Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1409.6386 · Physical Review E

Comparative study of the performance of quantum annealing and simulated annealing

Hidetoshi Nishimori, Junichi Tsuda, Sergey Knysh

Published Jan 6, 2015• 30 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Relations of simulated annealing and quantum annealing are studied by a mapping from the transition matrix of classical Markovian dynamics of the Ising model to a quantum Hamiltonian and vice versa. It is shown that these two operators, the transition matrix and the Hamiltonian, share the eigenvalue spectrum. Thus, if simulated annealing with slow temperature change does not encounter a difficulty caused by an exponentially long relaxation time at a first-order phase transition, the same is true for the corresponding process of quantum annealing in the adiabatic limit. One of the important differences between the classical-to-quantum mapping and the converse quantum-to-classical mapping is that the Markovian dynamics of a short-range Ising model is mapped to a short-range quantum system, but the converse mapping from a short-range quantum system to a classical one results in long-range interactions. This leads to a difference in efficiencies that simulated annealing can be efficiently simulated by quantum annealing but the converse is not necessarily true. We conclude that quantum annealing is easier to implement and is more flexible than simulated annealing. We also point out that the present mapping can be extended to accommodate explicit time dependence of temperature, which is used to justify the quantum-mechanical analysis of simulated annealing by Somma, Batista, and Ortiz. Additionally, an alternative method to solve the nonequilibrium dynamics of the one-dimensional Ising model is provided through the classical-to-quantum mapping.

DOI
10.1103/physreve.91.012104

Related papers

Relation of classical non-equilibrium dynamics and quantum annealing

Hidetoshi Nishimori

Non-equilibrium dynamics of the Ising model is a classical stochastic process whereas quantum mechanics has no stochastic elements in the classical sense. Nevertheless, it has been known that there exists a close formal relationship between these two processes. We reformulate this relationship and use it to compare the efficiency of simulated annealing that uses classical stochastic processes and quantum annealing to solve combinatorial optimization problems. It is shown that classical dynamics can be efficiently simulated by quantum- mechanical processes whereas the converse is not necessarily true. This may imply that quantum annealing may be regarded as a more powerful tool than simulated annealing for optimization problems.

arXiv:1503.02127•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Sep 3, 2015•1 citation

Direct comparison of quantum and simulated annealing on a fully connected Ising ferromagnet

Matteo M. Wauters, Rosario Fazio, Hidetoshi Nishimori +1 more

We compare the performance of quantum annealing (QA, through Schr\"odinger dynamics) and simulated annealing (SA, through a classical master equation) on the $p$-spin infinite range ferromagnetic Ising model, by slowly driving the system across its equilibrium, quantum or classical, phase transition. When the phase transition is second order ($p=2$, the familiar two-spin Ising interaction) SA shows a remarkable exponential speed-up over QA. For a first-order phase transition ($p\ensuremath{\ge}3$, i.e., with multispin Ising interactions), in contrast, the classical annealing dynamics appears to remain stuck in the disordered phase, while we have clear evidence that QA shows a residual energy which decreases towards zero when the total annealing time $\ensuremath{\tau}$ increases, albeit in a rather slow (logarithmic) fashion. This is one of the rare examples where a limited quantum speedup, a speedup by QA over SA, has been shown to exist by direct solutions of the Schr\"odinger and master equations in combination with a nonequilibrium Landau-Zener analysis. We also analyze the imaginary-time QA dynamics of the model, finding a $1/{\ensuremath{\tau}}^{2}$ behavior for all finite values of $p$, as predicted by the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics. The Grover-search limit $p(\mathrm{odd})=\ensuremath{\infty}$ is also discussed.

arXiv:1707.02621•Physical Review A•Aug 29, 2017•28 citations

Quantum versus Classical Annealing: Insights from Scaling Theory and Results for Spin Glasses on 3-Regular Graphs

Chengwei Liu, Anatoli Polkovnikov, Anders W. Sandvik

We discuss an Ising spin glass where each S=1/2 spin is coupled antiferromagnetically to three other spins (3-regular graphs). Inducing quantum fluctuations by a time-dependent transverse field, we use out-of-equilibrium quantum Monte Carlo simulations to study dynamic scaling at the quantum glass transition. Comparing the dynamic exponent and other critical exponents with those of the classical (temperature-driven) transition, we conclude that quantum annealing is less efficient than classical simulated annealing in bringing the system into the glass phase. Quantum computing based on the quantum annealing paradigm is therefore inferior to classical simulated annealing for this class of problems. We also comment on previous simulations where a parameter is changed with the simulation time, which is very different from the true Hamiltonian dynamics simulated here.

arXiv:1409.7192•Physical Review Letters•Apr 7, 2015•55 citations

Adiabatic Approximation for the Imaginary-Time Schrödinger Equation and Its Application to Simulated Annealing

