Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1108.3393 · Physical Review B

Spin- 12 J1 - J2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice: A plaquette renormalized tensor network study

Ji-Feng Yu, Ying-Jer Kao

Published Mar 5, 2012• 70 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We apply the plaquette renormalization scheme of tensor network states [Phys. Rev. E 83, 056703 (2011)] to study the spin-1/2 frustrated Heisenberg ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model on an $L\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}L$ square lattice with $L$ $=$ 8, 16, and 32. By treating tensor elements as variational parameters, we obtain the ground states for different ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$ values, and investigate staggered magnetizations, nearest-neighbor spin-spin correlations, and plaquette order parameters. In addition to the well-known N\'eel order and collinear order at low and high ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$, we observe a plaquettelike order at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\approx}0.5$. A continuous transition between the N\'eel order and the plaquettelike order near ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.40{J}_{1}$ is observed. The collinear order emerges at ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.62{J}_{1}$ through a first-order phase transition.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.85.094407

Related papers

Ground-state phase diagram of the spin- 12 square-lattice J1 - J2 model with plaquette structure

Oliver Götze, Sven E. Krüger, F. Fleck +2 more

Using the coupled-cluster method for high orders of approximation and Lanczos exact diagonalization we study the ground-state phase diagram of a quantum spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model on the square lattice with plaquette structure. We consider antiferromagnetic (${J}_{1}>0$) as well as ferromagnetic (${J}_{1}<0$) nearest-neighbor interactions together with frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction ${J}_{2}>0$. The strength of interplaquette interaction $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ varies between $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1$ (which corresponds to the uniform ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model) and $\ensuremath{\lambda}=0$ (which corresponds to isolated frustrated 4-spin plaquettes). While on the classical level ($s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$) both versions of models (i.e., with ferro- and antiferromagnetic ${J}_{1}$) exhibit the same ground-state behavior, the ground-state phase diagram differs basically for the quantum case $s=1/2$. For the antiferromagnetic case (${J}_{1}>0$) N\'eel antiferromagnetic long-range order at small ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.47$ as well as collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order at large ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.30$ appear which correspond to their classical counterparts. Both semiclassical magnetic phases are separated by a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase. The parameter region, where this nonmagnetic phase exists, increases with decreasing $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. For the ferromagnetic case (${J}_{1}<0$) we have the trivial ferromagnetic ground state at small ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|$. By increasing ${J}_{2}$ this classical phase gives way for a semiclassical plaquette phase, where the plaquette block spins of length $s=2$ are antiferromagnetically long-range ordered. Further increasing of ${J}_{2}$ then yields collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order for $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.38$, but a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.38$.

arXiv:1205.0681•Physical Review B•Jun 21, 2012•16 citations

Low-energy singlet sector in spin- 1 J1-J2 Heisenberg model on square lattice

A. Yu. Aktersky, A. V. Syromyatnikov

Based on a special variant of plaquette expansion, an operator is constructed whose eigenvalues give the low-energy singlet spectrum of spin-$\frac12$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on square lattice with nearest- and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor exchange couplings $J_1$ and $J_2$. It is well known that a non-magnetic phase arises in this model at $0.4\lesssim J_2/J_1\lesssim 0.6$ sandwiched by two Neel ordered phases. In agreement with previous results, we observe a first-order quantum phase transition (QPT) at $J_2\approx 0.64J_1$ from the non-magnetic phase to the Neel one. Large gap ($\gtrsim0.4J_1$) is found in the singlet spectrum at $J_2<0.64J_1$ that excludes a gapless spin-liquid state at $0.4\lesssim J_2/J_1\lesssim 0.6$ and the deconfined quantum criticality scenario for the QPT to another Neel phase. We observe a first-order QPT at $J_2\approx 0.55J_1$ presumably between two non-magnetic phases.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Ground state phases of the spin-1/2 J1–J2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice: A high-order coupled cluster treatment

