Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1312.6253

Interaction between a moving electron and magnetic flux in Aharonov-Bohm effect

Ruifeng Wang

Published Dec 21, 2013• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The back-action exerted by the moving electron on the magnetic flux in the A-B effect is analyzed. It is emphasized that a reasonable interpretation on the A-B effect should be consistent with the uncertain principle. If the back-action on the magnetic flux is reduced to zero, the A-B effect should not be observed, even through the vector potential still exists in space. To verify this interpretation, a new experimental scheme is proposed in this paper.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1312.6253

Related papers

A possible interplay between electron beams and magnetic fluxes in the Aharonov-Bohm effect

Ruifeng Wang

Most studies on the magnetic Aharonov-Bohm (A-B) effect focus on the action exerted by the magnetic flux on the electron beam, but neglect the back-action exerted by the electron beam on the magnetic flux. This paper focuses on the latter, which is the electromotive force Δ U across the solenoid induced by the time-dependent magnetic field of the electron beam. Based on the back-action analysis, we observe that the magnetic A-B effect arises owing to the interaction energy between the magnetic field of the electron beam and the magnetic field of the solenoid. We also demonstrate that the interpretation attributing the magnetic A-B effect to the vector potential violates the uncertainty principle.

Frontiers of Physics•Apr 17, 2015•10 citations

An experimental scheme to verify the dynamics of the Aharonov–Bohm effect

Ruifeng Wang

In this paper, it is emphasized that the dynamical cause for the A-B effect is the superimposed energy between the magnetic field produced by the moving charges and that in the solenoid, instead of the existence of the vector potential. If such a superposition between the magnetic fields can be eliminated, the A-B effect should not be observed any more. To verify this viewpoint, a new experimental method using a SQUID is suggested in this paper.

arXiv:0705.4011•Chinese Physics B•Jul 31, 2009•5 citations

An experimental proposal to test the physical effect of the vector potential

Ruifeng Wang

There are two interpretations of the Aharonov-Bohm (A-B) effect. One interpretation asserts that the A-B effect demonstrates that the vector potential is a physical reality that can result in the phase shift of a moving charge in quantum mechanics. The other interpretation asserts that the phase shift of the moving charge results from the interaction energy between the electromagnetic field of the moving charge and external electromagnetic fields. This paper briefly reviews these two interpretations and analyzes their differences. In addition, a new experimental scheme is proposed to determine which interpretation is correct.

Scientific Reports•Jan 29, 2016•7 citations

An interpretation for Aharonov-Bohm effect with classical electromagnetic theory

Gaobiao Xiao

The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect shows that charged particles may be affected by the vector potential in regions without any electric or magnetic fields [1]. The Aharonov-Bohm effect was experimentally confirmed [2-3] and has been found in many situations [4-6]. A common explanation is based on quantum mechanics, which states that the wavefunctions associated with the charges will accumulate a phase shift due to the vector potential. However, consensus about its nature and interpretation has not been achieved [7-14]. We here propose a simple but reasonable interpretation based on the theory for electromagnetic radiation and couplings [15]. The energy associated with a pulse radiator is divided into a Coulomb-velocity energy and a radiative energy, together with a macroscopic Schott energy accounting for the energy exchange between them. All these energies are expressed with terms including the potentials, so are the mutual coupling energies. There exists a force acting on the moving charges even though the fields completely vanish. This force makes the charges pass through the magnetic solenoid in different velocity with different path length, causing a phase shift the same as that obtained with quantum mechanics. The theory is originally aimed for providing an interpretation for electromagnetic radiation and mutual coupling. It is derived directly from the Maxwell theory with no modification but only substitution and reorganization.

