Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1207.2933 · Few-Body Systems

Extending the Four-Body Problem of Wolfes to Non-Translationally Invariant Interactions

A. Bachkhaznadji, Monique Lassaut

Published Mar 7, 2013• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s00601-013-0696-z

Related papers

Introduction of many-particle variables for the treatment of special translationally invariant many-body problems

P. Möbius

Nuclear Physics•May 1, 1960•11 citations

Different modes of motion in special translationally invariant many-body systems

P. Möbius

Nuclear Physics•Nov 1, 1961•3 citations

Universal Translationally-Invariant Hamiltonians

Stephen Piddock, Johannes Bausch

In this work we extend the notion of universal quantum Hamiltonians to the setting of translationally-invariant systems. We present a construction that allows a two-dimensional spin lattice with nearest-neighbour interactions, open boundaries, and translational symmetry to simulate any local target Hamiltonian---i.e. to reproduce the whole of the target system within its low-energy subspace to arbitrarily-high precision. Since this implies the capability to simulate non-translationally-invariant many-body systems with translationally-invariant couplings, any effect such as characteristics commonly associated to systems with external disorder, e.g. many-body localization, can also occur within the low-energy Hilbert space sector of translationally-invariant systems. Then we sketch a variant of the universal lattice construction optimized for simulating translationally-invariant target Hamiltonians. Finally we prove that qubit Hamiltonians consisting of Heisenberg or XY interactions of varying interaction strengths restricted to the edges of a connected translationally-invariant graph embedded in $\mathbb{R}^D$ are universal, and can efficiently simulate any geometrically local Hamiltonian in $\mathbb{R}^D$.

arXiv:2001.08050•Jan 22, 2020•3 citations

Undecidability as a Structural Invariant from Computability to Quantum Physics — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Undecidability is not a peripheral paradox but a structural invariant of formal systems, extending from classical computability (halting problem) into quantum many-body physics, where spectral gaps and ground-state properties become provably non-computable. | MATH: Halting problem: no Turing machine H exists s.t. H(P,I) halts iff P(I) halts — diagonalization proof yields contradiction via self-reference. Gödel: for any consistent, recursively axiomatizable system S containing arithmetic, ∃ sentence G with S⊬G and S⊬¬G. Quantum extension: the spectral gap problem (given a translation-invariant local Hamiltonian on a lattice, does the gap between ground and first excited state vanish in the thermodynamic limit?) is undecidable — reduction from the halting problem to 2D spin-lattice Hamiltonians (Cubitt, Perez-Garcia, Wolf, 2015). | CONNECTION: The undecidability proofs rely on encoding computation into lattice structures — the 2D square lattice (crystallographic symmetry p4m) se Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

The three-body problem with short-range interactions

E Nielsen

Physics Reports•Jun 1, 2001•482 citations

A model study of finite range three-body interactions

Rutgers University

Annals of Physics•May 1, 1990•0 citations
In this work we extend the notion of universal quantum Hamiltonians to the setting of translationally-invariant systems. We present a construction that allows a two-dimensional spin lattice with nearest-neighbour interactions, open boundaries, and translational symmetry to simulate any local target Hamiltonian---i.e. to reproduce the whole of the target system within its low-energy subspace to arbitrarily-high precision. Since this implies the capability to simulate non-translationally-invariant many-body systems with translationally-invariant couplings, any effect such as characteristics commonly associated to systems with external disorder, e.g. many-body localization, can also occur within the low-energy Hilbert space sector of translationally-invariant systems. Then we sketch a variant of the universal lattice construction optimized for simulating translationally-invariant target Hamiltonians. Finally we prove that qubit Hamiltonians consisting of Heisenberg or XY interactions of varying interaction strengths restricted to the edges of a connected translationally-invariant graph embedded in RD\mathbb{R}^DRD are universal, and can efficiently simulate any geometrically local Hamiltonian in RD\mathbb{R}^DRD.
FINDING: Undecidability is not a peripheral paradox but a structural invariant of formal systems, extending from classical computability (halting problem) into quantum many-body physics, where spectral gaps and ground-state properties become provably non-computable. | MATH: Halting problem: no Turing machine H exists s.t. H(P,I) halts iff P(I) halts — diagonalization proof yields contradiction via self-reference. Gödel: for any consistent, recursively axiomatizable system S containing arithmetic, ∃ sentence G with S⊬G and S⊬¬G. Quantum extension: the spectral gap problem (given a translation-invariant local Hamiltonian on a lattice, does the gap between ground and first excited state vanish in the thermodynamic limit?) is undecidable — reduction from the halting problem to 2D spin-lattice Hamiltonians (Cubitt, Perez-Garcia, Wolf, 2015). | CONNECTION: The undecidability proofs rely on encoding computation into lattice structures — the 2D square lattice (crystallographic symmetry p4m) se Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com