Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1307.6970 · Physical Review A

Implementation of standard quantum error-correction codes for solid-state qubits

Tetsufumi Tanamoto

Published Dec 26, 2013• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In quantum error-correcting code (QECC), many quantum operations and measurements are necessary to correct errors in logical qubits. In the stabilizer formalism, which is widely used in QECC, generators ${G}_{i}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}(i=1,2,...)$ consist of multiples of Pauli matrices and perform encoding, decoding, and measurement. In order to maintain encoding states, the stabilizer Hamiltonian ${H}_{\mathrm{stab}}=\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\sum}}_{i}{G}_{i}$ is suitable because its ground state corresponds to the code space. On the other hand, Hamiltonians of most solid-state qubits have two-body interactions and show their own dynamics. In addition solid-state qubits are fixed on substrate and qubit-qubit operation is restricted in their neighborhood. The main purpose of this paper is to show how to directly generate the stabilizer Hamiltonian ${H}_{\mathrm{stab}}$ from conventional two-body Hamiltonians with Ising interaction and $XY$ interaction by applying a pulse control method such as an NMR technique. We show that generation times of ${H}_{\mathrm{stab}}$ for nine-qubit code, five-qubit code, and Steane code are estimated to be less than 300 ns when typical experimental data of superconducting qubits are used, and sufficient pulse control is assumed. We also show how to prepare encoded states from an initial state $|0,...,0\ensuremath{\rangle}$. In addition, we discuss an appropriate arrangement of two- or three-dimensional arrayed qubits.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.88.062334

Related papers

Strategy for implementing stabilizer-based codes on solid-state qubits

Tetsufumi Tanamoto, Vladimir M. Stojanović, Christoph Bruder +1 more

We present a method for implementing stabilizer-based codes with encoding schemes of the operator quantum error correction paradigm, e.g., the ``standard'' five-qubit and CSS codes, on solid-state qubits with Ising or $XY$-type interactions. Using pulse sequences, we show how to dynamically generate the effective dynamics of the stabilizer Hamiltonian, the sum of an appropriate set of stabilizer operators for a given code. Within this approach, the encoded states (ground states of the stabilizer Hamiltonian) can be prepared without measurements and preserved against both the time evolution governed by the original qubit Hamiltonian, and errors caused by local sources.

arXiv:1301.4796•Physical Review A•May 6, 2013•12 citations

Experimental verification of five-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting qubits

Ming Gong, Xiao Yuan, Shiyu Wang +19 more

Quantum error correction is an essential ingredient for universal quantum computing. Despite tremendous experimental efforts in the study of quantum error correction, to date, there has been no demonstration in the realisation of universal quantum error correction code (QECC), with the subsequent verification of all key features including the identification of an arbitrary physical error, the capability for transversal manipulation of the logical state, and state decoding. To address this notoriously difficult challenge, we push the limits of the depth of superconducting quantum circuits and experimentally realise the universal five-qubit QECC, the so-called smallest perfect code that permits corrections of generic single-qubit errors. In the experiment, having optimised the encoding circuit, we employ an array of superconducting qubits to realise the five-qubit QECC for several typical logical states including the magic state, an indispensable resource for realising non-Clifford gates. The encoded states are prepared with an average fidelity of $57.1(3)\%$ while with a high fidelity of $98.6(1)\%$ in the code space. Then, the arbitrary single-qubit errors introduced manually are identified by measuring the stabilizers. We further implement logical Pauli operations with a fidelity of $97.2(2)\%$ within the code space. Finally, we realise the decoding circuit and recover the input state with a process fidelity of $57.4(7)\%$. After decoding, by identifying errors via the measurement of the four ancillae and then mathematically recovering the qubit state, we verify the power of error correction of this code. Thus, by demonstrating each key aspect of error correction with the five-qubit code, our work establishes the viability of experimental quantum error correction with superconducting qubits and paves the route to fault-tolerant quantum computing.

