Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1302.7206 · Physica Scripta

Quantum key distribution with several intercept–resend attacks via a depolarizing channel

Mustapha Dehmani, Mohamed Errahmani, Hamid Ez-zahraouy A, A. Benyoussef

Published Jun 25, 2012• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The disturbance effect of a depolarizing channel on the security of the quantum key distribution of the four state BB84 protocol with multiple sequentiel intercept and resend attacks of many eavesdroppers, has been studied. The quantum bit error rate and the mutual information are computed for arbitray number of attacks.
DOI
10.1088/0031-8949/86/01/015803

Related papers

Stop Conditions of BB84 Protocol via a Depolarizing Channel (Quantum Cryptography)

Iyed Ben Slimen, Olfa Trabelsi, Houria Rezig +2 more

Abstract: BB84 (Bennett and Brassard 1984) is one of the well known protocols of quantum keys distribution. It is built to allow two interlocutors commonly called Alice and Bob to share two similar binary keys and to detect the eavesdropper presence (the eavesdropper is commonly called Eve). However, Eve presence in a disturbed environment causes errors to the sifted keys and decreases the amount of secure information between Alice and Bob. One of the most important stages in BB84 protocol is to decide by using error probability estimation if we can continue the protocol phases or no. Indeed, this decision is function of some factors like: what is the amount of information that we will lose in the error correction phase? What is the degree of errors detected in our sifted keys? What is the origin of these errors: Eve strategy or the channel disturbance? For these reasons, we will study in this study some conditions to stop BB84 protocol in the context of depolarizing channel. We implement two types of eavesdropping strategy: Intercept and Resend and Cloning Attack.

Journal of Computer Science•Jun 1, 2007•11 citations

BB84 with Both Several Cloning and Intercept-resend Attacks

Mustapha Dehmani, El Mehdi Salmani, Hamid Ez-zahraouy A +1 more

The goal of the protocol QKD BB84 is to allow a transmitter and a receiver which uses a quantum channel to exchange their keys and to detect the presence of eavesdropping attacks. In the present research, we investigate the effect of several eavesdroppers with both intercept-resend and cloning attacks. We will propose the different possible cases of the positioning of the eavesdroppers and their strategies of attacks; also we will calculate the mutual information for each case. The explicit expressions of the mutual information and quantum error clearly show that the security of the exchanged information depends on the numbers of the eavesdroppers and their attacks parameters on the quantum channel.

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)•Oct 1, 2018•1 citation

Simulation-Grounded Security Analysis of BB84 Quantum Key Distribution under Intercept-Resend Attacks

aditya pratap mulluri

Abstract Quantum key distribution (QKD) introduces a fun- damentally different paradigm for secure communication by leveraging the physical laws of quantum mechanics rather than computational assumptions. This work presents an expanded simulation-grounded analysis of BB84 under intercept-resend attacks, emphasizing quantum bit error rate (QBER), adver- sarial disturbance, and integration into modern cybersecurity architectures.

•Apr 23, 2026•0 citations

Simulation and Security Analysis of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol under Intercept–Resend and PNS Attacks

Md. Rayhan Kabir Khan, Istiak Ahammed, Abu Obaidah

The BB84 protocol is fundamental to quantum-secure communications, yet its extension to multi-receiver networks remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by implementing a dual-receiver BB84 framework in Qiskit to evaluate security against intercept–resend and photon-number-splitting (PNS) attacks. Our methodology incorporates weak coherent pulses and realistic channel imperfections. Key findings show that intercept–resend attacks induce a detectable (~25%) increase in QBER, while PNS attacks allow a 100% gain in eavesdropper information with less than 2.5% QBER—revealing a critical vulnerability, which highlights the importance of a true single-photon source. The findings emphasize the suitability of BB84 for multiparty QKD scenarios, either as a decoy-state mechanism for enhanced eavesdropping detection or as a direct secure communication protocol.

International Conference on Electrical, Computer & Telecommunication Engineering (ICECTE)•Jan 29, 2026•0 citations

QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION WITH SEVERAL INTERCEPTS AND RESEND ATTACKS

Hamid Ez-zahraouy A, A. Benyoussef

The effect of several eavesdroppers intercept-resend attacks on the quantum error and mutual information between honest parties of a quantum channel chain is investigated within the BB84 (Bennett and Brassard, 1984). The quantum error and the mutual information are computed for arbitrary number of attacks. It is found that the quantum error and the secured–no secured transition depend strongly on the number N of eavesdroppers and their probabilities of intercepting attacks. For N = 3, numerical calculations show that the quantum error exhibits three kinds of different behaviors as a function of the probability of attack ω1of the first eavesdropper namely: (i) the quantum error remains constant for sufficiently small ω1, (ii) exhibits a plateau for intermediate values of ω1, (iii) increases, passes through a maximum and decreases when increasing ω1. However, depending on the probabilities of attack, phase diagrams present several kinds of topologies, in good agreement with the quantum error behavior. Moreover, in the particular case where all eavesdroppers intercept with identical probabilities ω, the quantum error increases as a nonlinear function with the number of eavesdroppers before reaching an upper limit of ≈ 0.475 for sufficiently large N. Besides, it is shown that the secured–no secured transition occurs under the effect of the number of eavesdroppers.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Sep 20, 2009•10 citations

