Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1304.1640 · Physica Scripta

Null weak values in multi-level systems

Oded Zilberberg, Alessandro Romito, Yuval Gefen

Published Nov 1, 2012• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A two-step measurement protocol of a quantum system, known as weak value (WV), has been introduced more than two decades ago by Aharonov et al. [1], and has since been studied in various contexts. Here we discuss another two-step measurement protocol which we dub null weak value (NWV). The protocol consists of a partial-collapse measurement followed by quantum manipulation on the system and finally a strong measurement. The first step is a strong measurement which takes place with small probability. The second strong measurement is used as postselection on the outcome of the earlier step. Not being measured in the partial-collapse stage (null outcome) leads to a non-trivial correlation between the two measurements. The NVW protocol, first defined for a two-level system [2], is generalized to a multi-level system, and compared to the standard-WV protocol.

DOI
10.1088/0031-8949/2012/t151/014014

Related papers

Null weak values in multi-level systems

Oded Zilberberg, Alessandro Romito, Yuval Gefen

A two-step measurement protocol of a quantum system, known as the weak value (WV), was introduced more than two decades ago by Aharonov et al (1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351) and has since then been studied in various contexts. In this paper, we discuss another two-step measurement protocol that we dub the null weak value (NWV). The protocol consists of a partial-collapse measurement followed by quantum manipulation on the system and finally a strong measurement. The first step is a strong measurement which takes place with a small probability. The second strong measurement is used as a postselection on the outcome of the earlier step. Not being measured in the partial-collapse stage (null outcome) leads to a nontrivial correlation between the two measurements. The NVW protocol, first defined for a two-level system (Zilberberg et al 2012 arXiv:1205.3877), is then generalized to a multi-level system and compared with the standard-WV protocol.

•Nov 1, 2012•1 citation

Weak measurements: From measuring incompatible observables and testing quantum contextuality to protective measurements

Fabrizio Piacentini, Alessio Avella, Rudi Lussana +9 more

Summary form only given. Measurements are the very basis of Physics, especially in Quantum Mechanics, where they assume even a more fundamental role because of wave function collapse after a “strong” (projective) measurement. Furthermore, measuring a quantum-mechanical observable completely erases the information on its conjugate one (e.g. measurement of position erases information on momentum, and vice-versa). Nevertheless, in Quantum Mechanics other kinds of measurement are possible. For example, wave function collapse can be overcome through Weak Measurements, i.e. measurements performed with an interaction sufficiently weak not to collapse the original state, featuring several interesting properties. An example of these are weak values [1-3], realised for the first time in [4-6], that have been used for addressing fundamental questions [7-12] as Contextuality and are also a tool for Quantum Metrology [13-19]. One of the most intriguing properties of Weak Measurements is that, since they are not affected by wave function collapse, they can allow gathering simultaneous information on non-commuting observables [20], impossible with the standard (projective) measurement protocols. A second example is offered by Protective Measurements [21], a new technique able to extract information on the expectation value of an observable even measuring a single particle. In this talk, after a general introduction to WMs, we present the first realisation of sequential weak value measurements [22], i.e. a joint measurement of the weak value of (incompatible) polarizations on a single photon. Then, we present an experiment addressed to explore the connection between anomalous weak values and Contextuality [23], showing a clear violation of the inequality proposed in [12] while satisfying all the additional theoretical requests, unequivocally demonstrating the contextual nature of weak values. Finally, we present and discuss the first implementation of Protective Measurements, showing unprecedented measurement capability and demonstrating how the expectation value of an observable can be obtained with a single measurement on a single particle.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)•Jun 1, 2017•0 citations

Multitime measurements in quantum mechanics

M. S. Wang

The one-time and two-time measurements are studied by employing the idea of Aharonov et al. that the strength of a measurement depends on the state of the measuring device in the context of von Neumann measurement theory. A measurement is classified as either a strong or a weak measurement depending on whether the interaction between the system and the measuring device is infinitely large or negligibly small. A single strong measurement yields one of the eigenvalues of the operator while a single weak measurement, in addition to the eigenvalues, has infinite other possible outcomes. Nevertheless, the expectation values of the strong and the weak one-time measurements are the same. However, the expectation values of the two-time measurements depend on the strength of the first measurement. For the strong case the result is consistent with the conventional result without having to introduce the state collapsing. For the weak case the result is the real part of the expectation value of the time-ordered two-time operator. The fact that this expectation value cannot be factorized indicates that the entanglement between the system and the measuring device introduced by a weak measurement cannot be neglected.

Physical Review A•Jan 4, 2002•5 citations

Null Values and Quantum State Discrìmination

Oded Zilberberg, Alessandro Romito, David J. Starling +4 more

We present a measurement protocol for discriminating between two different quantum states of a qubit with high fidelity. The protocol, called null value, is comprised of a projective measurement performed on the system with a small probability (also known as partial collapse), followed by a tuned postselection. We report on an optical experimental implementation of the scheme. We show that our protocol leads to an amplified signal-to-noise ratio (as compared with a straightforward strong measurement) when discerning between the two quantum states.

arXiv:1205.3877•Physical Review Letters•Apr 25, 2013•26 citations

Tomography of Many-Body Weak Values: Mach-Zehnder Interferometry

Vadim Shpitalnik, Yuval Gefen, Alessandro Romito

We propose and study a weak value (WV) protocol in the context of a solid state setup, specifically, an electronic Mach-Zehnder interferometer. This is the first specific proposal to measure both the real and imaginary part (i.e., complete tomography) of a WV. We also analyze the manifestation of many-body physics in the WV to be measured, including finite temperature and shot-noise-like contributions.

