Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1203.5052 · Physical Review A

Reexamination of the Runge-Gross action-integral functional

J. Schirmer

Published Jul 26, 2012• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The density-based action-integral functional introduced by Runge and Gross [Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)] in their foundation of time-dependent density-functional theory is reexamined. Based on a simple expansion of the original definition, it becomes apparent that the action-integral functional is a trivial construct and, moreover, nonstationary. It cannot be used to establish equations of motion for the time evolution of quantum systems at the density-function level.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.86.012514

Related papers

Reply to "Comment on 'Modifying the variational principle in the action-integral-functional derivation of time-dependent density functional theory'"

J. Schirmer

In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 77, 062511 (2008)], it was advocated to modify the variational principle for the action-integral functional in the Runge-Gross foundation of time-dependent density-functional theory. This was criticised in a subsequent paper [Phys. Rev. A 62, 052510 (2010)] by the present author. In a Comment [Phys. Rev. A 83, 046501 (2011)], it is argued that the criticism is unfounded. This is a response as given to the four specific points raised in the Comment, clarifying and confirming the essence of the original criticism.

arXiv:1105.2718•May 13, 2011•0 citations

Density-functional theory for time-dependent systems

Asish Kumar Dhara, Swapan Kumar Ghosh

The time-dependent density-functional theory of Runge and Gross [Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)] is reexamined on the basis of its limitations, and the criticisms raised by Xu and Rajagopal [Phys. Rev. A 31, 2682 (1985)] are addressed, within the imposition of natural boundary conditions of vanishing density and potential at infinity. Also, for a single-particle system characterized by an arbitrary time-dependent potential, the uniqueness of the density-to-potential mapping is established explicitly for both bound and scattering states.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1987•157 citations

Action formalism of time-dependent density-functional theory

Martín A. Mosquera

The Runge-Gross [E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)] action functional of time-dependent density-functional theory leads to a well-known causality paradox; that is, a perturbation of the electronic density in the future affects the response of the system in the present. This paradox is known to be caused by an inconsistent application of the Dirac-Frenkel variational principle. In view of the recent solutions to this problem, the action functional employed by Runge and Gross in their formulation of time-dependent density-functional theory is analyzed in the context of the Keldysh contour technique. The time-dependent electronic density and the concept of causality are extended to the contour. We derive a variational equation that obeys causality and relates the exchange-correlation potential with its kernel and the functional derivative of the exchange-correlation action functional with respect to the density. It is shown that the adiabatic local-density approximation is a consistent solution of this equation and that the time-dependent optimized potential method can also be derived from it. The formalism presented here can be used to find new approximation methods for the exchange-correlation potential and to avoid the causality dilemma.

arXiv:1303.5679•Physical Review A•Aug 26, 2013•6 citations

Modifying the variational principle in the action-integral-functional derivation of time-dependent density-functional theory

J. Schirmer

According to a recent paper by G. Vignale [Phys. Rev. A 77, 062511 (2008)], the problems arising in the original derivation of time-dependent density-functional theory based on the Runge-Gross (RG) action-integral functional (AIF) are because of an incorrect variational principle (VP). This argument and the proposed modification of the VP are critically analyzed. The more fundamental problem, though, is the indefiniteness of the RG AIF. In contrast to a widely held belief the indefiniteness is not eliminated in the variational procedure, which unwittingly is corroborated by Vignale's initial point.

arXiv:1010.4223•Physical Review A•Nov 11, 2010•6 citations

Comment on “Modifying the variational principle in the action-integral-functional derivation of time-dependent density-functional theory”

Giovanni Vignale

In a paper recently published in Phys. Rev. A [arXiv:1010.4223], Schirmer has criticized an earlier work of mine [arXiv:0803.2727], as well as the foundations of time-dependent density functional theory. In Ref.[2], I showed that the so-called "causality paradox" - i.e., the failure of the exchange-correlation potential derived from the Runge-Gross time-dependent variational principle to satisfy causality requirements - can be solved by a careful reformulation of that variational principle. Fortunately, the criticism presented in Ref.[1] is based on elementary misunderstandings of the nature of functionals, gauge transformations, and the time-dependent variational principle. In this Comment I wish to point out and clear these misunderstandings.

arXiv:1103.5702•Physical Review A•Apr 27, 2011•5 citations

Critique of the foundations of time-dependent density-functional theory

J. Schirmer, Andreas Dreuw

The general expectation that, in principle, the time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) is an exact formulation of the time evolution of an interacting $N$-electron system is critically reexamined. It is demonstrated that the previous TDDFT foundation, resting on four theorems by Runge and Gross (RG) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)], is invalid because undefined phase factors corrupt the RG action integral functionals. Our finding confirms much of a previous analysis by van Leeuwen [Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 1969 (2001)]. To analyze the RG theorems and other aspects of TDDFT, an utmost simplification of the Kohn-Sham (KS) concept has been introduced, in which the ground-state density is obtained from a single KS equation for one spatial (spinless) orbital. The time-dependent (TD) form of this radical Kohn-Sham (rKS) scheme, which has the same validity status as the ordinary KS version, has proved to be a valuable tool for analysis. The rKS concept is used to clarify also the alternative nonvariational formulation of TD KS theory. We argue that it is just a formal theory, allowing one to reproduce but not predict the time development of the exact density of the interacting $N$-electron system. Besides the issue of the formal exactness of TDDFT, it is shown that both the static and time-dependent KS linear response equations neglect the particle-particle ($p$-$p$) and hole-hole ($h$-$h$) matrix elements of the perturbing operator. For a local (multiplicative) operator this does not lead to a loss of information due to a remarkable general property of local operators. Accordingly, no logical inconsistency arises with respect to DFT, because DFT requires any external potential to be local. For a general nonlocal operator the error resulting from the neglected matrix elements is of second order in the electronic repulsion.

