A calculation of the classical analogue for the quantum wave function and local denity of states, in energy representation, is presented for simple Hamiltonian systems. Sucha analogous were proposed by M. V. Berry and A. voros considering the intersection of energy shells of two systems as the only semiclassical object which can give support to eigenfunctions. One of them is the system unser study and the other is the "unperturbed system" used to express the wave functions, even in the case that both systems are not close. For simple systems and as for scalable ones analytical expressions are obtainable. In the present work we offer examples of both.
A calculation of the classical analogue for the quantum wave function and local denity of states, in energy representation, is presented for simple Hamiltonian systems. Sucha analogous were proposed by M. V. Berry and A. voros considering the intersection of energy shells of two systems as the only semiclassical object which can give support to eigenfunctions. One of them is the system unser study and the other is the "unperturbed system" used to express the wave functions, even in the case that both systems are not close. For simple systems and as for scalable ones analytical expressions are obtainable. In the present work we offer examples of both.
Classical exact (CE) wave functions are certain integral representations of energy eigenfunctions that are parameterized in terms of the motion of the corresponding classical system in a semiclassically relevant way. When applied to systems for which they are not exact, such expressions serve as semiclassical approximations. Previous work identified CE wave functions for a number of specific systems and established their semiclassical usefulness. This paper explores the degree to which such representations can be found for more general systems. It is shown that CE wave functions exist, in principle, for bound states of an arbitrary integrable system that are confined to a single classically allowed region. Evidence is presented that CE representations also exist for more general states of such a system that are unbound, or that extend over more than one allowed region. The CE expressions are not unique: an innumerable variety exists for each such system. The existence proof provides a formal method for constructing CE expressions by Fourier transforming certain superpositions of energy eigenstates. The parameterization in terms of the classical motion is achieved by identifying certain quantities in these superpositions as classical action and angle variables. The semiclassical relevance of this identification is ensured by imposing some mild conditions on the coefficients in the superposition. This procedure for parameterizing exact wave functions in terms of classical variables indicates a basic relationship between the quantum and classical descriptions of states. The method of constructing CE wave functions introduced in the proof is shown to be consistent with a number of previously obtained CE formulas and is used to derive two new, closed-form, CE expressions. A simple numerical example is presented to illustrate the semiclassical application of one of these expressions and to further verify the physical significance of the classical parameterization.
Abstract Quantum classical correspondence, QCC, is a wide subject of interest from the historical approaches to current studies in simple and complex systems, including time dependent Hamiltonians. Quantum eigenfunctions, or wave-functions, are part of the quantities analysed in recent years, including the implementation due to M V Berry and A Voros in 1977 of a suitable quantity to be considered as the classical eigenfunction counterpart. Here we present the calculation of the statistical moments of eigenfunctions in energy representation for anharmonic oscillators. The classical counter part of the system is fully chaotic. The comparison of the quantum version in order to test for quantum classical correspondence is analysed using a slightly modified formula of the proposed by Berry and Voros. The agreement is good with the corresponding classical counterpart being at the bottom of the quantum version for all the energy range considered.
We review various methods of deriving expressions for quantum-mechanical quantities in the limit when hslash is small (in comparison with the relevant classical action functions). To start with we treat one-dimensional problems and discuss the derivation of WKB connection formulae (and their reversibility), reflection coefficients, phase shifts, bound state criteria and resonance formulae, employing first the complex method in which the classical turning points are avoided, and secondly the method of comparison equations with the aid of which uniform approximations are derived, which are valid right through the turningpoint regions. The special problems associated with radial equations are also considered. Next we examine semiclassical potential scattering, both for its own sake and also as an example of the three-stage approximation method which must generally be employed when dealing with eigenfunction expansions under semiclassical conditions, when they converge very slowly. Finally, we discuss the derivation of semiclassical expressions for Green functions and energy level densities in very general cases, employing Feynman's path-integral technique and emphasizing the limitations of the results obtained. Throughout the article we stress the fact that all the expressions obtained involve quantities characterizing the families of orbits in the corresponding purely classical problems, while the analytic forms of the quantal expressions depend on the topological properties of these families. This review was completed in February 1972.
The paper considers the class of Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom. Based on the classical normal form, according to the rules of Born-Jordan and Weyl-MacCoy, its quantum analogs are constructed for which the eigenvalue problem is solved and approximate formulas for the energy spectrum are found. For particular values of the parameters of quantum normal forms using these formulas, numerical calculations of the lower energy levels were performed, and the obtained results were compared with the known data of other authors. It was found that the best and good agreement with the known results is obtained using the Weyl-MacCoy quantization rule. The procedure for normalizing the classical Hamilton function is an extremely time-consuming task, since it involves hundreds and even thousands of polynomials for the necessary transformations. Therefore, in the work, normalization is performed using the REDUCE computer algebra system. It is shown that the use of the Weyl-MacCoy and Born-Jordan correspondence rules leads to almost the same values for the energy spectrum, while their proximity increases for large quantities of quantum numbers, that is, for highly excited states. The canonical transformation is used in the work, the quantum analog of which allows us to construct eigenfunctions for the quantum normal form and thus obtain analytical formulas for the energy spectra of different Hamiltonian systems. So, it is shown that quantization of classical Hamiltonian systems, including those admitting the classical mode of motion, using the method of normal forms gives a very accurate prediction of energy levels.
We compare the influence of perturbations of classically regular respectively chaotic Hamiltonians on their eigenfunctions. A generic measure of the perturbation strength is given by the average spreading width, which semiclassically is a phase-space integral. Thus, contrary to common assumption, the spreading width cannot be an indicator of regularity or chaos. The distribution of expansion coefficients of perturbed eigenfunctions in terms of unperturbed ones is markedly different for the two cases and may serve as a quantum signature of chaos referring to states rather than to spectra.
The solution of most problems associated with electron quantum states in physical systems and structures (atoms, molecules, quantum nanostructure objects, and crystals) is hard to find because of the mathematical difficulties of getting exact solutions of the Schrödinger equation. Therefore, approximate methods of solving such problems are of special interest. We will consider some of these methods, such as the adiabatic approximation now and later the effective-mass method , using real physical systems as examples. In this chapter we will consider several widely used approximation methods for finding the wavefunctions and energies of quantum states as well as the probabilities of transitions between quantum states. First of all, we will consider stationary and non-stationary perturbation theories. What is common to these two theories is that it is assumed that the perturbation is weak and that it changes negligibly the state of the unperturbed system. Stationary perturbation theory is used for the approximate description of a system's behavior if the Hamiltonian of the quantum system being considered does not directly depend on time. In the opposite case, non-stationary theory is used. Then, we will briefly consider the quasiclassical approximation, which is used for the problems of quantum mechanics which are close to analogous problems of classical mechanics. Stationary perturbation theory for a system with non-degenerate states This theory is used for the approximate calculation of the energy levels and the wavefunctions of stationary states of systems that are subjected to the influence of small perturbations.