Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1307.2505 · New Journal of Physics

Dispersive regime of the Jaynes–Cummings and Rabi lattice

Guanyu Zhu, Sebastian Schmidt, Jens Koch

Published Nov 1, 2013• 39 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Photon-based strongly correlated lattice models like the Jaynes–Cummings and Rabi lattices differ from their more conventional relatives like the Bose–Hubbard model by the presence of an additional tunable parameter: the frequency detuning between the pseudo-spin degree of freedom and the harmonic mode frequency on each site. Whenever this detuning is large compared to relevant coupling strengths, the system is said to be in the dispersive regime. The physics of this regime is well-understood at the level of a single Jaynes–Cummings or Rabi site. Here, we extend the theoretical description of the dispersive regime to lattices with many sites, for both strong and ultra-strong coupling. We discuss the nature and spatial range of the resulting qubit–qubit and photon–photon coupling, demonstrate the emergence of photon-pairing and squeezing and illustrate our results by exact diagonalization of the Rabi dimer.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/115002

Related papers

Jaynes-Cummings dynamics in strong coupling for many-interacting-qubit quantum Rabi models

Roberto Grimaudo, Sagnik Chakraborty, Rosario Lo Franco +1 more

The present work focuses on the strong/weak interaction of many-body spin-systems with a cavity mode. It introduces the necessity of redefining the physical conditions determining the strong/weak coupling regime in those systems. In more complex systems, the effective coupling emerging from the collective dynamics may differ indeed from the actual coupling of each individual subsystem with the bosonic field. This is shown by highlighting some counter-intuitive dynamical effects properly related to the coupling regime: a Jaynes-Cummings dynamics emerging although a strong interaction is present. The universality of this result is demonstrated through the analysis of three distinct systems: a two-qubit, a two-qutrit, and an $N$-qubit chain quantum Rabi models.

quant-pharXiv:2604.20363•Apr 23, 2026•0 citations

Qubit-oscillator dynamics in the dispersive regime: Analytical theory beyond the rotating-wave approximation

David Zueco, Georg M. Reuther, Sigmund Kohler +1 more

We generalize the dispersive theory of the Jaynes-Cummings model beyond the frequently employed rotating-wave approximation (RWA) in the coupling between the two-level system and the resonator. For a detuning sufficiently larger than the qubit-oscillator coupling, we diagonalize the non-RWA Hamiltonian and discuss the differences to the known RWA results. Our results extend the regime in which dispersive qubit readout is possible. If several qubits are coupled to one resonator, an effective qubit-qubit interaction of Ising type emerges, whereas RWA leads to isotropic $XY$ interaction. This impacts on the entanglement characteristics of the qubits.

arXiv:0907.3516•Physical Review A•Sep 30, 2009•201 citations

Quantum phase transitions for two coupled sites with dipole-coupled effective Jaynes-Cummings model

Lei Tan, Yu Qing Zhang, Liu, Wu Ming

The nature of the ground states for a system composed of two coupled cavities with each containing a pair of dipole-coupled two-level atoms are studied over a wide range of detunings and dipole coupling strengths. The cases for three limits of exact resonance, large positive and negative detunings are discussed, and four types of the ground states are revealed. Then the phase diagrams of the ground state are plotted by choosing three different "order parameters". We find that the phase space, determined by the combinative action of detuning and the dipole coupling strength, is divided into four regions. This is different from the general Bose-Hubbard model and more richer physics are presented in the two-site coupled cavities system. That is, the insulator region may be polaritonic or atomic and the superfluid region may be polaritonic or photonic in nature.

