Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1103.4092 · European Journal of Physics

Spin–orbit coupling and the conservation of angular momentum

V Hnizdo

Published Feb 7, 2012• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the total (i.e. orbital plus spin) angular momentum of a charged particle with spin that moves in a Coulomb plus spin–orbit-coupling potential is conserved. In a classical nonrelativistic treatment of this problem, in which the Lagrange equations determine the orbital motion and the Thomas equation yields the rate of change of the spin, the particle's total angular momentum in which the orbital angular momentum is defined in terms of the kinetic momentum is generally not conserved. However, a generalized total angular momentum, in which the orbital part is defined in terms of the canonical momentum, is conserved. This illustrates the fact that the quantum-mechanical operator of momentum corresponds to the canonical momentum of classical mechanics.

DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/33/2/407

Related papers

- Angular Momentum I

Alastair I. M. Rae, Jim Napolitano

Angular momentum is a very important and revealing property of many physical systems. In classical mechanics the principle of conservation of angular momentum is a powerful aid to the solution of such problems as the orbits of planets and satellites and the behaviour of gyroscopes and tops. The role of angular momentum in quantum mechanics is probably even more important and this will be the subject of the present chapter and the next. We shall find that the operators representing the components of angular momentum do not commute with each other, although they all commute with the operator representing the total angular momentum. It follows that no pair of these components can be measured compatibly and we shall therefore look for a set of eigenfunctions that are common to the operators representing the total angular momentum and one of its components. We shall find that the angular momentum eigenvalues always form a discrete set and that, in the case of a central field, the operators commute with the Hamiltonian, implying that the total angular momentum and one component can be measured compatibly with the energy in this case, so that their values, once measured, remain constant in time. Consideration of angular momentum will also enable us to make predictions about the behaviour of atoms in magnetic fields, and we shall find that these are in agreement with experiment only if we assume that the electron (in common with many other fundamental particles) has an intrinsic “spin” angular momentum in addition to the “orbital” angular momentum associated with its motion. The interaction between spin and orbital angular momenta leads to detailed features of the atomic spectra which are known as “fine structure.” We shall also use the measurement of angular momentum to illustrate the quantum theory of measurement discussed in the previous chapter.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 16, 2015•0 citations

Orbital Angular Momentum and Central Potentials

Gordon Baym

The orbital angular momentum of a particle in quantum mechanics is defined exactly as in classical mechanics. Before developing any properties of the angular momentum operators, students must know the commutation relations they satisfy with themselves, with the momentum operator, and with the position operator. The angular momentum operator is very closely related to rotations of the system. Students should compare the ability of the angular momentum operator to generate infinitesimal rotations, with the corresponding property of the linear momentum p. The chapter provides the theory of the orbital angular momentum sufficiently to study the problem of a particle in a central potential.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

A Unified Understanding of Spin and Orbital Angular Momentum in the Complex Plane

Ducharme, Robert J.

The quantum mechanical operator for angular momentum is transformed from the real plane into the complex plane. In doing so, the Cauchy-Riemann (C-R) equations are interpreted as constraint conditions defining two distinct domains where complex differentiation is permitted. It is shown each of these domains contains an orbital angular momentum contribution plus an non-orbital term that cancels out between them. It is further shown the field equations for spinning quantum particles include C-R equations that restrict the particles to a single complex constraint space. It is therefore proposed the non-orbital term in the constraint space angular momentum is the source of the spin.

arXiv:1503.01969•Jul 7, 2014•0 citations

Angular Momentum and Spin

James K. Freericks

In this chapter, we develop the background needed to move our quantum mechanical formalism fully into three dimensions. We discuss angular momentum, which is the motional complement to spin angular momentum, that we developed earlier. There are some critical differences between orbital and spin angular momentum, and we need to carefully discuss how they relate and how they differ. Why is angular momentum so important? Because in problems where we have central forces (forces that depend only on the distance between two particles and act along the line connecting the two particles), the angular momentum is conserved. So, it becomes an integral part of how we solve the problem. The most important problem we have to solve, the hydrogen atom, is a central force problem; hence, we need this work before we can move forward to some really interesting physics that will come in Chap. 11 . We cover the angular momentum operators, eigenvalues, and eigenstates, their matrix representations, how to combine angular momentum, and spherical harmonics. We revisit the EPR experiment using our new formalism. We also discuss some unique representations of angular momentum by mapping to two-dimensional harmonic oscillators, as developed by Schwinger.

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Angular momentum of a relativistic wave packet

P. Strange

Quantum-mechanical spin is often thought of in terms of classical angular momentum. In fact spin is defined by its commutation relations and the spin and orbital angular momentum operators are very different. Here we solve the Dirac equation in a rotating frame of reference and create a localized wave packet from the resulting wave functions to examine the consequences of the rotational motion. We highlight some unexpected effects in the properties of the wave packet and show that the spin operator and orbital angular momentum operator describe different aspects of the rotational properties of the wave packet. It is also observed that neither quantum-mechanical spin nor orbital angular momentum can be fully understood within an inertial frame.

Physical Review A•Nov 6, 2017•1 citation

Angular momentum of atomic systems

A.P. French, Edwin F. Taylor

This chapter analyses the orbital angular momentum to three dimensions and introduces the spin angular momentum of the electron. The description of a localized particle in orbit requires a superposition of eigenfunctions analogous to the packet state that describes motion in one dimension. If the distance between molecules is fixed, all the energy changes are rotational kinetic energy changes, and the quantization of total angular momentum gives rise to discrete rotational energy levels. The analysis of orbital angular momentum is a powerful tool for describing molecular rotation. The Stern-Gerlach experiment and many other lines of evidence show that the measured magnetic moment associated with an electron spin is almost exactly one Bohr magneton. When orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum both exist in the same atom, the magnetic moments that result from orbital and spin angular momenta interact to cause a splitting in the corresponding energy level.

