The Pauli exclusion principle requires the spectrum of the occupation numbers of the one-electron reduced density matrix (1-RDM) to be bounded by one and zero. However, for a 1-RDM from a wave function, there exist additional conditions on the spectrum of occupation numbers, known as pure $N$-representability conditions or generalized Pauli conditions. For atoms and molecules, we measure through a Euclidean-distance metric the proximity of the 1-RDM spectrum to the facets of the convex set (polytope) generated by the generalized Pauli conditions. For the ground state of any spin symmetry, as long as time-reversal symmetry is considered in the definition of the polytope, we find that the 1-RDM's spectrum is pinned to the boundary of the polytope. In contrast, for excited states, we find that the 1-RDM spectrum is not pinned. Proximity of the 1-RDM to the boundary of the polytope provides a measurement and classification of electron correlation and entanglement within the quantum system. For comparison, this distance to the boundary of the generalized Pauli conditions is also compared to the distance to the polytope of the traditional Pauli conditions, and the distance to the nearest 1-RDM spectrum from a Slater determinant. We explain the difference in pinning in the ground- and excited-state 1-RDMs through a connection to the $N$-representability conditions of the two-electron reduced density matrix.
The Pauli exclusion principle requires the spectrum of the occupation numbers of the one-electron reduced density matrix (1-RDM) to be bounded by one and zero. However, for a 1-RDM from a wave function, there exist additional conditions on the spectrum of occupation numbers, known as pure N-representability conditions or generalized Pauli conditions. For atoms and molecules, we measure through a Euclidean-distance metric the proximity of the 1-RDM spectrum to the facets of the convex set (polytope) generated by the generalized Pauli conditions. For the ground state of any spin symmetry, as long as time-reversal symmetry is considered in the definition of the polytope, we find that the 1-RDM's spectrum is pinned to the boundary of the polytope. In contrast, for excited states, we find that the 1-RDM spectrum is not pinned. Proximity of the 1-RDM to the boundary of the polytope provides a measurement and classification of electron correlation and entanglement within the quantum system. For comparison, this distance to the boundary of the generalized Pauli conditions is also compared to the distance to the polytope of the traditional Pauli conditions, and the distance to the nearest 1-RDM spectrum from a Slater determinant. We explain the difference in pinning in the ground- and excited-state 1-RDMs through a connection to the N-representability conditions of the two-electron reduced density matrix.
It is well known that determining the energy of molecules and other quantum many-body systems reduces in the standard approximation to optimizing a simple linear functional of a 12-variable object, the two-electron reduced density matrix (2-RDM). The difficulty is that the variation ensemble for that functional has never been satisfactorily determined. This is known as the N-representability problem of quantum chemistry (which to a large extent is a problem of quantum information theory). The situation has given rise to competing research programs, typically trading more complicated functionals for simpler representability conditions. Chief among them is density functional theory, based on a three-variable object for which the N-representability is trivial, whereas the exact functional is very strange indeed, and probably forever unknowable. An intermediate position is occupied by 1-RDM functional theory. Postulated by Pauli to explain the electronic structure of atoms and molecules, the exclusion principle establishes an upper bound of 1 for the fermionic natural occupation numbers, accordingly allowing no more than one electron in each quantum state. This is a necessary and sufficient condition for a 1-RDM to be the contraction of an ensemble N-body density matrix. The fermionic one-body quantum marginal problem asks whether given natural occupation numbers can arise from an antisymmetric (ensemble or pure) N-particle state. The configuration interaction method affords optimal descriptions of quantum states of atoms and molecules by expanding the wave function in terms of orbital-based configurations of Slater determinants. For these systems, the dimension of the Hilbert space grows binomially with m, the number of spin-orbitals in the basis of the one-particle Hilbert space, and N, the number of electrons of the system. It has been observed that for the rank-six approximation of a pure-state N=3 system, the occupation numbers satisfy some additional constraints, stronger than the Pauli exclusion principle. The recent analysis by Alexander Klyachko and coworkers of the one-body marginal problem of the pure N-fermion state establishes a systematic approach to this type of constraints. In fact, for a pure quantum system of N electrons arranged in m spin-orbitals the occupation numbers satisfy a set of linear inequalities, known as generalized Pauli constraints (GPC). These inequalities define a convex polytope of allowed states in R^m. They are conditions for a 1-RDM to be the contraction of a N-body state. When one of the GPC is completely saturated, the system is said to be pinned, and it lies on one of the facets of the polytope. The nature of those conditions has been explored till now only in a few systems: a model of three spinless fermions confined to a one-dimensional harmonic potential, the lithium isoelectronic series and ground and excited states of some three- and four-electron molecules for the rank being at least twice the number of electrons. For all these systems the inequalities are (quite often) nearly saturated. This is the so-called quasipinning phenomenon. In this PhD thesis we have taken up the challenge of using numerical and analytical methods to examine pinned and quasipinned states, for atoms and molecules, starting from scratch with configuration-interaction and multiconfiguration self-consistent methods. This procedure serves to study the occurrence of quasipinning in realistic systems. A second goal is to show how the subsets of pinned states defined by GPC give rise to the most efficient approach from a computational viewpoint, yielding the leading order of the electron-electron correlations. As a consequence, we underline in this thesis the theoretical and practical importance of Klyachko's approach to the quantum marginal problem and its impact on the competing research programs to determine feasible electronic densities, 1-RDM, 2-RDM, intracular distributions or Wigner density quasiprobabilities. In relation with the above, our research provides a new variational optimization method for few-fermion ground states. We quantitatively confirm its high accuracy for quasipinned systems and derive an upper bound on the error of the correlation energy given by the ratio of the numerical value of the Klyachko inequality and the distance to the Hartree-Fock point. Depending on the details of the algorithm, we are able to reach 98%-99% of the correlation energy for such systems.
