Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1405.5045 · Physical Science International Journal

Entropy and Temperature from Entangled Space and Time

Young S Kim

Published Jan 10, 2014• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Two coupled oscillators provide a mathematical instrument for solving many problems in modern physics, including squeezed states of light and Lorentz transformations of quantum bound states. The concept of entanglement can also be studied within this mathematical framework. For the system of two entangled photons, it is of interest to study what happens to the remaining photon if the other photon is not observed. It is pointed out that this problem is an issue of Feynman's rest of the universe. For quantum bound-state problems, it is pointed out the longitudinal and time-like coordinates become entangled when the system becomes boosted. Since time-like oscillations are not observed, the problem is exactly like the two-photon system where one of the photons is not observed. While the hadron is a quantum bound state of quarks, it appears quite differently when it moves rapidly than when it moves slowly. For slow hadrons, Gell-Mann's quark model is applicable, while Feynman's parton model is applicable to hadrons with their speeds close to that of light. While observing the temperature dependence of the speed, it is possible to explain the quark-to-parton transition as a phase transition.

DOI
10.9734/psij/2014/10336

Related papers

Entangled Harmonic Oscillators and Space-Time Entanglement

Sibel Başkal, Young Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

The mathematical basis for the Gaussian entanglement is discussed in detail, as well as its implications in the internal space-time structure of relativistic extended particles. It is shown that the Gaussian entanglement shares the same set of mathematical formulas with the harmonic oscillator in the Lorentz-covariant world. It is thus possible to transfer the concept of entanglement to the Lorentz-covariant picture of the bound state, which requires both space and time separations between two constituent particles. These space and time variables become entangled as the bound state moves with a relativistic speed. It is shown also that our inability to measure the time-separation variable leads to an entanglement entropy together with a rise in the temperature of the bound state. As was noted by Paul A. M. Dirac in 1963, the system of two oscillators contains the symmetries of the O ( 3 , 2 ) de Sitter group containing two O ( 3 , 1 ) Lorentz groups as its subgroups. Dirac noted also that the system contains the symmetry of the S p ( 4 ) group, which serves as the basic language for two-mode squeezed states. Since the S p ( 4 ) symmetry contains both rotations and squeezes, one interesting case is the combination of rotation and squeeze, resulting in a shear. While the current literature is mostly on the entanglement based on squeeze along the normal coordinates, the shear transformation is an interesting future possibility. The mathematical issues on this problem are clarified.

arXiv:1607.05785•Symmetry•Jun 28, 2016•13 citations

Entangled Harmonic Oscillators and Space-Time Entanglement

Sibel Başkal, Young Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

The mathematical basis for the Gaussian entanglement is discussed in detail, as well as its implications in the internal space-time structure of relativistic extended particles. It is shown that the Gaussian entanglement shares the same set of mathematical formulas with the harmonic oscillator in the Lorentz-covariant world. It is thus possible to transfer the concept of entanglement to the Lorentz-covariant picture of the bound state, which requires both space and time separations between two constituent particles. These space and time variables become entangled as the bound state moves with a relativistic speed. It is shown also that our inability to measure the time-separation variable leads to an entanglement entropy together with a rise in the temperature of the bound state. As was noted by Paul A. M. Dirac in 1963, the system of two oscillators contains the symmetries of the 𝑂(3,2) de Sitter group containing two 𝑂(3,1) Lorentz groups as its subgroups. Dirac noted also that the system contains the symmetry of the 𝑆𝑝(4) group, which serves as the basic language for two-mode squeezed states. Since the 𝑆𝑝(4) symmetry contains both rotations and squeezes, one interesting case is the combination of rotation and squeeze, resulting in a shear. While the current literature is mostly on the entanglement based on squeeze along the normal coordinates, the shear transformation is an interesting future possibility. The mathematical issues on this problem are clarified.

