Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1201.2076

QM, non-locality and the vacuum fluctuations: conclusions and new directions

David Rodríguez

Published Jan 10, 2012• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Summary of results and overall conclusions on my works in the field of Bell inequalities and QM's alleged non-locality.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1201.2076

Related papers

Bell Inequality Violation Confirms Quantum Non-Locality, Unproven in Microtubule Consciousness Models — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Bell inequality violation (S > 2) confirms quantum non-locality; no known biological system has demonstrated sustained violation in microtubule quantum field consciousness models. | MATH: Bell inequality S = |E(a,b) - E(a,b')| + |E(a',b) + E(a',b')| ≤ 2 (local hidden variables); quantum mechanics predicts S_max = 2√2 ≈ 2.828. | CONNECTION: No direct geometric ratio link in these videos; Bell's theorem uses correlation functions, not harmonic ratios. | DEPTH: 7 — foundational to quantum foundations, but no new mathematical structure or geometric harmony extracted from these summaries. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 11, 2026•0 citations

Non-locality in Quantum Mechanics and Bell’s Inequality

Pankaj Sharan

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation

Bell argument: Locality or realism? Time to make the choice

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

This paper discusses a possible resolution of the nonobjectivity-nonlocality dilemma in quantum mechanics in 'the light of experimental tests of the Bell inequality for two entangled photons and a Bell-like inequality for a single neutron. My conclusion is that these experiments show that quantum mechanics is nonobjective: that is, the values of physical observables cannot be assigned to a system before measurement. Bell's assumption of nonlocality has to be rejected as having no direct experimental confirmation, at least thus far. I also consider the relationships between nonobjectivity and contextuality. Specifically, I analyze the impact of the Kochen-Specker theorem on the problem of contextuality of quantum observables. I argue that, just as von Neumann's "no-go" theorem, the Kochen-Specker theorem is based on assumptions that do not correspond to the real physical situation. Finally, I present a theory of measurement based on a classical, purely wave model (pre-quantum classical statistical field theory), a model that reproduces quantum probabilities. In this model continuous fields are transformed into discrete clicks of detectors. While this model is classical, it is nonobjective. In this case, nonobjectivity is the result of the dependence of experimental outcomes on the context of measurement, in accordance with Bohr's view.

arXiv:1108.0001•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2012•26 citations

On the relevance of the bell inequalities to the problem of locality in quantum mechanics

Dennis Dieks

Physics Letters A•Sep 1, 1986•2 citations

Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality

Alejandro Andrés Hnilo

In the usual derivation of Bell's inequalities, Locality is assumed to justify statistical independence of the outcomes of observations performed in remote stations; as the inequalities are observed to be violated, it is concluded that these outcomes are statistically dependent, and hence, that non-Local effects exist. Here it is shown that the simplest description of Bell's experiment according to the canon of von Neumann's theory of measurement assumes statistical independence of those outcomes. In other words, the straightforward description of Bell's experiment according to Quantum Mechanics (which, of course, violates Bell's inequalities) does not assume non-Locality. Summing up this and other related results it is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects. In addition to its foundational significance, this conclusion has practical impact in the fields of quantum-certified and device-independent randomness generation and on the vulnerability of Quantum Key Distribution schemes, which are based on the existence of quantum non-Locality as an axiom.

arXiv:2002.12153•Feb 27, 2020•1 citation

The Bell inequalities and their irrelevance to the problem of locality in quantum mechanics

Willem M. de Muynck

Physics Letters A•Feb 1, 1986•51 citations
FINDING: Bell inequality violation (S > 2) confirms quantum non-locality; no known biological system has demonstrated sustained violation in microtubule quantum field consciousness models. | MATH: Bell inequality S = |E(a,b) - E(a,b')| + |E(a',b) + E(a',b')| ≤ 2 (local hidden variables); quantum mechanics predicts S_max = 2√2 ≈ 2.828. | CONNECTION: No direct geometric ratio link in these videos; Bell's theorem uses correlation functions, not harmonic ratios. | DEPTH: 7 — foundational to quantum foundations, but no new mathematical structure or geometric harmony extracted from these summaries. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
This paper discusses a possible resolution of the nonobjectivity-nonlocality dilemma in quantum mechanics in 'the light of experimental tests of the Bell inequality for two entangled photons and a Bell-like inequality for a single neutron. My conclusion is that these experiments show that quantum mechanics is nonobjective: that is, the values of physical observables cannot be assigned to a system before measurement. Bell's assumption of nonlocality has to be rejected as having no direct experimental confirmation, at least thus far. I also consider the relationships between nonobjectivity and contextuality. Specifically, I analyze the impact of the Kochen-Specker theorem on the problem of contextuality of quantum observables. I argue that, just as von Neumann's "no-go" theorem, the Kochen-Specker theorem is based on assumptions that do not correspond to the real physical situation. Finally, I present a theory of measurement based on a classical, purely wave model (pre-quantum classical statistical field theory), a model that reproduces quantum probabilities. In this model continuous fields are transformed into discrete clicks of detectors. While this model is classical, it is nonobjective. In this case, nonobjectivity is the result of the dependence of experimental outcomes on the context of measurement, in accordance with Bohr's view.
In the usual derivation of Bell's inequalities, Locality is assumed to justify statistical independence of the outcomes of observations performed in remote stations; as the inequalities are observed to be violated, it is concluded that these outcomes are statistically dependent, and hence, that non-Local effects exist. Here it is shown that the simplest description of Bell's experiment according to the canon of von Neumann's theory of measurement assumes statistical independence of those outcomes. In other words, the straightforward description of Bell's experiment according to Quantum Mechanics (which, of course, violates Bell's inequalities) does not assume non-Locality. Summing up this and other related results it is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects. In addition to its foundational significance, this conclusion has practical impact in the fields of quantum-certified and device-independent randomness generation and on the vulnerability of Quantum Key Distribution schemes, which are based on the existence of quantum non-Locality as an axiom.