R. Darradi, Oleg Derzhko, Ronald Zinke +3 more

Using the coupled cluster method for high orders of approximation and complementary exact diagonalization studies we investigate the ground state properties of the spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}--{J}_{2}$ frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice. We have calculated the ground state energy, the magnetic order parameter, the spin stiffness, and several generalized susceptibilities to probe magnetically disordered quantum valence-bond phases. We have found that the quantum critical points for both the N\'eel and collinear orders are ${J}_{2}^{c1}\ensuremath{\approx}(0.44\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01){J}_{1}$ and ${J}_{2}^{c2}\ensuremath{\approx}(0.59\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01){J}_{1}$, respectively, which are in good agreement with the results obtained by other approximations. In contrast to the recent study by [Sirker et al. Phys. Rev. B 73, 184420 (2006)], our data do not provide evidence for the transition from the N\'eel to the valence-bond solid state to be first order. Moreover, our results are in favor of the deconfinement scenario for that phase transition. We also discuss the nature of the magnetically disordered quantum phase.

arXiv:0806.3825•Physical Review B•Dec 11, 2008•183 citations

J1−J2 frustrated two-dimensional Heisenberg model: Random phase approximation and functional renormalization group

Johannes Reuther, P. Wölfle

We study the ground-state properties of the two-dimensional spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ Heisenberg model on a square lattice, within diagrammatic approximations using an auxiliary-fermion formulation with exact projection. In a first approximation, we assume a phenomenological width of the pseudofermion spectral function to calculate the magnetization, susceptibilities, and the spin-correlation length within random-phase approximation, demonstrating the appearance of a paramagnetic phase between the N\'eel-ordered and Collinear-ordered phases, at sufficiently large pseudofermion damping. Second we use a functional renormalization-group formulation. We find that the conventional truncation scheme omitting three-particle and higher-order vertices is not sufficient. We therefore include self-energy renormalizations in the single-scale propagator as recently proposed by Katanin, to preserve Ward identities in a better way. We find N\'eel order at $g={J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{g}_{\text{c}1}\ensuremath{\approx}0.4\dots{}0.45$ and Collinear order at $g\ensuremath{\gtrsim}{g}_{\text{c}2}\ensuremath{\approx}0.66\dots{}0.68$, which is in good agreement with results obtained by numerical studies. In the intervening quantum paramagnetic phase, we find enhanced columnar dimer and plaquette fluctuations of equal strength.

arXiv:0912.0860•Physical Review B•Apr 8, 2010•161 citations

Ground-state phases of the frustrated spin- 12 J1 – J2 – J3 Heisenberg ferromagnet ( J1<0 ) on the honeycomb lattice with J3=J2>0

P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop, DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL +2 more

We study the ground-state (GS) properties of the frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ ${J}_{1}$--${J}_{2}$--${J}_{3}$ Heisenberg model on the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor (${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) exchange and frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor (${J}_{2}>0$) and next-next-nearest-neighbor (${J}_{3}>0$) exchanges, for the case ${J}_{3}={J}_{2}$. We use the coupled-cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation, complemented by the Lanczos exact diagonalization of a large finite lattice with 32 sites, in order to calculate the GS energy, magnetic order parameter, and spin-spin correlation functions. In one scenario we find a quantum phase transition point between regions characterized by ferromagnetic order and a form of antiferromagnetic (``striped'') collinear order at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.1095\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0005$, which is below the corresponding hypothetical transition point at ${J}_{2}^{\mathrm{cl}}=\frac{1}{7}$ ($\ensuremath{\approx}0.143$) for the classical version of the model, in which we momentarily ignore the intervening noncollinear spiral phase in the region $\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}$. Hence we see that quantum fluctuations appear to stabilize somewhat the collinear antiferromagnetic order in preference to the ferromagnetic order in this model. We compare results for the present ferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) to previous results for the corresponding antiferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=+1$). The magnetic order parameter is found to behave similarly for the ferromagnetic and the antiferromagnetic models for large values of the frustration parameter ${J}_{2}$. However, there are considerable differences in the behavior of the order parameters for the two models for ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.6$. For example, the quasiclassical collinear magnetic long-range order for the antiferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=+1$) breaks down at ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.60$, whereas the ``equivalent'' point for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) occurs at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.11$. Unlike in the antiferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=+1$), where a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase intrudes between the two corresponding quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases (with N\'eel and striped order) for ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}<{J}_{2}<{J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}$, with ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.47$, we find no clear indications at all in the ferromagnetic model for an intermediate magnetically disordered phase between the corresponding phases exhibiting ferromagnetic and striped order. Instead the evidence for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) points to one of two scenarios: either there is a direct first-order transition between the two magnetically ordered phases, as mentioned above; or there exists an intervening phase between them in the very narrow range $0.10\ensuremath{\lesssim}{J}_{2}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.12$, which is probably a remnant of the spiral phase that exists in the classical counterpart of the model over the larger range $\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}$.

