Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1105.2535 · New Journal of Physics

A scattering quantum circuit for measuring Bell's time inequality: a nuclear magnetic resonance demonstration using maximally mixed states

A M Souza, I S Oliveira, R S Sarthour

Published May 13, 2011• 81 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In 1985, Leggett and Garg (1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 857) proposed a Bell-like inequality to test (in)compatibility between two fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics. The first concept is 'macroscopic realism', which is the quality of a physical property of a quantum system being independent of observation at the macroscopic level. The second concept is 'noninvasive measurability', which is the possibility of performing a measurement without disturbing the subsequent evolution of a system. One of the key requirement for testing the violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality, or Bell's time inequality, is the ability to perform noninvasive measurements over a qubit state. In this paper, we present a quantum scattering circuit that implements such a measurement for maximally mixed states. The operation of the circuit is demonstrated using liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in chloroform, in which the time correlations of a qubit are measured on a probe (ancillary) qubit state. The results clearly show a violation region and are in excellent agreement with the predictions of quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/053023

Related papers

Reply to Comment on ‘A scattering quantum circuit for measuring Bell's time inequality: a nuclear magnetic resonance demonstration using maximally mixed states’

Alexandre M. Souza, Ivan S. Oliveira, Roberto S. Sarthour

We have proposed an experiment for testing the violation of the Leggett–Garg (LG) inequality using an auxiliary probe [1]. In our scheme, a single microscopic qubit (ancillary) is correlated to a quantum ensemble. The operation of the method was demonstrated using liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [1]. Recently, a new experiment was performed using a very similar approach [2]. A special case in [2], the three-correlation case, is identical to our proposal [1].

New Journal of Physics•May 9, 2012•1 citation

Comment on ‘A scattering quantum circuit for measuring Bell's time inequality: a nuclear magnetic resonance demonstration using maximally mixed states’

George C. Knee, Erik M. Gauger, G. Andrew D. Briggs +1 more

A recent paper by Souza, Oliveira and Sarthour (SOS) reports the experimental violation of a Leggett–Garg (LG) inequality (sometimes referred to as a temporal Bell inequality). The inequality tests for quantum mechanical superposition: if the inequality is violated, the dynamics cannot be explained by a large class of classical theories under the heading of macrorealism. Experimental tests of the LG inequality are beset by the difficulty of carrying out the necessary so-called 'non-invasive' measurements (which for the macrorealist will extract information from a system of interest without disturbing it). SOS argue that they nevertheless achieve this difficult goal by putting the system in a maximally mixed state. The system then allegedly undergoes no perturbation during their experiment. Unfortunately, the method is ultimately unconvincing to a skeptical macrorealist and so the conclusions drawn by SOS are unjustified.

arXiv:1207.2786•New Journal of Physics•May 9, 2012•8 citations

Violation of entropic Leggett-Garg inequality in nuclear spins

Hemant Katiyar, Abhishek Shukla, ‎K‎. ‎R‎. ‎K‎. ‎Rao +1 more

We report an experimental study of recently formulated entropic Leggett-Garg inequality (ELGI) by Usha Devi et al. [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052103 (2013)]. This inequality places a bound on the statistical measurement outcomes of dynamical observables describing a macrorealistic system. Such a bound is not necessarily obeyed by quantum systems, and therefore provides an important way to distinguish quantumness from classical behavior. Here we study ELGI using a two-qubit nuclear magnetic resonance system. To perform the noninvasive measurements required for the ELGI study, we prepare the system qubit in a maximally mixed state as well as use the ``ideal negative result measurement'' procedure with the help of an ancilla qubit. The experimental results show a clear violation of ELGI by over four standard deviations. These results agree with the predictions of quantum theory. The violation of ELGI is attributed to the fact that certain joint probabilities are not legitimate in the quantum scenario, in the sense they do not reproduce all the marginal probabilities. Using a three-qubit system, we also demonstrate that three-time joint probabilities do not reproduce certain two-time marginal probabilities.

