Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1104.4695 · Physical Review Letters

Direct Fidelity Estimation from Few Pauli Measurements

Steven T. Flammia, Yi-Kai Liu

Published Jun 8, 2011• 463 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We describe a simple method for certifying that an experimental device prepares a desired quantum state ρ. Our method is applicable to any pure state ρ, and it provides an estimate of the fidelity between ρ and the actual (arbitrary) state in the lab, up to a constant additive error. The method requires measuring only a constant number of Pauli expectation values, selected at random according to an importance-weighting rule. Our method is faster than full tomography by a factor of d, the dimension of the state space, and extends easily and naturally to quantum channels.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.106.230501

Related papers

Sampling Groups of Pauli Operators to Enhance Direct Fidelity Estimation

Júlia Barberà-Rodríguez, Mariana Navarro, Leonardo Zambrano

Direct fidelity estimation is a protocol that estimates the fidelity between an experimental quantum state and a target pure state. By measuring the expectation values of Pauli operators selected through importance sampling, the method is exponentially faster than full quantum state tomography. We propose an enhanced direct fidelity estimation protocol that uses fewer copies of the experimental state by grouping Pauli operators before the sampling process. We derive analytical bounds on the measurement cost and estimator variance, showing improvements over the standard method. Numerical simulations validate our approach, demonstrating that for 8-qubit Haar-random states, our method achieves a one-third reduction in the required number of copies and reduces variance by an order of magnitude using only local measurements. These results underscore the potential of our protocol to enhance the efficiency of fidelity estimation in current quantum devices.

arXiv:2501.19228•Quantum•Jul 3, 2025•3 citations

Optimizing resource bounds in direct fidelity estimation

Netanel Barel, Lee Peleg, Yotam Kadish +2 more

Direct fidelity estimation provides a way to estimate the fidelity between an experimentally prepared state and a desired pure target state without performing full tomography. Two influential formulations were introduced in 2011 by Flammia and Liu and by da Silva, Landon-Cardinal, and Poulin. In these protocols, the total estimation error is controlled through two distinct probabilistic steps: first, the fidelity is approximated using randomly sampled Pauli observables; second, each sampled expectation value is estimated from finitely many measurement outcomes. In this work we show that additional structural information about the noise can substantially sharpen the corresponding resource bounds. In particular, for some canonical channels the effective number of sampled Pauli settings can be reduced, leading to lower measurement cost both in the general pure-state setting and in the case of a stabilizer state. These results illustrate a broader point: worst-case confidence bounds in direct fidelity estimation can be significantly conservative when experimentally relevant structure is ignored. As a technical ingredient, we also revisit the allocation of the total accuracy and confidence budgets between the two probabilistic steps. Reformulating the analysis in terms of separate error parameters yields a constrained optimization problem whose solution lowers the average number of measurements in the general pure-state setting. Numerical simulations based on quantum circuits implemented in Qiskit illustrate both the improvement obtained under structured-noise assumptions and the conservativeness of the original worst-case bounds.

quant-pharXiv:2606.16336•Jun 16, 2026•0 citations

Pure-state tomography with the expectation value of Pauli operators

Xian Ma, Tyler Jackson, Hui Zhou +10 more

We examine the problem of finding the minimum number of Pauli measurements needed to uniquely determine an arbitrary $n$-qubit pure state among all quantum states. We show that only 11 Pauli measurements are needed to determine an arbitrary two-qubit pure state compared to the full quantum state tomography with 16 measurements, and only 31 Pauli measurements are needed to determine an arbitrary three-qubit pure state compared to the full quantum state tomography with 64 measurements. We demonstrate that our protocol is robust under depolarizing error with simulated random pure states. We experimentally test the protocol on two- and three-qubit systems with nuclear magnetic resonance techniques. We show that the pure-state tomography protocol saves us a number of measurements without considerable loss of fidelity. We compare our protocol with same-size sets of randomly selected Pauli operators and find that our selected set of Pauli measurements significantly outperforms those random sampling sets. As a direct application, our scheme can also be used to reduce the number of settings needed for pure-state tomography in quantum optical systems.

arXiv:1601.05379•Physical Review A•Mar 31, 2016•38 citations

Practical Fidelity Estimation for Noisy Quantum Devices Using Direct and Survival-Probability-Based Protocols