arXiv:cond-mat/0602020•Physical Review A•Feb 22, 2007•84 citations
The density-based action-integral functional introduced by Runge and Gross [Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)] in their foundation of time-dependent density-functional theory is reexamined. Based on a simple expansion of the original definition, it becomes apparent that the action-integral functional is a trivial construct and, moreover, nonstationary. It cannot be used to establish equations of motion for the time evolution of quantum systems at the density-function level.
In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 77, 062511 (2008)], it was advocated to modify the variational principle for the action-integral functional in the Runge-Gross foundation of time-dependent density-functional theory. This was criticised in a subsequent paper [Phys. Rev. A 62, 052510 (2010)] by the present author. In a Comment [Phys. Rev. A 83, 046501 (2011)], it is argued that the criticism is unfounded. This is a response as given to the four specific points raised in the Comment, clarifying and confirming the essence of the original criticism.
The time-dependent density-functional theory of Runge and Gross [Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)] is reexamined on the basis of its limitations, and the criticisms raised by Xu and Rajagopal [Phys. Rev. A 31, 2682 (1985)] are addressed, within the imposition of natural boundary conditions of vanishing density and potential at infinity. Also, for a single-particle system characterized by an arbitrary time-dependent potential, the uniqueness of the density-to-potential mapping is established explicitly for both bound and scattering states.
The Runge-Gross [E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)] action functional of time-dependent density-functional theory leads to a well-known causality paradox; that is, a perturbation of the electronic density in the future affects the response of the system in the present. This paradox is known to be caused by an inconsistent application of the Dirac-Frenkel variational principle. In view of the recent solutions to this problem, the action functional employed by Runge and Gross in their formulation of time-dependent density-functional theory is analyzed in the context of the Keldysh contour technique. The time-dependent electronic density and the concept of causality are extended to the contour. We derive a variational equation that obeys causality and relates the exchange-correlation potential with its kernel and the functional derivative of the exchange-correlation action functional with respect to the density. It is shown that the adiabatic local-density approximation is a consistent solution of this equation and that the time-dependent optimized potential method can also be derived from it. The formalism presented here can be used to find new approximation methods for the exchange-correlation potential and to avoid the causality dilemma.
According to a recent paper by G. Vignale [Phys. Rev. A 77, 062511 (2008)], the problems arising in the original derivation of time-dependent density-functional theory based on the Runge-Gross (RG) action-integral functional (AIF) are because of an incorrect variational principle (VP). This argument and the proposed modification of the VP are critically analyzed. The more fundamental problem, though, is the indefiniteness of the RG AIF. In contrast to a widely held belief the indefiniteness is not eliminated in the variational procedure, which unwittingly is corroborated by Vignale's initial point.
In a paper recently published in Phys. Rev. A [arXiv:1010.4223], Schirmer has criticized an earlier work of mine [arXiv:0803.2727], as well as the foundations of time-dependent density functional theory. In Ref.[2], I showed that the so-called "causality paradox" - i.e., the failure of the exchange-correlation potential derived from the Runge-Gross time-dependent variational principle to satisfy causality requirements - can be solved by a careful reformulation of that variational principle. Fortunately, the criticism presented in Ref.[1] is based on elementary misunderstandings of the nature of functionals, gauge transformations, and the time-dependent variational principle. In this Comment I wish to point out and clear these misunderstandings.
The general expectation that, in principle, the time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) is an exact formulation of the time evolution of an interacting NNN-electron system is critically reexamined. It is demonstrated that the previous TDDFT foundation, resting on four theorems by Runge and Gross (RG) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)], is invalid because undefined phase factors corrupt the RG action integral functionals. Our finding confirms much of a previous analysis by van Leeuwen [Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 1969 (2001)]. To analyze the RG theorems and other aspects of TDDFT, an utmost simplification of the Kohn-Sham (KS) concept has been introduced, in which the ground-state density is obtained from a single KS equation for one spatial (spinless) orbital. The time-dependent (TD) form of this radical Kohn-Sham (rKS) scheme, which has the same validity status as the ordinary KS version, has proved to be a valuable tool for analysis. The rKS concept is used to clarify also the alternative nonvariational formulation of TD KS theory. We argue that it is just a formal theory, allowing one to reproduce but not predict the time development of the exact density of the interacting NNN-electron system. Besides the issue of the formal exactness of TDDFT, it is shown that both the static and time-dependent KS linear response equations neglect the particle-particle (ppp-ppp) and hole-hole (hhh-hhh) matrix elements of the perturbing operator. For a local (multiplicative) operator this does not lead to a loss of information due to a remarkable general property of local operators. Accordingly, no logical inconsistency arises with respect to DFT, because DFT requires any external potential to be local. For a general nonlocal operator the error resulting from the neglected matrix elements is of second order in the electronic repulsion.