•Jul 10, 2019•16 citations

New construction of nine-qubit error-correcting code

Long Yang Huang, Xiaohua Wu

We report new construction of nine-qubit error-correcting code, which introduces two new nine-qubit codes and one new three-qubit code. Because both the new two nine-qubit codes have the normal logical operators, as opposed to the nine-qubit Shor code, it results in different performance when the three codes are applied in concatenated quantum error-correction. On the other hand, one of the two nine-qubit codes has the same stabilizer generators as the nine-qubit Shor code, they are more suitable for the high-wight bit-flip noise, and the other code has the different stabilizer generators, which is more suitable for the high-wight phase-flip noise. This work is enlightening to the construction of quantum error-correcting codes, and adds more options for optimizing the performance of quantum error-correction.

arXiv:2110.05130•Oct 11, 2021•0 citations

Experimental exploration of five-qubit quantum error-correcting code with superconducting qubits

Ming Gong, Xiao Yuan, Shiyu Wang +19 more

Quantum error correction is an essential ingredient for universal quantum computing. Despite tremendous experimental efforts in the study of quantum error correction, to date, there has been no demonstration in the realisation of universal quantum error-correcting code, with the subsequent verification of all key features including the identification of an arbitrary physical error, the capability for transversal manipulation of the logical state and state decoding. To address this challenge, we experimentally realise the [5, 1, 3] code, the so-called smallest perfect code that permits corrections of generic single-qubit errors. In the experiment, having optimised the encoding circuit, we employ an array of superconducting qubits to realise the [5, 1, 3] code for several typical logical states including the magic state, an indispensable resource for realising non-Clifford gates. The encoded states are prepared with an average fidelity of [Formula: see text] while with a high fidelity of [Formula: see text] in the code space. Then, the arbitrary single-qubit errors introduced manually are identified by measuring the stabilisers. We further implement logical Pauli operations with a fidelity of [Formula: see text] within the code space. Finally, we realise the decoding circuit and recover the input state with an overall fidelity of [Formula: see text], in total with 92 gates. Our work demonstrates each key aspect of the [5, 1, 3] code and verifies the viability of experimental realisation of quantum error-correcting codes with superconducting qubits.

arXiv:1907.04507•National Science Review•Jan 15, 2021•53 citations

Quantum Circuits for Stabilizer Error Correcting Codes: A Tutorial

Arijit Mondal, Keshab K. Parhi

Quantum computers have the potential to provide exponential speedups over their classical counterparts. Quantum principles are being applied to fields such as communications, information processing, and artificial intelligence to achieve quantum advantage. However, quantum bits are extremely noisy and prone to decoherence. Thus, keeping the qubits error free is extremely important toward reliable quantum computing. Quantum error correcting codes have been studied for several decades and methods have been proposed to import classical error correcting codes to the quantum domain. Along with the exploration into novel and more efficient quantum error correction codes, it is also essential to design circuits for practical realization of these codes. This article serves as a tutorial on designing and simulating quantum encoder and decoder circuits for stabilizer codes. We first describe Shor’s 9-qubit code which was the first quantum error correcting code. We discuss the stabilizer formalism along with the design of encoding and decoding circuits for stabilizer codes such as the five-qubit code and Steane code. We also design nearest neighbor compliant circuits for the above codes. The circuits were simulated and verified using IBM Qiskit.

arXiv:2309.11793•IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine•Jan 1, 2024•12 citations

Realization of real-time fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Ciarán Ryan-Anderson, Justin Bohnet, K. Lee +14 more

Correcting errors in real time is essential for reliable large-scale quantum computations. Realizing this high-level function requires a system capable of several low-level primitives, including single-qubit and two-qubit operations, mid-circuit measurements of subsets of qubits, real-time processing of measurement outcomes, and the ability to condition subsequent gate operations on those measurements. In this work, we use a ten qubit QCCD trapped-ion quantum computer to encode a single logical qubit using the $[[7,1,3]]$ color code, first proposed by Steane~\cite{steane1996error}. The logical qubit is initialized into the eigenstates of three mutually unbiased bases using an encoding circuit, and we measure an average logical SPAM error of $1.7(6) \times 10^{-3}$, compared to the average physical SPAM error $2.4(8) \times 10^{-3}$ of our qubits. We then perform multiple syndrome measurements on the encoded qubit, using a real-time decoder to determine any necessary corrections that are done either as software updates to the Pauli frame or as physically applied gates. Moreover, these procedures are done repeatedly while maintaining coherence, demonstrating a dynamically protected logical qubit memory. Additionally, we demonstrate non-Clifford qubit operations by encoding a logical magic state with an error rate below the threshold required for magic state distillation. Finally, we present system-level simulations that allow us to identify key hardware upgrades that may enable the system to reach the pseudo-threshold.