•Jan 1, 2016•12 citations

Coupled oscillators, entangled oscillators, and Lorentz-covariant harmonic oscillators

Y S Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

Other than scattering problems where perturbation theory is applicable, there are basically two ways to solve problems in physics. One is to reduce the problem to harmonic oscillators, and the other is to formulate the problem in terms of two-by-two matrices. If two oscillators are coupled, the problem combines both two-by-two matrices and harmonic oscillators. This method then becomes a powerful research tool to cover many different branches of physics. Indeed, the concept and methodology in one branch of physics can be translated into another through the common mathematical formalism. Coupled oscillators provide clear illustrative examples for some of the current issues in physics, including entanglement and Feynman's rest of the universe. In addition, it is noted that the present form of quantum mechanics is largely a physics of harmonic oscillators. Special relativity is the physics of the Lorentz group which can be represented by the group of two-by-two matrices commonly called $SL(2,c)$. Thus the coupled harmonic oscillators can play the role of combining quantum mechanics with special relativity. It is therefore possible to relate the current issues of physics to the Lorentz-covariant formulation of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502096•Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Nov 4, 2005•22 citations

Speculation on the Interplay of X and Time in Quantum Bound States

Francesco R. Ruggeri

In Newtonian mechanics, one often thinks in terms of x(t) i.e. an association between x and t. Although this is part of Newtonian mechanics, the notion of motion always being linked to time (and so an internal clock being required) is not always the case. For example, two particles with different masses and different velocities such that their momenta are the same may strike a target and reflect with the same magnitude of momenta. The impulse is 2p for both even though they have different speeds. One does not need to consider their speed to discuss the impulse change and so an external clock is not needed. This is further emphasized by the Lorentz invariant A = -Et+px which separates x and t as if they were independent variables (even though implicitly a speed exists in the problem i.e. v=dx/dt.). The point is that there exists a subset of physics (i.e. interactions) which is not dependent on velocity and hence the presence of a clock. The impulse hit discussed above is one example, but interference through 2 slits etc is another. Two quantum particles with the same momentum, but different rest masses and velocities produce the same interference patterns. A particle with momentum, however, has energy and so both time and space are running variables, but there are problems in which one considers p without a clock. Interestingly, even if one thinks in terms of impulses without using a clock, if there is an x interval between impulses then the notion of velocity comes into play even without an external clock because there will be more impulses imparted by a fixed p with a higher velocity than a lower one in the same fixed time period. Without using the idea of a clock, this give rise to the observable called pressure in classical physics, but is also present in a quantum bound state, we argue. Pressure in classical physics is proportional to temperature which in turn is proportional to energy (and a running time). In a quantum bound state, the equivalent to pressure (namely impulse hits with a potential) also require an energy viewpoint which is linked to running time i..e exp(-i En t) where En is the bound energy.

•Mar 28, 2023•0 citations

Entanglement as an Observer-Dependent Concept: An Application to Quantum Phase Transitions

Gerardo Ortíz, Rolando D. Somma, Howard Barnum +2 more

This paper addresses the following main question: Do we have a theoretical understanding of entanglement applicable to a full variety of physical settings? It is clear that not only the assumption of distinguishability, but also the few-subsystem scenario, are too narrow to embrace all possible physical settings. In particular, the need to go beyond the traditional subsystem-based framework becomes manifest when one tries to apply the conventional concept of entanglement to the physics of matter, since the constituents of a quantum many-body system are indistinguishable particles. We shall discuss here a notion of generalized entanglement, which can be applied to any operator language (fermions, bosons, spins, etc.) used to describe a physical system and which includes the conventional entanglement settings introduced to date in a unified fashion. This is realized by noticing that entanglement is an observer-dependent concept, whose properties are determined by the expectations of a distinguished set of observables without reference to a preferred subsystem decomposition, i.e., it depends on the physically relevant point of view. This viewpoint depends in turn upon the relationship between different sets of observables that determine our ability to control the system of interest. Indeed, the extent to which entanglement is present depends on the observables used to measure a system and describe its states. This represents a most conspicuous advantage as will be highlighted by the condensed-matter application we will discuss.

