Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1210.3003

Recovering the Period in Shor's Algorithm with Gauss' Algorithm for Lattice Basis Reduction

Allison Koenecke, Paweł Wocjan

Published Oct 10, 2012• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Shor's algorithm contains a classical post-processing part for which we aim to create an efficient, understandable method aside from continued fractions. Let r be an unknown positive integer. Assume that with some constant probability we obtain random positive integers of the form x=[ N k/r ] where [.] is either the floor or ceiling of the rational number, k is selected uniformly at random from {0,1,...,r-1}, and N is a parameter that can be chosen. The problem of recovering r from such samples occurs precisely in the classical post-processing part of Shor's algorithm. The quantum part (quantum phase estimation) makes it possible to obtain such samples where r is the order of some element a of the unit group of Z_n and n is the number to be factored. Shor showed that the continued fraction algorithm can be used to efficiently recover r, since if N>2r^2 then k/r appears in lowest terms as one of the convergents of x/N due to a standard result on continued fractions. We present here an alternative method for recovering r based on the Gauss algorithm for lattice basis reduction, allowing us to efficiently find the shortest nonzero vector of a lattice generated by two vectors. Our method is about as efficient as the method based on continued fractions, yet it is much easier to understand all the details of why it works.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1210.3003

Related papers

Continued Fractions and Probability Estimations in the Shor Algorithm -- A Detailed and Self-Contained Treatise

Johanna Barzen, Frank Leymann

The algorithm of Shor for prime factorization is a hybrid algorithm consisting of a quantum part and a classical part. The main focus of the classical part is a continued fraction analysis. The presentation of this is often short, pointing to text books on number theory. In this contribution, we present the relevant results and proofs from the theory of continued fractions in detail (even in more detail than in text books) filling the gap to allow a complete comprehension of the algorithm of Shor. Similarly, we provide a detailed computation of the estimation of the probability that convergents will provide the period required for determining a prime factor.

arXiv:2205.01925•May 4, 2022•0 citations

Continued Fractions and Probability Estimations in Shor’s Algorithm: A Detailed and Self-Contained Treatise

Johanna Barzen, Frank Leymann

Shor’s algorithm for prime factorization is a hybrid algorithm consisting of a quantum part and a classical part. The main focus of the classical part is a continued fraction analysis. The presentation of this is often short, pointing to text books on number theory. In this contribution, we present the relevant results and proofs from the theory of continued fractions in detail (even in more detail than in text books), filling the gap to allow a complete comprehension of Shor’s algorithm. Similarly, we provide a detailed computation of the estimation of the probability that convergents will provide the period required for determining a prime factor.

AppliedMath•Jul 18, 2022•4 citations

Shor's Factoring Algorithm and Modular Exponentiation Operators

Robert Singleton

We provide a pedagogical presentation of Shor's factoring algorithm, which is a quantum algorithm for factoring very large numbers (of order of hundreds to thousands of bits) in polynomial time. In contrast, all known classical algorithms for the factoring problem take an exponential time to factor such large numbers. Shor's algorithm therefore has profound implication for public-key encryption such as RSA and Diffie–Hellman key exchange. We assume no prior knowledge of Shor's algorithm beyond a basic familiarity with the circuit model of quantum computing. Shor's algorithm contains a number of moving parts, and can be rather daunting at first. The literature is replete with derivations and expositions of Shor's algorithm, but most of them seem to be lacking in essential details, and none of them provide a pedagogical presentation. They require a thicket of appendices and assume a knowledge of quantum algorithms and classical mathematics with which the reader might not be familiar. We therefore start with first principle derivations of the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) and quantum phase estimation (QPE), which are the essential building blocks of Shor's algorithm. We then go on to develop the theory of modular exponentiation (ME) operators, one of the fundamental components of Shor's algorithm, and the place where most of the quantum resources are deployed. We also delve into the number theory that establishes the link between factorization and the period of the modular exponential function. We then apply the QPE algorithm to obtain Shor's factoring algorithm. We also discuss the post-quantum processing and the method of continued fractions, which is used to extract the exact period of the modular exponential function from the approximately measured phase angles of the ME operator. The manuscript then moves on to a series of examples. We first verify the formalism by factoring N=15, the smallest number accessible to Shor's algorithm. We then proceed to factor larger integers, developing a systematic procedure that will find the ME operators for any semi-prime N=p×q (where q and p are prime). Finally, we factor the composite numbers N=21, 33, 35, 143, 247 using the Qiskit simulator. It is observed that the ME operators are somewhat forgiving, and truncated approximate forms are able to extract factors just as well as the exact operators. This is because the method of continued fractions only requires an approximate phase value for its input, which suggests that implementing Shor's algorithm might not be as difficult as first suspected. Quanta 2023; 12: 41–130.

arXiv:2306.09122•Quanta•Sep 15, 2023•8 citations

How to detect whether Shor’s algorithm succeeds against large integers without a quantum computer

