Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1404.6898

Quantum Attacks on Classical Proof Systems - The Hardness of Quantum Rewinding

Andris Ambainis, Ansis Rosmanis, Dominique Unruh

Published Apr 28, 2014• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum zero-knowledge proofs and quantum proofs of knowledge are inherently difficult to analyze because their security analysis uses rewinding. Certain cases of quantum rewinding are handled by the results by Watrous (SIAM J Comput, 2009) and Unruh (Eurocrypt 2012), yet in general the problem remains elusive. We show that this is not only due to a lack of proof techniques: relative to an oracle, we show that classically secure proofs and proofs of knowledge are insecure in the quantum setting. More specifically, sigma-protocols, the Fiat-Shamir construction, and Fischlin's proof system are quantum insecure under assumptions that are sufficient for classical security. Additionally, we show that for similar reasons, computationally binding commitments provide almost no security guarantees in a quantum setting. To show these results, we develop the "pick-one trick", a general technique that allows an adversary to find one value satisfying a given predicate, but not two.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1404.6898

Related papers

Quantum Attacks on Classical Proof Systems: The Hardness of Quantum Rewinding

Andris Ambainis, Ansis Rosmanis, Dominique Unruh

Quantum zero-knowledge proofs and quantum proofs of knowledge are inherently difficult to analyze because their security analysis uses rewinding. Certain cases of quantum rewinding are handled by the results by Watrous (SIAM J Comput, 2009) and Unruh (Eurocrypt 2012), yet in general the problem remains elusive. We show that this is not only due to a lack of proof techniques: relative to an oracle, we show that classically secure proofs and proofs of knowledge are insecure in the quantum setting. More specifically, sigma-protocols, the Fiat-Shamir construction, and Fischlin's proof system are quantum insecure under assumptions that are sufficient for classical security. Additionally, we show that for similar reasons, computationally binding commitments provide almost no security guarantees in a quantum setting. To show these results, we develop the "pick-one trick", a general technique that allows an adversary to find one value satisfying a given predicate, but not two.

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2014•133 citations

On the Relativistic Zero Knowledge Quantum Proofs of Knowledge

Kaiyan Shi, Kaushik Chakraborty, Wen Yu Kon +3 more

We initiate the study of relativistic zero-knowledge quantum proof of knowledge systems with classical communication, formally defining a number of useful concepts and constructing appropriate knowledge extractors for all the existing protocols in the relativistic setting which satisfy a weaker variant of the special soundness property due to Unruh (EUROCRYPT 2012). We show that there exists quantum proofs of knowledge with knowledge error 1/2 + negl(η) for all relations in NP via a construction of such a system for the Hamiltonian cycle relation using a general relativistic commitment scheme exhibiting the fairly-binding property due to Fehr and Fillinger (EUROCRYPT 2016). We further show that one can construct quantum proof of knowledge extractors for proof systems which do not exhibit special soundness, and therefore require an extractor to rewind multiple times. We develop a new multi-prover quantum rewinding technique by combining ideas from monogamy of entanglement and gentle measurement lemmas that can break the quantum rewinding barrier. Finally, we prove a new bound on the impact of consecutive measurements and use it to significantly improve the soundness bound of some existing relativistic zero knowledge proof systems, such as the one due to Chailloux and Leverrier (EUROCRYPT 2017).

arXiv:2409.03635•Sep 5, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Proofs of Knowledge.

Dominique Unruh

We motivate, define and construct quantum proofs of knowledge, proofs of knowledge secure against quantum adversaries. Our constructions are based on a new quantum rewinding technique that allows us to extract witnesses in many classical proofs of knowledge. We give criteria under which a classical proof of knowledge is a quantum proof of knowledge. Combining our results with Watrous’ results on quantum zeroknowledge, we show that there are zero-knowledge quantum proofs of knowledge for all languages in NP.

