Abstract The relationship between bulk and boundary properties is one of the founding features of (rational) conformal field theory (CFT). Our goal in this paper is to explore the possibility of having an equivalent relationship in the context of lattice models. We focus on models based on the Temperley–Lieb algebra, and use the concept of ‘braid translation’, which is a natural way, in physical terms, to ‘close’ an open spin chain by adding an interaction between the first and last spins using braiding to ‘bring’ them next to each other. The interaction thus obtained is in general non-local, but has the key feature that it is expressed solely in terms of the algebra for the open spin chain—the ‘ordinary’ Temperley–Lieb algebra and its blob algebra generalization. This is in contrast with the usual periodic spin chains which involve only local interactions, and are described by the periodic Temperley–Lieb algebra. We show that for the restricted solid-on-solid models, which are known to be described by minimal unitary CFTs (with central charge c < 1 ) in the continuum limit, the braid translation in fact does provide the ordinary periodic model starting from the open model with fixed (identical) boundary conditions on the two sides of the strip. This statement has a precise mathematical formulation, which is a pull-back map between irreducible modules of, respectively, the blob algebra and the affine Temperley–Lieb algebra. We then turn to the same kind of analysis for two models whose continuum limits are logarithmic CFTs (LCFTs)—the alternating g l ( 1 | 1 ) and s l ( 2 | 1 ) spin chains. We find that the result for minimal models does not hold any longer: braid translation of the relevant (in that case, indecomposable but not irreducible) modules of the Temperley–Lieb algebra does not give rise to the modules known to be present in the periodic chains. In the g l ( 1 | 1 ) case, the content in terms of the irreducibles is the same, as well as the spectrum, but the detailed structure (like logarithmic coupling) is profoundly different. This carries over to the continuum limit. The situation is similar for the s l ( 2 | 1 ) case. The problem of relating bulk and boundary lattice models for LCFTs thus remains open.Abstract The relationship between bulk and boundary properties is one of the founding features of (rational) conformal field theory (CFT). Our goal in this paper is to explore the possibility of having an equivalent relationship in the context of lattice models. We focus on models based on the Temperley–Lieb algebra, and use the concept of ‘braid translation’, which is a natural way, in physical terms, to ‘close’ an open spin chain by adding an interaction between the first and last spins using braiding to ‘bring’ them next to each other. The interaction thus obtained is in general non-local, but has the key feature that it is expressed solely in terms of the algebra for the open spin chain—the ‘ordinary’ Temperley–Lieb algebra and its blob algebra generalization. This is in contrast with the usual periodic spin chains which involve only local interactions, and are described by the periodic Temperley–Lieb algebra. We show that for the restricted solid-on-solid models, which are known to be described by minimal unitary CFTs (with central charge c < 1 ) in the continuum limit, the braid translation in fact does provide the ordinary periodic model starting from the open model with fixed (identical) boundary conditions on the two sides of the strip. This statement has a precise mathematical formulation, which is a pull-back map between irreducible modules of, respectively, the blob algebra and the affine Temperley–Lieb algebra. We then turn to the same kind of analysis for two models whose continuum limits are logarithmic CFTs (LCFTs)—the alternating g l ( 1 | 1 ) and s l ( 2 | 1 ) spin chains. We find that the result for minimal models does not hold any longer: braid translation of the relevant (in that case, indecomposable but not irreducible) modules of the Temperley–Lieb algebra does not give rise to the modules known to be present in the periodic chains. In the g l ( 1 | 1 ) case, the content in terms of the irreducibles is the same, as well as the spectrum, but the detailed structure (like logarithmic coupling) is profoundly different. This carries over to the continuum limit. The situation is similar for the s l ( 2 | 1 ) case. The problem of relating bulk and boundary lattice models for LCFTs thus remains open.

arXiv:1705.07769Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalOct 2, 201714 citations

A fusion for the periodic Temperley-Lieb algebra and its continuum limit

Azat M. Gainutdinov, Jesper Lykke Jacobsen, Hubert Saleur

Abstract The equivalent of fusion in boundary conformal field theory (CFT) can be realized quite simply in the context of lattice models by essentially glueing two open spin chains. This has led to many developments, in particular in the context of chiral logarithmic CFT. We consider in this paper a possible generalization of the idea to the case of bulk conformal field theory. This is of course considerably more difficult, since there is no obvious way of merging two closed spin chains into a big one. In an earlier paper, two of us had proposed a “topological” way of performing this operation in the case of models based on the affine Temperley-Lieb (ATL) algebra, by exploiting the associated braid group representation and skein relations. In the present work, we establish — using, in particular, Frobenius reciprocity — the resulting fusion rules for standard modules of ATL in the generic as well as partially degenerate cases. These fusion rules have a simple interpretation in the continuum limit. However, unlike in the chiral case this interpretation does not match the usual fusion in non-chiral CFTs. Rather, it corresponds to the glueing of the right moving component of one conformal field with the left moving component of the other.Abstract The equivalent of fusion in boundary conformal field theory (CFT) can be realized quite simply in the context of lattice models by essentially glueing two open spin chains. This has led to many developments, in particular in the context of chiral logarithmic CFT. We consider in this paper a possible generalization of the idea to the case of bulk conformal field theory. This is of course considerably more difficult, since there is no obvious way of merging two closed spin chains into a big one. In an earlier paper, two of us had proposed a “topological” way of performing this operation in the case of models based on the affine Temperley-Lieb (ATL) algebra, by exploiting the associated braid group representation and skein relations. In the present work, we establish — using, in particular, Frobenius reciprocity — the resulting fusion rules for standard modules of ATL in the generic as well as partially degenerate cases. These fusion rules have a simple interpretation in the continuum limit. However, unlike in the chiral case this interpretation does not match the usual fusion in non-chiral CFTs. Rather, it corresponds to the glueing of the right moving component of one conformal field with the left moving component of the other.

arXiv:1712.07076Journal of High Energy PhysicsNov 1, 201827 citations

Perturbed logarithmic CFT and integrable models

M. A. Rajabpour, Shahin Rouhani

arXiv:hep-th/0510067Nuclear Physics BAug 29, 20064 citations

Heisenberg spin chain at the continuum limit and corresponding field theory

拓也小林

Jan 1, 20030 citations

Associative Algebraic Approach to Logarithmic CFT in the Bulk: The Continuum Limit of the

{\mathfrak{gl}(1|1)}

gl ( 1 | 1 ) Periodic Spin Chain, Howe Duality and the Interchiral Algebra