Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1401.6249 · Lecture notes in computer science

(Un)decidable Problems about Reachability of Quantum Systems

Yangjia Li, Mingsheng Ying

Published Jan 1, 2014• 19 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-44584-6_33

Related papers

Quantum temporal logic and reachability problems of matrix semigroups

Nengkun Yu

Information and Computation•Jul 23, 2024•2 citations

A Note on Quantum Markov Models

Christino Tamon, Weichen Xie

The study of Markov models is central to control theory and machine learning. A quantum analogue of partially observable Markov decision process was studied in (Barry, Barry, and Aaronson, Phys. Rev. A, 90, 2014). It was proved that goal-state reachability is undecidable in the quantum setting, whereas it is decidable classically. In contrast to this classical-to-quantum transition from decidable to undecidable, we observe that the problem of approximating the optimal policy which maximizes the average discounted reward over an infinite horizon remains decidable in the quantum setting. Given that most relevant problems related to Markov decision process are undecidable classically (which immediately implies undecidability in the quantum case), this provides one of the few examples where the quantum problem is tractable.

arXiv:1911.01953•Nov 5, 2019•0 citations

Reachability Probabilities of Quantum Markov Chains

Shenggang Ying, Yuan Feng, Nengkun Yu +1 more

arXiv:1304.0060•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•38 citations

Are problems in Quantum Information Theory (un)decidable?

Michael M. Wolf, Toby S. Cubitt, David Pérez-Garcı́a

This note is intended to foster a discussion about the extent to which typical problems arising in quantum information theory are algorithmically decidable (in principle rather than in practice). Various problems in the context of entanglement theory and quantum channels turn out to be decidable via quantifier elimination as long as they admit a compact formulation without quantification over integers. For many asymptotically defined properties which have to hold for all or for one integer N, however, effective procedures seem to be difficult if not impossible to find. We review some of the main tools for (dis)proving decidability and apply them to problems in quantum information theory. We find that questions like "can we overcome fidelity 1/2 w.r.t. a two-qubit singlet state?" easily become undecidable. A closer look at such questions might rule out some of the "single-letter" formulas sought in quantum information theory.

arXiv:1111.5425•Nov 23, 2011•32 citations

Unsolvability of the Halting Problem in Quantum Dynamics

Daegene Song

arXiv:quant-ph/0610047•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 6, 2007•3 citations

Quantum Walks for Chemical Reaction Networks

Seenivasan Hariharan, Sebastian Zur, Sachin Kinge +3 more

Near a detailed-balance equilibrium, the perturbed mass-action dynamics of a chemical reaction network (CRN) map exactly onto an electrical-flow problem on the bipartite species-reaction graph: chemical potentials become electrical potentials, Onsager coefficients become conductances, and the instantaneous Gibbs free-energy consumption equals the dissipated electrical energy. We exploit this map to design quantum walk algorithms that decide species reachability, sample reachable species, approximate any individual steady-state reaction flux, and estimate the total Gibbs dissipation. The first three follow from standard electrical-flow quantum walks; the last is non-trivial because the chemical flow is not the minimum-energy electrical flow on the same graph. We resolve this via a new use of alternative neighbourhoods in multidimensional quantum walks, which forces the walker onto the mass-action flow whenever the network is $σ-M$ rigid. In an adjacency-matrix QRAM access model the algorithms achieve up to a quadratic speedup over classical methods -- for example $Ω(n^{3/2})$ vs $Ω(n^2)$ for reachability -- and dissipation-aware bounds tighten this further when the perturbation is concentrated.

arXiv:2509.07890•Sep 9, 2025•0 citations
The study of Markov models is central to control theory and machine learning. A quantum analogue of partially observable Markov decision process was studied in (Barry, Barry, and Aaronson, Phys. Rev. A, 90, 2014). It was proved that goal-state reachability is undecidable in the quantum setting, whereas it is decidable classically. In contrast to this classical-to-quantum transition from decidable to undecidable, we observe that the problem of approximating the optimal policy which maximizes the average discounted reward over an infinite horizon remains decidable in the quantum setting. Given that most relevant problems related to Markov decision process are undecidable classically (which immediately implies undecidability in the quantum case), this provides one of the few examples where the quantum problem is tractable.
This note is intended to foster a discussion about the extent to which typical problems arising in quantum information theory are algorithmically decidable (in principle rather than in practice). Various problems in the context of entanglement theory and quantum channels turn out to be decidable via quantifier elimination as long as they admit a compact formulation without quantification over integers. For many asymptotically defined properties which have to hold for all or for one integer N, however, effective procedures seem to be difficult if not impossible to find. We review some of the main tools for (dis)proving decidability and apply them to problems in quantum information theory. We find that questions like "can we overcome fidelity 1/2 w.r.t. a two-qubit singlet state?" easily become undecidable. A closer look at such questions might rule out some of the "single-letter" formulas sought in quantum information theory.
Near a detailed-balance equilibrium, the perturbed mass-action dynamics of a chemical reaction network (CRN) map exactly onto an electrical-flow problem on the bipartite species-reaction graph: chemical potentials become electrical potentials, Onsager coefficients become conductances, and the instantaneous Gibbs free-energy consumption equals the dissipated electrical energy. We exploit this map to design quantum walk algorithms that decide species reachability, sample reachable species, approximate any individual steady-state reaction flux, and estimate the total Gibbs dissipation. The first three follow from standard electrical-flow quantum walks; the last is non-trivial because the chemical flow is not the minimum-energy electrical flow on the same graph. We resolve this via a new use of alternative neighbourhoods in multidimensional quantum walks, which forces the walker onto the mass-action flow whenever the network is σ−Mσ-Mσ−M rigid. In an adjacency-matrix QRAM access model the algorithms achieve up to a quadratic speedup over classical methods -- for example Ω(n3/2)Ω(n^{3/2})Ω(n3/2) vs Ω(n2)Ω(n^2)Ω(n2) for reachability -- and dissipation-aware bounds tighten this further when the perturbation is concentrated.