arXiv:1109.6229•Physical Review B•Feb 21, 2012•31 citations

Plaquette valence bond state in the spin- 12 J1−J2 XY model on the square lattice

Yang‐Hao Chan, Hong‐Chen Jiang, Ying-Cheng Chen

We studied the ground-state phase diagram of spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2} XY$ model on the square lattice with first-neighbor ${J}_{1}$ and second-neighbor ${J}_{2}$ antiferromagnetic interactions using both infinite density matrix renormalization group (iDMRG) and DMRG approaches. We show that a plaquette valence bond phase is realized in an intermediate region $0.50\ensuremath{\le}{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<0.54$ between a N\'eel magnetic ordered phase at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<0.50$ and a stripy magnetic ordered phase at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\ge}0.54$. The plaquette valence bond phase is characterized by finite dimer orders in both the horizontal and vertical directions. Contrary to the spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ Heisenberg model, we do not find numerical evidence for a quantum spin liquid phase in the ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2} XY$ model.

arXiv:2212.04863•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jun 1, 2023•3 citations
We apply the plaquette renormalization scheme of tensor network states [Phys. Rev. E 83, 056703 (2011)] to study the spin-1/2 frustrated Heisenberg J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ model on an L\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fiLL\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}LL\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fiL square lattice with LLL === 8, 16, and 32. By treating tensor elements as variational parameters, we obtain the ground states for different J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​ values, and investigate staggered magnetizations, nearest-neighbor spin-spin correlations, and plaquette order parameters. In addition to the well-known N'eel order and collinear order at low and high J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​, we observe a plaquettelike order at J2/J1\ensuremath≈0.5{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\approx}0.5J2​/J1​\ensuremath≈0.5. A continuous transition between the N'eel order and the plaquettelike order near J2c1\ensuremath≈0.40J1{J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.40{J}_{1}J2c1​​\ensuremath≈0.40J1​ is observed. The collinear order emerges at J2c2\ensuremath≈0.62J1{J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.62{J}_{1}J2c2​​\ensuremath≈0.62J1​ through a first-order phase transition.
Using the coupled-cluster method for high orders of approximation and Lanczos exact diagonalization we study the ground-state phase diagram of a quantum spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ model on the square lattice with plaquette structure. We consider antiferromagnetic (J1>0{J}_{1}>0J1​>0) as well as ferromagnetic (J1<0{J}_{1}<0J1​<0) nearest-neighbor interactions together with frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction J2>0{J}_{2}>0J2​>0. The strength of interplaquette interaction $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ varies between $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1$ (which corresponds to the uniform J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ model) and $\ensuremath{\lambda}=0$ (which corresponds to isolated frustrated 4-spin plaquettes). While on the classical level ($s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$) both versions of models (i.e., with ferro- and antiferromagnetic J1{J}_{1}J1​) exhibit the same ground-state behavior, the ground-state phase diagram differs basically for the quantum case s=1/2s=1/2s=1/2. For the antiferromagnetic case (J1>0{J}_{1}>0J1​>0) N\'eel antiferromagnetic long-range order at small J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.47$ as well as collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order at large J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.30$ appear which correspond to their classical counterparts. Both semiclassical magnetic phases are separated by a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase. The parameter region, where this nonmagnetic phase exists, increases with decreasing $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. For the ferromagnetic case (J1<0{J}_{1}<0J1​<0) we have the trivial ferromagnetic ground state at small J2/∣J1∣{J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|J2​/∣J1​∣. By increasing J2{J}_{2}J2​ this classical phase gives way for a semiclassical plaquette phase, where the plaquette block spins of length s=2s=2s=2 are antiferromagnetically long-range ordered. Further increasing of J2{J}_{2}J2​ then yields collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order for $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.38$, but a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.38$.