arXiv:2201.12292•Jan 26, 2022•3 citations

The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect

Ricardo Weder

The seminal paper of Aharonov and Bohm [Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)]10.1103/PhysRev.115.485 is at the origin of a very extensive literature in some of the more fundamental issues in physics. They claimed that electromagnetic fields can act at a distance on charged particles even if they are identically zero in the region of space where the particles propagate, that the fundamental electromagnetic quantities in quantum physics are not only the electromagnetic fields but also the circulations of the electromagnetic potentials; what gives them a real physical significance. They proposed two experiments to verify their theoretical conclusions. The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, where an electron is influenced by a magnetic field that is zero in the region of space accessible to the electron, and the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect where an electron is affected by a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in the region where the electron is propagating, i.e., such that the electric field vanishes along its trajectory. The Aharonov-Bohm effects imply such a strong departure from the physical intuition coming from classical physics that it is no wonder that they remain a highly controversial issue after more than fifty years, in spite of the fact that they are discussed in most of the text books in quantum mechanics. The magnetic case has been studied extensively. The experimental issues were settled by the remarkable experiments of Tonomura et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1443 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986)] with toroidal magnets, that gave a strong evidence of the existence of the effect, and by the recent experiment of Caprez et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210401 (2007)]10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210401 that shows that the results of the Tonomura et al. experiments cannot be explained by the action of a force. The theoretical issues were settled by Ballesteros and Weder [Commun. Math. Phys. 285, 345 (2009)10.1007/s00220-008-0579-1; J. Math. Phys. 50, 122108 (2009)10.1063/1.3266176; Commun. Math. Phys. 303, 175 (2011)]10.1007/s00220-010-1166-9 who rigorously proved that quantum mechanics predicts the experimental results of Tonomura et al. and of Caprez et al. The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect has been much less studied. Actually, its existence, that has not been confirmed experimentally, is a very controversial issue. In their 1959 paper Aharonov and Bohm proposed an ansatz for the solution to the Schrödinger equation in regions where there is a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in space. It consists in multiplying the free evolution by a phase given by the integral in time of the potential. The validity of this ansatz predicts interference fringes between parts of a coherent electron beam that are subjected to different potentials. In this paper we prove that the exact solution to the Schrödinger equation is given by the Aharonov-Bohm ansatz up to an error bound in norm that is uniform in time and that decays as a constant divided by the velocity. Our results give, for the first time, a rigorous proof that quantum mechanics predicts the existence of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect, under conditions that we provide. We hope that our results will stimulate the experimental research on the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect.

arXiv:1006.1385•Journal of Mathematical Physics•May 1, 2011•16 citations

Aharonov-Bohm effect, local field interaction, and Lorentz invariance

Kicheon Kang

A field-interaction scheme is introduced for describing the Aharonov-Bohm effect, fully consistent with the principle of relativity. Our theory is based on the fact that local field interactions are present even when a particle moves only in a field-free region. The interaction Lagrangian between a charge and a flux is uniquely constructed from three principles: Lorentz covariance, linearity in the interaction strength, and a correct stationary limit of charge. Our result resolves fundamental questions raised on the standard interpretation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect, concerning its duality with the Aharonov-Casher effect and the equivalence between the potential and the field-interaction models for describing the electromagnetic interaction. Most of all, potential is eliminated in our theory, and all kind of the force-free Aharonov-Bohm effect is understood in a unified framework of the Lorentz-covariant local interaction of electromagnetic fields.

