Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1408.1721

Statistical approach to quantum mechanics II: Nonrelativistic spin

G. H. Goedecke

Published Aug 7, 2014• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this second paper in a series, we show that the the general statistical approach to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics developed in the first paper yields a representation of quantum spin and magnetic moments based on classical nonrelativistic spinning top models, using Euler angle coordinates. The models allow half-odd-integer spin and predict supraluminal speeds only for electrons and other leptons, which must be treated relativistically. The spin operators in the space-fixed frame satisfy the usual commutation rules, while those in the rotating body-fixed frame satisfy "left-handed" rules. The commutation rules are independent of the structure of the top, so all nonrelativistic rigidly rotating objects must have integer or odd-half-integer spin. Physical boundary conditions restrict all mixed spin states to involve only half-odd-integer or only integer spin eigenstates. For spin 1/2, the theory automatically yields a modified Pauli-Schrödinger equation. The Hamiltonian operator in this equation contains a rigid rotator term and a term involving the square of the magmetic field, as well as an interaction term having the usual form in spherically symmetric and some cylindrically symmetric models, valid for any magnetogyric ratio.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1408.1721

Related papers

Statistical Wave Equation for Nonrelativistic Rigid Body Motions

G. H. Goedecke

In this work, the general nonrelativistic classical statistical theory presented in an earlier paper (J. Mod. Phys. 8, 786 (2017)) is applied in detail to the Euler angle and center-of-mass coordinates of an extended rigid body with arbitrary distributions of mass and electric charge. Results include the following: 1) The statistical theory spin angular momentum operators are independent of the body’s morphology; 2) These operators obey the usual quantum commutation rules in a non-rotating center-of-mass (CM) reference frame, but left-handed rules in a rotating body-fixed CM frame; 3) Physical boundary conditions on the Euler angle wavefunctions restrict all mixed spin wavefunctions to a superposition of half-odd-integer spin eigenstates only, or integer spin eigenstates only; 4) Spin s eigenfunctions are also Hamiltonian eigenfuctions only if at least two of the body’s principal moments of inertia are equal; 5) For a spin s body with nonzero charge density in a magnetic field, the theory automatically yields 2s+1 coupled wave equations, valid for any gyromagnetic ratio; and 6) For spin 1/2 the two coupled equations become a Pauli-Schrödinger equation, with the Pauli matrices appearing automatically in the interaction Hamiltonian.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Spin ½: the rigid rotator

Peter Holland

Classical dynamics of rigid bodies The difficulties in formulating the theory of spin ½ systems outlined at the end of the last chapter may be avoided if we start from a classical theory of rotation in which the translational and orientational coordinates enter on a symmetrical footing, and pass to the quantum theory via the standard canonical quantization procedure. The result is not simply the Pauli theory written in a different matrix representation but a more general physical theory which explicitly incorporates in the wave equation the extended character of the bodies considered, through moment-of-inertia-dependent terms. As expected, the spin ½ character of the wave is manifested through the dependence of the body motion on the total quantum state via quantum potential and torque terms. Spin is not usually approached from this angle in basic quantum mechanics texts so it is worthwhile to build up the theory from scratch (for a more rigorous treatment see Normand (1980) and for further details: Bopp & Haag (1950), Rosen (1951, 1984), van Winter (1954), Dankel (1970), Holland (1988a, b)). We begin by reviewing some basic results in the classical canonical theory of rigid body motion. Our treatment is confined to a rigid homogeneous sphere with moment of inertia I about any axis passing through its centre, where the centre of mass is located. The sphere carries a rigid charge and a magnetic moment. By Chasle's theorem an arbitrary displacement of a rigid body is composed of a translation together with a rotation about a line fixed in the body.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 13, 1993•0 citations

Statistical Description of Nonrelativistic Classical Systems

G. H. Goedecke

We prove that any nonrelativistic classical system must obey a statistical wave equation that is exactly the same as the Schrödinger equation for the system, including the usual “canonical quantization” and Hamiltonian operator, provided an unknown constant is set equal to . We show why the two equations must have exactly the same sets of solutions, whereby this classical statistical theory (CST) and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics may differ only in their interpretations of the same quantitative results. We identify some of the different interpretations. We show that the results also imply nonrelativistic Lagrangian classical mechanics and the associated Newtonian laws of motion. We prove that the CST applied to a nonrelativistic rigid rotator yields spin angular momentum operators that obey the quantum commutation rules and allow both integer and half-odd-integer spin. We also note that the CST applied to systems of identical massive particles is mathematically equivalent to nonrelativistic quantum field theory for those particles.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2017•2 citations

Proof of Spin-Statistics Theorem in Quantum Mechanics of Identical Particles

Takafumi Kita

A nonrelativistic proof of the spin-statistics theorem is given in terms of the field operators satisfying commutation and anticommutation relations, which are introduced here in the coordinate space as a means to build the permutation symmetry into the brackets of identical particles. An eigenvalue problem of a $π$-rotation for a product of two annihilation operators is combined with an analysis on its rotational property to prove the connection that the field operators for integral-spin and half-integral-spin particles obey the commutation and anticommutation relations, respectively.

