Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1307.2683

Metrology with entangled coherent states - a quantum scaling paradox

Michael J. W. Hall

Published Jul 10, 2013• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

There has been much interest in developing phase estimation schemes which beat the so-called Heisenberg limit, i.e., for which the phase resolution scales better than 1/n, where n is a measure of resources such as the average photon number or the number of atomic qubits. In particular, a number of nonlinear schemes have been proposed for which the resolution appears to scale as 1/n^k or even exp(-n), based on optimising the quantum Cramer-Rao bound. Such schemes include the use of entangled coherent states. However, it may be shown that the average root mean square errors of the proposed schemes (averaged over any prior distribution of phase shifts), cannot beat the Heisenberg limit, and that simple estimation schemes based on entangled coherent states cannot scale better than 1/n^{1/4}. This paradox is related to the role of 'bias' in Cramer-Rao bounds, and is only partially ameliorated via iterative implementations of the proposed schemes. The results are based on new information-theoretic bounds for the average information gain and error of any phase estimation scheme, and generalise to estimates of shifts generated by any operator having discrete eigenvalues.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1307.2683

Related papers

Quantum Weiss-Weinstein bounds for quantum metrology

Xiao-Ming Lu, Mankei Tsang

Abstract Sensing and imaging are among the most important applications of quantum information science. To investigate their fundamental limits and the possibility of quantum enhancements, for decades researchers have relied on the quantum Cramér-Rao lower error bounds pioneered by Helstrom. Recent work, however, has called into question the tightness of those bounds for highly nonclassical states in the non-asymptotic regime, and better methods are now needed to assess the attainable quantum limits in reality. Here we propose a new class of quantum bounds called quantum Weiss-Weinstein bounds, which include Cramér-Rao-type inequalities as special cases but can also be significantly tighter to the attainable error. We demonstrate the superiority of our bounds through the derivation of a Heisenberg limit and phase estimation examples.

arXiv:1511.08974•Quantum Science and Technology•Mar 1, 2016•31 citations

Quantum Speed Limits and the Ultimate Scaling of the Quantum Sensors

Yusef Maleki

Quantum metrology promises sensitivity beyond classical strategies, yet it remains unsettled how quantum-enabled precision should scale with physical resources and how to interpret quantum advantage. We provide a physically grounded resource accounting that clarifies the true Heisenberg limit and resolves apparent super-Heisenberg paradoxes. We demonstrate that the Heisenberg limit is best viewed as an information-theoretic manifestation of the quantum speed limit. We illustrate these ideas with a simple, super-resolving phase-estimation protocol based on Rabi oscillations in two-level atoms driven on an $m$-photon resonance. In this setting, the phase error scales as $n^{-m/2}$, where $n$ is the average photon number. Recasting metrological sensitivity through quantum dynamical speed limits yields operational bounds that reconcile such super-resolution strategies with the standard Heisenberg interpretation and identify the relevant resources in the norm of the generator. We also revisit the common attribution of the NOON state's $1/n$ scaling to quantum entanglement. We show that such an attribution is not generic and the Heisenberg $1/n$ scaling does not, by itself, certify entanglement as the enabling resource.