•Jan 1, 2010•3 citations

Post-Quantum Zero Knowledge, Revisited or: How to Do Quantum Rewinding Undetectably

Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, Nicholas Spooner

When do classical zero-knowledge protocols remain secure against quantum attacks? In this work, we develop the techniques, tools, and abstractions necessary to answer this question for foundational protocols:1)We prove that the Goldreich-Micali-Wigderson protocol for graph non-isomorphism and the Feige-Shamir protocol for NP remain zero-knowledge against quantum adversaries. At the heart of our proof is a new quantum rewinding technique that enables extracting information from multiple invocations of a quantum adversary without disturbing its state.2)We prove that the Goldreich-Kahan protocol for NP is post-quantum zero knowledge using a simulator that can be seen as a natural quantum extension of the classical simulator.Our results achieve negligible simulation error, appearing to contradict a recent impossibility result due to Chia-Chung-Liu-Yamakawa (FOCS 2021). This brings us to our final contribution:3.We introduce coherent-runtime expected quantum polynomial time, a simulation notion that (a) precisely captures all of our zero-knowledge simulators, (b) cannot break any polynomial hardness assumptions, (c) implies strict polynomial-time ε-simulation and (d) is not subject to the CCLY impossibility. In light of our positive results and the CCLY negative results, we propose coherent-runtime simulation to be the appropriate quantum analogue of classical expected polynomial-time simulation.

arXiv:2111.12257•Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2022•31 citations

Quantum-Secure Coin-Flipping and Applications

Ivan Damgaard, Carolin Lunemann

In this paper, we prove classical coin-flipping secure in the presence of quantum adversaries. The proof uses a recent result of Watrous [Wat09] that allows quantum rewinding for protocols of a certain form. We then discuss two applications. First, the combination of coin-flipping with any non-interactive zero-knowledge protocol leads to an easy transformation from non-interactive zero-knowledge to interactive quantum zero-knowledge. Second, we discuss how our protocol can be applied to a recently proposed method for improving the security of quantum protocols [DFL+09], resulting in an implementation without set-up assumptions. Finally, we sketch how to achieve efficient simulation for an extended construction in the common-reference-string model.

arXiv:0903.3118•Mar 18, 2009•8 citations

Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems for QMA

Anne Broadbent, Zhengfeng Ji, Fang Song +1 more

Prior work has established that all problems in NP admit classical zero-knowledge proof systems, and under reasonable hardness assumptions for quantum computations, these proof systems can be made secure against quantum attacks. We prove a result representing a further quantum generalization of this fact, which is that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum zero-knowledge proof system. More specifically, assuming the existence of an unconditionally binding and quantum computationally concealing commitment scheme, we prove that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum interactive proof system that is zero-knowledge with respect to efficient quantum computations. Our QMA proof system is sound against arbitrary quantum provers, but only requires an honest prover to perform polynomial-time quantum computations, provided that it holds a quantum witness for a given instance of the QMA problem under consideration.