arXiv:2107.07505•Jul 15, 2021•7 citations
In quantum error-correcting code (QECC), many quantum operations and measurements are necessary to correct errors in logical qubits. In the stabilizer formalism, which is widely used in QECC, generators Gi(i=1,2,...){G}_{i}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}(i=1,2,...)Gi​(i=1,2,...) consist of multiples of Pauli matrices and perform encoding, decoding, and measurement. In order to maintain encoding states, the stabilizer Hamiltonian Hstab=\ensuremath−\ensuremath∑iGi{H}_{\mathrm{stab}}=\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\sum}}_{i}{G}_{i}Hstab​=\ensuremath−\ensuremath∑i​Gi​ is suitable because its ground state corresponds to the code space. On the other hand, Hamiltonians of most solid-state qubits have two-body interactions and show their own dynamics. In addition solid-state qubits are fixed on substrate and qubit-qubit operation is restricted in their neighborhood. The main purpose of this paper is to show how to directly generate the stabilizer Hamiltonian Hstab{H}_{\mathrm{stab}}Hstab​ from conventional two-body Hamiltonians with Ising interaction and XYXYXY interaction by applying a pulse control method such as an NMR technique. We show that generation times of Hstab{H}_{\mathrm{stab}}Hstab​ for nine-qubit code, five-qubit code, and Steane code are estimated to be less than 300 ns when typical experimental data of superconducting qubits are used, and sufficient pulse control is assumed. We also show how to prepare encoded states from an initial state ∣0,...,0\ensuremath⟩|0,...,0\ensuremath{\rangle}∣0,...,0\ensuremath⟩. In addition, we discuss an appropriate arrangement of two- or three-dimensional arrayed qubits.
We present a method for implementing stabilizer-based codes with encoding schemes of the operator quantum error correction paradigm, e.g., the ``standard'' five-qubit and CSS codes, on solid-state qubits with Ising or XYXYXY-type interactions. Using pulse sequences, we show how to dynamically generate the effective dynamics of the stabilizer Hamiltonian, the sum of an appropriate set of stabilizer operators for a given code. Within this approach, the encoded states (ground states of the stabilizer Hamiltonian) can be prepared without measurements and preserved against both the time evolution governed by the original qubit Hamiltonian, and errors caused by local sources.
Quantum error correction is an essential ingredient for universal quantum computing. Despite tremendous experimental efforts in the study of quantum error correction, to date, there has been no demonstration in the realisation of universal quantum error correction code (QECC), with the subsequent verification of all key features including the identification of an arbitrary physical error, the capability for transversal manipulation of the logical state, and state decoding. To address this notoriously difficult challenge, we push the limits of the depth of superconducting quantum circuits and experimentally realise the universal five-qubit QECC, the so-called smallest perfect code that permits corrections of generic single-qubit errors. In the experiment, having optimised the encoding circuit, we employ an array of superconducting qubits to realise the five-qubit QECC for several typical logical states including the magic state, an indispensable resource for realising non-Clifford gates. The encoded states are prepared with an average fidelity of 57.1(3)%57.1(3)\%57.1(3)% while with a high fidelity of 98.6(1)%98.6(1)\%98.6(1)% in the code space. Then, the arbitrary single-qubit errors introduced manually are identified by measuring the stabilizers. We further implement logical Pauli operations with a fidelity of 97.2(2)%97.2(2)\%97.2(2)% within the code space. Finally, we realise the decoding circuit and recover the input state with a process fidelity of 57.4(7)%57.4(7)\%57.4(7)%. After decoding, by identifying errors via the measurement of the four ancillae and then mathematically recovering the qubit state, we verify the power of error correction of this code. Thus, by demonstrating each key aspect of error correction with the five-qubit code, our work establishes the viability of experimental quantum error correction with superconducting qubits and paves the route to fault-tolerant quantum computing.
We report new construction of nine-qubit error-correcting code, which introduces two new nine-qubit codes and one new three-qubit code. Because both the new two nine-qubit codes have the normal logical operators, as opposed to the nine-qubit Shor code, it results in different performance when the three codes are applied in concatenated quantum error-correction. On the other hand, one of the two nine-qubit codes has the same stabilizer generators as the nine-qubit Shor code, they are more suitable for the high-wight bit-flip noise, and the other code has the different stabilizer generators, which is more suitable for the high-wight phase-flip noise. This work is enlightening to the construction of quantum error-correcting codes, and adds more options for optimizing the performance of quantum error-correction.
