Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1110.4540 · Physical Review A

Nonexistence of a universal quantum machine to examine the precision of unknown quantum states

Shengshi Pang, Shengjun Wu, Zeng‐Bing Chen

Published Dec 19, 2011• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this work, we reveal a type of impossibility discovered in our recent research which forbids comparing the closeness of multiple unknown quantum states with any nontrivial threshold in a perfect or unambiguous way. This impossibility is distinct from the existing impossibilities in that it is a ``collective'' impossibility on multiple quantum states; most other ``no-go'' theorems are concerned with only one single state each time, i.e., it is an impossibility on a nonlocal quantum operation. This impossibility may provide new insight into the nature of quantum mechanics, and it implies more limitations on quantum information tasks than the existing no-go theorems.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.84.062313

Related papers

Is there a universal quantum machine to examine the precision of unknown quantum states

Shengshi Pang, Shengjun Wu, Zeng‐Bing Chen

In this work, we reveal a new type of impossibility discovered in our recent research which forbids comparing the closeness of multiple unknown quantum states with any non-trivial threshold in a perfect or an unambiguous way. This impossibility is distinct from the existing impossibilities in that it is a collective impossibility on multiple quantum states while most other no-go theorems concern with only one single state each time, i.e., it is an impossibility on a non-local quantum operation. This novel impossibility may provide a new insight into the nature of quantum mechanics and it implies more limitations on quantum information tasks than the existing no-go theorems.

•Oct 20, 2011•0 citations

Unambiguously determining the orthogonality of multiple quantum states

Shengshi Pang, Shengjun Wu

In this article, we study an opposite problem of universal quantum state comparison, that is unambiguously determining whether multiple unknown quantum states from a Hilbert space are orthogonal or not. We show that no unambiguous quantum measurement can accomplish this task with a nonzero probability. Moreover, we extend the problem to a more general case, that is to compare how orthogonal multiple unknown quantum states are with a threshold, and it turns out that given any threshold this extended task is also impossible by any unambiguous quantum measurement except for a trivial case. It will be seen that the impossibility revealed in our problem is stronger than that in the universal quantum state comparison problem and distinct from those in the existing ``no-go'' theorems.

arXiv:1205.0634•Physical Review A•Oct 14, 2010•1 citation

Unknowability of Quantum State forbids perfectly quantum operations

CAIQing-yu, LIBai-wen

We analyze the oonnection between quantum operations and accessible information. And we find that the accessible information decreases under quantum operations. We show that it is impossible to perfectly manipulate an unknown state in an open quantum system. That the accessible information decreases under quantum operations gives a fundamental limitation in the microscopic world.

原子与分子物理学报•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Universal quantum cloning beyond noncontextual theory

Min Namkung, Hyang-Tag Lim

Quantum theory fundamentally forbids the perfect copying of an arbitrary unknown quantum state, according to a principle known as the no-cloning theorem. Nevertheless, it is possible to construct a deterministic quantum map that produces multiple approximate copies of an unknown quantum state. This task is referred to as universal quantum cloning, further facilitating numerous quantum technologies such as quantum cryptography and quantum communication. In this work, we theoretically verify that the universal quantum cloning cannot be realized within a noncontextual theory, highlighting its intrinsically nonclassical nature. Our verification first {focuses on revealing that} $1\rightarrow2$ cloning scenario {is fully contextual}, and {further covers general examples to observe the contextual behavior of} $N\rightarrow M$ scenario. We believe that our results regarding quantum cloning serve a key role for understanding both quantum foundation and application.

quant-pharXiv:2607.05959•Jul 8, 2026•0 citations

Comparison of mixed quantum states

Shengshi Pang, Shengjun Wu

In this article, we study the problem of comparing mixed quantum states: given $n$ unknown mixed quantum states, can one determine whether they are identical or not with an unambiguous quantum measurement? We first study the universal comparison of mixed quantum states, and prove that this task is generally impossible to accomplish. Then, we focus on the unambiguous comparison of $n$ mixed quantum states arbitrarily chosen from a set of $k$ mixed quantum states. The condition for the existence of an unambiguous measurement operator which can produce a conclusive result when the unknown states are actually the same and the condition for the existence of an unambiguous measurement operator when the unknown states are actually different are studied independently. We derive a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of the first measurement operator, and a necessary condition and two sufficient conditions for the second. Furthermore, we find that the sufficiency of the necessary condition for the second measurement operator has a simple and interesting dependence on $n$ and $k$. At the end, a unified condition is obtained for the simultaneous existence of these two unambiguous measurement operators.