quant-pharXiv:2512.12071•Dec 16, 2025•0 citations

Statistical approach to quantum mechanics I: General nonrelativistic theory

G. H. Goedecke

In this initial paper in a series, we first discuss why classical motions of small particles should be treated statistically. Then we show that any attempted statistical description of any nonrelativistic classical system inevitably yields the multi-coordinate Schrödinger equation, with its usual boundary conditions, as an essential statistical equation for the system. We derive the general "canonical quantization" rule, that the Hamiltonian operator must be the classical Hamiltonian in the $N$-dimensional metric configuration space defined by the classical kinetic energy of the system, with the classical conjugate momentum $N$-vector replaced by $-i\hbar$ times the vector gradient operator in that space. We obtain these results by using conservation of probability, general tensor calculus, the Madelung transform, the Ehrenfest theorem and/or the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, and comparison with results for the charged harmonic oscillator in stochastic electrodynamics. We also provide two illustrative examples and a discussion of how coordinate trajectories could be compatible with wave properties such as interference, diffraction, and tunneling.

arXiv:1408.1722•Aug 7, 2014•0 citations

Canonical group quantization, rotation generators, and quantum indistinguishability

Carlos Benavides, Andrés Fernando Reyes-Lega

Using the method of canonical group quantization, we construct the angular momentum operators associated to configuration spaces with the topology of (i) a sphere and (ii) a projective plane. In the first case, the angular momentum operators derived this way are the quantum version of Poincaré's vector, i.e., the physically correct angular momentum operators for an electron coupled to the field of a magnetic monopole. In the second case, the operators one obtains represent the angular momentum operators of a system of two indistinguishable spin zero quantum particles in three spatial dimensions. The relevance of the proposed formalism for the progress in our understanding of the spin–statistics connection in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is discussed. Introduction The connection between the spin of quantum particles and the statistics they obey is a remarkable example of a simply stated physical fact without the recognition of which many physical phenomena (ranging from the stability of matter and the electronic configuration of atoms to Bose–Einstein condensation and superconductivity) would not have an explanation. Nevertheless, the simplicity of the assertion “integer spin particles obey Bose statistics, and half-integer spin particles obey Fermi statistics” stands in bold contrast to its intricate physical origin. Indeed, Pauli's proof of the spin–statistics theorem [Pau40] (improving on earlier work by Fierz [Fie39]), showed that the spin–statistics connection was deeply rooted in relativistic quantum field theory. The path to a rigorous proof of this theorem (from the mathematical point of view) was a long one and involved the efforts of many people (see, e.g., the book by Duck and Sudarshan [DS98b]).

