Most entanglement verification is examined in either the completely characterized or the totally device-independent scenario. The assumptions imposed by these extreme cases are often either too weak or too strong for real experiments. Here we investigate this detection task in the intermediate regime where there is partial knowledge of the measured observables, considering cases like orthogonal, sharp, or only dimension-bounded measurements. We show that for all these assumptions it is not necessary to violate a corresponding Bell inequality in order to detect entanglement. We derive strong detection criteria that can be directly evaluated for experimental data and which are robust against large classes of calibration errors. The conditions are even capable of detecting bound entanglement under the sole assumption of dimension-bounded measurements.
Most entanglement verification is examined in either the completely characterized or the totally device-independent scenario. The assumptions imposed by these extreme cases are often either too weak or too strong for real experiments. Here we investigate this detection task in the intermediate regime where there is partial knowledge of the measured observables, considering cases like orthogonal, sharp, or only dimension-bounded measurements. We show that for all these assumptions it is not necessary to violate a corresponding Bell inequality in order to detect entanglement. We derive strong detection criteria that can be directly evaluated for experimental data and which are robust against large classes of calibration errors. The conditions are even capable of detecting bound entanglement under the sole assumption of dimension-bounded measurements.
Bell's test, initially devised to distinguish quantum theory from local hidden variable models through {violations of local bounds}, is also a common tool for detecting entanglement. For this purpose, one can assume the quantum description of devices and use available information to strengthen the bound for separable states, which may go beyond the local bound, enabling more efficient entanglement detection. Here we present a systematic approach for strengthening Bell inequalities for qubit systems, using Mermin-Klyshko-Bell inequalities as examples, by considering measurement devices that are coarsely calibrated only by their ability to generate nonlocal correlations without requiring precise quantum characterization. In the case of bipartite and tripartite systems, we derive trade-offs between upper bounds for separable states and general states in terms of structure functions to optimize the entanglement detection. We then strengthen n-partite Bell inequalities for the detection of states exhibiting a diversity of entanglement structures such as genuine multipartite entanglement. For general Bell scenarios with some measurements characterized, we demonstrate that entanglement can also be detected with some local correlations by exploiting the Navascués-Pironio-Acín hierarchy of tests.
Genuine multipartite entanglement represents the strongest type of entanglement, which is an essential resource for quantum information processing. Standard methods to detect genuine multipartite entanglement, e.g., entanglement witnesses, state tomography, or quantum state verification, require full knowledge of the Hilbert space dimension and precise calibration of measurement devices, which are usually difficult to acquire in an experiment. The most radical way to overcome these problems is to detect entanglement solely based on the Bell-like correlations of measurement outcomes collected in the experiment, namely, device independently. However, it is difficult to certify genuine entanglement of practical multipartite states in this way, and even more difficult to quantify it, due to the difficulty in identifying optimal multipartite Bell inequalities and protocols tolerant to state impurity. In this Letter, we explore a general and robust device-independent method that can be applied to various realistic multipartite quantum states in arbitrary finite dimension, while merely relying on bipartite Bell inequalities. Our method allows us both to certify the presence of genuine multipartite entanglement and to quantify it. Several important classes of entangled states are tested with this method, leading to the detection of genuinely entangled states. We also certify genuine multipartite entanglement in weakly entangled Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states, showing that the method applies equally well to less standard states.
Detection and quantification of entanglement in quantum resources are two key steps in the implementation of various quantum-information processing tasks. Here, we show that Bell-type inequalities are not only useful in verifying the presence of entanglement but can also be used to bound the entanglement of the underlying physical system. Our main tool consists of a family of Clauser-Horne-like Bell inequalities that cannot be violated maximally by any finite-dimensional maximally entangled state. Using these inequalities, we demonstrate the explicit construction of both lower and upper bounds on the concurrence for two-qubit states. The fact that these bounds arise from Bell-type inequalities also allows them to be obtained in a semi-device-independent manner, that is, with assumption of the dimension of the Hilbert space but without resorting to any knowledge of the actual measurements being performed on the individual subsystems.
Abstract Bell inequalities have long been essential for the device-independent detection of entanglement. This study introduces subcorrelation Bell inequalities as a robust framework for detecting entanglement and probing quantum non-locality. We derived a family of such inequalities, categorized according to their dependence on measurement settings, and numerically identified 19 distinct quantum states that achieve the maximal violation of these inequalities. Importantly, our focus on maximal violation is not for its own sake but because, in this framework, maximal violation directly corresponds to maximal robustness of nonlocal correlations against particle loss. This connection reveals a broad class of multipartite entangled states that remain resilient under loss, making them highly relevant for practical implementations of quantum information protocols. We further characterized their entanglement properties using concurrence and the geometric measure, confirming their utility for critical areas such as quantum communication, cryptography, and device-independent protocols. The framework established herein sets the stage for future investigations, including the generalization of these inequalities to higher-dimensional systems and a more comprehensive characterization of their robustness against various forms of noise, thereby expanding the potential for non-local states to drive progress in quantum technologies.
Practical robust self-testing of multipartite entanglement has so far been restricted to small-scale systems due to error bounds that degrade severely with system size. In this work, we establish multipartite self-testing with robustness independent of the size of the quantum network. We derive a fully analytic, device-independent self-testing bound for n-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states. The bound scales linearly with the observed violation error and lies universally within a constant factor of two from a theoretical upper bound. Furthermore, the operator-inequality framework reduces the verification of the conjectured optimal bound to a highly efficient numerical check, which we perform up to n=100. Consequently, GHZ entanglement can be certified under a fixed noise level in arbitrarily large systems, enabling scalable device-independent verification.
Abstract In the noisy intermediate‐scale quantum (NISQ) era, multipartite entanglement in realistic noisy environments exhibits complex structures. Characterizing entanglement structures—particularly entanglement depth and intactness—has become increasingly essential for quantum information processing tasks. Traditional methods like standard entanglement witnesses assume that experimenters can exactly implement specific quantum measurements. Even minor inaccuracies in standard witness can introduce significant errors in entanglement detection. Certification methods are proposed with relaxed assumptions about the system and measurements for entanglement structures. First, entanglement states are classified with the same intactness into three distinct types based on their depth. Next, analytical witnesses are derived to detect the entanglement structure of general n‐qubit systems in both device‐independent and semi‐device‐independent scenarios, where some observables are untrusted while others remain reliable. Furthermore, this framework is extended to account for small measurement imperfections, ensuring robustness in practical settings. It is demonstrated that this witness can detect larger entanglement regions compared to previous Bell‐type inequalities. Remarkably, for Type I 4‐partite quantum states, this entanglement witness with measurement imperfections is identical to both device‐dependent and semi‐device‐independent approaches.