Daniel Chicayban Bastos, Luis Antônio Brasil Kowada

Shor’s algorithm is a well-known probabilistic method for factoring large composite integers in polynomial-time on a quantum computer. The method computes the order r of a random element x in the group Z∗N and uses that information for splitting N with an application of the greatest common divisor algorithm. However, being probabilistic, the success of Shor’s algorithm relies on some special properties of N. If r is even and xr/2 £ -1 mod N, then gcd(xr/2 - 1, N) reveals a nontrivial factor of N and the method succeeds. But even assuming that r is even and being given the complete prime factorization of N it is not obvious whether xr/2 £ -1 mod N and, therefore, it is not easy to assert whether Shor’s algorithm would split N without running it and looking at its answer. We present a strategy for detecting whether the splitting occurs without any need for running the quantum order-finding algorithm, but we must be given the prime factorization of N. This has allowed us to produce the first direct evidence of the probability of success of Shor’s method. The composites chosen were the product of two randomly-generated probable primes of similar sizes that pass the Miller-Rabin test.

Procedia Computer Science•Jan 1, 2021•6 citations

On completely factoring any integer efficiently in a single run of an order-finding algorithm

Martin Ekerå

Abstract We show that given the order of a single element selected uniformly at random from $${\mathbb {Z}}_N^*$$ Z N ∗ , we can with very high probability, and for any integer N, efficiently find the complete factorization of N in polynomial time. This implies that a single run of the quantum part of Shor’s factoring algorithm is usually sufficient. All prime factors of N can then be recovered with negligible computational cost in a classical post-processing step. The classical algorithm required for this step is essentially due to Miller.

arXiv:2007.10044•Quantum Information Processing•Jun 1, 2021•14 citations

Enhancing the Practical Reliability of Shor's Quantum Algorithm via Generalized Period Decomposition: Theory and Large-Scale Empirical Validation

Chih-Chen Liao, Chia-Hsin Liu, Yun-Cheng Tsai

This work presents a generalized period decomposition approach, significantly improving the practical reliability of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm. Although Shor's algorithm theoretically enables polynomial-time integer factorization, its real-world performance heavily depends on stringent conditions related to the period obtained via quantum phase estimation. Our generalized decomposition method relaxes these conditions by systematically exploiting arbitrary divisors of the obtained period, effectively broadening the applicability of each quantum execution. Extensive classical simulations were performed to empirically validate our approach, involving over one million test cases across integers ranging from 2 to 8 digits. The proposed method achieved near-perfect success rates, exceeding 99.998% for 7-digit numbers and 99.999% for 8-digit numbers, significantly surpassing traditional and recently improved variants of Shor's algorithm. Crucially, this improvement is achieved without compromising the algorithm's polynomial-time complexity and integrates seamlessly with existing quantum computational frameworks. Moreover, our method enhances the efficiency of quantum resource usage by minimizing unnecessary repetitions, making it particularly relevant for quantum cryptanalysis with noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. This study thus provides both theoretical advancements and substantial practical benefits, contributing meaningfully to the field of quantum algorithm research and the broader field of quantum information processing.