Based on a special variant of plaquette expansion, an operator is constructed whose eigenvalues give the low-energy singlet spectrum of spin-12\frac1221​ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on square lattice with nearest- and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor exchange couplings J1J_1J1​ and J2J_2J2​. It is well known that a non-magnetic phase arises in this model at 0.4≲J2/J1≲0.60.4\lesssim J_2/J_1\lesssim 0.60.4≲J2​/J1​≲0.6 sandwiched by two Neel ordered phases. In agreement with previous results, we observe a first-order quantum phase transition (QPT) at J2≈0.64J1J_2\approx 0.64J_1J2​≈0.64J1​ from the non-magnetic phase to the Neel one. Large gap (≳0.4J1\gtrsim0.4J_1≳0.4J1​) is found in the singlet spectrum at J2<0.64J1J_2<0.64J_1J2​<0.64J1​ that excludes a gapless spin-liquid state at 0.4≲J2/J1≲0.60.4\lesssim J_2/J_1\lesssim 0.60.4≲J2​/J1​≲0.6 and the deconfined quantum criticality scenario for the QPT to another Neel phase. We observe a first-order QPT at J2≈0.55J1J_2\approx 0.55J_1J2​≈0.55J1​ presumably between two non-magnetic phases.
Using the coupled cluster method for high orders of approximation and complementary exact diagonalization studies we investigate the ground state properties of the spin-1/2 J1−−J2{J}_{1}--{J}_{2}J1​−−J2​ frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice. We have calculated the ground state energy, the magnetic order parameter, the spin stiffness, and several generalized susceptibilities to probe magnetically disordered quantum valence-bond phases. We have found that the quantum critical points for both the N\'eel and collinear orders are ${J}_{2}^{c1}\ensuremath{\approx}(0.44\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01){J}_{1}$ and ${J}_{2}^{c2}\ensuremath{\approx}(0.59\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01){J}_{1}$, respectively, which are in good agreement with the results obtained by other approximations. In contrast to the recent study by [Sirker et al. Phys. Rev. B 73, 184420 (2006)], our data do not provide evidence for the transition from the N\'eel to the valence-bond solid state to be first order. Moreover, our results are in favor of the deconfinement scenario for that phase transition. We also discuss the nature of the magnetically disordered quantum phase.
We study the ground-state properties of the two-dimensional spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ Heisenberg model on a square lattice, within diagrammatic approximations using an auxiliary-fermion formulation with exact projection. In a first approximation, we assume a phenomenological width of the pseudofermion spectral function to calculate the magnetization, susceptibilities, and the spin-correlation length within random-phase approximation, demonstrating the appearance of a paramagnetic phase between the N\'eel-ordered and Collinear-ordered phases, at sufficiently large pseudofermion damping. Second we use a functional renormalization-group formulation. We find that the conventional truncation scheme omitting three-particle and higher-order vertices is not sufficient. We therefore include self-energy renormalizations in the single-scale propagator as recently proposed by Katanin, to preserve Ward identities in a better way. We find N\'eel order at $g={J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{g}_{\text{c}1}\ensuremath{\approx}0.4\dots{}0.45$ and Collinear order at $g\ensuremath{\gtrsim}{g}_{\text{c}2}\ensuremath{\approx}0.66\dots{}0.68$, which is in good agreement with results obtained by numerical studies. In the intervening quantum paramagnetic phase, we find enhanced columnar dimer and plaquette fluctuations of equal strength.