arXiv:1101.4751•Jan 25, 2011•0 citations

From Adiabatic to Dispersive Readout of Quantum Circuits

A. Levy Yeyati, Sunghun Park, C. Metzger +4 more

Spectral properties of a quantum circuit are efficiently read out by monitoring the resonance frequency shift it induces in a microwave resonator coupled to it. When the two systems are strongly detuned, theory attributes the shift to an effective resonator capacitance or inductance that depends on the quantum circuit state. At small detuning, the shift arises from the exchange of virtual photons, as described by the Jaynes-Cummings model. Here we present a theory bridging these two limits and illustrate, with several examples, its necessity for a general description of quantum circuits readout. Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics (cQED) is at the heart of most advanced superconducting quantum technologies. Different types of superconducting qubits can be strongly coupled to microwave resonators thus achieving regimes and phenomenena which cannot be reached within the realm of quantum optics [1]. More recently, strong coupling between microwave resonators and a variety of other quantum systems not necessarily involving superconductors has been achieved [2], extending further the realm of cQED. In all these applications the measurement of the qubit or the hybrid device state is achieved by monitoring the resonator properties. Theoretically , two regimes have been approached using disconnected descriptions [3]: the dispersive regime, where the qubit-resonator detuning is larger than the coupling strength yet small enough to allow the exchange of virtual photons, and the adiabatic regime, where the de-tuning is sufficiently large for virtual processes to be strongly suppressed. The dispersive regime, which describes level repulsion between those of the quantum circuit and of the resonator, is typically dealt with using a Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian within different levels of approximation [3-10]. In contrast, the adiabatic regime accounts for the renormalization of the resonator capaci-tance/inductance by the effective capacitance of the circuit , including its "quantum capacitance" [11, 12], or its effective inductance [13, 14], which modifies the resonator frequency [15, 16]. However, there is no actual border between these two regimes which could justify a separate treatment, as illustrated by recent experiments on hybrid cQED setups [17] that reveal features of both regimes for the same device. This situation claims for a unified description of quantum circuits readout, going beyond the standard Jaynes-Cummings model, which could be applied to different types of devices over a large range of parameters. * Corresponding author : a.l.yeyati@uam.es In the present Letter we derive a general expression for the resonator frequency shift when coupled to a generic quantum circuit. This expression naturally interpolates between the adiabatic and the dispersive regimes, thus allowing to clarify their origin from the same coupling Hamiltonian. In addition our formalism is not restricted to the usual two-level approximations but any multilevel situation can be described on the same footing. We illustrate the importance of the different terms in our expression by analyzing well-known models like a short single channel superconducting weak link hosting Andreev states, the RF-SQUID and the Cooper pair box. Resonator-quantum circuit coupling.-The system we consider comprises a resonant circuit and a quantum circuit coupled through phase or charge fluctuations as depicted in Figs. 1(a), 2(a) and in the inset of Fig. 3. The resonant circuit is represented as a lumped-element LC resonator with bare resonance frequency f r = ω r /2π, with ω r = 1/ √ L r C r. Introducing the photon annihilation (creation) operators a (a †), it can be described by the Hamiltonian H r = ω r a † a. On the other hand, the quantum circuit Hamiltonian,Ĥ qc (x), depends on a dimensionless control parameter x, corresponding to an excess charge on a capacitor or a flux through a loop. We denote by |Φ i (x) the eigenstates of the uncoupled quantum circuit,Ĥ qc (x)|Φ i (x) = E i (x)|Φ i (x). Flux (charge) fluctuations in the resonator lead to x → x 0 +x r , wherex r = λ(s a + s * a †) with a coupling constant λ, depending on a coupling scheme [19], and s = 1 (−i). We assume λ 1 in accordance with experiments. The resonator-quantum circuit coupling HamiltonianĤ c is obtained by expandingĤ qc (x 0 +x r) up to second order inx rĤ c (x 0) =x rĤ qc (x 0) +x 2 r 2Ĥ qc (x 0), (1) where the prime stands for the derivative with respect to x. The Hamiltonian describing resonator, quantum

•Aug 10, 2020•0 citations

Spectral classification of coupling regimes in the quantum Rabi model

Daniel Z. Rossatto, Celso J. Villas-Bôas, Mikel Sanz +1 more

The quantum Rabi model is in the scientific spotlight due to the recent theoretical and experimental progress. Nevertheless, a full-fledged classification of its coupling regimes remains as a relevant open question. We propose a spectral classification dividing the coupling regimes into three regions based on the validity of perturbative criteria on the quantum Rabi model, which allows us the use of exactly solvable effective Hamiltonians. These coupling regimes are (i) the perturbative ultrastrong coupling regime which comprises the Jaynes-Cummings model, (ii) a region where nonperturbative ultrastrong and nonperturbative deep strong coupling regimes coexist, and (iii) the perturbative deep strong coupling regime. We show that this spectral classification depends not only on the ratio between the coupling strength and the natural frequencies of the unperturbed parts, but also on the energy to which the system can access. These regimes additionally discriminate the completely different behaviors of several static physical properties, namely the total number of excitations, the photon statistics of the field, and the cavity-qubit entanglement. Finally, we explain the dynamical properties which are traditionally associated with the deep strong coupling regime, such as the collapses and revivals of the state population, in the frame of the proposed spectral classification.

arXiv:1612.03090•Physical Review A•Jul 24, 2017•111 citations

Dissipation of the Rabi model beyond the Jaynes–Cummings approximation: quasi-degenerate qubit and ultra-strong coupling