arXiv:quant-ph/0403043•Mar 4, 2004•4 citations

Feynman’s decoherence

Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

Gell-Mann’s quarks are coherent particles confined within a hadron at rest, but Feynman’s partons are incoherent particles which constitute a hadron moving with a velocity close to that of light. It is widely believed that the quark model and the parton model are two different manifestations of the same covariant entity. If this is the case, the question arises whether the Lorentz boost destroys coherence. It is pointed out that this is not the case, and it is possible to resolve this puzzle without inventing new physics. It is shown that this decoherence is due to the measurement processes which are less than complete.

arXiv:quant-ph/0206146•Optics and Spectroscopy•May 1, 2003•4 citations
Two coupled oscillators provide a mathematical instrument for solving many problems in modern physics, including squeezed states of light and Lorentz transformations of quantum bound states. The concept of entanglement can also be studied within this mathematical framework. For the system of two entangled photons, it is of interest to study what happens to the remaining photon if the other photon is not observed. It is pointed out that this problem is an issue of Feynman's rest of the universe. For quantum bound-state problems, it is pointed out the longitudinal and time-like coordinates become entangled when the system becomes boosted. Since time-like oscillations are not observed, the problem is exactly like the two-photon system where one of the photons is not observed. While the hadron is a quantum bound state of quarks, it appears quite differently when it moves rapidly than when it moves slowly. For slow hadrons, Gell-Mann's quark model is applicable, while Feynman's parton model is applicable to hadrons with their speeds close to that of light. While observing the temperature dependence of the speed, it is possible to explain the quark-to-parton transition as a phase transition.
The mathematical basis for the Gaussian entanglement is discussed in detail, as well as its implications in the internal space-time structure of relativistic extended particles. It is shown that the Gaussian entanglement shares the same set of mathematical formulas with the harmonic oscillator in the Lorentz-covariant world. It is thus possible to transfer the concept of entanglement to the Lorentz-covariant picture of the bound state, which requires both space and time separations between two constituent particles. These space and time variables become entangled as the bound state moves with a relativistic speed. It is shown also that our inability to measure the time-separation variable leads to an entanglement entropy together with a rise in the temperature of the bound state. As was noted by Paul A. M. Dirac in 1963, the system of two oscillators contains the symmetries of the O ( 3 , 2 ) de Sitter group containing two O ( 3 , 1 ) Lorentz groups as its subgroups. Dirac noted also that the system contains the symmetry of the S p ( 4 ) group, which serves as the basic language for two-mode squeezed states. Since the S p ( 4 ) symmetry contains both rotations and squeezes, one interesting case is the combination of rotation and squeeze, resulting in a shear. While the current literature is mostly on the entanglement based on squeeze along the normal coordinates, the shear transformation is an interesting future possibility. The mathematical issues on this problem are clarified.
The mathematical basis for the Gaussian entanglement is discussed in detail, as well as its implications in the internal space-time structure of relativistic extended particles. It is shown that the Gaussian entanglement shares the same set of mathematical formulas with the harmonic oscillator in the Lorentz-covariant world. It is thus possible to transfer the concept of entanglement to the Lorentz-covariant picture of the bound state, which requires both space and time separations between two constituent particles. These space and time variables become entangled as the bound state moves with a relativistic speed. It is shown also that our inability to measure the time-separation variable leads to an entanglement entropy together with a rise in the temperature of the bound state. As was noted by Paul A. M. Dirac in 1963, the system of two oscillators contains the symmetries of the 𝑂(3,2) de Sitter group containing two 𝑂(3,1) Lorentz groups as its subgroups. Dirac noted also that the system contains the symmetry of the 𝑆𝑝(4) group, which serves as the basic language for two-mode squeezed states. Since the 𝑆𝑝(4) symmetry contains both rotations and squeezes, one interesting case is the combination of rotation and squeeze, resulting in a shear. While the current literature is mostly on the entanglement based on squeeze along the normal coordinates, the shear transformation is an interesting future possibility. The mathematical issues on this problem are clarified.