Ahmed Aman, Kaustav Chatterjee, Younes Javanmard +1 more

Reliable characterization of quantum states and quantum processes is central to the development of scalable quantum computing. Standard characterization techniques such as full quantum state tomography become rapidly impractical as system size increases. In this work we present two software-oriented fidelity estimation protocols that avoid full tomographic reconstruction while remaining experimentally relevant for noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. The first protocol is direct fidelity estimation (DFE), where the fidelity between a target state and an experimentally prepared state is estimated from importance-sampled Pauli measurements. The second protocol is a survival-probability-based method that reconstructs fidelity from experimentally accessible moments of a noisy evolution and its approximate inverse, and is intrinsically robust against state-preparation-and-measurement (SPAM) errors. We discuss the theoretical basis of both approaches, analyze their noise sensitivity, and present numerical evidence on representative multiqubit states under depolarizing, dephasing, and amplitude-damping channels. For DFE we show that attenuation-aware correction improves robustness against measurement noise. For the survival-probability approach we show that an $L_2$-optimized expansion substantially outperforms naive Taylor truncation in high-noise regimes.

quant-pharXiv:2610.21606•Oct 16, 2026•0 citations

Efficient sampling for Pauli-measurement-based shadow tomography in direct fidelity estimation

Hyun-Ho Cha, Jungwoo Lee

A constant number of random Clifford measurements allows the classical shadow protocol to perform direct fidelity estimation (DFE) with high precision. However, estimating properties of an unknown quantum state is expected to be more feasible with random Pauli measurements than with random Clifford measurements in the near future. Inspired by the importance sampling technique applied to sampling Pauli measurements for DFE, we show that similar strategies can be derived from classical shadows. Specifically, we describe efficient methods using only local Pauli measurements to perform DFE with Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ), W , and Dicke states, establishing tighter bounds (by factors of 14.22 and 16 for GHZ and W /Dicke, respectively) on the number of measurements required for desired precision. These protocols are derived by adjusting the distribution of observables. Notably, they require no preprocessing steps other than the sampling algorithms.

arXiv:2501.03512•Physical Review A•Aug 13, 2025•2 citations

Certifying quantum states without independence assumptions

Mariana Navarro, Leonardo Zambrano

Standard quantum verification and certification protocols often assume that experimental sources emit independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) states. In realistic scenarios, however, temporal drift, memory effects, feedback, and correlated noise can violate this assumption, causing standard analyses to underestimate uncertainty and overestimate device performance. Here, we introduce a general framework for quantum verification and certification in which the state produced in each round may depend arbitrarily on the preceding experimental history. Our method provides rigorous confidence intervals for observable expectation values averaged over the experimental trajectory. The framework covers both full verification, in which every state is measured, and spot-checking certification, in which a randomly selected subset is tested to certify the average observable value of the complementary, remaining systems. We apply the framework to importance-sampled Pauli measurements for direct fidelity estimation, energy estimation, and entanglement witnessing, and to classical shadows, allowing multiple observables to be certified simultaneously from the same test data. We illustrate the framework numerically and demonstrate it experimentally through Bell-state certification on a quantum processor.