arXiv:1210.1970•Physical Review A•May 2, 2013•68 citations

Some theoretical considerations related to the experimental tests of a Temporal Bell's inequality

Mao-Chuang Yeh

"According to the quantum superposition principle, quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale predicts that a macroscopic system can be in more than one distinct state at the same time. Such an extrapolation of quantum mechanics contradicts our everyday instinct, summarized by Leggett and Garg (LG) under the heading of macrorealism (MR) [1]. To resolve the conflict and to determine whether MR or quantum mechanics is the right description of macroscopic objects, in 1985, Leggett and Garg [1] proposed the temporal Bell's inequality (TBI). If a macorealist description is possible, the inequality is satisfied - quantum mechanics, on the other hand, predicts a violation. Thereafter, people were motivated to engineer macroscopic quantum systems and to test the TBI. In the TBI, one of the most critical postulates is that of the noninvasive measurability (NIM) : it is in principle possible to determine which state the system is in with an arbitrarily small e ect on the subsequent system dynamics. To satisfy the NIM postulate in the TBI experiment, the implementation of the ""ideal negative result"" (INR) measurement was also proposed by LG [1]. In a two-state system, an INR measurement is designed to interact (in each run) with only one of two system states. Only runs where the measurement reported no outcome are kept. Although in the last few years there have been tests of the TBI on microscopic systems with the use of INR measurements [4] and on macroscopic systems using weak measurement [5], no one has ever implemented INR measurements on macroscopic systems in TBI tests so far. In addition, the NIM postulate was simply assumed, and not veri ed by an ancillary test [9, 3]. With these considerations in mind, there are two main tasks in this thesis: the rst one is to analyze the realization of an INR measurement on a macroscopic object. I propose an experiment based on coupling a flux-qubit to a dcSQUID, which mirrors the approach of Knee et al. [4], where the system of interest is coupled to another quantum system which acts as a measuring device. In order to accomplish the first task, we analyze the escape dynamics of a flux-qubit SQUID composite system in various limits and discuss the prospects of operating in a regime realizing a von Neumann (""projective"")-like measurement onto the qubit flux basis. Later in the thesis, I discuss current feasibility of the proposed experiment based on the possible measurement error (the ""venality"" [4]) of our INR measurement. The second task is to analyze experimental tests of measurement invasiveness. I propose a concrete protocol, ancillary to the main TBI experiment, which may narrow some loopholes in the test of MR [3]. I generalize the approach of Wilde and Mizel [3], using the behavior of the two-time correlator of a system as an indicator of measurement invasiveness. The measured invasivities can be used to give a improved lower bound for the TBI."

•Aug 16, 2016•1 citation

Quantum- vs. Macro- Realism: What does the Leggett-Garg Inequality actually test?

O. J. E. Maroney, Christopher G. Timpson

Macroscopic Realism (MR) says that a macroscopic system is always determinately in one or other of the macroscopically distinguishable states available to it. The Leggett-Garg (LG) inequality was derived to allow experimental test of whether or not this doctrine is true; it is also often thought of as a temporal version of a Bell-inequality. Despite recent interest in the inequality, controversy remains regarding what would be shown by its violation. Here we resolve this controversy, which arises due to an insufficiently general and model-independent approach to the question so far. We argue that LG's initial characterisation of MR does not pick out a particularly natural realist position, so we articulate an operationally well-defined and well-motivated position in its place. We show that much weaker conditions than LG's are sufficient to derive the inequality: in the first instance, its violation only demonstrates that certain measurements fail to be non-disturbing at the operational level. We articulate three distinct species of MR-ist position, and argue that it is only the first of these which can be refuted by LG inequality violation. This first position is an attractive one, so ruling it out remains of interest, however. A crucial role is played in LG's argument by the assumption of noninvasive measurability. We show that this notion is ambiguous between the weaker notion of disturbance at the operational level, and the stronger notion of invasiveness at the ontic level of properties of the system. Ontic noninvasiveness would be required to rule out MR per se but this property is not entailed by MR, and its presence cannot be established in a model-independent way. It follows that despite the formal parallels, Bell's and LG's inequalities are not methodologically on a par. We close with some reflections on the implications of our analysis for the pedagogy of quantum superposition.

