Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1401.5420

Reply to a Commentary "Asking photons where they have been without telling them what to say"

Ariel Danan, Demitry Farfurnik, Shimshon Bar-Ad, Lev Vaidman A

Published Jan 21, 2014• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Interesting objections to conclusions of our experiment with nested interferometers raised by Salih in a recent Commentary are analysed and refuted.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1401.5420

Related papers

A Comment on "Asking photons where they have been in plain language"

Lev Vaidman A

The criticism of the experiment showing disconnected traces of photons passing through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer is shown to be unfounded.

arXiv:1703.03615•Mar 10, 2017•1 citation

Comments to Asking Photons Where They Have Been (A Danan et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013))

B. E. Y. Svensson

I critize some of the conclusions in the paper by Danan et al, in particular their claim that '(S)ome (of the photons) have been inside the nested interferometer ... but they never entered and never left (it) ...'. A standard quantum-mechanical analysis also casts doubts on their statement that '(o)nly the description with forward and backward evolving quantum states provides a simple and intuitive picture of pre- and postselected quantum particles.'

arXiv:1402.4315•Feb 18, 2014•0 citations

Interpreting a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer with classical optics

Pablo L. Saldanha

In an recent work with the title ``Asking Photons Where They Have Been,'' Danan et al. experimentally demonstrate an intriguing behavior of photons in an interferometer [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)]. In their words: ``The photons tell us that they have been in the parts of the interferometer through which they could not pass.'' They interpret the results using the two-state vector formalism of quantum theory and say that, although an explanation of the experimental results in terms of classical electromagnetic waves in the interferometer is possible (and they provide a partial description), it is not so intuitive. Here we present a more detailed classical description of their experimental results, showing that it is actually intuitive. The same description is valid for the quantum wave function of the photons propagating in the interferometer. In particular, we show that it is essential that the wave propagates through all parts of the interferometer to describe the experimental results. We hope that our work helps to give a deeper understanding of these interesting experimental results.

arXiv:1312.7438•Physical Review A•Mar 13, 2014•42 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer' ”

Robert B. Griffiths

While much of the technical analysis in the preceding Comment is correct, in the end it confirms the conclusion reached in my previous work [Phys. Rev. A 94, 032115 (2016)]: A consistent histories analysis provides no support for the claim of counterfactual quantum communication put forward by Salih et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)].

arXiv:1712.01895•Physical Review A•Feb 9, 2018•12 citations

XXVI. New contributions to interferometry.—Part I. A Reply

Samuel Tolansky

The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science•Mar 1, 1944•0 citations

Once more about an interferometer with entangled atoms

Michael B. Mensky

Physics Letters A•Nov 1, 2001•0 citations
In an recent work with the title ``Asking Photons Where They Have Been,'' Danan et al. experimentally demonstrate an intriguing behavior of photons in an interferometer [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)]. In their words: ``The photons tell us that they have been in the parts of the interferometer through which they could not pass.'' They interpret the results using the two-state vector formalism of quantum theory and say that, although an explanation of the experimental results in terms of classical electromagnetic waves in the interferometer is possible (and they provide a partial description), it is not so intuitive. Here we present a more detailed classical description of their experimental results, showing that it is actually intuitive. The same description is valid for the quantum wave function of the photons propagating in the interferometer. In particular, we show that it is essential that the wave propagates through all parts of the interferometer to describe the experimental results. We hope that our work helps to give a deeper understanding of these interesting experimental results.