quant-pharXiv:2512.11004•Dec 12, 2025•0 citations
Shor's algorithm contains a classical post-processing part for which we aim to create an efficient, understandable method aside from continued fractions. Let r be an unknown positive integer. Assume that with some constant probability we obtain random positive integers of the form x=[ N k/r ] where [.] is either the floor or ceiling of the rational number, k is selected uniformly at random from {0,1,...,r-1}, and N is a parameter that can be chosen. The problem of recovering r from such samples occurs precisely in the classical post-processing part of Shor's algorithm. The quantum part (quantum phase estimation) makes it possible to obtain such samples where r is the order of some element a of the unit group of Z_n and n is the number to be factored. Shor showed that the continued fraction algorithm can be used to efficiently recover r, since if N>2r^2 then k/r appears in lowest terms as one of the convergents of x/N due to a standard result on continued fractions. We present here an alternative method for recovering r based on the Gauss algorithm for lattice basis reduction, allowing us to efficiently find the shortest nonzero vector of a lattice generated by two vectors. Our method is about as efficient as the method based on continued fractions, yet it is much easier to understand all the details of why it works.
The algorithm of Shor for prime factorization is a hybrid algorithm consisting of a quantum part and a classical part. The main focus of the classical part is a continued fraction analysis. The presentation of this is often short, pointing to text books on number theory. In this contribution, we present the relevant results and proofs from the theory of continued fractions in detail (even in more detail than in text books) filling the gap to allow a complete comprehension of the algorithm of Shor. Similarly, we provide a detailed computation of the estimation of the probability that convergents will provide the period required for determining a prime factor.
Shor’s algorithm for prime factorization is a hybrid algorithm consisting of a quantum part and a classical part. The main focus of the classical part is a continued fraction analysis. The presentation of this is often short, pointing to text books on number theory. In this contribution, we present the relevant results and proofs from the theory of continued fractions in detail (even in more detail than in text books), filling the gap to allow a complete comprehension of Shor’s algorithm. Similarly, we provide a detailed computation of the estimation of the probability that convergents will provide the period required for determining a prime factor.
We provide a pedagogical presentation of Shor's factoring algorithm, which is a quantum algorithm for factoring very large numbers (of order of hundreds to thousands of bits) in polynomial time. In contrast, all known classical algorithms for the factoring problem take an exponential time to factor such large numbers. Shor's algorithm therefore has profound implication for public-key encryption such as RSA and Diffie–Hellman key exchange. We assume no prior knowledge of Shor's algorithm beyond a basic familiarity with the circuit model of quantum computing. Shor's algorithm contains a number of moving parts, and can be rather daunting at first. The literature is replete with derivations and expositions of Shor's algorithm, but most of them seem to be lacking in essential details, and none of them provide a pedagogical presentation. They require a thicket of appendices and assume a knowledge of quantum algorithms and classical mathematics with which the reader might not be familiar. We therefore start with first principle derivations of the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) and quantum phase estimation (QPE), which are the essential building blocks of Shor's algorithm. We then go on to develop the theory of modular exponentiation (ME) operators, one of the fundamental components of Shor's algorithm, and the place where most of the quantum resources are deployed. We also delve into the number theory that establishes the link between factorization and the period of the modular exponential function. We then apply the QPE algorithm to obtain Shor's factoring algorithm. We also discuss the post-quantum processing and the method of continued fractions, which is used to extract the exact period of the modular exponential function from the approximately measured phase angles of the ME operator. The manuscript then moves on to a series of examples. We first verify the formalism by factoring N=15, the smallest number accessible to Shor's algorithm. We then proceed to factor larger integers, developing a systematic procedure that will find the ME operators for any semi-prime N=p×q (where q and p are prime). Finally, we factor the composite numbers N=21, 33, 35, 143, 247 using the Qiskit simulator. It is observed that the ME operators are somewhat forgiving, and truncated approximate forms are able to extract factors just as well as the exact operators. This is because the method of continued fractions only requires an approximate phase value for its input, which suggests that implementing Shor's algorithm might not be as difficult as first suspected. Quanta 2023; 12: 41–130.
Shor’s algorithm is a well-known probabilistic method for factoring large composite integers in polynomial-time on a quantum computer. The method computes the order r of a random element x in the group Z∗N and uses that information for splitting N with an application of the greatest common divisor algorithm. However, being probabilistic, the success of Shor’s algorithm relies on some special properties of N. If r is even and xr/2 £ -1 mod N, then gcd(xr/2 - 1, N) reveals a nontrivial factor of N and the method succeeds. But even assuming that r is even and being given the complete prime factorization of N it is not obvious whether xr/2 £ -1 mod N and, therefore, it is not easy to assert whether Shor’s algorithm would split N without running it and looking at its answer. We present a strategy for detecting whether the splitting occurs without any need for running the quantum order-finding algorithm, but we must be given the prime factorization of N. This has allowed us to produce the first direct evidence of the probability of success of Shor’s method. The composites chosen were the product of two randomly-generated probable primes of similar sizes that pass the Miller-Rabin test.
Abstract We show that given the order of a single element selected uniformly at random from ZN∗{\mathbb {Z}}_N^*ZN∗​ Z N ∗ , we can with very high probability, and for any integer N, efficiently find the complete factorization of N in polynomial time. This implies that a single run of the quantum part of Shor’s factoring algorithm is usually sufficient. All prime factors of N can then be recovered with negligible computational cost in a classical post-processing step. The classical algorithm required for this step is essentially due to Miller.
This work presents a generalized period decomposition approach, significantly improving the practical reliability of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm. Although Shor's algorithm theoretically enables polynomial-time integer factorization, its real-world performance heavily depends on stringent conditions related to the period obtained via quantum phase estimation. Our generalized decomposition method relaxes these conditions by systematically exploiting arbitrary divisors of the obtained period, effectively broadening the applicability of each quantum execution. Extensive classical simulations were performed to empirically validate our approach, involving over one million test cases across integers ranging from 2 to 8 digits. The proposed method achieved near-perfect success rates, exceeding 99.998% for 7-digit numbers and 99.999% for 8-digit numbers, significantly surpassing traditional and recently improved variants of Shor's algorithm. Crucially, this improvement is achieved without compromising the algorithm's polynomial-time complexity and integrates seamlessly with existing quantum computational frameworks. Moreover, our method enhances the efficiency of quantum resource usage by minimizing unnecessary repetitions, making it particularly relevant for quantum cryptanalysis with noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. This study thus provides both theoretical advancements and substantial practical benefits, contributing meaningfully to the field of quantum algorithm research and the broader field of quantum information processing.