arXiv:0806.2449•Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 2010•2 citations
In this second paper in a series, we show that the the general statistical approach to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics developed in the first paper yields a representation of quantum spin and magnetic moments based on classical nonrelativistic spinning top models, using Euler angle coordinates. The models allow half-odd-integer spin and predict supraluminal speeds only for electrons and other leptons, which must be treated relativistically. The spin operators in the space-fixed frame satisfy the usual commutation rules, while those in the rotating body-fixed frame satisfy "left-handed" rules. The commutation rules are independent of the structure of the top, so all nonrelativistic rigidly rotating objects must have integer or odd-half-integer spin. Physical boundary conditions restrict all mixed spin states to involve only half-odd-integer or only integer spin eigenstates. For spin 1/2, the theory automatically yields a modified Pauli-Schrödinger equation. The Hamiltonian operator in this equation contains a rigid rotator term and a term involving the square of the magmetic field, as well as an interaction term having the usual form in spherically symmetric and some cylindrically symmetric models, valid for any magnetogyric ratio.
In this work, the general nonrelativistic classical statistical theory presented in an earlier paper (J. Mod. Phys. 8, 786 (2017)) is applied in detail to the Euler angle and center-of-mass coordinates of an extended rigid body with arbitrary distributions of mass and electric charge. Results include the following: 1) The statistical theory spin angular momentum operators are independent of the body’s morphology; 2) These operators obey the usual quantum commutation rules in a non-rotating center-of-mass (CM) reference frame, but left-handed rules in a rotating body-fixed CM frame; 3) Physical boundary conditions on the Euler angle wavefunctions restrict all mixed spin wavefunctions to a superposition of half-odd-integer spin eigenstates only, or integer spin eigenstates only; 4) Spin s eigenfunctions are also Hamiltonian eigenfuctions only if at least two of the body’s principal moments of inertia are equal; 5) For a spin s body with nonzero charge density in a magnetic field, the theory automatically yields 2s+1 coupled wave equations, valid for any gyromagnetic ratio; and 6) For spin 1/2 the two coupled equations become a Pauli-Schrödinger equation, with the Pauli matrices appearing automatically in the interaction Hamiltonian.
Classical dynamics of rigid bodies The difficulties in formulating the theory of spin ½ systems outlined at the end of the last chapter may be avoided if we start from a classical theory of rotation in which the translational and orientational coordinates enter on a symmetrical footing, and pass to the quantum theory via the standard canonical quantization procedure. The result is not simply the Pauli theory written in a different matrix representation but a more general physical theory which explicitly incorporates in the wave equation the extended character of the bodies considered, through moment-of-inertia-dependent terms. As expected, the spin ½ character of the wave is manifested through the dependence of the body motion on the total quantum state via quantum potential and torque terms. Spin is not usually approached from this angle in basic quantum mechanics texts so it is worthwhile to build up the theory from scratch (for a more rigorous treatment see Normand (1980) and for further details: Bopp & Haag (1950), Rosen (1951, 1984), van Winter (1954), Dankel (1970), Holland (1988a, b)). We begin by reviewing some basic results in the classical canonical theory of rigid body motion. Our treatment is confined to a rigid homogeneous sphere with moment of inertia I about any axis passing through its centre, where the centre of mass is located. The sphere carries a rigid charge and a magnetic moment. By Chasle's theorem an arbitrary displacement of a rigid body is composed of a translation together with a rotation about a line fixed in the body.
We prove that any nonrelativistic classical system must obey a statistical wave equation that is exactly the same as the Schrödinger equation for the system, including the usual “canonical quantization” and Hamiltonian operator, provided an unknown constant is set equal to . We show why the two equations must have exactly the same sets of solutions, whereby this classical statistical theory (CST) and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics may differ only in their interpretations of the same quantitative results. We identify some of the different interpretations. We show that the results also imply nonrelativistic Lagrangian classical mechanics and the associated Newtonian laws of motion. We prove that the CST applied to a nonrelativistic rigid rotator yields spin angular momentum operators that obey the quantum commutation rules and allow both integer and half-odd-integer spin. We also note that the CST applied to systems of identical massive particles is mathematically equivalent to nonrelativistic quantum field theory for those particles.
A nonrelativistic proof of the spin-statistics theorem is given in terms of the field operators satisfying commutation and anticommutation relations, which are introduced here in the coordinate space as a means to build the permutation symmetry into the brackets of identical particles. An eigenvalue problem of a πππ-rotation for a product of two annihilation operators is combined with an analysis on its rotational property to prove the connection that the field operators for integral-spin and half-integral-spin particles obey the commutation and anticommutation relations, respectively.
In this initial paper in a series, we first discuss why classical motions of small particles should be treated statistically. Then we show that any attempted statistical description of any nonrelativistic classical system inevitably yields the multi-coordinate Schrödinger equation, with its usual boundary conditions, as an essential statistical equation for the system. We derive the general "canonical quantization" rule, that the Hamiltonian operator must be the classical Hamiltonian in the NNN-dimensional metric configuration space defined by the classical kinetic energy of the system, with the classical conjugate momentum NNN-vector replaced by −iℏ-i\hbar−iℏ times the vector gradient operator in that space. We obtain these results by using conservation of probability, general tensor calculus, the Madelung transform, the Ehrenfest theorem and/or the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, and comparison with results for the charged harmonic oscillator in stochastic electrodynamics. We also provide two illustrative examples and a discussion of how coordinate trajectories could be compatible with wave properties such as interference, diffraction, and tunneling.
Using the method of canonical group quantization, we construct the angular momentum operators associated to configuration spaces with the topology of (i) a sphere and (ii) a projective plane. In the first case, the angular momentum operators derived this way are the quantum version of Poincaré's vector, i.e., the physically correct angular momentum operators for an electron coupled to the field of a magnetic monopole. In the second case, the operators one obtains represent the angular momentum operators of a system of two indistinguishable spin zero quantum particles in three spatial dimensions. The relevance of the proposed formalism for the progress in our understanding of the spin–statistics connection in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is discussed. Introduction The connection between the spin of quantum particles and the statistics they obey is a remarkable example of a simply stated physical fact without the recognition of which many physical phenomena (ranging from the stability of matter and the electronic configuration of atoms to Bose–Einstein condensation and superconductivity) would not have an explanation. Nevertheless, the simplicity of the assertion “integer spin particles obey Bose statistics, and half-integer spin particles obey Fermi statistics” stands in bold contrast to its intricate physical origin. Indeed, Pauli's proof of the spin–statistics theorem [Pau40] (improving on earlier work by Fierz [Fie39]), showed that the spin–statistics connection was deeply rooted in relativistic quantum field theory. The path to a rigorous proof of this theorem (from the mathematical point of view) was a long one and involved the efforts of many people (see, e.g., the book by Duck and Sudarshan [DS98b]).