arXiv:1412.6139•Dec 18, 2014•23 citations

Experimental demonstration of the violation of the temporal Peres-Mermin inequality using contextual temporal correlations and noninvasive measurements

Dileep Singh, Arvind, Kavita Dorai

We present a generalized quantum scattering circuit which can be used to perform a noninvasive quantum measurement and implement it on NMR qubits. Such a measurement is a key requirement for testing temporal noncontextual inequalities. We use this circuit to experimentally demonstrate the violation of the Peres-Mermin inequality on a three-qubit NMR quantum information processor. Further, we experimentally construct a Bell-type inequality corresponding to the temporal Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality, and demonstrate that the maximum quantum correlation is achieved for four two-point correlation functions involved in this inequality. The experimental violation of all the inequalities matches well with the theoretically predicted values, within experimental errors.

arXiv:2101.02152•Physical Review A•Feb 24, 2022•3 citations
In 1985, Leggett and Garg (1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 857) proposed a Bell-like inequality to test (in)compatibility between two fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics. The first concept is 'macroscopic realism', which is the quality of a physical property of a quantum system being independent of observation at the macroscopic level. The second concept is 'noninvasive measurability', which is the possibility of performing a measurement without disturbing the subsequent evolution of a system. One of the key requirement for testing the violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality, or Bell's time inequality, is the ability to perform noninvasive measurements over a qubit state. In this paper, we present a quantum scattering circuit that implements such a measurement for maximally mixed states. The operation of the circuit is demonstrated using liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in chloroform, in which the time correlations of a qubit are measured on a probe (ancillary) qubit state. The results clearly show a violation region and are in excellent agreement with the predictions of quantum mechanics.
A recent paper by Souza, Oliveira and Sarthour (SOS) reports the experimental violation of a Leggett–Garg (LG) inequality (sometimes referred to as a temporal Bell inequality). The inequality tests for quantum mechanical superposition: if the inequality is violated, the dynamics cannot be explained by a large class of classical theories under the heading of macrorealism. Experimental tests of the LG inequality are beset by the difficulty of carrying out the necessary so-called 'non-invasive' measurements (which for the macrorealist will extract information from a system of interest without disturbing it). SOS argue that they nevertheless achieve this difficult goal by putting the system in a maximally mixed state. The system then allegedly undergoes no perturbation during their experiment. Unfortunately, the method is ultimately unconvincing to a skeptical macrorealist and so the conclusions drawn by SOS are unjustified.
We report an experimental study of recently formulated entropic Leggett-Garg inequality (ELGI) by Usha Devi et al. [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052103 (2013)]. This inequality places a bound on the statistical measurement outcomes of dynamical observables describing a macrorealistic system. Such a bound is not necessarily obeyed by quantum systems, and therefore provides an important way to distinguish quantumness from classical behavior. Here we study ELGI using a two-qubit nuclear magnetic resonance system. To perform the noninvasive measurements required for the ELGI study, we prepare the system qubit in a maximally mixed state as well as use the ``ideal negative result measurement'' procedure with the help of an ancilla qubit. The experimental results show a clear violation of ELGI by over four standard deviations. These results agree with the predictions of quantum theory. The violation of ELGI is attributed to the fact that certain joint probabilities are not legitimate in the quantum scenario, in the sense they do not reproduce all the marginal probabilities. Using a three-qubit system, we also demonstrate that three-time joint probabilities do not reproduce certain two-time marginal probabilities.