quant-pharXiv:2607.23573•Entropy•Jul 28, 2026•1 citation

Heisenberg Limit beyond Quantum Fisher Information

Wojciech Górecki

The Heisenberg limit provides a fundamental bound on the achievable estimation precision with a limited number of $N$ resources used (e.g., atoms, photons, etc.). Using entangled quantum states makes it possible to scale the precision with $N$ better than when resources would be used independently. Consequently, the optimal use of all resources involves accumulating them in a single execution of the experiment. Unfortunately, that implies that the most common theoretical tool used to analyze metrological protocols - quantum Fisher information (QFI) - does not allow for a reliable description of this problem, as it becomes operationally meaningful only with multiple repetitions of the experiment. In this thesis, using the formalism of Bayesian estimation and the minimax estimator, I derive asymptotically saturable bounds on the precision of the estimation for the case of noiseless unitary evolution. For the case where the number of resources $N$ is strictly constrained, I show that the final measurement uncertainty is $π$ times larger than would be implied by a naive use of QFI. I also analyze the case where a constraint is imposed only on the average amount of resources, the exact value of which may fluctuate (in which case QFI does not provide any universal bound for precision). In both cases, I study the asymptotic saturability and the rate of convergence of these bounds. In the following part, I analyze the problem of the Heisenberg limit when multiple parameters are measured simultaneously on the same physical system. In particular, I investigate the existence of a gain from measuring all parameters simultaneously compared to distributing the same amount of resources to measure them independently. I focus on two examples - the measurement of multiple phase shifts in a multi-arm interferometer and the measurement of three magnetic field components.

arXiv:2304.14370•Apr 27, 2023•1 citation

Quantum Metrology

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract Chapter 24 provides a compact introduction to the topic of quantum metrology, focusing on Hamiltonian parameter estimation in the frequentist and in the Bayesian paradigms. We first discuss how estimates of non-directly measurable quantities such as phases are obtained from measurement statistics in the frequentist approach. We then discuss the Cramér-Rao bound and the Fisher information and study single-qubit phase estimation in the light of this result. We then turn to the multi-qubit setting and discuss the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, for which the quantum Fisher information is the central quantity of interest. In this context we discuss the Uhlmann fidelity in detail. We further contrast Heisenberg scaling with the standard quantum limit in the phase-estimation scenario. Finally, we analyse phase estimation in the Bayesian-estimation approach and derive the van Trees inequality as a Bayesian version of the Cramér-Rao bound

•Sep 7, 2023•0 citations

Global Precision Limits in Critical Quantum Metrology: From Cramér-Rao to Ziv-Zakai

Neng Zeng, Tao Liu, Yu-Ran Zhang

Critical quantum metrology with equilibrium states predicts quantum-enhanced sensitivity only in the vicinity of criticality, where large prior information about the parameter is required. By employing quantum Ziv-Zakai bounds, we derive a limit on the mean-square error in critical quantum metrology. For second-order quantum phase transitions, we show that the precision predicted by the Cramér-Rao bound offers no substantial improvement over the prior standard deviation. Thus, the critical quantum sensor's precision can only achieve a constant gain compared to the prior standard deviation, even without performing any measurement. We elucidate the fundamental limitation on the achievable precision in critical quantum metrology in the context of local sensing, even without considering state-preparation costs or noise. Thus, the super-Heisenberg-limited sensitivity at criticality arises from precise prior knowledge rather than a genuine gain due to criticality. Our work provides a practical framework for assessing critical quantum metrology and a routine for studying quantum sensing with many-body systems.

quant-pharXiv:2607.08431•Jul 10, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-enhanced Phase Estimation in Optical Interferometry

Jaspreet Sahota

Quantum-enhanced interferometers utilize non-classical states of light in order to surpass the limitations imposed by classical physics on phase measurement sensitivity and resolution. We review key scientific developments in this growing field of research and derive fundamental metrology concepts, namely the Cram\'{e}r-Rao bound and the Fisher information, which are used to analyze the metrological performance of quantum states of light. We propose a supersensitive quantum interferometry protocol that can be amplified to the macroscopic realm (i.e. the mean number of photons of the probe state can reach approximately 100,000 photons) using contemporary techniques of spontaneous parametric down conversion. The parity measurement on the output field asymptotically saturates the quantum Cram\'{e}r-Rao bound, which scales like the Heisenberg limit. We uncover the role of photon statistics on phase sensitivity and rule out the necessity of mode entanglement for quantum-enhanced interferometry. Based on these insights we outline a practical metrology technique (independent of mode entanglement) that measures a phase delay of a single-mode anti-squeezing operation. This scheme can also be scaled macroscopically using contemporary techniques and is shown to significantly surpass the shot-noise limit (SNL) in the presence of realistic losses. Finally, the physical resources that enable quantum-enhanced interferometry is studied by analyzing the quantum Fisher information (QFI) using the first quantization and the second quantization formalisms of quantum mechanics. It is shown that increasing the intra-mode correlations of an interferometer (as quantified by the second order Glauber coherence function) can be conducive to attaining a quantum advantage in phase estimation; whereas, introducing mode entanglement can reduce phase sensitivity. Using the first quantization description, we derive a formula for the QFI that shows explicitly how the Heisenberg scaling term depends on particle entanglement.

