Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1407.8459 · Journal of Physics Conference Series

The manifestly covariant Aharonov-Bohm effect in terms of the 4D fields

Tomislav Ivezić

Published May 14, 2015• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper it is presented a manifestly covariant formulation of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase difference for the magnetic AB effect. This covariant AB phase is written in terms of the Faraday 2-form F and using the decomposition of F in terms of the electric and magnetic fields as four-dimensional (4D) geometric quantities. It is shown that there is a static electric field outside a stationary solenoid with resistive conductor carrying steady current, which causes that the AB phase difference in the magnetic AB effect may be determined by the electric part of the covariant expression, i.e., by the local influence of the 4D electric field and not, as generally accepted, in terms of nonzero vector potential.

DOI
10.1088/1742-6596/615/1/012015

Related papers

The covariant, time-dependent Aharonov–Bohm effect

Douglas Singleton, Elias C. Vagenas

We discuss two possible covariant generalizations of the Aharonov–Bohm effect – one expression in terms of the space–time line integral of the four-vector potential and the other expression in terms of the space–time “area” integral of the electric and magnetic fields written in terms of the Faraday 2-form. These expressions allow one to calculate the Aharonov–Bohm effect for time-dependent situations. In particular, we use these expressions to study the case of an infinite solenoid with a time varying flux and find that the phase shift is zero due to a cancellation of the Aharonov–Bohm phase shift with a phase shift coming from the Lorentz force associated with the electric field, E=−∂tA, outside the solenoid. This result may already have been confirmed experimentally.

arXiv:1305.1498•Physics Letters B•May 9, 2013•45 citations

The Influence of the Electric Field Outside a Resistive Solenoid on The Aharonov-Bohm Effect

S Héctor Torres, André Koch Torres Assis

"It is a known fact that there is no magnetic field outside an infinite solenoid carrying a constant current, althoughthere is magnetic vector potential non-null outside it. The existence of the Aharonov-Bohm effect (AB) is usuallyconsidered as proof of the relevance of the vector potential for quantum mechanics. In this paper we will see that thereis a non null electric field outside an infinite resistive solenoid carrying a constant current and its possible relevanceto the analysis of the Aharonov-Bohm effect. When calculating, we introduce the Galilean invariance of Maxwell´sequations and then we obtain the contribution to the AB effect due to electric potential."

Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

On the role of induced electric field in the time-dependent Aharonov-Bohm effect

Masashi Wakamatsu

Whether the time-dependent Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect even exists or not has been the subject of long-standing debate. There are two factors complicating the problem. First, in the closed spacetime line integral of the vector potential that is thought to give the AB-phase shift, how to treat the time-varying vector potential is highly nontrivial. Second, the time-varying magnetic flux generates induced electric field even outside the solenoid. In the present paper, motivated by a recent work by Gao, we re-investigate the role of the induced electric field with the utmost care. This analysis reveals a highly nontrivial effect of the induced electric field, which turns out to be useful for verifying the very existence of the time-dependent AB-effect.

quant-pharXiv:2511.07775•Nov 12, 2025•0 citations

Electrodynamic Aharonov-Bohm effect

Pablo L. Saldanha

We propose an electrodynamic Aharonov-Bohm (AB) scheme where a nonzero AB phase difference appears even if the interferometer paths do not enclose a magnetic flux and are subjected to negligible scalar potential differences during the propagation of the quantum charged particle. In the proposal, the current in a solenoid outside the interferometer varies in time while the quantum particle is in a superposition state inside two Faraday cages, such that it is always subjected to negligible electromagnetic fields. At first glance, this result could challenge the topological nature of the AB effect. However, by considering the topology of the electromagnetic field configuration and the possible particle trajectories in spacetime, we demonstrate the topological nature of this situation.

arXiv:2302.14542•Physical Review A•Dec 22, 2023•7 citations

Comment on Macroscopic Test of the Aharonov-Bohm Effect

Tomislav Ivezić

In this Comment it is shown that it cannot be argued that in the magnetic AB effect there is no force acting on the particle, i.e., that the observed phase shift is entirely due to nonzero vector potential. In stationary resistive conductors carrying constant currents there are quasistatic surface charges, which generate not only the electric field inside the wire driving the current, but also a static electric field outside it. These external static electric fields have nothing to do with Boyer's force picture and with his result for the existence of a time delay.