"According to the quantum superposition principle, quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale predicts that a macroscopic system can be in more than one distinct state at the same time. Such an extrapolation of quantum mechanics contradicts our everyday instinct, summarized by Leggett and Garg (LG) under the heading of macrorealism (MR) [1]. To resolve the conflict and to determine whether MR or quantum mechanics is the right description of macroscopic objects, in 1985, Leggett and Garg [1] proposed the temporal Bell's inequality (TBI). If a macorealist description is possible, the inequality is satisfied - quantum mechanics, on the other hand, predicts a violation. Thereafter, people were motivated to engineer macroscopic quantum systems and to test the TBI. In the TBI, one of the most critical postulates is that of the noninvasive measurability (NIM) : it is in principle possible to determine which state the system is in with an arbitrarily small e ect on the subsequent system dynamics. To satisfy the NIM postulate in the TBI experiment, the implementation of the ""ideal negative result"" (INR) measurement was also proposed by LG [1]. In a two-state system, an INR measurement is designed to interact (in each run) with only one of two system states. Only runs where the measurement reported no outcome are kept. Although in the last few years there have been tests of the TBI on microscopic systems with the use of INR measurements [4] and on macroscopic systems using weak measurement [5], no one has ever implemented INR measurements on macroscopic systems in TBI tests so far. In addition, the NIM postulate was simply assumed, and not veri ed by an ancillary test [9, 3]. With these considerations in mind, there are two main tasks in this thesis: the rst one is to analyze the realization of an INR measurement on a macroscopic object. I propose an experiment based on coupling a flux-qubit to a dcSQUID, which mirrors the approach of Knee et al. [4], where the system of interest is coupled to another quantum system which acts as a measuring device. In order to accomplish the first task, we analyze the escape dynamics of a flux-qubit SQUID composite system in various limits and discuss the prospects of operating in a regime realizing a von Neumann (""projective"")-like measurement onto the qubit flux basis. Later in the thesis, I discuss current feasibility of the proposed experiment based on the possible measurement error (the ""venality"" [4]) of our INR measurement. The second task is to analyze experimental tests of measurement invasiveness. I propose a concrete protocol, ancillary to the main TBI experiment, which may narrow some loopholes in the test of MR [3]. I generalize the approach of Wilde and Mizel [3], using the behavior of the two-time correlator of a system as an indicator of measurement invasiveness. The measured invasivities can be used to give a improved lower bound for the TBI."
Macroscopic Realism (MR) says that a macroscopic system is always determinately in one or other of the macroscopically distinguishable states available to it. The Leggett-Garg (LG) inequality was derived to allow experimental test of whether or not this doctrine is true; it is also often thought of as a temporal version of a Bell-inequality. Despite recent interest in the inequality, controversy remains regarding what would be shown by its violation. Here we resolve this controversy, which arises due to an insufficiently general and model-independent approach to the question so far. We argue that LG's initial characterisation of MR does not pick out a particularly natural realist position, so we articulate an operationally well-defined and well-motivated position in its place. We show that much weaker conditions than LG's are sufficient to derive the inequality: in the first instance, its violation only demonstrates that certain measurements fail to be non-disturbing at the operational level. We articulate three distinct species of MR-ist position, and argue that it is only the first of these which can be refuted by LG inequality violation. This first position is an attractive one, so ruling it out remains of interest, however. A crucial role is played in LG's argument by the assumption of noninvasive measurability. We show that this notion is ambiguous between the weaker notion of disturbance at the operational level, and the stronger notion of invasiveness at the ontic level of properties of the system. Ontic noninvasiveness would be required to rule out MR per se but this property is not entailed by MR, and its presence cannot be established in a model-independent way. It follows that despite the formal parallels, Bell's and LG's inequalities are not methodologically on a par. We close with some reflections on the implications of our analysis for the pedagogy of quantum superposition.
We present a generalized quantum scattering circuit which can be used to perform a noninvasive quantum measurement and implement it on NMR qubits. Such a measurement is a key requirement for testing temporal noncontextual inequalities. We use this circuit to experimentally demonstrate the violation of the Peres-Mermin inequality on a three-qubit NMR quantum information processor. Further, we experimentally construct a Bell-type inequality corresponding to the temporal Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality, and demonstrate that the maximum quantum correlation is achieved for four two-point correlation functions involved in this inequality. The experimental violation of all the inequalities matches well with the theoretically predicted values, within experimental errors.