Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1302.1049 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

On separable decompositions of quantum states with strong positive partial transposes

B Bylicka, Dariusz Chruściński, J Jurkowski

Published May 2, 2013• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We analyze a class of positive partial transpose states (PPT) such that the positivity of its partial transposition is recognized with respect to canonical factorization of the original density operator (Cholesky block decomposition). We call such PPT states strong PPT states (SPPT). This property, contrary to PPT, is basis dependent. It is shown that there exists a proper subset of SPPT states which are separable and provide a separable decomposition for any of these states.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/46/20/205303

Related papers

Quantum states with strong positive partial transpose

Dariusz Chruściński, Jacek Jurkowski, Andrzej Kossakowski

We construct a large class of bipartite $M\ensuremath{\bigotimes}N$ quantum states which defines a proper subset of states with positive partial transposes (PPTs). Any state from this class has PPT but the positivity of its partial transposition is recognized with respect to canonical factorization of the original density operator. We propose to call elements from this class states with strong positive partial transposes (SPPTs). We conjecture that all SPPT states are separable.

arXiv:0710.1934•Physical Review A•Feb 25, 2008•32 citations

Separability of multipartite quantum states with strong positive partial transpose

Lilong Qian

We generalize the definition of strong positive partial transpose (SPPT) to the multipartite system. The tripartite case was first considered by Yu and Zhao [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54, 292 (2014)]. In this extension, unfortunately, desired properties such as the PPT of SPPT states and the separability of super and pure SPPT states are not preserved. In contrast, this paper provides an alternative generalization to multipartite cases with these properties preserved. We also provide sufficient conditions for the separability of SPPT states.

arXiv:1804.10923•Physical Review A•Jul 9, 2018•9 citations

Witnessing quantum discord in 2×N systems

Bogna Bylicka, Dariusz Chruściński

Bipartite states with vanishing quantum discord are necessarily separable and hence positive partial transpose (PPT). We show that $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}N$ states satisfy additional property: the positivity of their partial transposition is recognized with respect to the canonical factorization of the original density operator. We call such states strong PPT (SPPT). Therefore, we provide a natural witness for a quantum discord: if a $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}N$ state is not SPPT it must contain nonclassical correlations measured by quantum discord. It is an analog of the celebrated Peres-Horodecki criterion: if a state is not PPT it must be entangled.

arXiv:1004.0434•Physical Review A•Jun 2, 2010•96 citations

Entangled states with strong positive partial transpose

Kil-Chan Ha

Chru\ifmmode \acute{s}\else \'{s}\fi{}ci\ifmmode \acute{n}\else \'{n}\fi{}ski, Jurkowski, and Kossakowski [Phys. Rev. A 77, 022113 (2008)] studied quantum states with strong positive partial transpose (SPPT) and conjectured that all SPPT states are separable. We construct a two-parameter class of $3\ensuremath{\bigotimes}3$ entangled SPPT states, so the conjecture does not hold true for general SPPT states.

Physical Review A•Jun 17, 2010•13 citations

Separability of qubit-qudit quantum states with strong positive partial transposes

Kil-Chan Ha

We show that all $2\ensuremath{\bigotimes}4$ states with strong positive partial transposes (SPPTs) are separable. We also construct a family of $2\ensuremath{\bigotimes}5$ entangled SPPT states, so the conjecture on the separability of SPPT states is completely settled. In addition, we clarify the relation between the set of all $2\ensuremath{\bigotimes}d$ separable states and the set of all $2\ensuremath{\bigotimes}d$ SPPT states for the case of $d=3,4$.

arXiv:1212.6378•Physical Review A•Feb 13, 2013•5 citations

On the separability of Bell-diagonal states with absolutely positive partial transposition

