Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1104.5047 · Communications in Mathematical Physics

Models for Gapped Boundaries and Domain Walls

Alexei Kitaev, Liang Kong

Published Jun 6, 2012• 443 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s00220-012-1500-5

Related papers

Exact Solution of the Six-Vertex Model with Domain Wall Boundary Conditions

Pavel Bleher

New Trends in Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 2009•31 citations

Classification of gapped domain walls of topological orders in 2+1 dimensions: a Levin-Wen model realization

Y. F. Chen, Siyuan Wang, Yu Zhao +2 more

A bstract This paper introduces a novel systematic construction of gapped domain walls (GDWs) within the Levin-Wen (LW) model. By gluing two LW models along their open sides in a compatible way, we achieve a complete GDW classification by subsets of bulk input data, which encompass the classifications in terms of bimodule categories. A generalized bimodule structure is introduced to capture domain-wall excitations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that folding along any GDW yields a gapped boundary (GB) described by a Frobenius algebra of the input UFC for the folded model, thus bridging our GDW classification and the GB classification in [1].

arXiv:2502.07664•Journal of High Energy Physics•Jun 11, 2025•1 citation

A Remark on Gapped Domain Walls Between Topological Phases

Yasuyuki Kawahigashi

arXiv:1504.01088•Letters in Mathematical Physics•May 26, 2015•20 citations

Edge pinning and internal phase transitions in a system of domain walls

Theodore W. Burkhardt, P. Schlottmann

The European Physical Journal B•Jun 1, 1985•2 citations

2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls

Alexei Kitaev, Liang Kong

We define a class of lattice models for two-dimensional topological phases with boundary such that both the bulk and the boundary excitations are gapped. The bulk part is constructed using a unitary tensor category $\calC$ as in the Levin-Wen model, whereas the boundary is associated with a module category over $\calC$. We also consider domain walls (or defect lines) between different bulk phases. A domain wall is transparent to bulk excitations if the corresponding unitary tensor categories are Morita equivalent. Defects of higher codimension will also be studied. In summary, we give a dictionary between physical ingredients of lattice models and tensor-categorical notions.

•Aug 17, 2016•431 citations

The border model in one dimension

George Allen Baker Jr., James D. Johnson

Journal of Statistical Physics•Feb 1, 1990•0 citations
A bstract This paper introduces a novel systematic construction of gapped domain walls (GDWs) within the Levin-Wen (LW) model. By gluing two LW models along their open sides in a compatible way, we achieve a complete GDW classification by subsets of bulk input data, which encompass the classifications in terms of bimodule categories. A generalized bimodule structure is introduced to capture domain-wall excitations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that folding along any GDW yields a gapped boundary (GB) described by a Frobenius algebra of the input UFC for the folded model, thus bridging our GDW classification and the GB classification in [1].
We define a class of lattice models for two-dimensional topological phases with boundary such that both the bulk and the boundary excitations are gapped. The bulk part is constructed using a unitary tensor category $\calC$ as in the Levin-Wen model, whereas the boundary is associated with a module category over $\calC$. We also consider domain walls (or defect lines) between different bulk phases. A domain wall is transparent to bulk excitations if the corresponding unitary tensor categories are Morita equivalent. Defects of higher codimension will also be studied. In summary, we give a dictionary between physical ingredients of lattice models and tensor-categorical notions.