arXiv:1003.5145•Physical Review A•Jul 29, 2011•8 citations

Impossibility of creating a superposition of unknown quantum states

Somshubhro Bandyopadhyay

The superposition principle is fundamental to quantum theory. Yet a recent no-go theorem has proved that quantum theory forbids superposition of unknown quantum states, even with nonzero probability. The implications of this result, however, remain poorly understood so far. In this Rapid Communication we show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability (allowed to vary over input states) leads to the violation of other no-go theorems. In particular, such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden not only in quantum theory but in no-signaling theories as well.

arXiv:2011.02275•Physical Review A•Nov 23, 2020•6 citations
In this work, we reveal a type of impossibility discovered in our recent research which forbids comparing the closeness of multiple unknown quantum states with any nontrivial threshold in a perfect or unambiguous way. This impossibility is distinct from the existing impossibilities in that it is a collective'' impossibility on multiple quantum states; most other no-go'' theorems are concerned with only one single state each time, i.e., it is an impossibility on a nonlocal quantum operation. This impossibility may provide new insight into the nature of quantum mechanics, and it implies more limitations on quantum information tasks than the existing no-go theorems.
In this work, we reveal a new type of impossibility discovered in our recent research which forbids comparing the closeness of multiple unknown quantum states with any non-trivial threshold in a perfect or an unambiguous way. This impossibility is distinct from the existing impossibilities in that it is a collective impossibility on multiple quantum states while most other no-go theorems concern with only one single state each time, i.e., it is an impossibility on a non-local quantum operation. This novel impossibility may provide a new insight into the nature of quantum mechanics and it implies more limitations on quantum information tasks than the existing no-go theorems.
In this article, we study an opposite problem of universal quantum state comparison, that is unambiguously determining whether multiple unknown quantum states from a Hilbert space are orthogonal or not. We show that no unambiguous quantum measurement can accomplish this task with a nonzero probability. Moreover, we extend the problem to a more general case, that is to compare how orthogonal multiple unknown quantum states are with a threshold, and it turns out that given any threshold this extended task is also impossible by any unambiguous quantum measurement except for a trivial case. It will be seen that the impossibility revealed in our problem is stronger than that in the universal quantum state comparison problem and distinct from those in the existing ``no-go'' theorems.
Quantum theory fundamentally forbids the perfect copying of an arbitrary unknown quantum state, according to a principle known as the no-cloning theorem. Nevertheless, it is possible to construct a deterministic quantum map that produces multiple approximate copies of an unknown quantum state. This task is referred to as universal quantum cloning, further facilitating numerous quantum technologies such as quantum cryptography and quantum communication. In this work, we theoretically verify that the universal quantum cloning cannot be realized within a noncontextual theory, highlighting its intrinsically nonclassical nature. Our verification first {focuses on revealing that} 1→21\rightarrow21→2 cloning scenario {is fully contextual}, and {further covers general examples to observe the contextual behavior of} N→MN\rightarrow MN→M scenario. We believe that our results regarding quantum cloning serve a key role for understanding both quantum foundation and application.
In this article, we study the problem of comparing mixed quantum states: given nnn unknown mixed quantum states, can one determine whether they are identical or not with an unambiguous quantum measurement? We first study the universal comparison of mixed quantum states, and prove that this task is generally impossible to accomplish. Then, we focus on the unambiguous comparison of nnn mixed quantum states arbitrarily chosen from a set of kkk mixed quantum states. The condition for the existence of an unambiguous measurement operator which can produce a conclusive result when the unknown states are actually the same and the condition for the existence of an unambiguous measurement operator when the unknown states are actually different are studied independently. We derive a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of the first measurement operator, and a necessary condition and two sufficient conditions for the second. Furthermore, we find that the sufficiency of the necessary condition for the second measurement operator has a simple and interesting dependence on nnn and kkk. At the end, a unified condition is obtained for the simultaneous existence of these two unambiguous measurement operators.
The superposition principle is fundamental to quantum theory. Yet a recent no-go theorem has proved that quantum theory forbids superposition of unknown quantum states, even with nonzero probability. The implications of this result, however, remain poorly understood so far. In this Rapid Communication we show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability (allowed to vary over input states) leads to the violation of other no-go theorems. In particular, such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden not only in quantum theory but in no-signaling theories as well.