We describe quantum behaviors of a simple harmonic oscillator, starting from the classical mechanics. By imposing two conditions on the phase points generated from a symplectic algorithm, we obtain discrete energy levels, satisfying $E_n τ_n = h$ where $E_n$ is the total energy of the oscillator and $τ_n$ is the time step for the closed orbit of $n$-polygon in phase space. We can thus successfully integrate classical and quantum mechanics into a single frame, if we assume that time is discrete.
We describe quantum behaviors of a simple harmonic oscillator, starting from the classical mechanics. By imposing two conditions on the phase points generated from a symplectic algorithm, we obtain discrete energy levels, satisfying Enτn=h where En is the total energy of the oscillator and τn is the time step for the closed orbit of n-polygon in phase space. We can thus successfully integrate classical and quantum mechanics into a single frame, if we assume that time is discrete.
In classical mechanics the harmonic oscillator (HO) provides the generic example for the use of angle and action variables and I > 0 which played a prominent role in the “old” Bohr-Sommerfeld quantum theory. However, already classically there is a problem which has essential implications for the quantum mechanics of the (φ,I)-model for the HO: the transformation is only locally symplectic and singular for (q,p) = (0,0). Globally the phase space {(q,p)} has the topological structure of the plane ℝ2, whereas the phase space {(φ,I)} corresponds globally to the punctured plane ℝ2 -(0,0) or to a simple cone with the tip deleted. From the properties of the symplectic transformations on that phase space one can derive the functions h0 = I, h1 = Icos φ and h2 = -Isin φ as the basic coordinates on {(φ,I)}, where their Poisson brackets obey the Lie algebra of the symplectic group of the plane. This implies a qualitative difference as to the quantum theory of the phase space {(φ,I)} compared to the usual one for {(q,p)}: In the quantum mechanics for the (φ,I)-model of the HO the three hj correspond to the self-adjoint generators Kj, j = 0,1,2, of certain irreducible unitary representations of the symplectic group or one of its infinitely many covering groups, the representations being parametrized by a (Bargmann) index k > 0. This index k determines the ground state energy of the (φ,I)-Hamiltonian . For an m-fold covering the lowest possible value for k is k = 1/m, which can be made arbitrarily small by choosing m accordingly! This is not in contradiction to the usual approach in terms of the operators Q and P which are now expressed as functions of the Kj, but keep their usual properties. The richer structure of the Kj quantum model of the HO is “erased” when passing to the simpler (Q,P)-model! This more refined approach to the quantum theory of the HO implies many experimental tests: Mulliken-type experiments for isotopic diatomic molecules, experiments with harmonic traps for atoms, ions and BE-condensates, with charged HOs in external electric fields and the (Landau) levels of charged particles in external magnetic fields, with the propagation of light in vacuum, passing through strong external electric or magnetic fields. Finally it may lead to a new theoretical estimate for the quantum vacuum energy of fields and its relation to the cosmological constant.
Abstract In classical mechanics the harmonic oscillator (HO) provides the generic example for the use of angle and action variables and I > 0 which played a prominent role in the “old” Bohr‐Sommerfeld quantum theory. However, already classically there is a problem which has essential implications for the quantum mechanics of the (φ,I)‐model for the HO: the transformation is only locally symplectic and singular for (q,p) = (0,0). Globally the phase space {(q,p)} has the topological structure of the plane ℝ2, whereas the phase space {(φ,I)} corresponds globally to the punctured plane ℝ2 ‐(0,0) or to a simple cone with the tip deleted. From the properties of the symplectic transformations on that phase space one can derive the functions h0 = I, h1 = Icos φ and h2 = ‐Isin φ as the basic coordinates on {(φ,I)}, where their Poisson brackets obey the Lie algebra of the symplectic group of the plane. This implies a qualitative difference as to the quantum theory of the phase space {(φ,I)} compared to the usual one for {(q,p)}: In the quantum mechanics for the (φ,I)‐model of the HO the three hj correspond to the self‐adjoint generators Kj, j = 0,1,2, of certain irreducible unitary representations of the symplectic group or one of its infinitely many covering groups, the representations being parametrized by a (Bargmann) index k > 0. This index k determines the ground state energy of the (φ,I)‐Hamiltonian . For an m‐fold covering the lowest possible value for k is k = 1/m, which can be made arbitrarily small by choosing m accordingly! This is not in contradiction to the usual approach in terms of the operators Q and P which are now expressed as functions of the Kj, but keep their usual properties. The richer structure of the Kj quantum model of the HO is “erased” when passing to the simpler (Q,P)‐model! This more refined approach to the quantum theory of the HO implies many experimental tests: Mulliken‐type experiments for isotopic diatomic molecules, experiments with harmonic traps for atoms, ions and BE‐condensates, with charged HOs in external electric fields and the (Landau) levels of charged particles in external magnetic fields, with the propagation of light in vacuum, passing through strong external electric or magnetic fields. Finally it may lead to a new theoretical estimate for the quantum vacuum energy of fields and its relation to the cosmological constant.