arXiv:1604.02804•Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2016•44 citations
Quantum zero-knowledge proofs and quantum proofs of knowledge are inherently difficult to analyze because their security analysis uses rewinding. Certain cases of quantum rewinding are handled by the results by Watrous (SIAM J Comput, 2009) and Unruh (Eurocrypt 2012), yet in general the problem remains elusive. We show that this is not only due to a lack of proof techniques: relative to an oracle, we show that classically secure proofs and proofs of knowledge are insecure in the quantum setting. More specifically, sigma-protocols, the Fiat-Shamir construction, and Fischlin's proof system are quantum insecure under assumptions that are sufficient for classical security. Additionally, we show that for similar reasons, computationally binding commitments provide almost no security guarantees in a quantum setting. To show these results, we develop the "pick-one trick", a general technique that allows an adversary to find one value satisfying a given predicate, but not two.
Quantum zero-knowledge proofs and quantum proofs of knowledge are inherently difficult to analyze because their security analysis uses rewinding. Certain cases of quantum rewinding are handled by the results by Watrous (SIAM J Comput, 2009) and Unruh (Eurocrypt 2012), yet in general the problem remains elusive. We show that this is not only due to a lack of proof techniques: relative to an oracle, we show that classically secure proofs and proofs of knowledge are insecure in the quantum setting. More specifically, sigma-protocols, the Fiat-Shamir construction, and Fischlin's proof system are quantum insecure under assumptions that are sufficient for classical security. Additionally, we show that for similar reasons, computationally binding commitments provide almost no security guarantees in a quantum setting. To show these results, we develop the "pick-one trick", a general technique that allows an adversary to find one value satisfying a given predicate, but not two.
We initiate the study of relativistic zero-knowledge quantum proof of knowledge systems with classical communication, formally defining a number of useful concepts and constructing appropriate knowledge extractors for all the existing protocols in the relativistic setting which satisfy a weaker variant of the special soundness property due to Unruh (EUROCRYPT 2012). We show that there exists quantum proofs of knowledge with knowledge error 1/2 + negl(η) for all relations in NP via a construction of such a system for the Hamiltonian cycle relation using a general relativistic commitment scheme exhibiting the fairly-binding property due to Fehr and Fillinger (EUROCRYPT 2016). We further show that one can construct quantum proof of knowledge extractors for proof systems which do not exhibit special soundness, and therefore require an extractor to rewind multiple times. We develop a new multi-prover quantum rewinding technique by combining ideas from monogamy of entanglement and gentle measurement lemmas that can break the quantum rewinding barrier. Finally, we prove a new bound on the impact of consecutive measurements and use it to significantly improve the soundness bound of some existing relativistic zero knowledge proof systems, such as the one due to Chailloux and Leverrier (EUROCRYPT 2017).
We motivate, define and construct quantum proofs of knowledge, proofs of knowledge secure against quantum adversaries. Our constructions are based on a new quantum rewinding technique that allows us to extract witnesses in many classical proofs of knowledge. We give criteria under which a classical proof of knowledge is a quantum proof of knowledge. Combining our results with Watrous’ results on quantum zeroknowledge, we show that there are zero-knowledge quantum proofs of knowledge for all languages in NP.
When do classical zero-knowledge protocols remain secure against quantum attacks? In this work, we develop the techniques, tools, and abstractions necessary to answer this question for foundational protocols:1)We prove that the Goldreich-Micali-Wigderson protocol for graph non-isomorphism and the Feige-Shamir protocol for NP remain zero-knowledge against quantum adversaries. At the heart of our proof is a new quantum rewinding technique that enables extracting information from multiple invocations of a quantum adversary without disturbing its state.2)We prove that the Goldreich-Kahan protocol for NP is post-quantum zero knowledge using a simulator that can be seen as a natural quantum extension of the classical simulator.Our results achieve negligible simulation error, appearing to contradict a recent impossibility result due to Chia-Chung-Liu-Yamakawa (FOCS 2021). This brings us to our final contribution:3.We introduce coherent-runtime expected quantum polynomial time, a simulation notion that (a) precisely captures all of our zero-knowledge simulators, (b) cannot break any polynomial hardness assumptions, (c) implies strict polynomial-time ε-simulation and (d) is not subject to the CCLY impossibility. In light of our positive results and the CCLY negative results, we propose coherent-runtime simulation to be the appropriate quantum analogue of classical expected polynomial-time simulation.
In this paper, we prove classical coin-flipping secure in the presence of quantum adversaries. The proof uses a recent result of Watrous [Wat09] that allows quantum rewinding for protocols of a certain form. We then discuss two applications. First, the combination of coin-flipping with any non-interactive zero-knowledge protocol leads to an easy transformation from non-interactive zero-knowledge to interactive quantum zero-knowledge. Second, we discuss how our protocol can be applied to a recently proposed method for improving the security of quantum protocols [DFL+09], resulting in an implementation without set-up assumptions. Finally, we sketch how to achieve efficient simulation for an extended construction in the common-reference-string model.
Prior work has established that all problems in NP admit classical zero-knowledge proof systems, and under reasonable hardness assumptions for quantum computations, these proof systems can be made secure against quantum attacks. We prove a result representing a further quantum generalization of this fact, which is that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum zero-knowledge proof system. More specifically, assuming the existence of an unconditionally binding and quantum computationally concealing commitment scheme, we prove that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum interactive proof system that is zero-knowledge with respect to efficient quantum computations. Our QMA proof system is sound against arbitrary quantum provers, but only requires an honest prover to perform polynomial-time quantum computations, provided that it holds a quantum witness for a given instance of the QMA problem under consideration.