Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1204.1540

Analytical Quantum Dynamics in Infinite Phase Space

Maxim Raykin

Published Apr 6, 2012• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We develop a dynamical theory, based on a system of ordinary differential equations describing the motion of particles which reproduces the results of quantum mechanics. The system generalizes the Hamilton equations of classical mechanics to the quantum domain, and turns into them in the classical limit $\hbar\rightarrow 0$. The particles' motions are completely determined by the initial conditions. In this theory, the wave function $ψ$ of quantum mechanics is equal to the exponent of an action function, obtained by integrating some Lagrangian function along particle trajectories, described by equations of motion. Consequently, the equation for the logarithm of a wave function is related to the equations of motion in the same way as the Hamilton-Jacobi equation is related to the Hamilton equations in classical mechanics. We demonstrate that the probability density of particles, moving according to these equations, should be given by a standard quantum-mechanical relation, $ρ=|ψ|^2$. The theory of quantum measurements is presented, and the mechanism of nonlocal correlations between results of distant measurements with entangled particles is revealed. In the last section, we extend the theory to particles with nonzero spin.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1204.1540

Related papers

From interpretation of the three classical mechanics actions to the wave function in quantum mechanics

Michel Gondran, Alexandre Gondran

First, we show that there exists in classical mechanics three actions corresponding to different boundary conditions: two well-known actions, the Euler-Lagrange classical action S_cl(x,t;x_0), which links the initial position x_0 and its position x at time t, the Hamilton-Jacobi action S(x,t), which links a family of particles of initial action S_0(x) to their various positions x at time t, and a new action, the deterministic action S(x,t;x_0,v_0), which links a particle in initial position x_0 and initial velocity v_0 to its position x at time t. We study, in the semi-classical approximation, the convergence of the quantum density and the quantum action, solutions to the Madelung equations, when the Planck constant h tends to 0. We find two different solutions which depend on the initial density. In the first case, where the initial quantum density is a classical density, the quantum density and the quantum action converge to a classical action and a classical density which satisfy the statistical Hamilton-Jacobi equations. These are the equations of a set of classical particles whose initial positions are known only by the initial density. In the second case where initial density converges to a Dirac density, the density converges to the Dirac function and the quantum action converges to a deterministic action. Therefore we introduce into classical mechanics non-discerned particles, which satisfy the statistical Hamilton-Jacobi-equations and explain the Gibbs paradox, and discerned particles, which satisfy the deterministic Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Finally, we propose an interpretation of the Schrodinger wave function that depends on the initial conditions (preparation). This double interpretation seems to be the interpretation of Louis de Broglie's "double solution" idea.

arXiv:1210.3025•Oct 10, 2012•0 citations

Modified de Broglian Mechanics and the Dynamical Origin of Quantum Probability

Moncy V. John

A well-known formulation of classical mechanics of system of particles is based on solving the Hamilton-Jacobi equation ∂S ∂t + H ( qi , ∂S ∂qi , t ) = 0, (19.1) where S(qi , αi , t) is Hamilton’s principal function, H is the Hamiltonian, qi are the configuration space variables, αi are constants of integration, and t denotes time. If the Hamiltonian is independent of t and is a constant of motion equal to the total energy E, then S and Hamilton’s characteristic function W are related by S = W − Et . (19.2) Since W is independent of time, the surfaces with W = constant have fixed locations in configuration space. However, the S = constant surfaces move in time and may be considered as wavefronts propagating in this space [1]. For a single particle one can show that the wave velocity at any point is given by u = E|∇W | = E p = E mv . (19.3) T&F Cat # K11224, Chapter 19, Page 302, 15-9-2010 This shows that the velocity of a point on this surface is inversely proportional to the spatial velocity of the particle. Also one can show that the trajectories of the particle must always be normal to the surfaces of constant S. The momentum of the particle is obtained as [1] p = ∇W . (19.4) It is not clear whether this wave picture was known to classical physicists. However, in hindsight, we may now observe that there exists a correspondence between classical mechanics and geometrical optics. That is, the particle trajectories orthogonal to surfaces of constant S in classical mechanics, as we have discussed above, are similar to light rays traveling orthogonal to Huygens’ wavefronts.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Quantum mechanics and classical trajectories

Christoph Nölle

The classical limit $\hbar$->0 of quantum mechanics is known to be delicate, in particular there seems to be no simple derivation of the classical Hamilton equation, starting from the Schrödinger equation. In this paper I elaborate on an idea of M. Reuter to represent wave functions by parallel sections of a flat vector bundle over phase space, using the connection of Fedosov's construction of deformation quantization. This generalizes the ordinary Schrödinger representation, and allows naturally for a description of quantum states in terms of a curve plus a wave function. Hamilton's equation arises in this context as a condition on the curve, ensuring the dynamics to split into a classical and a quantum part.

arXiv:1005.3786•May 20, 2010•1 citation

Contribution to understanding the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics

