Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1206.1035 · Quantum Information Processing

Gaussian quantum computation with oracle-decision problems

Mark R. A. Adcock, Peter Høyer, Barry C. Sanders

Published Sep 25, 2012• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-012-0489-1

Related papers

Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem

Sandy Irani, Anand Natarajan, Chinmay Nirkhe +2 more

It is a useful fact in classical computer science that many search problems are reducible to decision problems; this has led to decision problems being regarded as the $\textit{de facto}$ computational task to study in complexity theory. In this work, we explore search-to-decision reductions for quantum search problems, wherein a quantum algorithm makes queries to a classical decision oracle to output a desired quantum state. In particular, we focus on search-to-decision reductions for $\mathsf{QMA}$, and show that there exists a quantum polynomial-time algorithm that can generate a witness for a $\mathsf{QMA}$ problem up to inverse polynomial precision by making one query to a $\mathsf{PP}$ decision oracle. We complement this result by showing that $\mathsf{QMA}$-search does $\textit{not}$ reduce to $\mathsf{QMA}$-decision in polynomial-time, relative to a quantum oracle. We also explore the more general $\textit{state synthesis problem}$, in which the goal is to efficiently synthesize a target state by making queries to a classical oracle encoding the state. We prove that there exists a classical oracle with which any quantum state can be synthesized to inverse polynomial precision using only one oracle query and to inverse exponential precision using two oracle queries. This answers an open question of Aaronson from 2016, who presented a state synthesis algorithm that makes $O(n)$ queries to a classical oracle to prepare an $n$-qubit state, and asked if the query complexity could be made sublinear.

arXiv:2111.02999•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Nov 4, 2021•8 citations

Quantum Computation Relative to Oracles

Christino Tamon, Tomoyuki Yamakami

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•1 citation

Oracle Quantum Algorithms: An Overview

Rafael Pereira da Silva

•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Oracle Quantum Computing

Departement Iro

This paper continues the study of the power of oracles to separate quantum com.plexity classes from classical (including probabilistic and nondeterministic) complexity classes, which we initiated in an earlier paper [5]. The new results are that, under appropriate oracles, (1) there is a decision problem that can be solved in polynomial time on the quantum computer, which would classically require exponential time in the worst case even on a nondeterministic computer (in particular QP g NP relative to this oracle), and (2) there is a decision problem that can be solved in exponential time on the quantum computer for which any deterministic classical computer would require double exponential time on all but finitely many instances.

•Jan 1, 1993•6 citations

Quantum computation: Algorithms and Applications

Chien‐Hung Cho, Chih-Yu Chen, Kuo-Chin Chen +6 more

Chinese Journal of Physics•May 8, 2021•48 citations

Oracle Quantum Computing

André Berthiaume, Gilles Brassard A

Building on the work of Deutsch and Jozsa, we construct oracles relative to which (1) there is a decision problem that can be solved with certainty in worst-case polynomial time on the quantum computer, yet it cannot be solved classically in probabilistic expected polynomial time if errors are not tolerated, nor even in nondeterministic polynomial time, and (2) there is a decision problem that can be solved in exponential time on the quantum computer, which requires double exponential time on all but finitely many instances on any classical deterministic computer.

Journal of Modern Optics•Dec 1, 1994•99 citations
It is a useful fact in classical computer science that many search problems are reducible to decision problems; this has led to decision problems being regarded as the de facto\textit{de facto}de facto computational task to study in complexity theory. In this work, we explore search-to-decision reductions for quantum search problems, wherein a quantum algorithm makes queries to a classical decision oracle to output a desired quantum state. In particular, we focus on search-to-decision reductions for QMA\mathsf{QMA}QMA, and show that there exists a quantum polynomial-time algorithm that can generate a witness for a QMA\mathsf{QMA}QMA problem up to inverse polynomial precision by making one query to a PP\mathsf{PP}PP decision oracle. We complement this result by showing that QMA\mathsf{QMA}QMA-search does not\textit{not}not reduce to QMA\mathsf{QMA}QMA-decision in polynomial-time, relative to a quantum oracle. We also explore the more general state synthesis problem\textit{state synthesis problem}state synthesis problem, in which the goal is to efficiently synthesize a target state by making queries to a classical oracle encoding the state. We prove that there exists a classical oracle with which any quantum state can be synthesized to inverse polynomial precision using only one oracle query and to inverse exponential precision using two oracle queries. This answers an open question of Aaronson from 2016, who presented a state synthesis algorithm that makes O(n)O(n)O(n) queries to a classical oracle to prepare an nnn-qubit state, and asked if the query complexity could be made sublinear.
This paper continues the study of the power of oracles to separate quantum com.plexity classes from classical (including probabilistic and nondeterministic) complexity classes, which we initiated in an earlier paper [5]. The new results are that, under appropriate oracles, (1) there is a decision problem that can be solved in polynomial time on the quantum computer, which would classically require exponential time in the worst case even on a nondeterministic computer (in particular QP g NP relative to this oracle), and (2) there is a decision problem that can be solved in exponential time on the quantum computer for which any deterministic classical computer would require double exponential time on all but finitely many instances.
Building on the work of Deutsch and Jozsa, we construct oracles relative to which (1) there is a decision problem that can be solved with certainty in worst-case polynomial time on the quantum computer, yet it cannot be solved classically in probabilistic expected polynomial time if errors are not tolerated, nor even in nondeterministic polynomial time, and (2) there is a decision problem that can be solved in exponential time on the quantum computer, which requires double exponential time on all but finitely many instances on any classical deterministic computer.