•Nov 1, 2017•0 citations
There has been much interest in developing phase estimation schemes which beat the so-called Heisenberg limit, i.e., for which the phase resolution scales better than 1/n, where n is a measure of resources such as the average photon number or the number of atomic qubits. In particular, a number of nonlinear schemes have been proposed for which the resolution appears to scale as 1/n^k or even exp(-n), based on optimising the quantum Cramer-Rao bound. Such schemes include the use of entangled coherent states. However, it may be shown that the average root mean square errors of the proposed schemes (averaged over any prior distribution of phase shifts), cannot beat the Heisenberg limit, and that simple estimation schemes based on entangled coherent states cannot scale better than 1/n^{1/4}. This paradox is related to the role of 'bias' in Cramer-Rao bounds, and is only partially ameliorated via iterative implementations of the proposed schemes. The results are based on new information-theoretic bounds for the average information gain and error of any phase estimation scheme, and generalise to estimates of shifts generated by any operator having discrete eigenvalues.
Abstract Sensing and imaging are among the most important applications of quantum information science. To investigate their fundamental limits and the possibility of quantum enhancements, for decades researchers have relied on the quantum Cramér-Rao lower error bounds pioneered by Helstrom. Recent work, however, has called into question the tightness of those bounds for highly nonclassical states in the non-asymptotic regime, and better methods are now needed to assess the attainable quantum limits in reality. Here we propose a new class of quantum bounds called quantum Weiss-Weinstein bounds, which include Cramér-Rao-type inequalities as special cases but can also be significantly tighter to the attainable error. We demonstrate the superiority of our bounds through the derivation of a Heisenberg limit and phase estimation examples.
Quantum metrology promises sensitivity beyond classical strategies, yet it remains unsettled how quantum-enabled precision should scale with physical resources and how to interpret quantum advantage. We provide a physically grounded resource accounting that clarifies the true Heisenberg limit and resolves apparent super-Heisenberg paradoxes. We demonstrate that the Heisenberg limit is best viewed as an information-theoretic manifestation of the quantum speed limit. We illustrate these ideas with a simple, super-resolving phase-estimation protocol based on Rabi oscillations in two-level atoms driven on an mmm-photon resonance. In this setting, the phase error scales as n−m/2n^{-m/2}n−m/2, where nnn is the average photon number. Recasting metrological sensitivity through quantum dynamical speed limits yields operational bounds that reconcile such super-resolution strategies with the standard Heisenberg interpretation and identify the relevant resources in the norm of the generator. We also revisit the common attribution of the NOON state's 1/n1/n1/n scaling to quantum entanglement. We show that such an attribution is not generic and the Heisenberg 1/n1/n1/n scaling does not, by itself, certify entanglement as the enabling resource.
The Heisenberg limit provides a fundamental bound on the achievable estimation precision with a limited number of NNN resources used (e.g., atoms, photons, etc.). Using entangled quantum states makes it possible to scale the precision with NNN better than when resources would be used independently. Consequently, the optimal use of all resources involves accumulating them in a single execution of the experiment. Unfortunately, that implies that the most common theoretical tool used to analyze metrological protocols - quantum Fisher information (QFI) - does not allow for a reliable description of this problem, as it becomes operationally meaningful only with multiple repetitions of the experiment. In this thesis, using the formalism of Bayesian estimation and the minimax estimator, I derive asymptotically saturable bounds on the precision of the estimation for the case of noiseless unitary evolution. For the case where the number of resources NNN is strictly constrained, I show that the final measurement uncertainty is πππ times larger than would be implied by a naive use of QFI. I also analyze the case where a constraint is imposed only on the average amount of resources, the exact value of which may fluctuate (in which case QFI does not provide any universal bound for precision). In both cases, I study the asymptotic saturability and the rate of convergence of these bounds. In the following part, I analyze the problem of the Heisenberg limit when multiple parameters are measured simultaneously on the same physical system. In particular, I investigate the existence of a gain from measuring all parameters simultaneously compared to distributing the same amount of resources to measure them independently. I focus on two examples - the measurement of multiple phase shifts in a multi-arm interferometer and the measurement of three magnetic field components.