Kazuya Kaneko, Hidetoshi Nishimori

We formulate an adiabatic approximation for the imaginary-time Schroedinger equation. The obtained adiabatic condition consists of two inequalities, one of which coincides with the conventional adiabatic condition for the real-time Schroedinger equation, but the other does not. We apply this adiabatic approximation to the analysis of Markovian dynamics of the classical Ising model, which can be formulated as the imaginary-time Schrödinger equation, to obtain an asymptotic formula for the probability that the system reaches the ground state in the limit of a long annealing time in simulated annealing. Using this form, we amend the theory of Somma, Batista, and Ortiz for a convergence condition for simulated annealing.

arXiv:1504.00425•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Aug 5, 2015•7 citations

Convergence of Quantum Annealing with Real-Time Schrödinger Dynamics

Satoshi Morita, Hidetoshi Nishimori

Convergence conditions for quantum annealing are derived for optimization problems represented by the Ising model of a general form. Quantum fluctuations are introduced as a transverse field and/or transverse ferromagnetic interactions, and the time evolution follows the real-time Schrodinger equation. It is shown that the system stays arbitrarily close to the instantaneous ground state, finally reaching the target optimal state, if the strength of quantum fluctuations decreases sufficiently slowly, in particular inversely proportionally to the power of time in the asymptotic region. This is the same condition as the other implementations of quantum annealing, quantum Monte Carlo and Green's function Monte Carlo simulations, in spite of the essential difference in the type of dynamics. The method of analysis is an application of the adiabatic theorem in conjunction with an estimate of a lower bound of the energy gap based on the recently proposed idea of Somma et. al. for the analysis of classical simulated annealing using a classical-quantum correspondence.

arXiv:quant-ph/0702252•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 25, 2007•41 citations

Best Annealing Path of Quantum Annealing via Efficient Adiabatic Phase Transition

Kiyotaka Murashima

Quantum Annealing (QA) has already put into practical use and considered useful for solving many social issues, such as reduction of traffic congestion and delivery optimization. But in QA, when the energy difference between the ground state and the first excited state is small, the transition probability between them increases. Therefore, in order to decrease the transition, QA has to be performed at extremely low temperatures. To simulate the situation, it has the problem in that it takes much time. Many studies are underway to accelerate QA theoretically, one of which is to incorporate non-stoquastic Hamiltonian. On the other hand, I proposed Nested Simulated Annealing (NSA) inspired by Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). I showed the computational speedup could be achieved dramatically, by considering the idea that the effect of flipping a spin preferentially influenced the spins directly interacting with it. Although NSA was based on such classical concept of causality, the hybrid computation both quantum and classical approach worked well. In this paper, in order to discuss the relationship between NSA and non-stoquastic Hamiltonian like XX-interaction, the spins are treated as continuous variables. I derive the formula to calculate the total energy in both with a problem Hamiltonian and the perturbation Hamiltonian induced by a transverse electromagnetic field. And I will show a clear relationship between local-maxima and the convergence speed when calculating it with the binary spin. More precisely, the annealing path with the smallest local-maxima converges fast, even though it consumes fewer computational resources. Therefore, it is possible to induce an optimal adiabatic phase transition by selecting NSA parameters appropriately. This paper shows an effective method to choose the parameters when simulating QMC on a classical computer.