Shantanu Agarwal, Seyed Mohammad Hashemi Rafsanjani, Joseph H. Eberly

Environmental influences on the dynamics of a coupled qubit-oscillator system are studied analytically in a regime where deviations from the exactly solvable Jaynes–Cummings model are important. We investigate the case of a quasi-degenerate qubit within the ultra-strong coupling regime for which the qubit frequency is much smaller than the frequency of the oscillator, and the coupling between the qubit and the oscillator is large, both of which invalidate the usually employed rotating wave approximation. In contrast to the standard quantum optics master equation, we explicitly take the qubit-oscillator coupling into account while microscopically deriving a dressed state master equation. Using the derived master equation, we discuss a spectroscopic technique which can be used to probe the dressed energy-level structure of the qubit-oscillator system.

arXiv:1304.5308•Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Nov 7, 2013•13 citations
Photon-based strongly correlated lattice models like the Jaynes–Cummings and Rabi lattices differ from their more conventional relatives like the Bose–Hubbard model by the presence of an additional tunable parameter: the frequency detuning between the pseudo-spin degree of freedom and the harmonic mode frequency on each site. Whenever this detuning is large compared to relevant coupling strengths, the system is said to be in the dispersive regime. The physics of this regime is well-understood at the level of a single Jaynes–Cummings or Rabi site. Here, we extend the theoretical description of the dispersive regime to lattices with many sites, for both strong and ultra-strong coupling. We discuss the nature and spatial range of the resulting qubit–qubit and photon–photon coupling, demonstrate the emergence of photon-pairing and squeezing and illustrate our results by exact diagonalization of the Rabi dimer.
The present work focuses on the strong/weak interaction of many-body spin-systems with a cavity mode. It introduces the necessity of redefining the physical conditions determining the strong/weak coupling regime in those systems. In more complex systems, the effective coupling emerging from the collective dynamics may differ indeed from the actual coupling of each individual subsystem with the bosonic field. This is shown by highlighting some counter-intuitive dynamical effects properly related to the coupling regime: a Jaynes-Cummings dynamics emerging although a strong interaction is present. The universality of this result is demonstrated through the analysis of three distinct systems: a two-qubit, a two-qutrit, and an NNN-qubit chain quantum Rabi models.
We generalize the dispersive theory of the Jaynes-Cummings model beyond the frequently employed rotating-wave approximation (RWA) in the coupling between the two-level system and the resonator. For a detuning sufficiently larger than the qubit-oscillator coupling, we diagonalize the non-RWA Hamiltonian and discuss the differences to the known RWA results. Our results extend the regime in which dispersive qubit readout is possible. If several qubits are coupled to one resonator, an effective qubit-qubit interaction of Ising type emerges, whereas RWA leads to isotropic XYXYXY interaction. This impacts on the entanglement characteristics of the qubits.
The nature of the ground states for a system composed of two coupled cavities with each containing a pair of dipole-coupled two-level atoms are studied over a wide range of detunings and dipole coupling strengths. The cases for three limits of exact resonance, large positive and negative detunings are discussed, and four types of the ground states are revealed. Then the phase diagrams of the ground state are plotted by choosing three different "order parameters". We find that the phase space, determined by the combinative action of detuning and the dipole coupling strength, is divided into four regions. This is different from the general Bose-Hubbard model and more richer physics are presented in the two-site coupled cavities system. That is, the insulator region may be polaritonic or atomic and the superfluid region may be polaritonic or photonic in nature.
Spectral properties of a quantum circuit are efficiently read out by monitoring the resonance frequency shift it induces in a microwave resonator coupled to it. When the two systems are strongly detuned, theory attributes the shift to an effective resonator capacitance or inductance that depends on the quantum circuit state. At small detuning, the shift arises from the exchange of virtual photons, as described by the Jaynes-Cummings model. Here we present a theory bridging these two limits and illustrate, with several examples, its necessity for a general description of quantum circuits readout. Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics (cQED) is at the heart of most advanced superconducting quantum technologies. Different types of superconducting qubits can be strongly coupled to microwave resonators thus achieving regimes and phenomenena which cannot be reached within the realm of quantum optics [1]. More recently, strong coupling between microwave resonators and a variety of other quantum systems not necessarily involving superconductors has been achieved [2], extending further the realm of cQED. In all these applications the measurement of the qubit or the hybrid device state is achieved by monitoring the resonator properties. Theoretically , two regimes have been approached using disconnected descriptions [3]: the dispersive regime, where the qubit-resonator detuning is larger than the coupling strength yet small enough to allow the exchange of virtual photons, and the adiabatic regime, where the de-tuning is sufficiently large for virtual processes to be strongly suppressed. The dispersive regime, which describes level repulsion between those of the quantum circuit and of the resonator, is typically dealt with using a Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian within different levels of approximation [3-10]. In contrast, the adiabatic regime accounts for the renormalization of the resonator capaci-tance/inductance by the effective capacitance of the circuit , including its "quantum capacitance" [11, 12], or its effective inductance [13, 14], which modifies the resonator frequency [15, 16]. However, there is no actual border between these two regimes which could justify a separate treatment, as illustrated by recent experiments on hybrid cQED setups [17] that reveal features of both regimes for the same device. This situation claims for a unified description of quantum circuits readout, going beyond the standard Jaynes-Cummings model, which could be applied to different types of devices over a large range of parameters. * Corresponding author : a.l.yeyati@uam.es In the present Letter we derive a general expression for the resonator frequency shift when coupled to a generic quantum circuit. This expression naturally interpolates between the adiabatic and the dispersive regimes, thus allowing to clarify their origin from the same coupling Hamiltonian. In addition our formalism is not restricted to the usual two-level approximations but any multilevel situation can be described on the same footing. We illustrate the importance of the different terms in our expression by analyzing well-known models like a short single channel superconducting weak link hosting Andreev states, the RF-SQUID and the Cooper pair box. Resonator-quantum circuit coupling.-The system we consider comprises a resonant circuit and a quantum circuit coupled through phase or charge fluctuations as depicted in Figs. 1(a), 2(a) and in the inset of Fig. 3. The resonant circuit is represented as a lumped-element LC resonator with bare resonance frequency f r = ω r /2π, with ω r = 1/ √ L r C r. Introducing the photon annihilation (creation) operators a (a †), it can be described by the Hamiltonian H r = ω r a † a. On the other hand, the quantum circuit Hamiltonian,Ĥ qc (x), depends on a dimensionless control parameter x, corresponding to an excess charge on a capacitor or a flux through a loop. We denote by |Φ i (x) the eigenstates of the uncoupled quantum circuit,Ĥ qc (x)|Φ i (x) = E i (x)|Φ i (x). Flux (charge) fluctuations in the resonator lead to x → x 0 +x r , wherex r = λ(s a + s * a †) with a coupling constant λ, depending on a coupling scheme [19], and s = 1 (−i). We assume λ 1 in accordance with experiments. The resonator-quantum circuit coupling HamiltonianĤ c is obtained by expandingĤ qc (x 0 +x r) up to second order inx rĤ c (x 0) =x rĤ qc (x 0) +x 2 r 2Ĥ qc (x 0), (1) where the prime stands for the derivative with respect to x. The Hamiltonian describing resonator, quantum
The quantum Rabi model is in the scientific spotlight due to the recent theoretical and experimental progress. Nevertheless, a full-fledged classification of its coupling regimes remains as a relevant open question. We propose a spectral classification dividing the coupling regimes into three regions based on the validity of perturbative criteria on the quantum Rabi model, which allows us the use of exactly solvable effective Hamiltonians. These coupling regimes are (i) the perturbative ultrastrong coupling regime which comprises the Jaynes-Cummings model, (ii) a region where nonperturbative ultrastrong and nonperturbative deep strong coupling regimes coexist, and (iii) the perturbative deep strong coupling regime. We show that this spectral classification depends not only on the ratio between the coupling strength and the natural frequencies of the unperturbed parts, but also on the energy to which the system can access. These regimes additionally discriminate the completely different behaviors of several static physical properties, namely the total number of excitations, the photon statistics of the field, and the cavity-qubit entanglement. Finally, we explain the dynamical properties which are traditionally associated with the deep strong coupling regime, such as the collapses and revivals of the state population, in the frame of the proposed spectral classification.
Environmental influences on the dynamics of a coupled qubit-oscillator system are studied analytically in a regime where deviations from the exactly solvable Jaynes–Cummings model are important. We investigate the case of a quasi-degenerate qubit within the ultra-strong coupling regime for which the qubit frequency is much smaller than the frequency of the oscillator, and the coupling between the qubit and the oscillator is large, both of which invalidate the usually employed rotating wave approximation. In contrast to the standard quantum optics master equation, we explicitly take the qubit-oscillator coupling into account while microscopically deriving a dressed state master equation. Using the derived master equation, we discuss a spectroscopic technique which can be used to probe the dressed energy-level structure of the qubit-oscillator system.