Abstract Chapter 24 provides a compact introduction to the topic of quantum metrology, focusing on Hamiltonian parameter estimation in the frequentist and in the Bayesian paradigms. We first discuss how estimates of non-directly measurable quantities such as phases are obtained from measurement statistics in the frequentist approach. We then discuss the Cramér-Rao bound and the Fisher information and study single-qubit phase estimation in the light of this result. We then turn to the multi-qubit setting and discuss the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, for which the quantum Fisher information is the central quantity of interest. In this context we discuss the Uhlmann fidelity in detail. We further contrast Heisenberg scaling with the standard quantum limit in the phase-estimation scenario. Finally, we analyse phase estimation in the Bayesian-estimation approach and derive the van Trees inequality as a Bayesian version of the Cramér-Rao bound
Critical quantum metrology with equilibrium states predicts quantum-enhanced sensitivity only in the vicinity of criticality, where large prior information about the parameter is required. By employing quantum Ziv-Zakai bounds, we derive a limit on the mean-square error in critical quantum metrology. For second-order quantum phase transitions, we show that the precision predicted by the Cramér-Rao bound offers no substantial improvement over the prior standard deviation. Thus, the critical quantum sensor's precision can only achieve a constant gain compared to the prior standard deviation, even without performing any measurement. We elucidate the fundamental limitation on the achievable precision in critical quantum metrology in the context of local sensing, even without considering state-preparation costs or noise. Thus, the super-Heisenberg-limited sensitivity at criticality arises from precise prior knowledge rather than a genuine gain due to criticality. Our work provides a practical framework for assessing critical quantum metrology and a routine for studying quantum sensing with many-body systems.
Quantum-enhanced interferometers utilize non-classical states of light in order to surpass the limitations imposed by classical physics on phase measurement sensitivity and resolution. We review key scientific developments in this growing field of research and derive fundamental metrology concepts, namely the Cram\'{e}r-Rao bound and the Fisher information, which are used to analyze the metrological performance of quantum states of light. We propose a supersensitive quantum interferometry protocol that can be amplified to the macroscopic realm (i.e. the mean number of photons of the probe state can reach approximately 100,000 photons) using contemporary techniques of spontaneous parametric down conversion. The parity measurement on the output field asymptotically saturates the quantum Cram\'{e}r-Rao bound, which scales like the Heisenberg limit. We uncover the role of photon statistics on phase sensitivity and rule out the necessity of mode entanglement for quantum-enhanced interferometry. Based on these insights we outline a practical metrology technique (independent of mode entanglement) that measures a phase delay of a single-mode anti-squeezing operation. This scheme can also be scaled macroscopically using contemporary techniques and is shown to significantly surpass the shot-noise limit (SNL) in the presence of realistic losses. Finally, the physical resources that enable quantum-enhanced interferometry is studied by analyzing the quantum Fisher information (QFI) using the first quantization and the second quantization formalisms of quantum mechanics. It is shown that increasing the intra-mode correlations of an interferometer (as quantified by the second order Glauber coherence function) can be conducive to attaining a quantum advantage in phase estimation; whereas, introducing mode entanglement can reduce phase sensitivity. Using the first quantization description, we derive a formula for the QFI that shows explicitly how the Heisenberg scaling term depends on particle entanglement.