Ayan Patra, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr

Absolutely positive partial transpose (APPT) states, which remain PPT under every global unitary, provide a spectral relaxation of absolutely separable states, which remain separable under every such transformation. Despite substantial progress, whether these two notions coincide beyond qubit-qudit systems remains unresolved, motivating the study of structured state families in which the APPT spectral constraints and separability can be analyzed exactly. We study this problem for Bell-diagonal states in two settings: the standard two-qutrit Weyl-Heisenberg basis and the two-ququart lattice basis generated by two-qubit Pauli operators. In the two-qutrit case, we show that a linearized necessary condition for APPT defines a polytope of spectra in which every associated Weyl-Heisenberg Bell-diagonal state admits an exact decomposition into explicitly separable states. This yields a separability criterion that applies to a region even larger than the APPT set itself. In the two-ququart lattice Bell-diagonal setting, we show that a state remains PPT under every permutation of its Bell coefficients if and only if its six largest Bell coefficients sum to at most 1/2, and we prove that all such states are separable. Equivalently, every entangled lattice Bell-diagonal state becomes NPT after a suitable coefficient permutation and is therefore not APPT. The proofs combine convex-polytope analysis, affine and symplectic orbit reductions, and exact rational decompositions into separable states supported on affine Lagrangian subsets. Our results rule out entangled APPT states in both Bell-diagonal families, and provide simple spectral inequalities as sufficient criteria for separability in both cases. Being basis-specific, however, they do not by themselves settle whether APPT and absolute separability coincide.

quant-pharXiv:2610.12000•Oct 9, 2026•0 citations
We analyze a class of positive partial transpose states (PPT) such that the positivity of its partial transposition is recognized with respect to canonical factorization of the original density operator (Cholesky block decomposition). We call such PPT states strong PPT states (SPPT). This property, contrary to PPT, is basis dependent. It is shown that there exists a proper subset of SPPT states which are separable and provide a separable decomposition for any of these states.
We generalize the definition of strong positive partial transpose (SPPT) to the multipartite system. The tripartite case was first considered by Yu and Zhao [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54, 292 (2014)]. In this extension, unfortunately, desired properties such as the PPT of SPPT states and the separability of super and pure SPPT states are not preserved. In contrast, this paper provides an alternative generalization to multipartite cases with these properties preserved. We also provide sufficient conditions for the separability of SPPT states.
Bipartite states with vanishing quantum discord are necessarily separable and hence positive partial transpose (PPT). We show that $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}N$ states satisfy additional property: the positivity of their partial transposition is recognized with respect to the canonical factorization of the original density operator. We call such states strong PPT (SPPT). Therefore, we provide a natural witness for a quantum discord: if a $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}N$ state is not SPPT it must contain nonclassical correlations measured by quantum discord. It is an analog of the celebrated Peres-Horodecki criterion: if a state is not PPT it must be entangled.
We show that all $2\ensuremath{\bigotimes}4$ states with strong positive partial transposes (SPPTs) are separable. We also construct a family of $2\ensuremath{\bigotimes}5$ entangled SPPT states, so the conjecture on the separability of SPPT states is completely settled. In addition, we clarify the relation between the set of all $2\ensuremath{\bigotimes}d$ separable states and the set of all $2\ensuremath{\bigotimes}d$ SPPT states for the case of d=3,4d=3,4d=3,4.
Absolutely positive partial transpose (APPT) states, which remain PPT under every global unitary, provide a spectral relaxation of absolutely separable states, which remain separable under every such transformation. Despite substantial progress, whether these two notions coincide beyond qubit-qudit systems remains unresolved, motivating the study of structured state families in which the APPT spectral constraints and separability can be analyzed exactly. We study this problem for Bell-diagonal states in two settings: the standard two-qutrit Weyl-Heisenberg basis and the two-ququart lattice basis generated by two-qubit Pauli operators. In the two-qutrit case, we show that a linearized necessary condition for APPT defines a polytope of spectra in which every associated Weyl-Heisenberg Bell-diagonal state admits an exact decomposition into explicitly separable states. This yields a separability criterion that applies to a region even larger than the APPT set itself. In the two-ququart lattice Bell-diagonal setting, we show that a state remains PPT under every permutation of its Bell coefficients if and only if its six largest Bell coefficients sum to at most 1/2, and we prove that all such states are separable. Equivalently, every entangled lattice Bell-diagonal state becomes NPT after a suitable coefficient permutation and is therefore not APPT. The proofs combine convex-polytope analysis, affine and symplectic orbit reductions, and exact rational decompositions into separable states supported on affine Lagrangian subsets. Our results rule out entangled APPT states in both Bell-diagonal families, and provide simple spectral inequalities as sufficient criteria for separability in both cases. Being basis-specific, however, they do not by themselves settle whether APPT and absolute separability coincide.