Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1102.4827 · Journal of Physics & Astronomy

A Model of Violation and Superviolation of Bell's Inequality in Local Quantum Mechanics

V. K. Ignatovich

Published Jan 25, 2011• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A model for violation and even superviolation of the Bell's inequalities in coincidence experiments with photons in local \qm\ is presented. The model is based on assumption that time retardation or losses in an analyzer depend on angle between linear polarization of an incident photon and the analyzer's axis.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1102.4827

Related papers

Bell's inequality and the coincidence-time loophole

Jan-Åke Larsson, Richard David Gill

This paper analyzes effects of time dependence in the Bell inequality. A generalized inequality is derived for the case when coincidence and non-coincidence (and hence whether or not a pair contributes to the actual data) is controlled by timing that depends on the detector settings. Needless to say, this inequality is violated by quantum mechanics and could be violated by experimental data provided that the loss of measurement pairs through failure of coincidence is small enough, but the quantitative bound is more restrictive in this case than in the previously analyzed "efficiency loophole".

arXiv:quant-ph/0312035•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Aug 25, 2004•94 citations

VIOLATION OF BELL’S INEQUALITIES WITH A LOCAL THEORY OF PHOTONS

Patrick Suppes, De Barros, J A, San Sant'Adonai, A

We use a local theory of photons purely as particles to model the single-photon experiment proposed by Tan, Walls, and Collett. Like Tan et al. we are able to derive a violation of Bell's inequalities for photon counts coincidence measurements. Our local probabilistic theory does not use any specific quantum mechanical calculations.

•Jun 18, 1996•9 citations

A Re-examination of Bell's Inequality: Polarization Correspondence in Entangled Photon Pairs

Jingyuan Guo

Bell's inequality is widely regarded as the death knell of local hidden variable theories. However, this paper points out that Bell's argument implicitly relies on an overly narrow assumption about what constitutes a "local hidden variable"—namely, that hidden variables must assign measurement outcomes to each particle independently at the moment of measurement. This paper proposes that the deterministic correspondence established between entangled particles at the moment of their creation, and determined by initial conditions, can itself serve as a local hidden variable. As long as the polarization direction of the photons is not altered, this correspondence persists indefinitely. It is independent of whether a measurement is performed, and requires no superluminal communication to sustain. From this perspective, quantum entanglement experiments do not violate special relativity; the violation of Bell's inequality merely rules out a specific class of hidden variable models, not all forms of local realism.

•Aug 18, 2026•0 citations

Bell-inequality violation with entangled photons, free of the coincidence-time loophole

Jan-Åke Larsson, Marissa Giustina, Johannes Kofler +3 more

In a local realist model, physical properties are defined prior to and independent of measurement and no physical influence can propagate faster than the speed of light. Proper experimental violation of a Bell inequality would show that the world cannot be described with such a model. Experiments intended to demonstrate a violation usually require additional assumptions that make them vulnerable to a number of ``loopholes.'' In both pulsed and continuously pumped photonic experiments, an experimenter needs to identify which detected photons belong to the same pair, giving rise to the coincidence-time loophole. Here, via two different methods, we derive Clauser-Horne- and Eberhard-type inequalities that are not only free of the fair-sampling assumption (thus not being vulnerable to the detection loophole), but also free of the fair-coincidence assumption (thus not being vulnerable to the coincidence-time loophole). Both approaches can be used for pulsed as well as for continuously pumped experiments. Moreover, as they can also be applied to already existing experimental data, we finally show that a recent experiment [Giustina et al., Nature (London) 497, 227 (2013)] violated local realism without requiring the fair-coincidence assumption.

arXiv:1309.0712•Physical Review A•Sep 16, 2014•53 citations

Bell’s inequality and the coincidence-time loophole

Jan-Åke Larsson

This paper analyzes effects of time‐dependence in the Bell inequality. A generalized inequality is derived for the case when coincidence and non‐coincidence [and hence whether or not a pair contributes to the actual data] is controlled by timing that depends on the detector settings. Needless to say, this inequality is violated by quantum mechanics and could be violated by experimental data provided that the loss of measurement pairs through failure of coincidence is small enough, but the quantitative bound is more restrictive in this case than in the previously analyzed “efficiency loophole.”

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2005•5 citations

Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism with Entangled Photons

Marissa Giustina, Marijn A. M. Versteegh, Sören Wengerowsky +19 more

We report an experimental violation of a Bell inequality with strong statistical significance. Our experiment employs polarization measurements on entangled single photons and closes the locality, freedom-of-choice, fair-sampling, coincidence-time, and memory loopholes simultaneously.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•Jan 1, 2016•2 citations
This paper analyzes effects of time dependence in the Bell inequality. A generalized inequality is derived for the case when coincidence and non-coincidence (and hence whether or not a pair contributes to the actual data) is controlled by timing that depends on the detector settings. Needless to say, this inequality is violated by quantum mechanics and could be violated by experimental data provided that the loss of measurement pairs through failure of coincidence is small enough, but the quantitative bound is more restrictive in this case than in the previously analyzed "efficiency loophole".
Bell's inequality is widely regarded as the death knell of local hidden variable theories. However, this paper points out that Bell's argument implicitly relies on an overly narrow assumption about what constitutes a "local hidden variable"—namely, that hidden variables must assign measurement outcomes to each particle independently at the moment of measurement. This paper proposes that the deterministic correspondence established between entangled particles at the moment of their creation, and determined by initial conditions, can itself serve as a local hidden variable. As long as the polarization direction of the photons is not altered, this correspondence persists indefinitely. It is independent of whether a measurement is performed, and requires no superluminal communication to sustain. From this perspective, quantum entanglement experiments do not violate special relativity; the violation of Bell's inequality merely rules out a specific class of hidden variable models, not all forms of local realism.
In a local realist model, physical properties are defined prior to and independent of measurement and no physical influence can propagate faster than the speed of light. Proper experimental violation of a Bell inequality would show that the world cannot be described with such a model. Experiments intended to demonstrate a violation usually require additional assumptions that make them vulnerable to a number of ``loopholes.'' In both pulsed and continuously pumped photonic experiments, an experimenter needs to identify which detected photons belong to the same pair, giving rise to the coincidence-time loophole. Here, via two different methods, we derive Clauser-Horne- and Eberhard-type inequalities that are not only free of the fair-sampling assumption (thus not being vulnerable to the detection loophole), but also free of the fair-coincidence assumption (thus not being vulnerable to the coincidence-time loophole). Both approaches can be used for pulsed as well as for continuously pumped experiments. Moreover, as they can also be applied to already existing experimental data, we finally show that a recent experiment [Giustina et al., Nature (London) 497, 227 (2013)] violated local realism without requiring the fair-coincidence assumption.
This paper analyzes effects of time‐dependence in the Bell inequality. A generalized inequality is derived for the case when coincidence and non‐coincidence [and hence whether or not a pair contributes to the actual data] is controlled by timing that depends on the detector settings. Needless to say, this inequality is violated by quantum mechanics and could be violated by experimental data provided that the loss of measurement pairs through failure of coincidence is small enough, but the quantitative bound is more restrictive in this case than in the previously analyzed “efficiency loophole.”