Routledge eBooks•May 11, 2018•0 citations
In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the total (i.e. orbital plus spin) angular momentum of a charged particle with spin that moves in a Coulomb plus spin–orbit-coupling potential is conserved. In a classical nonrelativistic treatment of this problem, in which the Lagrange equations determine the orbital motion and the Thomas equation yields the rate of change of the spin, the particle's total angular momentum in which the orbital angular momentum is defined in terms of the kinetic momentum is generally not conserved. However, a generalized total angular momentum, in which the orbital part is defined in terms of the canonical momentum, is conserved. This illustrates the fact that the quantum-mechanical operator of momentum corresponds to the canonical momentum of classical mechanics.
Angular momentum is a very important and revealing property of many physical systems. In classical mechanics the principle of conservation of angular momentum is a powerful aid to the solution of such problems as the orbits of planets and satellites and the behaviour of gyroscopes and tops. The role of angular momentum in quantum mechanics is probably even more important and this will be the subject of the present chapter and the next. We shall find that the operators representing the components of angular momentum do not commute with each other, although they all commute with the operator representing the total angular momentum. It follows that no pair of these components can be measured compatibly and we shall therefore look for a set of eigenfunctions that are common to the operators representing the total angular momentum and one of its components. We shall find that the angular momentum eigenvalues always form a discrete set and that, in the case of a central field, the operators commute with the Hamiltonian, implying that the total angular momentum and one component can be measured compatibly with the energy in this case, so that their values, once measured, remain constant in time. Consideration of angular momentum will also enable us to make predictions about the behaviour of atoms in magnetic fields, and we shall find that these are in agreement with experiment only if we assume that the electron (in common with many other fundamental particles) has an intrinsic “spin” angular momentum in addition to the “orbital” angular momentum associated with its motion. The interaction between spin and orbital angular momenta leads to detailed features of the atomic spectra which are known as “fine structure.” We shall also use the measurement of angular momentum to illustrate the quantum theory of measurement discussed in the previous chapter.
The orbital angular momentum of a particle in quantum mechanics is defined exactly as in classical mechanics. Before developing any properties of the angular momentum operators, students must know the commutation relations they satisfy with themselves, with the momentum operator, and with the position operator. The angular momentum operator is very closely related to rotations of the system. Students should compare the ability of the angular momentum operator to generate infinitesimal rotations, with the corresponding property of the linear momentum p. The chapter provides the theory of the orbital angular momentum sufficiently to study the problem of a particle in a central potential.
The quantum mechanical operator for angular momentum is transformed from the real plane into the complex plane. In doing so, the Cauchy-Riemann (C-R) equations are interpreted as constraint conditions defining two distinct domains where complex differentiation is permitted. It is shown each of these domains contains an orbital angular momentum contribution plus an non-orbital term that cancels out between them. It is further shown the field equations for spinning quantum particles include C-R equations that restrict the particles to a single complex constraint space. It is therefore proposed the non-orbital term in the constraint space angular momentum is the source of the spin.
In this chapter, we develop the background needed to move our quantum mechanical formalism fully into three dimensions. We discuss angular momentum, which is the motional complement to spin angular momentum, that we developed earlier. There are some critical differences between orbital and spin angular momentum, and we need to carefully discuss how they relate and how they differ. Why is angular momentum so important? Because in problems where we have central forces (forces that depend only on the distance between two particles and act along the line connecting the two particles), the angular momentum is conserved. So, it becomes an integral part of how we solve the problem. The most important problem we have to solve, the hydrogen atom, is a central force problem; hence, we need this work before we can move forward to some really interesting physics that will come in Chap. 11 . We cover the angular momentum operators, eigenvalues, and eigenstates, their matrix representations, how to combine angular momentum, and spherical harmonics. We revisit the EPR experiment using our new formalism. We also discuss some unique representations of angular momentum by mapping to two-dimensional harmonic oscillators, as developed by Schwinger.
Quantum-mechanical spin is often thought of in terms of classical angular momentum. In fact spin is defined by its commutation relations and the spin and orbital angular momentum operators are very different. Here we solve the Dirac equation in a rotating frame of reference and create a localized wave packet from the resulting wave functions to examine the consequences of the rotational motion. We highlight some unexpected effects in the properties of the wave packet and show that the spin operator and orbital angular momentum operator describe different aspects of the rotational properties of the wave packet. It is also observed that neither quantum-mechanical spin nor orbital angular momentum can be fully understood within an inertial frame.
This chapter analyses the orbital angular momentum to three dimensions and introduces the spin angular momentum of the electron. The description of a localized particle in orbit requires a superposition of eigenfunctions analogous to the packet state that describes motion in one dimension. If the distance between molecules is fixed, all the energy changes are rotational kinetic energy changes, and the quantization of total angular momentum gives rise to discrete rotational energy levels. The analysis of orbital angular momentum is a powerful tool for describing molecular rotation. The Stern-Gerlach experiment and many other lines of evidence show that the measured magnetic moment associated with an electron spin is almost exactly one Bohr magneton. When orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum both exist in the same atom, the magnetic moments that result from orbital and spin angular momenta interact to cause a splitting in the corresponding energy level.