Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1310.4144 · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Drude Weight, Meissner Weight, Rotational Inertia of Bosonic Superfluids: How Are They Distinguished?

Balázs Hetényi

Published Feb 25, 2014• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Drude weight, the quantity which distinguishes metals from insulators, is proportional to the second derivative of the ground state energy with respect to a flux at zero flux.The same expression also appears in the definition of the Meissner weight, the quantity which indicates superconductivity, as well as in the definition of non-classical rotational inertia of bosonic superfluids.It is shown that the difference between these quantities depends on the interpretation of the average momentum term, which can be understood as the expectation value of the total momentum (Drude weight), the sum of the expectation values of single momenta (rotational inertia of a superfluid), or the sum over expectation values of momentum pairs (Meissner weight).This distinction appears naturally when the current from which the particular transport quantity is derived is cast in terms of shift operators.

DOI
10.7566/jpsj.83.034711

Related papers

Drude and Superfluid Weights in Extended Systems: the Role of Discontinuities and δ-peaks in the One and Two-Body Momentum Densities

The question of conductivity is revisited. Using the total momentum shift operator to construct the perturbed many-body Hamiltonian and ground state wave function the second derivative of the ground state energy with respect to the perturbing field is expressed in terms of the one and two-body momentum densities. The distinction between the adiabatic and envelope function derivatives, hence that between the Drude and superfluid weights, can be introduced in a straightforward manner. It is shown that a discontinuity in the momentum density leads to a contribution to the Drude weight, but not the superfluid weight, however a δ-function contribution in the two-body momentum density (such as in the BCS wave-funtion) contributes to both quantities. The connection between the discontinuity in the momentum density and localization is also demonstrated.

•Jan 1, 2012•3 citations

Drude and Superfluid Weights in Extended Systems: The Role of Discontinuities and δ-Peaks in the One- and Two-Body Momentum Densities

Balázs Hetényi

The question of conductivity is revisited. Using the total momentum shift operator to construct the perturbed many-body Hamiltonian and ground state wave function the second derivative of the ground state energy with respect to the perturbing field is expressed in terms of the one and two-body momentum densities. The distinction between the adiabatic and envelope function derivatives, hence that between the Drude and superfluid weights can be introduced in a straightforward manner. It is shown that a discontinuity in the momentum density leads to a contribution to the Drude weight, but not the superfluid weight, however a $δ$-function contribution in the two-body momentum density (such as in the BCS wave-funtion) contributes to both quantities. The connection between the discontinuity in the momentum density and localization is also demonstrated.

arXiv:1111.6166•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Jan 12, 2012•3 citations

Superfluid density and the Drude weight of the Hubbard model

Douglas J. Scalapino, Steven R. White, Shoucheng Zhang

We study the superfluid density and the Drude weight of the Hubbard model by investigating two different limiting behaviors of the current-current correlation function. These quantities provide criteria which allow one to distinguish between superconducting, metallic, and insulating ground states of an interacting many-body system. Monte Carlo calculations are performed to study these quantities.

Physical Review Letters•May 4, 1992•264 citations

Drude weight in hard-core boson systems: Possibility of a finite-temperature ideal conductor

