Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1103.6161

The Grothendieck constant is strictly smaller than Krivine's bound

Mark Braverman, Konstantin Makarychev, Yury Makarychev, Assaf Naor

Published Mar 31, 2011• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We prove that $K_G
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1103.6161

Related papers

Better bounds on finite-order Grothendieck constants with applications to Bell nonlocality

Sébastien Designolle, Tamás Vértesi, Sebastian Pokutta

Physical Review A•Dec 10, 2025•1 citation

The Grothendieck Constant is Strictly Larger than Davie-Reeds' Bound

Chris Jones, Giulio Malavolta

The Grothendieck constant $K_{G}$ is a fundamental quantity in functional analysis, with important connections to quantum information, combinatorial optimization, and the geometry of Banach spaces. Despite decades of study, the value of $K_{G}$ is unknown. The best known lower bound on $K_{G}$ was obtained independently by Davie and Reeds in the 1980s. In this paper we show that their bound is not optimal. We prove that $K_{G} \ge K_{DR} + 10^{-12}$, where $K_{DR}$ denotes the Davie-Reeds lower bound. Our argument is based on a perturbative analysis of the Davie-Reeds operator. We show that every near-extremizer for the Davie-Reeds problem has $Ω(1)$ weight on its degree-3 Hermite coefficients, and therefore introducing a small cubic perturbation increases the integrality gap of the operator.

math.FACross-listedarXiv:2603.30039•Apr 1, 2026

Hadamard’s Matrices, Grothendieck’s Constant, and Root Two

Dominique Fortin

Springer optimization and its applications•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Approximating the little Grothendieck problem over the orthogonal and unitary groups

Afonso S. Bandeira, Christopher Kennedy, Amit Singer

arXiv:1308.5207•Mathematical Programming•Mar 25, 2016•37 citations

Simulating Quantum Correlations with Finite Communication

Oded Regev, Ben Toner

Assume Alice and Bob share some bipartite d-dimensional quantum state. As is well known, by performing two-outcome measurements, Alice and Bob can produce correlations that cannot be obtained classically. We show that by using only two bits of communication, Alice and Bob can classically simulate any such correlations. All previous protocols for exact simulation required the communication to grow to infinity with the dimension d. Our protocol and analysis are based on a power series method, resembling Krivine's bound on Grothendieck's constant, and on the computation of volumes of spherical tetrahedra.

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2007•14 citations

Approximating the little Grothendieck problem over the orthogonal and unitary groups

Christopher Kennedy, Amit Singer, Afonso S. Bandeira

Springer eBooks•Mar 1, 2016•0 citations
The Grothendieck constant KGK_{G}KG​ is a fundamental quantity in functional analysis, with important connections to quantum information, combinatorial optimization, and the geometry of Banach spaces. Despite decades of study, the value of KGK_{G}KG​ is unknown. The best known lower bound on KGK_{G}KG​ was obtained independently by Davie and Reeds in the 1980s. In this paper we show that their bound is not optimal. We prove that KG≥KDR+10−12K_{G} \ge K_{DR} + 10^{-12}KG​≥KDR​+10−12, where KDRK_{DR}KDR​ denotes the Davie-Reeds lower bound. Our argument is based on a perturbative analysis of the Davie-Reeds operator. We show that every near-extremizer for the Davie-Reeds problem has Ω(1)Ω(1)Ω(1) weight on its degree-3 Hermite coefficients, and therefore introducing a small cubic perturbation increases the integrality gap of the operator.
Assume Alice and Bob share some bipartite d-dimensional quantum state. As is well known, by performing two-outcome measurements, Alice and Bob can produce correlations that cannot be obtained classically. We show that by using only two bits of communication, Alice and Bob can classically simulate any such correlations. All previous protocols for exact simulation required the communication to grow to infinity with the dimension d. Our protocol and analysis are based on a power series method, resembling Krivine's bound on Grothendieck's constant, and on the computation of volumes of spherical tetrahedra.