arXiv:1308.2093•Aug 9, 2013•1 citation
The back-action exerted by the moving electron on the magnetic flux in the A-B effect is analyzed. It is emphasized that a reasonable interpretation on the A-B effect should be consistent with the uncertain principle. If the back-action on the magnetic flux is reduced to zero, the A-B effect should not be observed, even through the vector potential still exists in space. To verify this interpretation, a new experimental scheme is proposed in this paper.
Most studies on the magnetic Aharonov-Bohm (A-B) effect focus on the action exerted by the magnetic flux on the electron beam, but neglect the back-action exerted by the electron beam on the magnetic flux. This paper focuses on the latter, which is the electromotive force Δ U across the solenoid induced by the time-dependent magnetic field of the electron beam. Based on the back-action analysis, we observe that the magnetic A-B effect arises owing to the interaction energy between the magnetic field of the electron beam and the magnetic field of the solenoid. We also demonstrate that the interpretation attributing the magnetic A-B effect to the vector potential violates the uncertainty principle.
There are two interpretations of the Aharonov-Bohm (A-B) effect. One interpretation asserts that the A-B effect demonstrates that the vector potential is a physical reality that can result in the phase shift of a moving charge in quantum mechanics. The other interpretation asserts that the phase shift of the moving charge results from the interaction energy between the electromagnetic field of the moving charge and external electromagnetic fields. This paper briefly reviews these two interpretations and analyzes their differences. In addition, a new experimental scheme is proposed to determine which interpretation is correct.
The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect shows that charged particles may be affected by the vector potential in regions without any electric or magnetic fields [1]. The Aharonov-Bohm effect was experimentally confirmed [2-3] and has been found in many situations [4-6]. A common explanation is based on quantum mechanics, which states that the wavefunctions associated with the charges will accumulate a phase shift due to the vector potential. However, consensus about its nature and interpretation has not been achieved [7-14]. We here propose a simple but reasonable interpretation based on the theory for electromagnetic radiation and couplings [15]. The energy associated with a pulse radiator is divided into a Coulomb-velocity energy and a radiative energy, together with a macroscopic Schott energy accounting for the energy exchange between them. All these energies are expressed with terms including the potentials, so are the mutual coupling energies. There exists a force acting on the moving charges even though the fields completely vanish. This force makes the charges pass through the magnetic solenoid in different velocity with different path length, causing a phase shift the same as that obtained with quantum mechanics. The theory is originally aimed for providing an interpretation for electromagnetic radiation and mutual coupling. It is derived directly from the Maxwell theory with no modification but only substitution and reorganization.
The seminal paper of Aharonov and Bohm [Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)]10.1103/PhysRev.115.485 is at the origin of a very extensive literature in some of the more fundamental issues in physics. They claimed that electromagnetic fields can act at a distance on charged particles even if they are identically zero in the region of space where the particles propagate, that the fundamental electromagnetic quantities in quantum physics are not only the electromagnetic fields but also the circulations of the electromagnetic potentials; what gives them a real physical significance. They proposed two experiments to verify their theoretical conclusions. The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, where an electron is influenced by a magnetic field that is zero in the region of space accessible to the electron, and the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect where an electron is affected by a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in the region where the electron is propagating, i.e., such that the electric field vanishes along its trajectory. The Aharonov-Bohm effects imply such a strong departure from the physical intuition coming from classical physics that it is no wonder that they remain a highly controversial issue after more than fifty years, in spite of the fact that they are discussed in most of the text books in quantum mechanics. The magnetic case has been studied extensively. The experimental issues were settled by the remarkable experiments of Tonomura et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1443 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986)] with toroidal magnets, that gave a strong evidence of the existence of the effect, and by the recent experiment of Caprez et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210401 (2007)]10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210401 that shows that the results of the Tonomura et al. experiments cannot be explained by the action of a force. The theoretical issues were settled by Ballesteros and Weder [Commun. Math. Phys. 285, 345 (2009)10.1007/s00220-008-0579-1; J. Math. Phys. 50, 122108 (2009)10.1063/1.3266176; Commun. Math. Phys. 303, 175 (2011)]10.1007/s00220-010-1166-9 who rigorously proved that quantum mechanics predicts the experimental results of Tonomura et al. and of Caprez et al. The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect has been much less studied. Actually, its existence, that has not been confirmed experimentally, is a very controversial issue. In their 1959 paper Aharonov and Bohm proposed an ansatz for the solution to the Schrödinger equation in regions where there is a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in space. It consists in multiplying the free evolution by a phase given by the integral in time of the potential. The validity of this ansatz predicts interference fringes between parts of a coherent electron beam that are subjected to different potentials. In this paper we prove that the exact solution to the Schrödinger equation is given by the Aharonov-Bohm ansatz up to an error bound in norm that is uniform in time and that decays as a constant divided by the velocity. Our results give, for the first time, a rigorous proof that quantum mechanics predicts the existence of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect, under conditions that we provide. We hope that our results will stimulate the experimental research on the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect.
A field-interaction scheme is introduced for describing the Aharonov-Bohm effect, fully consistent with the principle of relativity. Our theory is based on the fact that local field interactions are present even when a particle moves only in a field-free region. The interaction Lagrangian between a charge and a flux is uniquely constructed from three principles: Lorentz covariance, linearity in the interaction strength, and a correct stationary limit of charge. Our result resolves fundamental questions raised on the standard interpretation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect, concerning its duality with the Aharonov-Casher effect and the equivalence between the potential and the field-interaction models for describing the electromagnetic interaction. Most of all, potential is eliminated in our theory, and all kind of the force-free Aharonov-Bohm effect is understood in a unified framework of the Lorentz-covariant local interaction of electromagnetic fields.