L. Skála, V. Kapsa

Probabilistic description of results of measurements and its consequences for understanding quantum mechanics are discussed. It is shown that the basic mathematical structure of quantum mechanics like the probability amplitudes, the Born rule, commutation and uncertainty relations, probability density current, momentum operator, and rules for including the scalar and vector potentials and antiparticles can be obtained from the probabilistic description of results of measurement of the space coordinates and time. Equations of motion of quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon equation, the Schrödinger equation, and the Dirac equation are obtained from the requirement of the relativistic invariance of the space-time Fisher information. The limit case of th e δ-like probability densities leads to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation of classical mechanics. Manyparticle systems and the postulates of quantum mechanics are also discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0602182•Optics and Spectroscopy•Sep 1, 2007•7 citations

Stochastic Theory of Quantum Mechanics

M. Godart

The stochastic theory of non-relativistic quantum mechanics presented here relies heavily upon the theory of stochastic processes, with its definitions, theorems and specific vocabulary as well. Its main hypothesis states indeed that the classical trajectories of the particles are identical to the sample functions of a diffusion Markov process, whose conditional probability density is proposed as a substitute for the wave function. The Schroedinger equation and the so-called Nelson equations are used to determine the diffusion tensor and the drift vectors characteristic of such a process. It is then possible to write down the forward and backward Kolmogorov equations that are used to determine the conditional probability density, as well as the Fokker-Planck equation that is used to determine the normal probability density. This method is applied to several simple cases and the results obtained are compared with those of the orthodox theory. Among the most important differences let us mention that any system evolving freely from any original state returns spontaneously to its ground state, that the definitions of the particles velocities and momenta are impossible because the sample functions of a diffusion Markov process nowhere possess a derivative with respect to time and that the so-called collapse of the wave function is a mere mirage explained by the updating choice between new and older initial conditions in the resolution of partial differential equations. We finally attempt to extend the proposed theory to the domain of the relativistic quantum mechanics. It is promising but is clearly unfinished because it has not been possible up to now to solve the Nelson and Kolmogorov equations, except in the very simple case of a free particle.

arXiv:1206.2917•Jun 13, 2012•3 citations

From probabilistic mechanics to quantum theory

U. Klein

We show that quantum theory (QT) is a substructure of classical probabilistic physics. The central quantity of the classical theory is Hamilton’s function, which determines canonical equations, a corresponding flow, and a Liouville equation for a probability density. We extend this theory in two respects: (1) The same structure is defined for arbitrary observables. Thus, we have all of the above entities generated not only by Hamilton’s function but also by every observable. (2) We introduce for each observable a phase space function representing the classical action. This is a redundant quantity in a classical context but indispensable for the transition to QT. The basic equations of the resulting theory take a “quantum-like” form, which allows for a simple derivation of QT by means of a projection to configuration space reported previously [Quantum Stud Math Found 5:219–227, 2018]. We obtain the most important relations of QT, namely the form of operators, Schrödinger’s equation, eigenvalue equations, commutation relations, expectation values, and Born’s rule. Implications for the interpretation of QT are discussed, as well as an alternative projection method allowing for a derivation of spin.