A simple harmonic oscillator, or oscillator in short, is one of the most important systems in physics as well as in quantum mechanics. The path integral and Hamiltonian of a simple harmonic oscillator are leading exemplars for the description of a wide class of physical systems. An oscillator is a theoretical model of great utility, primarily due to its simplicity that allows for the exact derivation of many results. The simple harmonic oscillator can be generalized to the case of infinitely many oscillators, and is also the starting point for analysis of many nonlinear quantum systems. Path integrals for the simple harmonic oscillator are all based on Gaussian integration, which has been discussed in Section 7.2. The harmonic oscillator is described by Gaussian path integrals , and is a bedrock of the general theory of path integration. Moreover, all perturbation expansions of nonlinear path integrals about the oscillator path integral, which includes the semi-classical expansion, are based on results of Gaussian integration. The properties of the harmonic oscillator are analyzed in the coordinate space representation, and its path integral as well as its correlation functions are analyzed. All formulas and derivations are for Euclidean time. In Sections 11.1 and 11.2 the Hamiltonian and state space of the oscillator are studied and the correlator is derived using state space methods. In Section 11.2 the infinite time oscillator is introduced and in Sections 11.3–11.5 the path integral for the oscillator is evaluated.
Until this point, we have been solving problems that involve just two states or are reducible to two-state problems. While we could examine a plethora of complex quantum phenomena, it is not sufficient to describe the behavior of electrons in atoms or how quantum particles interact with each other. That all changes now as we work to set-up the quantum mechanics of the atom. There is much for us to do before we get to the hydrogen atom. We start, in this chapter, with the simple harmonic oscillator in one dimension. We show how to determine the canonical commutation relation between position and momentum from the fact that atomic spectra have sharp lines and then move into describing free particles and free particles on a circle. We introduce two of our operator identities, the Hadamard lemma and the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula and we revisit exponential disentangling, now for the symplectic group Sp(2). Then we show how to solve the harmonic oscillator energy eigenstates using operator algebra, discuss Heisenberg uncertainty, determine harmonic oscillator wavefunctions, and examine coherent and squeezed states. We end with a discussion of applications of the simple harmonic oscillator.
An earlier study of quantum-mechanical time has suggested that, from the quantum-theoretic point of view, time is a random variable. The present work explores how such a description of time can be used to bring greater detail into the analysis of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. Specifically, the classical equations for harmonic motion are used as a point transformation between phase space and time-energy space, permitting probability distributions in the two spaces to be different representations of the same thing. The familiar energy-quantization hypothesis is supplemented with the hypothesis that quantized energy values are means (averages) of energy distributions characteristic of each energy state. With the probability distribution of time determined from the previously cited study, the desired quantized energy distributions follow from the requirements: (1) that they should be normalized, non-negative, and with means equal to the quantized energy values; (2) that the equivalent representation of distribution in position-momentum space should have marginal densities that are proportional (except near the origin) to the densities in position and momentum, ${|\ensuremath{\phi}(q)|}^{2}$ and ${|\ensuremath{\psi}(p)|}^{2}$, which are postulated in quantum theory. Requirement (2) is a weakening of the Born postulate. In the time-energy space, the probability distributions exclude energies smaller than the mode (energy value with maximum probability). In position-momentum space this exclusion requirement becomes the dynamical restriction: $\frac{{q}^{2}m{\ensuremath{\omega}}^{2}}{2}+\frac{{p}^{2}}{2m}\ensuremath{\ge}\frac{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{n}\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}}{2}$, where, for the first three energy states, ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{0}=0$, ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{1}=\frac{3}{2}$, ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{2}=2+\ensuremath{\surd}\frac{3}{2}$. In general terms it is thus shown that the quantized harmonic oscillator can be described as a statistical ensemble of classical oscillators. Some comparisons with work on phase-space formulations of quantum mechanics (especially with the work of Wigner) are made and some aspects of the theory that should submit to experimental verification are pointed out.
We consider the nature of the wave function using the example of a harmonic oscillator. We show that the eigenfunctions ψn=zn of the quantum Hamiltonian in the complex Bargmann-Fock-Segal representation with z∈C are the coordinates of a classical oscillator with energy En=ℏωn, n=0,1,2,.... They are defined on conical spaces C/Zn with cone angles 2π/n, which are embedded as subspaces in the phase space C of the classical oscillator. Here Zn is the finite cyclic group of rotations of the space C by an angle 2π/n. The superposition ψ=∑ncnψn of the eigenfunctions ψn arises only with incomplete knowledge of the initial data for solving the Schrödinger equation, when the conditions of invariance with respect to the discrete groups Zn are not imposed and the general solution takes into account all possible initial data parametrized by the numbers n∈N.