arXiv:0805.2737•Physical Review Letters•Nov 24, 2008•38 citations

Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

A description of quantum systems at the time interval between two successive measurements is presented. Two wave functions, the first preselected by the initial measurement and the second postselected by the final measurement, describe quantum systems at a single time. It is shown how this approach leads to a new concept: a weak value of an observable. Weak values represent novel characteristics of quantum systems between two measurements. They are outcomes of a standard measurement procedure that fulfills certain requirements of ``weakness.'' We call it weak measurement. Physical meaning, underlying mathematical structure, and prospects of practical usage of weak measurements are explored.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1990•1,084 citations
A two-step measurement protocol of a quantum system, known as weak value (WV), has been introduced more than two decades ago by Aharonov et al. [1], and has since been studied in various contexts. Here we discuss another two-step measurement protocol which we dub null weak value (NWV). The protocol consists of a partial-collapse measurement followed by quantum manipulation on the system and finally a strong measurement. The first step is a strong measurement which takes place with small probability. The second strong measurement is used as postselection on the outcome of the earlier step. Not being measured in the partial-collapse stage (null outcome) leads to a non-trivial correlation between the two measurements. The NVW protocol, first defined for a two-level system [2], is generalized to a multi-level system, and compared to the standard-WV protocol.
A two-step measurement protocol of a quantum system, known as the weak value (WV), was introduced more than two decades ago by Aharonov et al (1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351) and has since then been studied in various contexts. In this paper, we discuss another two-step measurement protocol that we dub the null weak value (NWV). The protocol consists of a partial-collapse measurement followed by quantum manipulation on the system and finally a strong measurement. The first step is a strong measurement which takes place with a small probability. The second strong measurement is used as a postselection on the outcome of the earlier step. Not being measured in the partial-collapse stage (null outcome) leads to a nontrivial correlation between the two measurements. The NVW protocol, first defined for a two-level system (Zilberberg et al 2012 arXiv:1205.3877), is then generalized to a multi-level system and compared with the standard-WV protocol.
Summary form only given. Measurements are the very basis of Physics, especially in Quantum Mechanics, where they assume even a more fundamental role because of wave function collapse after a “strong” (projective) measurement. Furthermore, measuring a quantum-mechanical observable completely erases the information on its conjugate one (e.g. measurement of position erases information on momentum, and vice-versa). Nevertheless, in Quantum Mechanics other kinds of measurement are possible. For example, wave function collapse can be overcome through Weak Measurements, i.e. measurements performed with an interaction sufficiently weak not to collapse the original state, featuring several interesting properties. An example of these are weak values [1-3], realised for the first time in [4-6], that have been used for addressing fundamental questions [7-12] as Contextuality and are also a tool for Quantum Metrology [13-19]. One of the most intriguing properties of Weak Measurements is that, since they are not affected by wave function collapse, they can allow gathering simultaneous information on non-commuting observables [20], impossible with the standard (projective) measurement protocols. A second example is offered by Protective Measurements [21], a new technique able to extract information on the expectation value of an observable even measuring a single particle. In this talk, after a general introduction to WMs, we present the first realisation of sequential weak value measurements [22], i.e. a joint measurement of the weak value of (incompatible) polarizations on a single photon. Then, we present an experiment addressed to explore the connection between anomalous weak values and Contextuality [23], showing a clear violation of the inequality proposed in [12] while satisfying all the additional theoretical requests, unequivocally demonstrating the contextual nature of weak values. Finally, we present and discuss the first implementation of Protective Measurements, showing unprecedented measurement capability and demonstrating how the expectation value of an observable can be obtained with a single measurement on a single particle.
The one-time and two-time measurements are studied by employing the idea of Aharonov et al. that the strength of a measurement depends on the state of the measuring device in the context of von Neumann measurement theory. A measurement is classified as either a strong or a weak measurement depending on whether the interaction between the system and the measuring device is infinitely large or negligibly small. A single strong measurement yields one of the eigenvalues of the operator while a single weak measurement, in addition to the eigenvalues, has infinite other possible outcomes. Nevertheless, the expectation values of the strong and the weak one-time measurements are the same. However, the expectation values of the two-time measurements depend on the strength of the first measurement. For the strong case the result is consistent with the conventional result without having to introduce the state collapsing. For the weak case the result is the real part of the expectation value of the time-ordered two-time operator. The fact that this expectation value cannot be factorized indicates that the entanglement between the system and the measuring device introduced by a weak measurement cannot be neglected.
We present a measurement protocol for discriminating between two different quantum states of a qubit with high fidelity. The protocol, called null value, is comprised of a projective measurement performed on the system with a small probability (also known as partial collapse), followed by a tuned postselection. We report on an optical experimental implementation of the scheme. We show that our protocol leads to an amplified signal-to-noise ratio (as compared with a straightforward strong measurement) when discerning between the two quantum states.
A description of quantum systems at the time interval between two successive measurements is presented. Two wave functions, the first preselected by the initial measurement and the second postselected by the final measurement, describe quantum systems at a single time. It is shown how this approach leads to a new concept: a weak value of an observable. Weak values represent novel characteristics of quantum systems between two measurements. They are outcomes of a standard measurement procedure that fulfills certain requirements of ``weakness.'' We call it weak measurement. Physical meaning, underlying mathematical structure, and prospects of practical usage of weak measurements are explored.