Gourab Majumder, Arti Garg

We calculate the Drude weight in the superfluid (SF) and supersolid (SS) phases of the hard-core boson (HCB) model on a square lattice using stochastic series expansion (SSE). We demonstrate from our numerical calculations that the normal phase of HCBs in two dimensions can be an ideal conductor with dissipationless transport. In two dimensions, when the ground state is a SF, the superfluid stiffness drops to zero with a Kosterlitz-Thouless type transition at ${T}_{\mathrm{KT}}$. The Drude weight, though is equal to the stiffness below ${T}_{\mathrm{KT}}$, surprisingly, stays finite even for a range of temperatures above ${T}_{\mathrm{KT}}$ indicating the nondissipative transport in the normal state of this system. In contrast to this, in a three-dimensional SF phase, where the superfluid stiffness goes to zero continuously via a second-order phase transition at ${T}_{c}$, the Drude weight goes to zero at ${T}_{c}$, as expected. We also calculated the Drude weight in a two-dimensional SS phase, where the charge density wave (CDW) order coexists with superfluidity. For the SS phase we studied, superfluidity is lost via a Kosterlitz-Thouless transition at ${T}_{\mathrm{KT}}$ and the transition temperature for the CDW order is larger than ${T}_{\mathrm{KT}}$. In striped SS phase where the CDW order breaks the rotational symmetry of the lattice, the system behaves like an ideal conductor for a range of temperatures above ${T}_{\mathrm{KT}}$ along the lattice direction parallel to the stripes, while along the direction perpendicular to the stripes it behaves like an insulator for all $T>{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}$. In contrast to this, in the star-SS phase, the Drude weight along both lattice directions goes to zero along with the superfluid stiffness and for $T>{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}$ we have the finite temperature phase of a CDW insulator.

arXiv:1602.03687•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Oct 12, 2016•1 citation

Variational Study of Mott Transition by Means of Drude Weight and Superfluid Density

Shun Tamura, H. Yokoyama

To distinguish a metal from an insulator, the Drude weight (D, zero-frequency component of conductivity) is a useful measure, as Kohn pointed out long ago: D > 0(=0) for a metal (insulator). Later, Millis and Coppersmith showed that a variational wave function ΨQ in which the key ingredient for a Mott transition (a doublon-holon binding effect) is introduced exhibits D > 0 (metallic) even for sufficiently large correlation strength, namely, a Mott transition is absent from. ΨQ In contrast, variational Monte Carlo studies using ΨQ confirmed, by studying relevant quantities such as doublon density d and a superconducting correlation function, Pd∞ that ΨQ undoubtedly raises a Mott transition. This contradiction has been a long-standing perplexing problem. We definitely settle this problem by adding ΨQ to a configuration-dependent phase factor Pθ, which has been hitherto overlooked. This factor appropriately picks out a negative counterpart in D for insulators, so that D vanishes. Because Pθ does not affect the quantities such as d and Pd∞, the previous results of ΨQ on the Mott transition remain intact for PθΨQ.

Physics Procedia•Jan 1, 2013•6 citations

Drude and Superfluid Weights in Variational Theory: Application to the Gutzwiller Wavefunction

Balázs Hetényi

The Drude and superfluid weights are investigated in the context of variational theory. It is shown that a commonly applied procedure to obtain the Drude weight actually corresponds to the superfluid weight. This realization changes previous interpretations of conductivity for variational wavefunctions, one result being that the Gutzwiller wavefunction displays a finite superfluid weight at finite interaction. To gain insight into DC conductivity an expression for the current response in terms of a geometric phase is derived. Applying to the Gutzwiller wavefunction it is shown that for any value of the interaction the Gutzwiller wavefunction is a perfect conductor.