quant-pharXiv:2608.30282•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations
Relations of simulated annealing and quantum annealing are studied by a mapping from the transition matrix of classical Markovian dynamics of the Ising model to a quantum Hamiltonian and vice versa. It is shown that these two operators, the transition matrix and the Hamiltonian, share the eigenvalue spectrum. Thus, if simulated annealing with slow temperature change does not encounter a difficulty caused by an exponentially long relaxation time at a first-order phase transition, the same is true for the corresponding process of quantum annealing in the adiabatic limit. One of the important differences between the classical-to-quantum mapping and the converse quantum-to-classical mapping is that the Markovian dynamics of a short-range Ising model is mapped to a short-range quantum system, but the converse mapping from a short-range quantum system to a classical one results in long-range interactions. This leads to a difference in efficiencies that simulated annealing can be efficiently simulated by quantum annealing but the converse is not necessarily true. We conclude that quantum annealing is easier to implement and is more flexible than simulated annealing. We also point out that the present mapping can be extended to accommodate explicit time dependence of temperature, which is used to justify the quantum-mechanical analysis of simulated annealing by Somma, Batista, and Ortiz. Additionally, an alternative method to solve the nonequilibrium dynamics of the one-dimensional Ising model is provided through the classical-to-quantum mapping.
Non-equilibrium dynamics of the Ising model is a classical stochastic process whereas quantum mechanics has no stochastic elements in the classical sense. Nevertheless, it has been known that there exists a close formal relationship between these two processes. We reformulate this relationship and use it to compare the efficiency of simulated annealing that uses classical stochastic processes and quantum annealing to solve combinatorial optimization problems. It is shown that classical dynamics can be efficiently simulated by quantum- mechanical processes whereas the converse is not necessarily true. This may imply that quantum annealing may be regarded as a more powerful tool than simulated annealing for optimization problems.
We compare the performance of quantum annealing (QA, through Schr\"odinger dynamics) and simulated annealing (SA, through a classical master equation) on the ppp-spin infinite range ferromagnetic Ising model, by slowly driving the system across its equilibrium, quantum or classical, phase transition. When the phase transition is second order (p=2p=2p=2, the familiar two-spin Ising interaction) SA shows a remarkable exponential speed-up over QA. For a first-order phase transition ($p\ensuremath{\ge}3$, i.e., with multispin Ising interactions), in contrast, the classical annealing dynamics appears to remain stuck in the disordered phase, while we have clear evidence that QA shows a residual energy which decreases towards zero when the total annealing time $\ensuremath{\tau}$ increases, albeit in a rather slow (logarithmic) fashion. This is one of the rare examples where a limited quantum speedup, a speedup by QA over SA, has been shown to exist by direct solutions of the Schr\"odinger and master equations in combination with a nonequilibrium Landau-Zener analysis. We also analyze the imaginary-time QA dynamics of the model, finding a $1/{\ensuremath{\tau}}^{2}$ behavior for all finite values of ppp, as predicted by the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics. The Grover-search limit $p(\mathrm{odd})=\ensuremath{\infty}$ is also discussed.
We discuss an Ising spin glass where each S=1/2 spin is coupled antiferromagnetically to three other spins (3-regular graphs). Inducing quantum fluctuations by a time-dependent transverse field, we use out-of-equilibrium quantum Monte Carlo simulations to study dynamic scaling at the quantum glass transition. Comparing the dynamic exponent and other critical exponents with those of the classical (temperature-driven) transition, we conclude that quantum annealing is less efficient than classical simulated annealing in bringing the system into the glass phase. Quantum computing based on the quantum annealing paradigm is therefore inferior to classical simulated annealing for this class of problems. We also comment on previous simulations where a parameter is changed with the simulation time, which is very different from the true Hamiltonian dynamics simulated here.
We formulate an adiabatic approximation for the imaginary-time Schroedinger equation. The obtained adiabatic condition consists of two inequalities, one of which coincides with the conventional adiabatic condition for the real-time Schroedinger equation, but the other does not. We apply this adiabatic approximation to the analysis of Markovian dynamics of the classical Ising model, which can be formulated as the imaginary-time Schrödinger equation, to obtain an asymptotic formula for the probability that the system reaches the ground state in the limit of a long annealing time in simulated annealing. Using this form, we amend the theory of Somma, Batista, and Ortiz for a convergence condition for simulated annealing.
Convergence conditions for quantum annealing are derived for optimization problems represented by the Ising model of a general form. Quantum fluctuations are introduced as a transverse field and/or transverse ferromagnetic interactions, and the time evolution follows the real-time Schrodinger equation. It is shown that the system stays arbitrarily close to the instantaneous ground state, finally reaching the target optimal state, if the strength of quantum fluctuations decreases sufficiently slowly, in particular inversely proportionally to the power of time in the asymptotic region. This is the same condition as the other implementations of quantum annealing, quantum Monte Carlo and Green's function Monte Carlo simulations, in spite of the essential difference in the type of dynamics. The method of analysis is an application of the adiabatic theorem in conjunction with an estimate of a lower bound of the energy gap based on the recently proposed idea of Somma et. al. for the analysis of classical simulated annealing using a classical-quantum correspondence.
Quantum Annealing (QA) has already put into practical use and considered useful for solving many social issues, such as reduction of traffic congestion and delivery optimization. But in QA, when the energy difference between the ground state and the first excited state is small, the transition probability between them increases. Therefore, in order to decrease the transition, QA has to be performed at extremely low temperatures. To simulate the situation, it has the problem in that it takes much time. Many studies are underway to accelerate QA theoretically, one of which is to incorporate non-stoquastic Hamiltonian. On the other hand, I proposed Nested Simulated Annealing (NSA) inspired by Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). I showed the computational speedup could be achieved dramatically, by considering the idea that the effect of flipping a spin preferentially influenced the spins directly interacting with it. Although NSA was based on such classical concept of causality, the hybrid computation both quantum and classical approach worked well. In this paper, in order to discuss the relationship between NSA and non-stoquastic Hamiltonian like XX-interaction, the spins are treated as continuous variables. I derive the formula to calculate the total energy in both with a problem Hamiltonian and the perturbation Hamiltonian induced by a transverse electromagnetic field. And I will show a clear relationship between local-maxima and the convergence speed when calculating it with the binary spin. More precisely, the annealing path with the smallest local-maxima converges fast, even though it consumes fewer computational resources. Therefore, it is possible to induce an optimal adiabatic phase transition by selecting NSA parameters appropriately. This paper shows an effective method to choose the parameters when simulating QMC on a classical computer.