Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1309.0962 · Advances in cognitive neurodynamics

Random Variables Recorded Under Mutually Exclusive Conditions: Contextuality-by-Default

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Janne V. Kujala

Published Dec 1, 2014• 19 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/978-94-017-9548-7_57

Related papers

Contextuality-by-Default 2.0: Systems with Binary Random Variables

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Janne V. Kujala

arXiv:1604.04799•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2017•55 citations

Context–content systems of random variables: The Contextuality-by-Default theory

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Janne V. Kujala

arXiv:1511.03516•Journal of Mathematical Psychology•Jun 4, 2016•79 citations

Contextuality and Random Variables

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov

arXiv:2104.12495•Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation

Contextuality and Dichotomizations of Random Variables

Janne V. Kujala, Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov

arXiv:2105.03718•Foundations of Physics•Dec 14, 2021•1 citation

Is contextuality about the identity of random variables?

Mojtaba Aliakbarzadeh, Kirsty Kitto

arXiv:1909.13048•Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 2021•1 citation

Contextuality is about identity of random variables

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Janne V. Kujala

Contextual situations are those in which seemingly ‘the same’ random variable changes its identity depending on the conditions under which it is recorded. Such a change of identity is observed whenever the assumption that the variable is one and the same under different conditions leads to contradictions when one considers its joint distribution with other random variables (this is the essence of all Bell-type theorems). In our Contextuality-by-Default approach, instead of asking why or how the conditions force ‘one and the same’ random variable to change ‘its’ identity, any two random variables recorded under different conditions are considered different ‘automatically.’ They are never the same, nor are they jointly distributed, but one can always impose on them a joint distribution (probabilistic coupling). The special situations when there is a coupling in which these random variables are equal with probability 1 are considered noncontextual. Contextuality means that such couplings do not exist. We argue that the determination of the identity of random variables by conditions under which they are recorded is not a causal relationship and cannot violate laws of physics.

arXiv:1405.2116•Physica Scripta•Dec 1, 2014•59 citations
Contextual situations are those in which seemingly ‘the same’ random variable changes its identity depending on the conditions under which it is recorded. Such a change of identity is observed whenever the assumption that the variable is one and the same under different conditions leads to contradictions when one considers its joint distribution with other random variables (this is the essence of all Bell-type theorems). In our Contextuality-by-Default approach, instead of asking why or how the conditions force ‘one and the same’ random variable to change ‘its’ identity, any two random variables recorded under different conditions are considered different ‘automatically.’ They are never the same, nor are they jointly distributed, but one can always impose on them a joint distribution (probabilistic coupling). The special situations when there is a coupling in which these random variables are equal with probability 1 are considered noncontextual. Contextuality means that such couplings do not exist. We argue that the determination of the identity of random variables by conditions under which they are recorded is not a causal relationship and cannot violate laws of physics.