•Aug 3, 2012•0 citations
The Drude weight, the quantity which distinguishes metals from insulators, is proportional to the second derivative of the ground state energy with respect to a flux at zero flux.The same expression also appears in the definition of the Meissner weight, the quantity which indicates superconductivity, as well as in the definition of non-classical rotational inertia of bosonic superfluids.It is shown that the difference between these quantities depends on the interpretation of the average momentum term, which can be understood as the expectation value of the total momentum (Drude weight), the sum of the expectation values of single momenta (rotational inertia of a superfluid), or the sum over expectation values of momentum pairs (Meissner weight).This distinction appears naturally when the current from which the particular transport quantity is derived is cast in terms of shift operators.
The question of conductivity is revisited. Using the total momentum shift operator to construct the perturbed many-body Hamiltonian and ground state wave function the second derivative of the ground state energy with respect to the perturbing field is expressed in terms of the one and two-body momentum densities. The distinction between the adiabatic and envelope function derivatives, hence that between the Drude and superfluid weights, can be introduced in a straightforward manner. It is shown that a discontinuity in the momentum density leads to a contribution to the Drude weight, but not the superfluid weight, however a δ-function contribution in the two-body momentum density (such as in the BCS wave-funtion) contributes to both quantities. The connection between the discontinuity in the momentum density and localization is also demonstrated.
The question of conductivity is revisited. Using the total momentum shift operator to construct the perturbed many-body Hamiltonian and ground state wave function the second derivative of the ground state energy with respect to the perturbing field is expressed in terms of the one and two-body momentum densities. The distinction between the adiabatic and envelope function derivatives, hence that between the Drude and superfluid weights can be introduced in a straightforward manner. It is shown that a discontinuity in the momentum density leads to a contribution to the Drude weight, but not the superfluid weight, however a δδδ-function contribution in the two-body momentum density (such as in the BCS wave-funtion) contributes to both quantities. The connection between the discontinuity in the momentum density and localization is also demonstrated.
We calculate the Drude weight in the superfluid (SF) and supersolid (SS) phases of the hard-core boson (HCB) model on a square lattice using stochastic series expansion (SSE). We demonstrate from our numerical calculations that the normal phase of HCBs in two dimensions can be an ideal conductor with dissipationless transport. In two dimensions, when the ground state is a SF, the superfluid stiffness drops to zero with a Kosterlitz-Thouless type transition at TKT{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}TKT​. The Drude weight, though is equal to the stiffness below TKT{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}TKT​, surprisingly, stays finite even for a range of temperatures above TKT{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}TKT​ indicating the nondissipative transport in the normal state of this system. In contrast to this, in a three-dimensional SF phase, where the superfluid stiffness goes to zero continuously via a second-order phase transition at Tc{T}_{c}Tc​, the Drude weight goes to zero at Tc{T}_{c}Tc​, as expected. We also calculated the Drude weight in a two-dimensional SS phase, where the charge density wave (CDW) order coexists with superfluidity. For the SS phase we studied, superfluidity is lost via a Kosterlitz-Thouless transition at TKT{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}TKT​ and the transition temperature for the CDW order is larger than TKT{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}TKT​. In striped SS phase where the CDW order breaks the rotational symmetry of the lattice, the system behaves like an ideal conductor for a range of temperatures above TKT{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}TKT​ along the lattice direction parallel to the stripes, while along the direction perpendicular to the stripes it behaves like an insulator for all T>TKTT>{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}T>TKT​. In contrast to this, in the star-SS phase, the Drude weight along both lattice directions goes to zero along with the superfluid stiffness and for T>TKTT>{T}_{\mathrm{KT}}T>TKT​ we have the finite temperature phase of a CDW insulator.
To distinguish a metal from an insulator, the Drude weight (D, zero-frequency component of conductivity) is a useful measure, as Kohn pointed out long ago: D > 0(=0) for a metal (insulator). Later, Millis and Coppersmith showed that a variational wave function ΨQ in which the key ingredient for a Mott transition (a doublon-holon binding effect) is introduced exhibits D > 0 (metallic) even for sufficiently large correlation strength, namely, a Mott transition is absent from. ΨQ In contrast, variational Monte Carlo studies using ΨQ confirmed, by studying relevant quantities such as doublon density d and a superconducting correlation function, Pd∞ that ΨQ undoubtedly raises a Mott transition. This contradiction has been a long-standing perplexing problem. We definitely settle this problem by adding ΨQ to a configuration-dependent phase factor Pθ, which has been hitherto overlooked. This factor appropriately picks out a negative counterpart in D for insulators, so that D vanishes. Because Pθ does not affect the quantities such as d and Pd∞, the previous results of ΨQ on the Mott transition remain intact for PθΨQ.
The Drude and superfluid weights are investigated in the context of variational theory. It is shown that a commonly applied procedure to obtain the Drude weight actually corresponds to the superfluid weight. This realization changes previous interpretations of conductivity for variational wavefunctions, one result being that the Gutzwiller wavefunction displays a finite superfluid weight at finite interaction. To gain insight into DC conductivity an expression for the current response in terms of a geometric phase is derived. Applying to the Gutzwiller wavefunction it is shown that for any value of the interaction the Gutzwiller wavefunction is a perfect conductor.