Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1401.5172 · Physical Review A

Quantum gates with controlled adiabatic evolutions

Itay Hen

Published Feb 12, 2015• 37 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We introduce a class of quantum adiabatic evolutions that we claim may be interpreted as the equivalents of the unitary gates of the quantum gate model. We argue that these gates form a universal set and may therefore be used as building blocks in the construction of arbitrary ``adiabatic circuits,'' analogously to the manner in which gates are used in the circuit model. One implication of the above construction is that arbitrary classical boolean circuits as well as gate model circuits may be directly translated to adiabatic algorithms with no additional resources or complexities. We show that while these adiabatic algorithms fail to exhibit certain aspects of the inherent fault tolerance of traditional quantum adiabatic algorithms, they may have certain other experimental advantages acting as quantum gates.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.91.022309

Related papers

Direct mapping of quantum circuits to adiabatic algorithms

M. Stewart Siu

We give a method of mapping any arbitrary circuit in the standard quantum computing model to an adiabatic algorithm of the same depth. It is a direct mapping as we use the same initial, intermediate and final states as in the circuit. Hence we show constructively the existence of efficient adiabatic evolution paths for a class of problems. Since the physical implementation of unitary gates in the circuit model requires precise timing control, the equivalent adiabatic construction may also provide a more realizable alternative.

•Sep 3, 2004•0 citations

Exact Equivalence between Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm and Quantum Circuit Algorithm

Hongye Yu, Yuliang Huang, Biao Wu

We present a rigorous proof that quantum circuit algorithm can be transformed into quantum adiabatic algorithm with the exact same time complexity. This means that from a quantum circuit algorithm of L gates we can construct a quantum adiabatic algorithm with time complexity of O(L). Additionally, our construction shows that one may exponentially speed up some quantum adiabatic algorithms by properly choosing an evolution path .

arXiv:1706.07646•Chinese Physics Letters•Oct 1, 2018•21 citations

Gates for Adiabatic Quantum Computing

Richard H. Warren

The goal of this paper is to introduce building blocks for adiabatic quantum algorithms. Adiabatic quantum computing uses the principle of quantum annealing, which implies that a carefully controlled energy solution is optimal and corresponds to minimizing a discrete function. The input function can be influenced by rewards and penalties to favor a solution that meets restrictions that are imposed by the problem. We show how to accomplish this influence for gates in adiabatic quantum computing, particularly the controlled-NOT gate (CNOT gate) which is fundamental to all quantum gates on two or more qubits. In addition, we adapt the Toffoli gate, the Fredkin gate, and the Hadamard gate to the Ising objective function which is a foundation for discrete optimization on D-Wave System machines. The quantum work in this paper encompasses Boolean operations, some of which are used to construct gates. We think the possible advantages of the building blocks in this paper will enhance quantum algorithms on D-Wave System computers.

arXiv:1405.2354•May 7, 2014•2 citations

Implementation Of Quantum Rotation Gates Using Controlled Non-Adiabatic Evolutions

Abdelrahman A. H. Abdelrahim, Gharib S. Mahmoud, Sherzod Turaev +1 more

Quantum gates are the basic building blocks in the quantum circuits model. These gates can be implemented using adiabatic or non adiabatic processes. Adiabatic models can be controlled using auxiliary qubits, whereas non adiabatic models can be simplified by using one single-shot implementation. In this paper, the controlled adiabatic evolutions is combined with the single-shot implementation to obtain quantum gates with controlled non adiabatic evolutions. This is an important improvement which can speed the implementation of quantum gates and reduce the errors due to the long run in the adiabatic model. The robustness of our scheme to different types of errors is also investigated.

•Jan 29, 2018•0 citations

Adiabatic Gate Teleportation

Dave Bacon, Steven T. Flammia

The difficulty in producing precisely timed and controlled quantum gates is a significant source of error in many physical implementations of quantum computers. Here we introduce a simple universal primitive, adiabatic gate teleportation, which is robust to timing errors and many control errors and maintains a constant energy gap throughout the computation above a degenerate ground state space. This construction allows for geometric robustness based upon the control of two independent qubit interactions. Further, our piecewise adiabatic evolution easily relates to the quantum circuit model, enabling the use of standard methods from fault-tolerance theory for establishing thresholds.

