Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1308.6212 · Physics Letters A

Entanglement, superselection rules and supersymmetric quantum mechanics

E. Cattaruzza, E. Gozzi, Carlo Pagani

Published Jul 1, 2014• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2014.07.002

Related papers

Entanglement in the presence of superselection rules

Stephen D. Bartlett, Howard M. Wiseman

•Mar 23, 2003•2 citations

Quantum entanglement theory in the presence of superselection rules (15 pages)

Norbert Schuch, Frank Verstraete

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

The structure of the quantum mechanical state space and induced superselection rules

Joachim Kupsch

arXiv:quant-ph/9612033•Pramana•Nov 1, 1998•4 citations

Tradeoff between extractable mechanical work, accessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference system, under arbitrary superselection rules

Joan A. Vaccaro, Fabio Anselmi, Howard M. Wiseman +1 more

Superselection rules (SSRs) limit the mechanical and quantum processing resources represented by quantum states. However, SSRs can be violated using reference systems to break the underlying symmetry. We show that there is a duality between the ability of a system to do mechanical work and to act as a reference system. Further, for a bipartite system in a globally symmetric pure state, we find a triality between the system's ability to do local mechanical work, its ability to do ``logical work'' due to its accessible entanglement, and its ability to act as a shared reference system.

arXiv:quant-ph/0501121•Physical Review A•Mar 25, 2008•138 citations

Entanglement and Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics

E. Cattaruzza, E. Gozzi

•Aug 28, 2013•0 citations

Complementarity between extractable mechanical work, accessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference frame, under arbitrary superselection rules

Joan A. Vaccaro, Fabio Anselmi, Howard M. Wiseman +1 more

Superselection rules (SSRs) limit the mechanical and quantum processing resources represented by quantum states. However SSRs can be violated using reference systems to break the underlying symmetry. We show that there is a duality between the ability of a system to do mechanical work and to act as a reference system. Further, for a bipartite system in a globally symmetric pure state, we find a triality between the system's ability to do local mechanical work, its ability to do ``logical work'' due to its accessible entanglement, and its ability to act as a shared reference system.

•Jan 21, 2005•3 citations
Superselection rules (SSRs) limit the mechanical and quantum processing resources represented by quantum states. However, SSRs can be violated using reference systems to break the underlying symmetry. We show that there is a duality between the ability of a system to do mechanical work and to act as a reference system. Further, for a bipartite system in a globally symmetric pure state, we find a triality between the system's ability to do local mechanical work, its ability to do ``logical work'' due to its accessible entanglement, and its ability to act as a shared reference system.
Superselection rules (SSRs) limit the mechanical and quantum processing resources represented by quantum states. However SSRs can be violated using reference systems to break the underlying symmetry. We show that there is a duality between the ability of a system to do mechanical work and to act as a reference system. Further, for a bipartite system in a globally symmetric pure state, we find a triality between the system's ability to do local mechanical work, its ability to do ``logical work'' due to its accessible entanglement, and its ability to act as a shared reference system.