arXiv:1407.4826•Jun 4, 2014•0 citations

Topological schemes in spacetime for the electrodynamic Aharonov-Bohm effect

Pablo L. Saldanha, Herman Batelaan

Abstract We consider different schemes for the electrodynamic Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect introduced in Saldanha P. L., Phys. Rev. A , 108 (2023) 062218, exploring the phenomenon to enhance the understanding of its topological nature in spacetime. In the treated examples, the electric current in a solenoid varies in time, changing its internal magnetic field and producing an external electric field, while a quantum charged particle is in a superposition state inside two Faraday cages in an interferometer. The Faraday cages cancel the electric field at their interiors, such that the particle is always subjected to null electromagnetic fields. We discuss how the AB phase difference depends on the topology of the electric and magnetic fields in spacetime in the different treated situations. In particular, we discuss interesting results when a conducting wire connects the two Faraday cages, with the AB phase depending on the wire position. We also show an amplification of the AB phase when the wire makes several turns around the solenoid, which could enable an experimental verification of the effect.

arXiv:2411.09622•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•May 1, 2025•1 citation
In this paper it is presented a manifestly covariant formulation of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase difference for the magnetic AB effect. This covariant AB phase is written in terms of the Faraday 2-form F and using the decomposition of F in terms of the electric and magnetic fields as four-dimensional (4D) geometric quantities. It is shown that there is a static electric field outside a stationary solenoid with resistive conductor carrying steady current, which causes that the AB phase difference in the magnetic AB effect may be determined by the electric part of the covariant expression, i.e., by the local influence of the 4D electric field and not, as generally accepted, in terms of nonzero vector potential.
We discuss two possible covariant generalizations of the Aharonov–Bohm effect – one expression in terms of the space–time line integral of the four-vector potential and the other expression in terms of the space–time “area” integral of the electric and magnetic fields written in terms of the Faraday 2-form. These expressions allow one to calculate the Aharonov–Bohm effect for time-dependent situations. In particular, we use these expressions to study the case of an infinite solenoid with a time varying flux and find that the phase shift is zero due to a cancellation of the Aharonov–Bohm phase shift with a phase shift coming from the Lorentz force associated with the electric field, E=−∂tA, outside the solenoid. This result may already have been confirmed experimentally.
"It is a known fact that there is no magnetic field outside an infinite solenoid carrying a constant current, althoughthere is magnetic vector potential non-null outside it. The existence of the Aharonov-Bohm effect (AB) is usuallyconsidered as proof of the relevance of the vector potential for quantum mechanics. In this paper we will see that thereis a non null electric field outside an infinite resistive solenoid carrying a constant current and its possible relevanceto the analysis of the Aharonov-Bohm effect. When calculating, we introduce the Galilean invariance of Maxwell´sequations and then we obtain the contribution to the AB effect due to electric potential."
Whether the time-dependent Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect even exists or not has been the subject of long-standing debate. There are two factors complicating the problem. First, in the closed spacetime line integral of the vector potential that is thought to give the AB-phase shift, how to treat the time-varying vector potential is highly nontrivial. Second, the time-varying magnetic flux generates induced electric field even outside the solenoid. In the present paper, motivated by a recent work by Gao, we re-investigate the role of the induced electric field with the utmost care. This analysis reveals a highly nontrivial effect of the induced electric field, which turns out to be useful for verifying the very existence of the time-dependent AB-effect.
We propose an electrodynamic Aharonov-Bohm (AB) scheme where a nonzero AB phase difference appears even if the interferometer paths do not enclose a magnetic flux and are subjected to negligible scalar potential differences during the propagation of the quantum charged particle. In the proposal, the current in a solenoid outside the interferometer varies in time while the quantum particle is in a superposition state inside two Faraday cages, such that it is always subjected to negligible electromagnetic fields. At first glance, this result could challenge the topological nature of the AB effect. However, by considering the topology of the electromagnetic field configuration and the possible particle trajectories in spacetime, we demonstrate the topological nature of this situation.
In this Comment it is shown that it cannot be argued that in the magnetic AB effect there is no force acting on the particle, i.e., that the observed phase shift is entirely due to nonzero vector potential. In stationary resistive conductors carrying constant currents there are quasistatic surface charges, which generate not only the electric field inside the wire driving the current, but also a static electric field outside it. These external static electric fields have nothing to do with Boyer's force picture and with his result for the existence of a time delay.
Abstract We consider different schemes for the electrodynamic Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect introduced in Saldanha P. L., Phys. Rev. A , 108 (2023) 062218, exploring the phenomenon to enhance the understanding of its topological nature in spacetime. In the treated examples, the electric current in a solenoid varies in time, changing its internal magnetic field and producing an external electric field, while a quantum charged particle is in a superposition state inside two Faraday cages in an interferometer. The Faraday cages cancel the electric field at their interiors, such that the particle is always subjected to null electromagnetic fields. We discuss how the AB phase difference depends on the topology of the electric and magnetic fields in spacetime in the different treated situations. In particular, we discuss interesting results when a conducting wire connects the two Faraday cages, with the AB phase depending on the wire position. We also show an amplification of the AB phase when the wire makes several turns around the solenoid, which could enable an experimental verification of the effect.