Any classical-mechanics system can be formulated in reparametrization-invariant form. That is, we use the parametric representation for the trajectories, x=x(τ) and t=t(τ) instead of x=x(t). We discuss the quantization rules in this formulation and show that some of the rules become clearer. In particular, both the temporal and the spatial coordinates are subject to quantization, and the canonical Hamiltonian in the reparametrization-invariant formulation is proportional to H̃=pt+H, where H is the usual Hamiltonian and pt is the momentum conjugate to the variable t. Due to reparametrization invariance, H̃ vanishes for any solution, and hence the corresponding quantum-mechanical operator has the property H̃∧Ψ=0, which is the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, iℏ∂tΨ=H∧Ψ. We discuss the quantum mechanics of a relativistic particle as an example.
Any classical-mechanics system can be formulated in reparametrization-invariant form. That is, we use the parametric representation for the trajectories, x=x(τ) and t=t(τ) instead of x=x(t). We discuss the quantization rules in this formulation and show that some of the rules become clearer. In particular, both the temporal and the spatial coordinates are subject to quantization, and the canonical Hamiltonian in the reparametrization-invariant formulation is proportional to H̃=pt+H, where H is the usual Hamiltonian and pt is the momentum conjugate to the variable t. Due to reparametrization invariance, H̃ vanishes for any solution, and hence the corresponding quantum-mechanical operator has the property H̃∧Ψ=0, which is the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, iℏ∂tΨ=H∧Ψ. We discuss the quantum mechanics of a relativistic particle as an example.
In the first part of the lectures dynamical invariants in classical mechanics and conventional quantum mechanics will be considered. In particular, we will begin with some remarks on classical mechanics and on quantization in order to establish the theory in the form that will be used later on. Starting from the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation, the dynamics of Gaussian wave packets and Ermakov invariants, the time‐dependent Green function/Feynman kernel, quantum‐classical connections, energetics and Lagrange—Hamilton formalism for quantum uncertainties, momentum space representation and the relation between the Wigner function and the Ermakov invariant will be discussed. The representation of canonical transformations in time‐independent and time‐dependent quantum mechanics, factorization of the Ermakov invariant and generalized creation/annihilation operators will be studied. Subsequently, the time‐independent Schrödinger equation, leading to nonlinear quantum mechanics related to Riccati/Ermakov systems as well as the occurrence of Riccati/Ermakov systems in the treatment of Bose—Einstein condensates via the so‐called moment method will be analyzed.In part two, irreversible dynamics of dissipative systems, classical and quantum mechanical descriptions and corresponding invariants will be treated. After some general remarks on classical and quantum mechanics with unitary time‐evolution and energy conservation, phenomenological Langevin and Fokker—Planck equations, master equations in classical and quantum mechanics and the system‐plus‐reservoir approach will be mentioned briefly. Then follows a more detailed discussion of modified Schrödinger equations and, particularly, of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with complex logarithmic nonlinearity; its properties, solutions, invariants and energetics will be studied. Finally, a comparison with a classical description in expanding coordinates will lead to a non‐unitary connection between the logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the Caldirola‐Kanai approach and the expanding coordinate approach.
In the first part of the lectures dynamical invariants in classical mechanics and conventional quantum mechanics will be considered. In particular, we will begin with some remarks on classical mechanics and on quantization in order to establish the theory in the form that will be used later on. Starting from the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation, the dynamics of Gaussian wave packets and Ermakov invariants, the time‐dependent Green function/Feynman kernel, quantum‐classical connections, energetics and Lagrange—Hamilton formalism for quantum uncertainties, momentum space representation and the relation between the Wigner function and the Ermakov invariant will be discussed. The representation of canonical transformations in time‐independent and time‐dependent quantum mechanics, factorization of the Ermakov invariant and generalized creation/annihilation operators will be studied. Subsequently, the time‐independent Schrödinger equation, leading to nonlinear quantum mechanics related to Riccati/Ermakov systems as well as the occurrence of Riccati/Ermakov systems in the treatment of Bose—Einstein condensates via the so‐called moment method will be analyzed.In part two, irreversible dynamics of dissipative systems, classical and quantum mechanical descriptions and corresponding invariants will be treated. After some general remarks on classical and quantum mechanics with unitary time‐evolution and energy conservation, phenomenological Langevin and Fokker—Planck equations, master equations in classical and quantum mechanics and the system‐plus‐reservoir approach will be mentioned briefly. Then follows a more detailed discussion of modified Schrödinger equations and, particularly, of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with complex logarithmic nonlinearity; its properties, solutions, invariants and energetics will be studied. Finally, a comparison with a classical description in expanding coordinates will lead to a non‐unitary connection between the logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the Caldirola‐Kanai approach and the expanding coordinate approach.
The starting point of this research is a representation of a quantum particle according to the Schrodinger equation of the conventional quantum mechanics. In this representation, a quantum particle is described by a wave packet in the coordinate space and the conjugated wave packet in the momentum space. The problem is that while in the coordinate space the group velocity is in agreement with one of the Hamilton equations, the group velocity in the momentum space is in contradiction with the other Hamilton equation - a minus sign is missing. Group velocities in agreement with the Hamilton equations are obtained only when in the time dependent phase of a quantum particle wave packet, instead of the Hamiltonian coming from the conventional Schrodinger equation, the Lagrangian is considered. This suggests us to consider the relativistic Lagrangian in the time dependent phase. In this way, the conventional relativistic principle of invariance of the time-space interval gets the more physically understandable form of the invariance of the time dependent phase of a quantum particle - the time dependent phase of a quantum particle is the same in any system of coordinates. Based on the relativistic time dependent phase invariance of a quantum particle, from the group velocities of this particle the relativistic kinematics and dynamics are obtained. The interaction with an electromagnetic field is described by a modification of the time dependent phase with a scalar potential conjugated to time and a vector potential conjugated to the space coordinates. In this paper, we find that, according to the formalism of the general relativity, any matter element in a field of forces is accelerated only perpendicularly to its velocity. This means that the matter propagation of a quantum particle can be conceived in planes perpendicular to velocity, while the mater distribution can be considered in a Fourier representation - quantum waves. We study the quantum particle dynamics in gravitational waves and derive the graviton spin. We consider a quantum particle in electromagnetic field and obtain a Schrödinger-Dirac-type equation, with additional terms describing the velocity dependence of the particle dynamics.
Conventional quantum mechanical treatments of many systems have worked with coordinates and momenta that are not canonically conjugate. In this work it is shown how the quantum expressions may be reformulated in terms of the canonical set of action-angle variables, and specific examples of the harmonic oscillator, linear rotor, and triaxial rotor are presented. When expressed in these terms, the quantum mechanics take on a form which can be directly related to analogous results from classical mechanics. In addition, it becomes possible to express the Hamiltonian in the minimum number of coordinates. It is also shown that the common assumption of an exponential form for the overlap of canonical coordinate and momentum eigenstates is false for an asymmetric rotor. This has important implications for the quantization rules applicable to nonseparable systems.
Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].