quant-pharXiv:2606.31913•Jul 1, 2026•0 citations
We describe a simple method for certifying that an experimental device prepares a desired quantum state ρ. Our method is applicable to any pure state ρ, and it provides an estimate of the fidelity between ρ and the actual (arbitrary) state in the lab, up to a constant additive error. The method requires measuring only a constant number of Pauli expectation values, selected at random according to an importance-weighting rule. Our method is faster than full tomography by a factor of d, the dimension of the state space, and extends easily and naturally to quantum channels.
Direct fidelity estimation is a protocol that estimates the fidelity between an experimental quantum state and a target pure state. By measuring the expectation values of Pauli operators selected through importance sampling, the method is exponentially faster than full quantum state tomography. We propose an enhanced direct fidelity estimation protocol that uses fewer copies of the experimental state by grouping Pauli operators before the sampling process. We derive analytical bounds on the measurement cost and estimator variance, showing improvements over the standard method. Numerical simulations validate our approach, demonstrating that for 8-qubit Haar-random states, our method achieves a one-third reduction in the required number of copies and reduces variance by an order of magnitude using only local measurements. These results underscore the potential of our protocol to enhance the efficiency of fidelity estimation in current quantum devices.
Direct fidelity estimation provides a way to estimate the fidelity between an experimentally prepared state and a desired pure target state without performing full tomography. Two influential formulations were introduced in 2011 by Flammia and Liu and by da Silva, Landon-Cardinal, and Poulin. In these protocols, the total estimation error is controlled through two distinct probabilistic steps: first, the fidelity is approximated using randomly sampled Pauli observables; second, each sampled expectation value is estimated from finitely many measurement outcomes. In this work we show that additional structural information about the noise can substantially sharpen the corresponding resource bounds. In particular, for some canonical channels the effective number of sampled Pauli settings can be reduced, leading to lower measurement cost both in the general pure-state setting and in the case of a stabilizer state. These results illustrate a broader point: worst-case confidence bounds in direct fidelity estimation can be significantly conservative when experimentally relevant structure is ignored. As a technical ingredient, we also revisit the allocation of the total accuracy and confidence budgets between the two probabilistic steps. Reformulating the analysis in terms of separate error parameters yields a constrained optimization problem whose solution lowers the average number of measurements in the general pure-state setting. Numerical simulations based on quantum circuits implemented in Qiskit illustrate both the improvement obtained under structured-noise assumptions and the conservativeness of the original worst-case bounds.
We examine the problem of finding the minimum number of Pauli measurements needed to uniquely determine an arbitrary nnn-qubit pure state among all quantum states. We show that only 11 Pauli measurements are needed to determine an arbitrary two-qubit pure state compared to the full quantum state tomography with 16 measurements, and only 31 Pauli measurements are needed to determine an arbitrary three-qubit pure state compared to the full quantum state tomography with 64 measurements. We demonstrate that our protocol is robust under depolarizing error with simulated random pure states. We experimentally test the protocol on two- and three-qubit systems with nuclear magnetic resonance techniques. We show that the pure-state tomography protocol saves us a number of measurements without considerable loss of fidelity. We compare our protocol with same-size sets of randomly selected Pauli operators and find that our selected set of Pauli measurements significantly outperforms those random sampling sets. As a direct application, our scheme can also be used to reduce the number of settings needed for pure-state tomography in quantum optical systems.
Reliable characterization of quantum states and quantum processes is central to the development of scalable quantum computing. Standard characterization techniques such as full quantum state tomography become rapidly impractical as system size increases. In this work we present two software-oriented fidelity estimation protocols that avoid full tomographic reconstruction while remaining experimentally relevant for noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. The first protocol is direct fidelity estimation (DFE), where the fidelity between a target state and an experimentally prepared state is estimated from importance-sampled Pauli measurements. The second protocol is a survival-probability-based method that reconstructs fidelity from experimentally accessible moments of a noisy evolution and its approximate inverse, and is intrinsically robust against state-preparation-and-measurement (SPAM) errors. We discuss the theoretical basis of both approaches, analyze their noise sensitivity, and present numerical evidence on representative multiqubit states under depolarizing, dephasing, and amplitude-damping channels. For DFE we show that attenuation-aware correction improves robustness against measurement noise. For the survival-probability approach we show that an L2L_2L2​-optimized expansion substantially outperforms naive Taylor truncation in high-noise regimes.
A constant number of random Clifford measurements allows the classical shadow protocol to perform direct fidelity estimation (DFE) with high precision. However, estimating properties of an unknown quantum state is expected to be more feasible with random Pauli measurements than with random Clifford measurements in the near future. Inspired by the importance sampling technique applied to sampling Pauli measurements for DFE, we show that similar strategies can be derived from classical shadows. Specifically, we describe efficient methods using only local Pauli measurements to perform DFE with Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ), W , and Dicke states, establishing tighter bounds (by factors of 14.22 and 16 for GHZ and W /Dicke, respectively) on the number of measurements required for desired precision. These protocols are derived by adjusting the distribution of observables. Notably, they require no preprocessing steps other than the sampling algorithms.
Standard quantum verification and certification protocols often assume that experimental sources emit independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) states. In realistic scenarios, however, temporal drift, memory effects, feedback, and correlated noise can violate this assumption, causing standard analyses to underestimate uncertainty and overestimate device performance. Here, we introduce a general framework for quantum verification and certification in which the state produced in each round may depend arbitrarily on the preceding experimental history. Our method provides rigorous confidence intervals for observable expectation values averaged over the experimental trajectory. The framework covers both full verification, in which every state is measured, and spot-checking certification, in which a randomly selected subset is tested to certify the average observable value of the complementary, remaining systems. We apply the framework to importance-sampled Pauli measurements for direct fidelity estimation, energy estimation, and entanglement witnessing, and to classical shadows, allowing multiple observables to be certified simultaneously from the same test data. We illustrate the framework numerically and demonstrate it experimentally through Bell-state certification on a quantum processor.