Intercept-resend attack on six-state quantum key distribution over collective-rotation noise channels

Kevin Garapo, Mhlambululi Mafu, Francesco Petruccione

We investigate the effect of collective-rotation noise on the security of the six-state quantum key distribution. We study the case where the eavesdropper, Eve, performs an intercept-resend attack on the quantum communication between Alice, the sender, and Bob, the receiver. We first derive the collective-rotation noise model for the six-state protocol and then parameterize the mutual information between Alice and Eve. We then derive quantum bit error rate for three intercept-resend attack scenarios. We observe that the six-state protocol is robust against intercept-resend attacks on collective rotation noise channels when the rotation angle is kept within certain bounds.

Chinese Physics B•Jul 1, 2016•15 citations
Abstract: BB84 (Bennett and Brassard 1984) is one of the well known protocols of quantum keys distribution. It is built to allow two interlocutors commonly called Alice and Bob to share two similar binary keys and to detect the eavesdropper presence (the eavesdropper is commonly called Eve). However, Eve presence in a disturbed environment causes errors to the sifted keys and decreases the amount of secure information between Alice and Bob. One of the most important stages in BB84 protocol is to decide by using error probability estimation if we can continue the protocol phases or no. Indeed, this decision is function of some factors like: what is the amount of information that we will lose in the error correction phase? What is the degree of errors detected in our sifted keys? What is the origin of these errors: Eve strategy or the channel disturbance? For these reasons, we will study in this study some conditions to stop BB84 protocol in the context of depolarizing channel. We implement two types of eavesdropping strategy: Intercept and Resend and Cloning Attack.
The goal of the protocol QKD BB84 is to allow a transmitter and a receiver which uses a quantum channel to exchange their keys and to detect the presence of eavesdropping attacks. In the present research, we investigate the effect of several eavesdroppers with both intercept-resend and cloning attacks. We will propose the different possible cases of the positioning of the eavesdroppers and their strategies of attacks; also we will calculate the mutual information for each case. The explicit expressions of the mutual information and quantum error clearly show that the security of the exchanged information depends on the numbers of the eavesdroppers and their attacks parameters on the quantum channel.
The BB84 protocol is fundamental to quantum-secure communications, yet its extension to multi-receiver networks remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by implementing a dual-receiver BB84 framework in Qiskit to evaluate security against intercept–resend and photon-number-splitting (PNS) attacks. Our methodology incorporates weak coherent pulses and realistic channel imperfections. Key findings show that intercept–resend attacks induce a detectable (~25%) increase in QBER, while PNS attacks allow a 100% gain in eavesdropper information with less than 2.5% QBER—revealing a critical vulnerability, which highlights the importance of a true single-photon source. The findings emphasize the suitability of BB84 for multiparty QKD scenarios, either as a decoy-state mechanism for enhanced eavesdropping detection or as a direct secure communication protocol.
The effect of several eavesdroppers intercept-resend attacks on the quantum error and mutual information between honest parties of a quantum channel chain is investigated within the BB84 (Bennett and Brassard, 1984). The quantum error and the mutual information are computed for arbitrary number of attacks. It is found that the quantum error and the secured–no secured transition depend strongly on the number N of eavesdroppers and their probabilities of intercepting attacks. For N = 3, numerical calculations show that the quantum error exhibits three kinds of different behaviors as a function of the probability of attack ω1of the first eavesdropper namely: (i) the quantum error remains constant for sufficiently small ω1, (ii) exhibits a plateau for intermediate values of ω1, (iii) increases, passes through a maximum and decreases when increasing ω1. However, depending on the probabilities of attack, phase diagrams present several kinds of topologies, in good agreement with the quantum error behavior. Moreover, in the particular case where all eavesdroppers intercept with identical probabilities ω, the quantum error increases as a nonlinear function with the number of eavesdroppers before reaching an upper limit of ≈ 0.475 for sufficiently large N. Besides, it is shown that the secured–no secured transition occurs under the effect of the number of eavesdroppers.
We investigate the effect of collective-rotation noise on the security of the six-state quantum key distribution. We study the case where the eavesdropper, Eve, performs an intercept-resend attack on the quantum communication between Alice, the sender, and Bob, the receiver. We first derive the collective-rotation noise model for the six-state protocol and then parameterize the mutual information between Alice and Eve. We then derive quantum bit error rate for three intercept-resend attack scenarios. We observe that the six-state protocol is robust against intercept-resend attacks on collective rotation noise channels when the rotation angle is kept within certain bounds.