We study the ground-state (GS) properties of the frustrated spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1{J}_{1}J1​--J2{J}_{2}J2​--J3{J}_{3}J3​ Heisenberg model on the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor (${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) exchange and frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor (J2>0{J}_{2}>0J2​>0) and next-next-nearest-neighbor (J3>0{J}_{3}>0J3​>0) exchanges, for the case J3=J2{J}_{3}={J}_{2}J3​=J2​. We use the coupled-cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation, complemented by the Lanczos exact diagonalization of a large finite lattice with 32 sites, in order to calculate the GS energy, magnetic order parameter, and spin-spin correlation functions. In one scenario we find a quantum phase transition point between regions characterized by ferromagnetic order and a form of antiferromagnetic (``striped'') collinear order at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.1095\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0005$, which is below the corresponding hypothetical transition point at J2cl=17{J}_{2}^{\mathrm{cl}}=\frac{1}{7}J2cl​=71​ ($\ensuremath{\approx}0.143$) for the classical version of the model, in which we momentarily ignore the intervening noncollinear spiral phase in the region 110<J2<15\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}101​<J2​<51​. Hence we see that quantum fluctuations appear to stabilize somewhat the collinear antiferromagnetic order in preference to the ferromagnetic order in this model. We compare results for the present ferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) to previous results for the corresponding antiferromagnetic case (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1). The magnetic order parameter is found to behave similarly for the ferromagnetic and the antiferromagnetic models for large values of the frustration parameter J2{J}_{2}J2​. However, there are considerable differences in the behavior of the order parameters for the two models for ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.6$. For example, the quasiclassical collinear magnetic long-range order for the antiferromagnetic model (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1) breaks down at ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.60$, whereas the ``equivalent'' point for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) occurs at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.11$. Unlike in the antiferromagnetic model (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1), where a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase intrudes between the two corresponding quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases (with N\'eel and striped order) for J2c1<J2<J2c2{J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}<{J}_{2}<{J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}J2c1​​<J2​<J2c2​​, with ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.47$, we find no clear indications at all in the ferromagnetic model for an intermediate magnetically disordered phase between the corresponding phases exhibiting ferromagnetic and striped order. Instead the evidence for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) points to one of two scenarios: either there is a direct first-order transition between the two magnetically ordered phases, as mentioned above; or there exists an intervening phase between them in the very narrow range $0.10\ensuremath{\lesssim}{J}_{2}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.12$, which is probably a remnant of the spiral phase that exists in the classical counterpart of the model over the larger range 110<J2<15\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}101​<J2​<51​.
We studied the ground-state phase diagram of spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2} XY$ model on the square lattice with first-neighbor J1{J}_{1}J1​ and second-neighbor J2{J}_{2}J2​ antiferromagnetic interactions using both infinite density matrix renormalization group (iDMRG) and DMRG approaches. We show that a plaquette valence bond phase is realized in an intermediate region $0.50\ensuremath{\le}{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<0.54$ between a N\'eel magnetic ordered phase at J2/J1<0.50{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<0.50J2​/J1​<0.50 and a stripy magnetic ordered phase at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\ge}0.54$. The plaquette valence bond phase is characterized by finite dimer orders in both the horizontal and vertical directions. Contrary to the spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ Heisenberg model, we do not find numerical evidence for a quantum spin liquid phase in the ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2} XY$ model.