A promising variational approach for determining the ground state energy and its properties is by using the second-order reduced density matrix (2-RDM). However, the leading obstacle with this approach is the N-representability problem. By employing a subset of conditions (typically the P, Q, G, T1 and T2′ conditions) results comparable to those of CCSD(T) can be achieved. However, these conditions do not guarantee size-consistency. In this work, we show that size-consistency can be satisfied if the 2-RDM satisfies the following conditions: (i) the 2-RDM is unitary invariant diagonal N-representable; (ii) the 2-RDM corresponding to each (unspecified) subsystem is the eigenstate of the number of corresponding electrons; and (iii) the 2-RDM satisfies at least one of the P, Q, G, T1 and T2′ conditions. This is the first time that a computationally feasible (though demanding) sufficient condition for the RDM method that guarantees size-consistency in all chemical systems has been published in the literature.
The reduced density matrix (RDM) method, which is a variational calculation based on the second-order reduced density matrix, is applied to the ground state energies and the dipole moments for 57 different states of atoms, molecules, and to the ground state energies and the elements of 2-RDM for the Hubbard model. We explore the well-known N-representability conditions (P, Q, and G) together with the more recent and much stronger T1 and T2(') conditions. T2(') condition was recently rederived and it implies T2 condition. Using these N-representability conditions, we can usually calculate correlation energies in percentage ranging from 100% to 101%, whose accuracy is similar to CCSD(T) and even better for high spin states or anion systems where CCSD(T) fails. Highly accurate calculations are carried out by handling equality constraints and/or developing multiple precision arithmetic in the semidefinite programming (SDP) solver. Results show that handling equality constraints correctly improves the accuracy from 0.1 to 0.6 mhartree. Additionally, improvements by replacing T2 condition with T2(') condition are typically of 0.1-0.5 mhartree. The newly developed multiple precision arithmetic version of SDP solver calculates extraordinary accurate energies for the one dimensional Hubbard model and Be atom. It gives at least 16 significant digits for energies, where double precision calculations gives only two to eight digits. It also provides physically meaningful results for the Hubbard model in the high correlation limit.
Variationally calculating the ground state of a many-electron quantum system using only the two-electron reduced-density-matrix (2-RDM) requires
N-representability conditions that constrain the 2-RDM to correspond to an
N-electron wave function. A systematic hierarchy of
N-representability conditions, known as
p-positivity conditions, has been developed [D. A. Mazziotti and R. M. Erdahl, Phys. Rev. A 63, 042113 (2001)], and many-electron atoms and molecules in nonminimal basis sets have been solved with useful accuracy by a variational 2-RDM method with 2-positivity conditions [D. A. Mazziotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 213001 (2004)]. This paper considers two forms of partial 3-positivity conditions, the lifting conditions and the
T1∕T2 conditions, to further enhance the accuracy of the 2-RDM methods without the computational cost of full 3-positivity conditions. Variational 2-RDM methods with different
N-representability constraints including 2-positivity conditions, the two types of partial 3-positivity conditions, as well as the complete 3-positivity conditions are applied to compute the ground state of the Lipkin spin model. The energies and 2-RDMs are compared to the results from full and truncated configuration interaction, many-body perturbation theory, and couple cluster theory with single and double excitations. Implications of using partial 3-positivity for variational 2-RDM calculations of many-electron atoms and molecules will be discussed.
Molecular two-electron reduced density matrices (2-RDMs) are computed variationally without the many-electron wave function by constraining the 2-RDM with a set of three-particle
N-representability conditions known as three-positivity conditions. These constraints restrict four distinct three-particle probability distributions, which can be defined for any
N-particle system, to be nonnegative. The variational calculation of the 2-RDM with full three-positivity conditions is implemented with the first-order semidefinite programming algorithm [D.A. Mazziotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 213001 (2004)]. We also derive and implement a generalization of the
T2 representability condition, which is a subset of the three-positivity conditions. Energies and 2-RDMs are computed for several molecules as well as the nitrogen molecule at both equilibrium and nonequilibrium geometries. The ground-state energies for nitrogen are within
0.0015a.u. of the values from full configuration interaction at all internuclear distances.
With the density-matrix variational method, the ground-state energy of a many-electron system is calculated by minimizing the energy expectation value subject to the selected representability conditions for the second-order reduced-density matrix (2-RDM). There is a lack of size extensivity under the
P,
Q, and
G conditions of this method by applying to
M noninteracting atoms and molecules up to
M=32;
BeM,
(CH4)M, and
(N2)M. The energy per molecule
(E/M) monotonically decreases as
M increases, showing the lack of size extensivity in this method. The inextensive contributions to energies are $3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$ and $3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{a}\text{.u}\text{.}$ for
(CH4)M and
(N2)M using the STO-6G basis set, respectively. In the examples studied,
E/M approaches a finite value as $M\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$. The intermolecular elements of 2-RDMs do not satisfy the cumulant expansion.
The latest results of density matrix theory are summarized in terms of analysis of off-diagonal components. For a given reduced density matrix (RDM) of arbitrary order, the full density matrix is explicitly constructed, from which the RDM is derived by means of the corresponding reduction procedure. Both the matrices satisfy all the necessary conditions, such antisymmetry, normalization, hermiticity, except that the non-negative definiteness of the full DM is not guaranteed. If an RDM satisfies the necessary inequalities with the same number of indices as it has itself, then, as proved here, there is an additive correction to the full DM matrix that turns it into a non-negative definite matrix leading to the same RDM and satisfying the other requirements. This establishes a fundamental fact that these inequalities are sufficient as well, providing the N-representability of the given RDM. The construction is based on the classification, introduced in the article, of the multi-index elements of the RDM and full DM according to their degree of off-diagonality. RDM elements with a predetermined degree of off-diagonality are expressed through full DM elements with the same off-diagonality. This shows that the conventional variational approach to calculating the energy of the system by convex programming methods under the conditions of N-representability (before and even after reaching the minimum energy) generally does not lead to constructing a mixed quantum state composed of solutions to the Schrödinger equation. Therefore, except for the energy, it does not guarantee a correct description of the other properties so long as the conditions of correctness for each particular property are not expressed in terms of the RDM and not incorporated into the specific conditions of N-representability (regardless of the requirement of energy minimization).
We recently presented a constructive solution to the
N-representability problem of the two-electron reduced density matrix (2-RDM)---a systematic approach to constructing complete conditions to ensure that the 2-RDM represents a realistic
N-electron quantum system [D. A. Mazziotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published)]. In this paper we provide additional details and derive further
N-representability conditions on the 2-RDM that follow from the constructive solution. The resulting conditions can be classified into a hierarchy of constraints, known as the
(2,q)-positivity conditions, where the
q indicates their derivation from the non-negativity of
q-body operators. In addition to the known T1 and T2 conditions, we derive another class of (2,3)-positivity conditions. We also derive 3 classes of (2,4)-positivity conditions, 6 classes of (2,5)-positivity conditions, and 24 classes of (2,6)-positivity conditions. The constraints obtained can be divided into two general types: (i) lifting conditions, that is, conditions which arise from lifting lower
(2,q)-positivity conditions to higher
(2,q+1)-positivity conditions, and (ii) pure conditions, that is, conditions which cannot be derived from a simple lifting of the lower conditions. All of the lifting conditions and the pure
(2,q)-positivity conditions for
q>3 require tensor decompositions of the coefficients in the model Hamiltonians. Subsets of the derived
N-representability conditions can be employed with the previously known conditions to achieve polynomially scaling calculations of ground-state energies and 2-RDMs of many-electron quantum systems even in the presence of strong electron correlation.