributions are derived that provide a measure of how paths contribute towards any given eigenstate. In the limit of long travel-time, these distributions turn out to be real-valued, non-negative functions of a momentum variable that describes classical travel between the endpoints of a path (with the paths explicitly including nonclassical ones, described in terms of elastica). The distributions are functions of both this characteristic momentum as well as a polar angle that provides a tilt, relative to the z-axis of the chosen coordinate system, of the geodesic that connects the endpoints. The resulting description provides a replacement for the well-known "vector model" for describing orbital angular momentum, and importantly, it includes treatment of the case when the quantum number ℓ\ellℓ is zero (i.e., s-states).