Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1405.0636 · Chinese Physics Letters

Critical Behavior of the Energy Gap and Its Relation with the Berry Phase Close to the Excited State Quantum Phase Transition in the Lipkin Model

Zi-Gang Yuan, Ping Zhang

Published Jun 1, 2015• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In our previous work [Phys. Rev. A 85 (2012) 044102], we studied the Berry phase of the ground state and exited states in the Lipkin model. In this work, using the Hellmann—Feynman theorem, we derive the relation between the energy gap and the Berry phase closed to the excited state quantum phase transition (ESQPT) in the Lipkin model. It is found that the energy gap is approximately linearly dependent on the Berry phase being closed to the ESQPT for large N. As a result, the critical behavior of the energy gap is similar to that of the Berry phase. In addition, we also perform a semiclassical qualitative analysis about the critical behavior of the energy gap.

DOI
10.1088/0256-307x/32/6/060301

Related papers

Scaling of the Berry phase close to the excited-state quantum phase transition in the Lipkin model

Zi-Gang Yuan, Ping Zhang, Shu‐Shen Li +2 more

We study the Berry phase of the ground state and excited states in the Lipkin model. Using the Schwinger representation of spin operators, we get the expression for the Berry phase of the ground state in the thermodynamic limit and numerically calculate that of the excited states in finite sizes. We find that the Berry phase of the ground state is nonanalytic, but its derivative (with respect to the control parameter $\ensuremath{\alpha}$, see text) is finite even in the thermodynamic limit. Whereas, for the excited states, the Berry phase tends to be nonanalytic, and its derivative approaches $\ensuremath{\infty}$ in the thermodynamic limit and in the vicinity of the critical point of the excited-state quantum phase transition.

Physical Review A•Apr 25, 2012•35 citations

Critical Behavior of the Energy Gap and Its Relation with the Berry Phase Close to the Excited State Quantum Phase Transition in the Lipkin Model

袁子刚, Zhang Xiao Ping

Chinese Physics Letters•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Excited-state quantum phase transitions in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model: Static aspects

J. Gamito, Jamil Khalouf-Rivera, J. M. Arias +2 more

The basic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model displays a second-order ground-state quantum phase transition and an excited-state quantum phase transition (ESQPT). The inclusion of an anharmonic term in the Hamiltonian implies a second ESQPT of a different nature. We characterize this ESQPT using the mean field limit of the model. The alternative ESQPT, associated with the changes in the boundary of the finite Hilbert space of the system, can be properly described using the order parameter of the ground-state quantum phase transition, the energy gap between adjacent states, the participation ratio, and the quantum fidelity susceptibility.

arXiv:2202.11413•Physical review. E•Oct 17, 2022•17 citations

Effects of excited state quantum phase transitions on system dynamics

Francisco Pérez-Bernal, Léa Ferreira dos Santos

This work is concerned with the excited state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) defined in Ann. Phys. 323, 1106 (2008). In many‐body models that exhibit such transitions, the ground state quantum phase transition (QPT) occurs in parallel with a singularity in the energy spectrum that propagates to higher energies as the control parameter increases beyond the QPT critical point. The analysis of the spectrum has been a main tool for the detection of these ESQPTs. Studies of the effects of this transition on the system dynamics are more limited. Here, we extend our previous works and show that the evolution of an initial state with energy close to the ESQPT critical point may be extremely slow. This result is surprising, because it may take place in systems with long‐range interactions, where the dynamics is usually expected to be very fast. A timely example is the one‐dimensional spin‐1/2 model with infinite‐range Ising interaction studied in experiments with ion traps. Its Hamiltonian has a U(2) algebraic structure. More generally, the slow dynamics described here occurs in two‐level bosonic or fermionic models with pairing interactions and a Hamiltonian exhibiting a QPT between its limiting and dynamical symmetries. In this work, we compare the results for , and 3.

arXiv:1604.06851•Fortschritte der Physik•Jun 23, 2016•36 citations

Excited-state quantum phase transition in the Rabi model

Ricardo Puebla, Myung-Joong Hwang, Martin Bodo Plenio

The Rabi model, a two-level atom coupled to a harmonic oscillator, can undergo a second-order quantum phase transition (QPT) [M.-J. Hwang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015)]. Here we show that the Rabi QPT accompanies critical behavior in the higher-energy excited states, i.e., the excited-state QPT (ESQPT). We derive analytic expressions for the semiclassical density of states, which show a logarithmic divergence at a critical energy eigenvalue in the broken symmetry (superradiant) phase. Moreover, we find that the logarithmic singularities in the density of states lead to singularities in the relevant observables in the system such as photon number and atomic polarization. We corroborate our analytical semiclassical prediction of the ESQPT in the Rabi model with its numerically exact quantum mechanical solution.

arXiv:1607.00283•Physical Review A•Aug 18, 2016•73 citations

Excited-state quantum phase transitions in a two-fluid Lipkin model

J. E. García-Ramos, P. Pérez-Fernández, J. M. Arias

Background: Composed systems have become of great interest in the framework of ground-state quantum phase transitions (QPTs) and many of their properties have been studied in detail. However, in these systems, the study of the so-called excited-state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) has not received so much attention.Purpose: A quantum analysis of the ESQPTs in the two-fluid Lipkin model is presented in this work. The study is performed through the Hamiltonian diagonalization for selected values of the control parameters in order to cover the most interesting regions of the system phase diagram.Method: A Hamiltonian that resembles the consistent-Q Hamiltonian of the interacting boson model (IBM) is diagonalized for selected values of the parameters. Properties such as the density of states, the Peres lattices, the nearest-neighbor spacing distribution, and the participation ratio are analyzed.Results: An overview of the spectrum of the two-fluid Lipkin model for selected positions in the phase diagram has been obtained. The location of the excited-state quantum phase transition can be easily singled out with the Peres lattice, with the nearest-neighbor spacing distribution, with Poincar\'e sections, or with the participation ratio.Conclusions: This study completes the analysis of QPTs for the two-fluid Lipkin model, extending the previous study to excited states. The ESQPT signatures in composed systems behave in the same way as in single ones, although the evidences of their presence can be sometimes blurred. The Peres lattice turns out to be a convenient tool to look into the position of the ESQPT and to define the concept of phase in the excited states realm.