Other than scattering problems where perturbation theory is applicable, there are basically two ways to solve problems in physics. One is to reduce the problem to harmonic oscillators, and the other is to formulate the problem in terms of two-by-two matrices. If two oscillators are coupled, the problem combines both two-by-two matrices and harmonic oscillators. This method then becomes a powerful research tool to cover many different branches of physics. Indeed, the concept and methodology in one branch of physics can be translated into another through the common mathematical formalism. Coupled oscillators provide clear illustrative examples for some of the current issues in physics, including entanglement and Feynman's rest of the universe. In addition, it is noted that the present form of quantum mechanics is largely a physics of harmonic oscillators. Special relativity is the physics of the Lorentz group which can be represented by the group of two-by-two matrices commonly called SL(2,c)SL(2,c)SL(2,c). Thus the coupled harmonic oscillators can play the role of combining quantum mechanics with special relativity. It is therefore possible to relate the current issues of physics to the Lorentz-covariant formulation of quantum mechanics.
In Newtonian mechanics, one often thinks in terms of x(t) i.e. an association between x and t. Although this is part of Newtonian mechanics, the notion of motion always being linked to time (and so an internal clock being required) is not always the case. For example, two particles with different masses and different velocities such that their momenta are the same may strike a target and reflect with the same magnitude of momenta. The impulse is 2p for both even though they have different speeds. One does not need to consider their speed to discuss the impulse change and so an external clock is not needed. This is further emphasized by the Lorentz invariant A = -Et+px which separates x and t as if they were independent variables (even though implicitly a speed exists in the problem i.e. v=dx/dt.). The point is that there exists a subset of physics (i.e. interactions) which is not dependent on velocity and hence the presence of a clock. The impulse hit discussed above is one example, but interference through 2 slits etc is another. Two quantum particles with the same momentum, but different rest masses and velocities produce the same interference patterns. A particle with momentum, however, has energy and so both time and space are running variables, but there are problems in which one considers p without a clock. Interestingly, even if one thinks in terms of impulses without using a clock, if there is an x interval between impulses then the notion of velocity comes into play even without an external clock because there will be more impulses imparted by a fixed p with a higher velocity than a lower one in the same fixed time period. Without using the idea of a clock, this give rise to the observable called pressure in classical physics, but is also present in a quantum bound state, we argue. Pressure in classical physics is proportional to temperature which in turn is proportional to energy (and a running time). In a quantum bound state, the equivalent to pressure (namely impulse hits with a potential) also require an energy viewpoint which is linked to running time i..e exp(-i En t) where En is the bound energy.
This paper addresses the following main question: Do we have a theoretical understanding of entanglement applicable to a full variety of physical settings? It is clear that not only the assumption of distinguishability, but also the few-subsystem scenario, are too narrow to embrace all possible physical settings. In particular, the need to go beyond the traditional subsystem-based framework becomes manifest when one tries to apply the conventional concept of entanglement to the physics of matter, since the constituents of a quantum many-body system are indistinguishable particles. We shall discuss here a notion of generalized entanglement, which can be applied to any operator language (fermions, bosons, spins, etc.) used to describe a physical system and which includes the conventional entanglement settings introduced to date in a unified fashion. This is realized by noticing that entanglement is an observer-dependent concept, whose properties are determined by the expectations of a distinguished set of observables without reference to a preferred subsystem decomposition, i.e., it depends on the physically relevant point of view. This viewpoint depends in turn upon the relationship between different sets of observables that determine our ability to control the system of interest. Indeed, the extent to which entanglement is present depends on the observables used to measure a system and describe its states. This represents a most conspicuous advantage as will be highlighted by the condensed-matter application we will discuss.
Gell-Mann’s quarks are coherent particles confined within a hadron at rest, but Feynman’s partons are incoherent particles which constitute a hadron moving with a velocity close to that of light. It is widely believed that the quark model and the parton model are two different manifestations of the same covariant entity. If this is the case, the question arises whether the Lorentz boost destroys coherence. It is pointed out that this is not the case, and it is possible to resolve this puzzle without inventing new physics. It is shown that this decoherence is due to the measurement processes which are less than complete.