arXiv:1907.08513•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•Aug 29, 2019•9 citations
We develop a dynamical theory, based on a system of ordinary differential equations describing the motion of particles which reproduces the results of quantum mechanics. The system generalizes the Hamilton equations of classical mechanics to the quantum domain, and turns into them in the classical limit ℏ→0\hbar\rightarrow 0ℏ→0. The particles' motions are completely determined by the initial conditions. In this theory, the wave function ψψψ of quantum mechanics is equal to the exponent of an action function, obtained by integrating some Lagrangian function along particle trajectories, described by equations of motion. Consequently, the equation for the logarithm of a wave function is related to the equations of motion in the same way as the Hamilton-Jacobi equation is related to the Hamilton equations in classical mechanics. We demonstrate that the probability density of particles, moving according to these equations, should be given by a standard quantum-mechanical relation, ρ=∣ψ∣2ρ=|ψ|^2ρ=∣ψ∣2. The theory of quantum measurements is presented, and the mechanism of nonlocal correlations between results of distant measurements with entangled particles is revealed. In the last section, we extend the theory to particles with nonzero spin.
First, we show that there exists in classical mechanics three actions corresponding to different boundary conditions: two well-known actions, the Euler-Lagrange classical action S_cl(x,t;x_0), which links the initial position x_0 and its position x at time t, the Hamilton-Jacobi action S(x,t), which links a family of particles of initial action S_0(x) to their various positions x at time t, and a new action, the deterministic action S(x,t;x_0,v_0), which links a particle in initial position x_0 and initial velocity v_0 to its position x at time t. We study, in the semi-classical approximation, the convergence of the quantum density and the quantum action, solutions to the Madelung equations, when the Planck constant h tends to 0. We find two different solutions which depend on the initial density. In the first case, where the initial quantum density is a classical density, the quantum density and the quantum action converge to a classical action and a classical density which satisfy the statistical Hamilton-Jacobi equations. These are the equations of a set of classical particles whose initial positions are known only by the initial density. In the second case where initial density converges to a Dirac density, the density converges to the Dirac function and the quantum action converges to a deterministic action. Therefore we introduce into classical mechanics non-discerned particles, which satisfy the statistical Hamilton-Jacobi-equations and explain the Gibbs paradox, and discerned particles, which satisfy the deterministic Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Finally, we propose an interpretation of the Schrodinger wave function that depends on the initial conditions (preparation). This double interpretation seems to be the interpretation of Louis de Broglie's "double solution" idea.
A well-known formulation of classical mechanics of system of particles is based on solving the Hamilton-Jacobi equation ∂S ∂t + H ( qi , ∂S ∂qi , t ) = 0, (19.1) where S(qi , αi , t) is Hamilton’s principal function, H is the Hamiltonian, qi are the configuration space variables, αi are constants of integration, and t denotes time. If the Hamiltonian is independent of t and is a constant of motion equal to the total energy E, then S and Hamilton’s characteristic function W are related by S = W − Et . (19.2) Since W is independent of time, the surfaces with W = constant have fixed locations in configuration space. However, the S = constant surfaces move in time and may be considered as wavefronts propagating in this space [1]. For a single particle one can show that the wave velocity at any point is given by u = E|∇W | = E p = E mv . (19.3) T&F Cat # K11224, Chapter 19, Page 302, 15-9-2010 This shows that the velocity of a point on this surface is inversely proportional to the spatial velocity of the particle. Also one can show that the trajectories of the particle must always be normal to the surfaces of constant S. The momentum of the particle is obtained as [1] p = ∇W . (19.4) It is not clear whether this wave picture was known to classical physicists. However, in hindsight, we may now observe that there exists a correspondence between classical mechanics and geometrical optics. That is, the particle trajectories orthogonal to surfaces of constant S in classical mechanics, as we have discussed above, are similar to light rays traveling orthogonal to Huygens’ wavefronts.
The classical limit ℏ\hbarℏ->0 of quantum mechanics is known to be delicate, in particular there seems to be no simple derivation of the classical Hamilton equation, starting from the Schrödinger equation. In this paper I elaborate on an idea of M. Reuter to represent wave functions by parallel sections of a flat vector bundle over phase space, using the connection of Fedosov's construction of deformation quantization. This generalizes the ordinary Schrödinger representation, and allows naturally for a description of quantum states in terms of a curve plus a wave function. Hamilton's equation arises in this context as a condition on the curve, ensuring the dynamics to split into a classical and a quantum part.
Probabilistic description of results of measurements and its consequences for understanding quantum mechanics are discussed. It is shown that the basic mathematical structure of quantum mechanics like the probability amplitudes, the Born rule, commutation and uncertainty relations, probability density current, momentum operator, and rules for including the scalar and vector potentials and antiparticles can be obtained from the probabilistic description of results of measurement of the space coordinates and time. Equations of motion of quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon equation, the Schrödinger equation, and the Dirac equation are obtained from the requirement of the relativistic invariance of the space-time Fisher information. The limit case of th e δ-like probability densities leads to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation of classical mechanics. Manyparticle systems and the postulates of quantum mechanics are also discussed.
The stochastic theory of non-relativistic quantum mechanics presented here relies heavily upon the theory of stochastic processes, with its definitions, theorems and specific vocabulary as well. Its main hypothesis states indeed that the classical trajectories of the particles are identical to the sample functions of a diffusion Markov process, whose conditional probability density is proposed as a substitute for the wave function. The Schroedinger equation and the so-called Nelson equations are used to determine the diffusion tensor and the drift vectors characteristic of such a process. It is then possible to write down the forward and backward Kolmogorov equations that are used to determine the conditional probability density, as well as the Fokker-Planck equation that is used to determine the normal probability density. This method is applied to several simple cases and the results obtained are compared with those of the orthodox theory. Among the most important differences let us mention that any system evolving freely from any original state returns spontaneously to its ground state, that the definitions of the particles velocities and momenta are impossible because the sample functions of a diffusion Markov process nowhere possess a derivative with respect to time and that the so-called collapse of the wave function is a mere mirage explained by the updating choice between new and older initial conditions in the resolution of partial differential equations. We finally attempt to extend the proposed theory to the domain of the relativistic quantum mechanics. It is promising but is clearly unfinished because it has not been possible up to now to solve the Nelson and Kolmogorov equations, except in the very simple case of a free particle.
We show that quantum theory (QT) is a substructure of classical probabilistic physics. The central quantity of the classical theory is Hamilton’s function, which determines canonical equations, a corresponding flow, and a Liouville equation for a probability density. We extend this theory in two respects: (1) The same structure is defined for arbitrary observables. Thus, we have all of the above entities generated not only by Hamilton’s function but also by every observable. (2) We introduce for each observable a phase space function representing the classical action. This is a redundant quantity in a classical context but indispensable for the transition to QT. The basic equations of the resulting theory take a “quantum-like” form, which allows for a simple derivation of QT by means of a projection to configuration space reported previously [Quantum Stud Math Found 5:219–227, 2018]. We obtain the most important relations of QT, namely the form of operators, Schrödinger’s equation, eigenvalue equations, commutation relations, expectation values, and Born’s rule. Implications for the interpretation of QT are discussed, as well as an alternative projection method allowing for a derivation of spin.