arXiv:0905.0901•Physical Review Letters•Sep 18, 2009•62 citations

Classical analog circuit emulation of quantum Grover search algorithm

Samuel Feldman, Hassam Ghazali, Andrey Rogachev

We construct a completely analog framework that emulates universal quantum gates and quantum algorithms. It is based on electronic circuits made of operational amplifiers, resistors and capacitors. In these circuits, input and output lines represent the computational basis states (CBSs) and thus $2^n$ lines are required to represent $n$ qubits. An operation of the circuits is based on classical evolution and interference of complex amplitudes associated with each CBS. The framework can emulate entangled states and is free from decoherence, measurements are classical and do not collapse states. Similar to physical quantum computers, emulated quantum algorithms can be constructed as a sequence of the gates belonging to a universal set (phase shift, Hadamard, controlled-NOT), as a unitary matrix and as combinations of the two. Circuits representing the universal gates have been made and tested. We also have made a matrix-based emulator of a 3-qubit Grover search algorithm. We tested it by searching for one and two particular states with one and two iterations and found that its outputs accurately match predicted values. We anticipate that the emulators can work as sub-components of physical quantum computers. On their own, the emulators can be used for operations that require a few qubits or operations that can be split into independent (and perhaps weakly entangled) blocks of qubits.

arXiv:2506.06502•Jun 6, 2025•0 citations
We introduce a class of quantum adiabatic evolutions that we claim may be interpreted as the equivalents of the unitary gates of the quantum gate model. We argue that these gates form a universal set and may therefore be used as building blocks in the construction of arbitrary ``adiabatic circuits,'' analogously to the manner in which gates are used in the circuit model. One implication of the above construction is that arbitrary classical boolean circuits as well as gate model circuits may be directly translated to adiabatic algorithms with no additional resources or complexities. We show that while these adiabatic algorithms fail to exhibit certain aspects of the inherent fault tolerance of traditional quantum adiabatic algorithms, they may have certain other experimental advantages acting as quantum gates.
We give a method of mapping any arbitrary circuit in the standard quantum computing model to an adiabatic algorithm of the same depth. It is a direct mapping as we use the same initial, intermediate and final states as in the circuit. Hence we show constructively the existence of efficient adiabatic evolution paths for a class of problems. Since the physical implementation of unitary gates in the circuit model requires precise timing control, the equivalent adiabatic construction may also provide a more realizable alternative.
The goal of this paper is to introduce building blocks for adiabatic quantum algorithms. Adiabatic quantum computing uses the principle of quantum annealing, which implies that a carefully controlled energy solution is optimal and corresponds to minimizing a discrete function. The input function can be influenced by rewards and penalties to favor a solution that meets restrictions that are imposed by the problem. We show how to accomplish this influence for gates in adiabatic quantum computing, particularly the controlled-NOT gate (CNOT gate) which is fundamental to all quantum gates on two or more qubits. In addition, we adapt the Toffoli gate, the Fredkin gate, and the Hadamard gate to the Ising objective function which is a foundation for discrete optimization on D-Wave System machines. The quantum work in this paper encompasses Boolean operations, some of which are used to construct gates. We think the possible advantages of the building blocks in this paper will enhance quantum algorithms on D-Wave System computers.
Quantum gates are the basic building blocks in the quantum circuits model. These gates can be implemented using adiabatic or non adiabatic processes. Adiabatic models can be controlled using auxiliary qubits, whereas non adiabatic models can be simplified by using one single-shot implementation. In this paper, the controlled adiabatic evolutions is combined with the single-shot implementation to obtain quantum gates with controlled non adiabatic evolutions. This is an important improvement which can speed the implementation of quantum gates and reduce the errors due to the long run in the adiabatic model. The robustness of our scheme to different types of errors is also investigated.
The difficulty in producing precisely timed and controlled quantum gates is a significant source of error in many physical implementations of quantum computers. Here we introduce a simple universal primitive, adiabatic gate teleportation, which is robust to timing errors and many control errors and maintains a constant energy gap throughout the computation above a degenerate ground state space. This construction allows for geometric robustness based upon the control of two independent qubit interactions. Further, our piecewise adiabatic evolution easily relates to the quantum circuit model, enabling the use of standard methods from fault-tolerance theory for establishing thresholds.
We construct a completely analog framework that emulates universal quantum gates and quantum algorithms. It is based on electronic circuits made of operational amplifiers, resistors and capacitors. In these circuits, input and output lines represent the computational basis states (CBSs) and thus 2n2^n2n lines are required to represent nnn qubits. An operation of the circuits is based on classical evolution and interference of complex amplitudes associated with each CBS. The framework can emulate entangled states and is free from decoherence, measurements are classical and do not collapse states. Similar to physical quantum computers, emulated quantum algorithms can be constructed as a sequence of the gates belonging to a universal set (phase shift, Hadamard, controlled-NOT), as a unitary matrix and as combinations of the two. Circuits representing the universal gates have been made and tested. We also have made a matrix-based emulator of a 3-qubit Grover search algorithm. We tested it by searching for one and two particular states with one and two iterations and found that its outputs accurately match predicted values. We anticipate that the emulators can work as sub-components of physical quantum computers. On their own, the emulators can be used for operations that require a few qubits or operations that can be split into independent (and perhaps weakly entangled) blocks of qubits.