Quantum error correction is an essential ingredient for universal quantum computing. Despite tremendous experimental efforts in the study of quantum error correction, to date, there has been no demonstration in the realisation of universal quantum error-correcting code, with the subsequent verification of all key features including the identification of an arbitrary physical error, the capability for transversal manipulation of the logical state and state decoding. To address this challenge, we experimentally realise the [5, 1, 3] code, the so-called smallest perfect code that permits corrections of generic single-qubit errors. In the experiment, having optimised the encoding circuit, we employ an array of superconducting qubits to realise the [5, 1, 3] code for several typical logical states including the magic state, an indispensable resource for realising non-Clifford gates. The encoded states are prepared with an average fidelity of [Formula: see text] while with a high fidelity of [Formula: see text] in the code space. Then, the arbitrary single-qubit errors introduced manually are identified by measuring the stabilisers. We further implement logical Pauli operations with a fidelity of [Formula: see text] within the code space. Finally, we realise the decoding circuit and recover the input state with an overall fidelity of [Formula: see text], in total with 92 gates. Our work demonstrates each key aspect of the [5, 1, 3] code and verifies the viability of experimental realisation of quantum error-correcting codes with superconducting qubits.
Quantum computers have the potential to provide exponential speedups over their classical counterparts. Quantum principles are being applied to fields such as communications, information processing, and artificial intelligence to achieve quantum advantage. However, quantum bits are extremely noisy and prone to decoherence. Thus, keeping the qubits error free is extremely important toward reliable quantum computing. Quantum error correcting codes have been studied for several decades and methods have been proposed to import classical error correcting codes to the quantum domain. Along with the exploration into novel and more efficient quantum error correction codes, it is also essential to design circuits for practical realization of these codes. This article serves as a tutorial on designing and simulating quantum encoder and decoder circuits for stabilizer codes. We first describe Shor’s 9-qubit code which was the first quantum error correcting code. We discuss the stabilizer formalism along with the design of encoding and decoding circuits for stabilizer codes such as the five-qubit code and Steane code. We also design nearest neighbor compliant circuits for the above codes. The circuits were simulated and verified using IBM Qiskit.
Correcting errors in real time is essential for reliable large-scale quantum computations. Realizing this high-level function requires a system capable of several low-level primitives, including single-qubit and two-qubit operations, mid-circuit measurements of subsets of qubits, real-time processing of measurement outcomes, and the ability to condition subsequent gate operations on those measurements. In this work, we use a ten qubit QCCD trapped-ion quantum computer to encode a single logical qubit using the [[7,1,3]][[7,1,3]][[7,1,3]] color code, first proposed by Steane~\cite{steane1996error}. The logical qubit is initialized into the eigenstates of three mutually unbiased bases using an encoding circuit, and we measure an average logical SPAM error of 1.7(6)×10−31.7(6) \times 10^{-3}1.7(6)×10−3, compared to the average physical SPAM error 2.4(8)×10−32.4(8) \times 10^{-3}2.4(8)×10−3 of our qubits. We then perform multiple syndrome measurements on the encoded qubit, using a real-time decoder to determine any necessary corrections that are done either as software updates to the Pauli frame or as physically applied gates. Moreover, these procedures are done repeatedly while maintaining coherence, demonstrating a dynamically protected logical qubit memory. Additionally, we demonstrate non-Clifford qubit operations by encoding a logical magic state with an error rate below the threshold required for magic state distillation. Finally, we present system-level simulations that allow us to identify key hardware upgrades that may enable the system to reach the pseudo-threshold.