arXiv:1705.02988•Physical Review C•May 30, 2017•21 citations
In our previous work [Phys. Rev. A 85 (2012) 044102], we studied the Berry phase of the ground state and exited states in the Lipkin model. In this work, using the Hellmann—Feynman theorem, we derive the relation between the energy gap and the Berry phase closed to the excited state quantum phase transition (ESQPT) in the Lipkin model. It is found that the energy gap is approximately linearly dependent on the Berry phase being closed to the ESQPT for large N. As a result, the critical behavior of the energy gap is similar to that of the Berry phase. In addition, we also perform a semiclassical qualitative analysis about the critical behavior of the energy gap.
We study the Berry phase of the ground state and excited states in the Lipkin model. Using the Schwinger representation of spin operators, we get the expression for the Berry phase of the ground state in the thermodynamic limit and numerically calculate that of the excited states in finite sizes. We find that the Berry phase of the ground state is nonanalytic, but its derivative (with respect to the control parameter $\ensuremath{\alpha}$, see text) is finite even in the thermodynamic limit. Whereas, for the excited states, the Berry phase tends to be nonanalytic, and its derivative approaches $\ensuremath{\infty}$ in the thermodynamic limit and in the vicinity of the critical point of the excited-state quantum phase transition.
The basic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model displays a second-order ground-state quantum phase transition and an excited-state quantum phase transition (ESQPT). The inclusion of an anharmonic term in the Hamiltonian implies a second ESQPT of a different nature. We characterize this ESQPT using the mean field limit of the model. The alternative ESQPT, associated with the changes in the boundary of the finite Hilbert space of the system, can be properly described using the order parameter of the ground-state quantum phase transition, the energy gap between adjacent states, the participation ratio, and the quantum fidelity susceptibility.
This work is concerned with the excited state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) defined in Ann. Phys. 323, 1106 (2008). In many‐body models that exhibit such transitions, the ground state quantum phase transition (QPT) occurs in parallel with a singularity in the energy spectrum that propagates to higher energies as the control parameter increases beyond the QPT critical point. The analysis of the spectrum has been a main tool for the detection of these ESQPTs. Studies of the effects of this transition on the system dynamics are more limited. Here, we extend our previous works and show that the evolution of an initial state with energy close to the ESQPT critical point may be extremely slow. This result is surprising, because it may take place in systems with long‐range interactions, where the dynamics is usually expected to be very fast. A timely example is the one‐dimensional spin‐1/2 model with infinite‐range Ising interaction studied in experiments with ion traps. Its Hamiltonian has a U(2) algebraic structure. More generally, the slow dynamics described here occurs in two‐level bosonic or fermionic models with pairing interactions and a Hamiltonian exhibiting a QPT between its limiting and dynamical symmetries. In this work, we compare the results for , and 3.
The Rabi model, a two-level atom coupled to a harmonic oscillator, can undergo a second-order quantum phase transition (QPT) [M.-J. Hwang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015)]. Here we show that the Rabi QPT accompanies critical behavior in the higher-energy excited states, i.e., the excited-state QPT (ESQPT). We derive analytic expressions for the semiclassical density of states, which show a logarithmic divergence at a critical energy eigenvalue in the broken symmetry (superradiant) phase. Moreover, we find that the logarithmic singularities in the density of states lead to singularities in the relevant observables in the system such as photon number and atomic polarization. We corroborate our analytical semiclassical prediction of the ESQPT in the Rabi model with its numerically exact quantum mechanical solution.
Background: Composed systems have become of great interest in the framework of ground-state quantum phase transitions (QPTs) and many of their properties have been studied in detail. However, in these systems, the study of the so-called excited-state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) has not received so much attention.Purpose: A quantum analysis of the ESQPTs in the two-fluid Lipkin model is presented in this work. The study is performed through the Hamiltonian diagonalization for selected values of the control parameters in order to cover the most interesting regions of the system phase diagram.Method: A Hamiltonian that resembles the consistent-Q Hamiltonian of the interacting boson model (IBM) is diagonalized for selected values of the parameters. Properties such as the density of states, the Peres lattices, the nearest-neighbor spacing distribution, and the participation ratio are analyzed.Results: An overview of the spectrum of the two-fluid Lipkin model for selected positions in the phase diagram has been obtained. The location of the excited-state quantum phase transition can be easily singled out with the Peres lattice, with the nearest-neighbor spacing distribution, with Poincar\'e sections, or with the participation ratio.Conclusions: This study completes the analysis of QPTs for the two-fluid Lipkin model, extending the previous study to excited states. The ESQPT signatures in composed systems behave in the same way as in single ones, although the evidences of their presence can be sometimes blurred. The Peres lattice turns out to be a convenient tool to look into the position of the ESQPT and to define the concept of phase in the excited states realm.