In this paper we study an application of an information distance between two measurements to the problem of non-contextuality and local realism. We postulate the triangle principle which states that any information distance is well defined on any pair of measurements, even if the two measurements cannot be jointly performed. As a consequence, the triangle inequality for this distance is obeyed for any three measurements. This simple principle is valid in any classical realistic theory, however it does not hold in quantum theory. It allows us to re-derive in an astonishingly simple way a large class of non-contextuality and local realistic inequalities via multiple applications of the triangle inequality. We also show that this principle can be applied to derive monogamy relations. The triangle principle is different than the assumption of non-contextuality and local realism, which is defined as a lack of existence of a joined probability distribution giving rise to all measurable data. Therefore, we show that one can design Bell-Kochen-Specker tests using a different principle.
In this paper we study an application of an information distance between two measurements to the problem of non-contextuality and local realism. We postulate the triangle principle which states that any information distance is well defined on any pair of measurements, even if the two measurements cannot be jointly performed. As a consequence, the triangle inequality for this distance is obeyed for any three measurements. This simple principle is valid in any classical realistic theory, however it does not hold in quantum theory. It allows us to re-derive in an astonishingly simple way a large class of non-contextuality and local realistic inequalities via multiple applications of the triangle inequality. We also show that this principle can be applied to derive monogamy relations. The triangle principle is different than the assumption of non-contextuality and local realism, which is defined as a lack of existence of a joined probability distribution giving rise to all measurable data. Therefore, we show that one can design Bell-Kochen-Specker tests using a different principle.
In this paper we study an application of an information-theoretic distance between two measurements to investigate nonclassical correlations. We postulate the triangle principle, which states that any information-theoretic distance is valid for any sets of measurements, regardless if they can be jointly measured or not. As a consequence, the triangle inequality for this distance is obeyed for any three measurements. This simple principle is valid in any classical realistic theory, however, it may not hold in quantum theory. It leads to the derivation of certain inequalities whose violations are an indicator of nonclassicality. Some of these inequalities formally look the same as those found in the literature on local realism and noncontextuality, but we also derive completely different inequalities. We also show that our geometrical approach naturally implies monogamy of nonclassical correlations.
Abstract It is shown that the Bell inequalities are closely related to the triangle inequalities involving distance functions amongst pairs of random variables with values { 0 , 1 } . A hidden variables model may be defined as a mapping between a set of quantum projection operators and a set of random variables. The model is noncontextual if there is a joint probability distribution. The Bell inequalities are necessary conditions for its existence. The inequalities are most relevant when measurements are performed at space-like separation, thus showing a conflict between quantum mechanics and local realism (Bell's theorem). The relations of the Bell inequalities with contextuality, the Kochen–Specker theorem, and quantum entanglement are briefly discussed.
The descriptions of the quantum realm and the macroscopic classical world di�er signi
�cantly not only in their mathematical formulations, but also in their foundational concepts
and philosophical consequences. The assumptions of local realism, non-contextuality
and macroscopic realism (macro-realism) along with the quantum mechanical violations
of these assumptions are discussed.
A complete generalization is provided of Wigner's argument inferring quantum nonlocality,
originally restricted for the EPR-Bohm entangled state, based on assuming joint
probability distributions for all the relevant dichotomic observables. Such Generalized
Wigner Inequality (GWI) turns out to be the N-partite local realist inequality which is
violated by quantum mechanics for all pure entangled states for any N.
We then exploit the non-trivial manifestation of quantum non-locality via local contextuality
on three qubit system. Here, we propose an experimental scheme to realize this
feature by deriving a new local realist inequality. The way quantum entanglement can
be used for global contextual value assigning is discussed in a quantum pseudo-telepathy
game.
In the second part of this report, we formulate Leggett-Garg inequality (LGI) in terms
of joint probability and demonstrate its quantum mechanical violation for two state oscillation,
which is initial state dependent, unlike the case of standard LGI. It has been
shown that, the newly formulated LGI reveals robustness against unsharp measurement
for testing compatibility between macro-realism and quantum mechanics. Finally we
show that, the recently proposed No-signaling in time condition, contradicts with quantum
mechanical predictions for any degree of unsharpness in measurement.
The celebrated Bell-Kochen-Specker no-go theorem asserts that quantum mechanics does not present the property of realism; the essence of the theorem is the lack of a joint probability distribution for some experiment settings. We exploit the information theoretic form of the theorem using information measure instead of probabilistic measure and indicate that quantum mechanics does not present such kind of entropic realism either. The entropic form of Gleason's no-disturbance principle is developed and characterized by the intersection of several entropic cones. Entropic contextuality and entropic nonlocality are investigated in depth in this framework as well. We show how one can construct monogamy relations using entropic cone and basic Shannon-type inequalities. The general criterion for several entropic tests to be monogamous is also developed; using the criterion, we demonstrate that entropic nonlocal correlations, entropic contextuality tests, and entropic nonlocality and entropic contextuality are monogamous. Finally, we analyze the entropic monogamy relations for the multiparty and many-test case, which may play a crucial role in quantum network communication.
This paper discusses a possible resolution of the nonobjectivity-nonlocality dilemma in quantum mechanics in 'the light of experimental tests of the Bell inequality for two entangled photons and a Bell-like inequality for a single neutron. My conclusion is that these experiments show that quantum mechanics is nonobjective: that is, the values of physical observables cannot be assigned to a system before measurement. Bell's assumption of nonlocality has to be rejected as having no direct experimental confirmation, at least thus far. I also consider the relationships between nonobjectivity and contextuality. Specifically, I analyze the impact of the Kochen-Specker theorem on the problem of contextuality of quantum observables. I argue that, just as von Neumann's "no-go" theorem, the Kochen-Specker theorem is based on assumptions that do not correspond to the real physical situation. Finally, I present a theory of measurement based on a classical, purely wave model (pre-quantum classical statistical field theory), a model that reproduces quantum probabilities. In this model continuous fields are transformed into discrete clicks of detectors. While this model is classical, it is nonobjective. In this case, nonobjectivity is the result of the dependence of experimental outcomes on the context of measurement, in accordance with Bohr's view.
Contextuality means non-existence of a joint distribution for random variables recorded under mutually incompatible conditions, subject to certain constraints imposed on how the identity of these variables may change across these conditions. In simple quantum systems contextuality is indicated by violations of Bell-type or Leggett-Garg-type inequalities. These inequalities, however, are predicated on the assumption of no-signaling, defined as invariance of the distributions of measurement results with respect to other (e.g., earlier in time) measurements' settings. Signaling makes the inequalities inapplicable: a non-signaling system with any degree of contextuality, however high, loses any relation to this concept as soon as it exhibits any degree of signaling, however small. This is unsatisfactory. We describe a principled way of defining and measuring contextuality in arbitrary systems with random outputs, whether signaling is absent or present.