Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1404.4961 · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

A general perspective on time observables

Bryan Wilson Roberts

Published May 24, 2014• 24 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.05.001

Related papers

Generalized Time Flow in Quantum and Relativistic Systems and Cosmology

John Henderson

Quantum mechanics and general relativity have been very successful in their respective domains for understanding and predicting physical phenomena. The two theories differ in their perspectives on time, with relativistic time flowing at different rates for different observers but time in a quantum system flowing in a fixed spacetime. Experiments on the nature of time to probe this difference have shown there is a flow of time in a quantum system that is not detectable by a classical clock outside the quantum system. Accordingly, we generalize the concept of time to include the flow of time in both classical and quantum systems, and investigate whether the concept of “generalized time” has any explanatory or predictive value. We find that generalized time provides an explanation for quantum entanglement that is causal without violating the speed of light, provides insight regarding collapse of the wave function in a quantum system, provides a simple intuitive perspective to understand time dilation and length contraction in special relativity, resolves the black hole information paradox, and enables a physical model that explains cosmic inflation. CPT symmetry coupled with generalized time explains why time goes backwards for antiparticles in Feynman diagrams and why there is more matter than antimatter in the Universe, leads to a model of the Big Bang that explains some observed anisotropies in the Universe, and potentially explains CP violations observed in kaons and other particles. Models based on generalized time make testable predictions for laboratory and cosmological measurements.

•May 25, 2026•0 citations

Time derivatives of observables and applications

Bernard W. Banks

•Mar 4, 1975•0 citations

Time as an observable

Jonathan Oppenheim, Benni Reznik, William George Unruh

arXiv:quant-ph/9807058•Springer eBooks•Apr 7, 2008•5 citations

Quantum formalism for events and how time can emerge from its foundations

Eduardo O. Dias

Although time is one of our most intuitive physical concepts, its understanding at the fundamental level is still an open question in physics. For instance, time in quantum mechanics and general relativity are two distinct and incompatible entities. While relativity deals with events (points in spacetime), with time being observer dependent and dynamical, quantum mechanics describes physical systems by treating time as an independent parameter. To resolve this conflict, in this work, we extend the classical concept of an event to the quantum domain by defining an event as a transfer of information between physical systems. Then, by describing the universe from the perspective of a certain observer, we introduce quantum states of events with space-time-symmetric wave functions that predict the joint probability distribution of a measurement (observation) at $(t,\stackrel{P\vec}{x})$. Under these circumstances, without assuming collapse, we propose that a well-defined instant of time, like any other observable, arises from a single event, thus being an observer-dependent property. In this manner, we obtain a stationary quantum state written as a sum of a sequence of normalized states of events with increasing memories. As a consequence, a counterfactual asymmetry along this sequence of events gives rise to the flow of time as being successive ``snapshots'' from the observer's perspective. In this proposal, which contrasts strikingly to the view in which time is an illusion, it is the many distinguishable states in which the observer stores information that makes the existence of time possible.

arXiv:2007.00513•Physical Review A•Jan 21, 2021•9 citations

Time Derivatives as a Special Set of Observables

Eugen Fick, Günter Sauermann

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Physics

F. J. Duarte

In chapter 2 of Quantum Clear we provided our answer to the all important question What is physics? And we concluded that the crux of it all is Nature . Furthermore, we reaffirmed the implicit dictum, known even before the time of Newton, that the experiment is the voice of Nature. That is how Nature communicates with us. Hence, it is important to recognize that … the experiment is the ethos of physics . From a quantum perspective, this is only natural since quantum mechanics was born from the experiment (Planck). Not only that, but as expressed by Born, the principles of quantum mechanics ‘were found by a slow and tedious process of interpreting experimental results.’ Here, it is from this perspective that we look at general trends in physics, theoretical physics in particular, and we conclude with a simple observation: it is time to return to the old ways, it is time to return to the experiment .

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 10, 2026•0 citations
Quantum mechanics and general relativity have been very successful in their respective domains for understanding and predicting physical phenomena. The two theories differ in their perspectives on time, with relativistic time flowing at different rates for different observers but time in a quantum system flowing in a fixed spacetime. Experiments on the nature of time to probe this difference have shown there is a flow of time in a quantum system that is not detectable by a classical clock outside the quantum system. Accordingly, we generalize the concept of time to include the flow of time in both classical and quantum systems, and investigate whether the concept of “generalized time” has any explanatory or predictive value. We find that generalized time provides an explanation for quantum entanglement that is causal without violating the speed of light, provides insight regarding collapse of the wave function in a quantum system, provides a simple intuitive perspective to understand time dilation and length contraction in special relativity, resolves the black hole information paradox, and enables a physical model that explains cosmic inflation. CPT symmetry coupled with generalized time explains why time goes backwards for antiparticles in Feynman diagrams and why there is more matter than antimatter in the Universe, leads to a model of the Big Bang that explains some observed anisotropies in the Universe, and potentially explains CP violations observed in kaons and other particles. Models based on generalized time make testable predictions for laboratory and cosmological measurements.
Although time is one of our most intuitive physical concepts, its understanding at the fundamental level is still an open question in physics. For instance, time in quantum mechanics and general relativity are two distinct and incompatible entities. While relativity deals with events (points in spacetime), with time being observer dependent and dynamical, quantum mechanics describes physical systems by treating time as an independent parameter. To resolve this conflict, in this work, we extend the classical concept of an event to the quantum domain by defining an event as a transfer of information between physical systems. Then, by describing the universe from the perspective of a certain observer, we introduce quantum states of events with space-time-symmetric wave functions that predict the joint probability distribution of a measurement (observation) at $(t,\stackrel{P\vec}{x})$. Under these circumstances, without assuming collapse, we propose that a well-defined instant of time, like any other observable, arises from a single event, thus being an observer-dependent property. In this manner, we obtain a stationary quantum state written as a sum of a sequence of normalized states of events with increasing memories. As a consequence, a counterfactual asymmetry along this sequence of events gives rise to the flow of time as being successive ``snapshots'' from the observer's perspective. In this proposal, which contrasts strikingly to the view in which time is an illusion, it is the many distinguishable states in which the observer stores information that makes the existence of time possible.
In chapter 2 of Quantum Clear we provided our answer to the all important question What is physics? And we concluded that the crux of it all is Nature . Furthermore, we reaffirmed the implicit dictum, known even before the time of Newton, that the experiment is the voice of Nature. That is how Nature communicates with us. Hence, it is important to recognize that … the experiment is the ethos of physics . From a quantum perspective, this is only natural since quantum mechanics was born from the experiment (Planck). Not only that, but as expressed by Born, the principles of quantum mechanics ‘were found by a slow and tedious process of interpreting experimental results.’ Here, it is from this perspective that we look at general trends in physics, theoretical physics in particular, and we conclude with a simple observation: it is time to return to the old ways, it is time to return to the experiment .