Functionals of the one-body reduced density matrix (1-RDM) are routinely minimized under Coleman's ensemble N-representability conditions. Recently, the topic of pure-state N-representability conditions, also known as generalized Pauli constraints, received increased attention following the discovery of a systematic way to derive them for any number of electrons and any finite dimensionality of the Hilbert space. The target of this work is to assess the potential impact of the enforcement of the pure-state conditions on the results of reduced density-matrix functional theory calculations. In particular, we examine whether the standard minimization of typical 1-RDM functionals under the ensemble N-representability conditions violates the pure-state conditions for prototype 3-electron systems. We also enforce the pure-state conditions, in addition to the ensemble ones, for the same systems and functionals and compare the correlation energies and optimal occupation numbers with those obtained by the enforcement of the ensemble conditions alone.
Generalized Pauli constraints (GPCs) impose constraints in the form of inequalities on the natural orbital occupation numbers of the one electron reduced density matrix (1-RDM), defining the set of pure N-representable 1-RDMs, or 1-RDMs that can be derived from an N-electron wave function. Saturation of these constraints is termed “pinning” and implies a significant simplification of the N-electron wave function as the number of Slater determinants required to fully describe the system is reduced. Recent research has shown pinning to occur for the ground states of atoms and molecules with N = 3 and r = 6, where N is the number of electrons and r is the number of spin orbitals. For N = 4 and r = 8, however, pinning occurs not to the GPCs but rather to inequalities defining the pure N-representable two-electron reduced density matrices (2-RDMs). Using these more general inequalities, we derive a wave function ansatz for a system with four electrons in eight spin orbitals. We apply the ansatz to the isoelectronic series of the carbon atom and the dissociation of linear H4 where the correlation energies are recovered to fractions of a kcal/mol. These results provide a foundation for further developments in wave function and RDM theories based on “pinned” solutions, and elucidate a fundamental physical basis for the emergence of non-orthogonal bases in electronic systems of N ≥ 4.
Electron occupations that arise from pure quantum states are restricted by a stringent set of conditions that are said to generalize the Pauli exclusion principle. These generalized Pauli constraints (GPCs) define the boundary of the set of one-electron reduced density matrices (1-RDMs) that are derivable from at least one N-electron wavefunction. In this paper, we investigate the sparsity of the Slater-determinant representation of the wavefunction that is a necessary, albeit not sufficient, condition for its 1-RDM to lie on the boundary of the set of pure N-representable 1-RDMs or in other words saturate one of the GPCs. The sparse wavefunction, we show, is exact not only for 3 electrons in 6 orbitals but also for 3 electrons in 8 orbitals. For larger numbers of electrons and/or orbitals in the lowest spin state, the exact wavefunction does not generally saturate one of the GPCs, and hence, the sparse representation is typically an approximation. Because the sparsity of the wavefunction is a necessary but not sufficient condition for saturation of one of the GPCs, optimization of the sparse wavefunction Ansatz to minimize the ground-state energy does not necessarily produce a wavefunction whose 1-RDM exactly saturates one of the GPCs. While the sparse Ansatz can be employed with arbitrary orbitals or optimized orbitals, in this paper, we explore the Ansatz with the natural orbitals from full configuration interaction, which yields an upper bound to the ground-state energy that equals the exact energy for a given basis set if the full-configuration-interaction wavefunction saturates the Ansatz’s GPC. With calculations on the boron isoelectronic sequence, the dinitrogen cation N2+, hydrogen chains, and cyclic conjugated π systems, we examine the quality of the sparse wavefunction Ansatz from the amount of correlation energy recovered.